Youtube comments of (@TheArklyte).
-
5200
-
1300
-
722
-
628
-
449
-
412
-
392
-
303
-
287
-
258
-
256
-
250
-
235
-
220
-
211
-
206
-
199
-
195
-
191
-
190
-
190
-
169
-
169
-
168
-
162
-
160
-
153
-
150
-
150
-
147
-
145
-
140
-
139
-
135
-
132
-
130
-
122
-
120
-
120
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
107
-
105
-
100
-
97
-
96
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
91
-
90
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
84
-
83
-
82
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
67
-
67
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
57
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
Tbh I wouldn't be surprised if they'd still be useful today, it's just that I don't recall there being many places where troops can be trained in their use and the equipment of specifically horse cavalry wasn't updated in over a century.
In combat by deploying as dragoons nowadays they're potentially the deadliest they could have ever been with widespread availability of MANPADs, GPMGs, light mortars, grenade launchers, hadheld ATGMs to be used on foot and even carbines and PDWs that can be used on the horse.
In role of actual cavalry scouts they're slightly worse then they would have been around 1980's. By that I mean that electronic equipment like radios, night vision devices, portable reconnaissance radars and now thermals and drones was all at first too cumbersome for individual soldiers, but can be carried around by the horse and used by the rider more easily. Nowadays minituarization led to there not being a clear benefit a cavalrymen would have in this over infantrymen. Unless a horse can carry an active Starlink terminal while on the move, I guess? Then recon potential of horse cavalry is still ahead of its infantry. Might even also add helmet with HUD for drone control since rider isn't as encumbered by personal equipment as soldier on foot.
But then again, I don't recall seeing modern kit for horses being designed or produced anywhere in the world. Do MOLLE standard saddles exist? Are there kevlar vests for horses?😅
46
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
Armored cars irl: are actually armored, have NBC protection, can fit dozen guys, can carry a high caliber cannon or mortar, several ATGMs, autocannon, HMGs, sometimes all of the above at the same time, can swim.
Armored cars in games: best I can do is 3 dudes, open top, half of M2 and you'll all drown.
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
@zacht9447 design work began in 1856, first gun in 1857, full scale adoption by military in 1866(which you have previously also claimed to be the year, when he's "done with the design" because apparently in your eyes a rifle can be adopted by an army overnight, not to mention training, production, setting up shop, test trials and so on).
By the same logic you've previously used, your "brilliant" example should include first Maxim produced no earlier then in 1889 and first M16 to be produced only in 1965. Keep calling me whatever you wish, it won't change reality, sorry. Or how any outsider viewing this comment chain will make a guess, who's really an idiot here:D
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
Well, not really. His origin WAs that of Iron Man ie weapon manufacturer that decided to redeem himself, BUT
1)Iron Man wasn't stopping weapons production and redeeming himself before movies, even in animated series he was still producing weapons for government. In comics Armor Wars was his turning point and that happened after Steel;
2)he doesn't have any of Thor's powers. Just Iron Man's ones and even then he's cut short by budget. No army of [Insert]Busters, no army of support drones, no orbital weapons, no nanotech that basically makes one a Green Lantern. NANOMACHINES, SON!
3)Steel was given a short end of the stick because Luthor was redesigned in late 80's to basically be DC's Iron Man. Before that he was a criminal mastermind akin to Fisk, after redesign he became smartest person in DC, richest corporativists on Earth and became a more neutral in terms of his alignment. IE he still will do anything to get what he wants, but now he's also a human supremacist that would act as a hero against alien threats. Problem is in said supremacist part and not all aliens being evil:D
So I'd say 50/50
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Start tutorial, don't build slinger hut to finish it, send water guys to furthest point, leave it running for 20 minutes, finish tutorial, use amassed exp to get to max age, build most pathetic Space Marines, upgrade spawn rate, win. The bug that keeps timer on highscore from starting until you finish tutorial was never fixed. Judging by 0 second highscores, you can even chease it during tutorial stage... or they've hacked the game?
Fun game, great music, becomes a bit stale after a while, but has great replayability overall, units look great and so on. I'd recommend House of Wolves from the same author. Mostly for it's main theme;) Turrets are useless though, arrow rain is only ability worth buying.
Best to concentrate on universal units and water carriers. Upgrade moving speed and especially spawn rate. Meat wall is best wall.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@2008LethalMelody "в чью пользу собрались "спасать" промышленность Беларуси"
О, гении Луканомики подтянулись. В чью пользу ТЗ спасает АвтоВАЗ за чужой счет? В чью пользу все наши врачи уехали в РФ?(кстати, может вы своих учить начнете опять?). В чью пользу зазывали ребят с МЗКТ, чтобы "лучшие в мире и не имеющие аналогов" баллистические ракеты было на чем хотя бы возить во время очередной ссоры? В пользу Беларуси?
Народ все понимает, но и ты пойми хоть что-нибудь разок. Пойми почему Лука в предверии выборов остановил запуск БелАЭС, который должен был произойти в январе. Почему его защищают ваши СМИ, когда он все еще приказывает закрывать российских граждан, которые оказались у нас и говорит о российских "террористах". Пойми, что смотря со своей колокольни, как "единственный посвященный в механизмы реальной политики в отличии от жалкого стада", ты сам позабыл слова старичка Макиавелли о страхе и ненависти. Ты хочешь поразглагольствовать на тему вражеского лобби, дорогой любитель софизма? "Подождите еще 25 лет и все будет еще лучше!". Но нет, мы же все глупые, мы не знаем, что основа бизнеса всегда идет по методу "черной стрелы". Один ты Д'Артаньян.
