Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "After 2.5 Years, How Many MLRS Does Russia Have Left? Count Using Unreleased Satellite Imagery" video.

  1. That's... weird? 1)Russia and USSR view MLRS as one of the niches to be proud of. So they'd be more cautious with it and prioritise it's production more; 2)MLRS(unguided) is easier to produce then full blown SPGs as far as I know so again, higher priority in production to get more firepower; 3)I don't recall mass usage of MLRS breaking news and neither their mass losses. If anything, it's the equipment you'd expect to see more of, unlike critically important, but slow to replace IFVs.
    7
  2. ​ @Lock484  yeah, fields of tarp tents would be absolutely not suspicious 😅 Russia hides high priority equipment from satellites and that's TELs for ICBMs and SAMs and planes. If they would hide everything, the amount of effort to hide would outrun any benefit of enemy not knowing about the equipment.
    1