Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Russia's Looming Serious Tank Shortage - Tank Count Using Latest Bought Satellite Imagery" video.

Sorry for asking, but there are two questions I've been trying to figure out: 1)"russian" T-62's. The russian media official excuse for getting them back into service was that a factory specialising in their refits in Far East had survived the corruption that had striken T-72 production lines over the years. The reality however is likely connected to the fact that right before that Russia started buying north korean ammo in bulk. And North Korea is main producer of T-62 nowadays. So Russia could just be buying repair kits from NK if not outright delegating the repair work. How can this be checked? Are there any particular markings on north korean engines or transmissions or other units that should be on destroyed T-62's if that were the case? 2)T-72 numbers. Russia has insane disparity between the amount of those it had claimed to be in use and the amount it had when it needed them. Where are they? Were they lost in Syria? Were they cut down and taken for parts to allow production of T-90A and other vehicles like MSTA-S back in 2000's? Were they just sold under the carpet? Or have they never existed and are result of inflated propaganda numbers cooperating with low quality intelligence reports of other countries? Again, how can this be checked? Can serial numbers on units inside T-90A tell if they were taken from T-72B? Hopefully my comment makes sense😅
8
 @paavali1896 will you delete your profile and stop using "western" smartphones if it doesn't?
5
@chechennel4817 and that is... whom? No, seriously, who is that?
1
@orionide4032 so his "expert" is some no name with no credentials? Who could have thought...
1
@chechennel4817 well, I guess Putin doesn't have balls to take responsibility for his own actions once again, so I guess that remains to be seen as we don't know whom will replace hit. Yet.
1
@chechennel4817 it's okay. Слив засчитан;)
1
Sorry for asking, but there are two questions I've been trying to figure out: 1)"russian" T-62's. The russian media official excuse for getting them back into service was that a factory specialising in their refits in Far East had survived the corruption that had striken T-72 production lines over the years. The reality however is likely connected to the fact that right before that Russia started buying north korean ammo in bulk. And North Korea is main producer of T-62 nowadays. So Russia could just be buying repair kits from NK if not outright delegating the repair work. How can this be checked? Are there any particular markings on north korean engines or transmissions or other units that should be on destroyed T-62's if that were the case? 2)T-72 numbers. Russia has insane disparity between the amount of those it had claimed to be in use and the amount it had when it needed them. Where are they? Were they lost in Syria? Were they cut down and taken for parts to allow production of T-90A and other vehicles like MSTA-S back in 2000's? Were they just sold under the carpet? Or have they never existed and are result of inflated propaganda numbers cooperating with low quality intelligence reports of other countries? Again, how can this be checked? Can serial numbers on units inside T-90A tell if they were taken from T-72B? Hopefully my comment makes sense😅
1
 @tarstarkusz the fact that no recorded case of immortal human exists yet. But I'll gladly hear your argument on this one.
1