Удачного дня вам дня.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@odinmcboden9690 no, what he says has a point. If one person gets an illegal gun to defend themselves against criminals, it'll end badly, yes. And likely not even prison, but a "retaliation strike" to make said person and their family an example, to terrorize populace. Narcos aren't much different from SS or Taliban or Red Khmers.
But if your whole neighbourhood, thousands of people potentially own them? Then suddenly you're only facing prison, not retaliation. Because when they come for you, they now fear to turn their back to the doors and windows of other houses. If the whole city district has tens of thousands of potential gun owners, then suddenly police starts looking less into finding them and in many cases they prefer not to imprison the person, who defended themselves. Hmm, maybe there's a connection there between balance of gun quantity on both sides and how easily cops and narcos shit themselves when door creaks behind?:D
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@vosbertosarducco2581 same goes for most big countries. You can easily count 5 different Chinas(not including Macau, Hong Kong, independent Taiwan, Shenzhen, Beijing) or several Russias(Kaliningrad exclave, far east, polar, Moskow, Saint-Petersburg, European parts, Caucasus, Urals and so on. I'm not even going to mention puppeted Crimea). Even small UK is made up of several states. So it's no wonder Brazil goes the same way.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@HunterMILITARILY Ukraine was on backfoor for OVER TWO YEARS. It doesn't have nukes, it doesn't have territories, factories and ports outside of range of russian missiles, it doesn't have around 20 million "undesirable" recruits from poorer region that would be thrown into the grinder. But it has been two YEARS when Putin promised two weeks to Odessa. Will Ukraine eventually fall due to inability of current cabinet to sue for peace and lack of international help? Yes. Maybe in a week, maybe in 5 more years. But prorussian appeasement and peace dividend fell over, russian prestige, economy, military image, position in relation to other partners on global stage. It changed and it won't return now. People finally looked at mighty Russia on the map and found out that not only is it's projection onto the map a visual illusion, it's mostly empty and inhospitable. And when looked at actual population and GDP/c with removal of oligarchs, it's not such a big country all of a sudden😅
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Surtr174 какие именно ресурсы, my dear one year old profile? I mean, it's okay if I'll ask you in russian, right? After all, you pose as an expert in russian and ukranian history and ALSO geology, so you surely speak russian, correct? И отнюдь не потому, что это твоя, личинки мента, работа, верно?;)
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@rodney2x48 fan theory is that Krypton self isolated because they have witnessed effects of yellow and blue sunlight on newest generations of kryptonians and some even speculate that Earth was an abandonned kryptonian colony ie why humans and kryptonians can have children. It's all and good being a galaxy spanning militarist xenophobe empire until your own rioting citizens on some far away colony get superpowers strong enough not only to resist arrest, but to duke it out with your battleships.... well, maybe not battleships, but with kryptonian empire equivalent of a tank for sure.
And that is what DC lacks, background galaxy where events happen. Earth is the only hub for all storylines, empires of Mars, Thanagar, Tamaran, Apocalips and New Genesis are mostly ignored. There is no mention of continuos Cold Was between the latter two that forces Darkside to work through agents and provocation, there isn't actual diplomacy between thanagarians and tamaranians, there is no explanation about the state of Mars. Universe of DC lacks context so people are rarely invested into storylines.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
>SUSAT is called old(surprised that we're at this point)
>All of the so called near pear opponents, who are not NATO members either have worse and less widespread scopes(China) or don't have scopes for the troops at all(Russia)
So how exactly is it obsolete? If you have infinite budget you can likewise buy one of those Boston Dynamics robots and give it a rifle. Does it make humans obsolete? Nope, you're just showing off with your finances:D All those thermal digital scopes with automatic correction for weather, barrel bend, Earth rotation, tine dilation and so on are 1)very expensive, heavy, fragile and need someone smarter then normal grunt to operate; 2)provide miniscule increase in effectiveness of the soldier. Compared to just making sure that they're fed, warm and rested that's placebo effect. Because soldiers aren't tanks, IFVs or helicopters, their weapons don't benefit from all that extra accuracy. You can mount Hubble as a scope to your pistol, it'll still be just a pistol. Just with almost two dozen tons of extra dead weight...
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@jackwhite8204 that's the part Tolkien prefered not to touch upon. For example his orcs are based on combination of legend, but also real slavs, vikings and mongols. He had said that they are evil by nature and can't be redeemed. Mind you, when he said it, british jingoism was all the rage and "commies" were dehumanized as easy target all eover wstern Europe. Time passes, certain events happen, true horror of Holocaust gets exposed alongside at least a quarter of what was done to slavs, romanies, chinese, koreans and many others. And suddenly out of nowhere good old professor changes his opinion to saying that orcs aren't evil, they're "just following orders"(does that sound familiar?) and real culprits are only Morgoth and Sauron. But I really like this part of his worldview truly shifting or at least pretending to follow the new trends.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Ahloveyafuhso yeah, as well as 1)army was in Gotham in full strength and were willing to turn the city into rubble to kill Bruce. Only presence of Kal, who was supposed to handle situation is holding them back; 2)USSR was still few minutes from launching full scale retaliation strike. If the news of Superman being killed would get out, say hello to our old friend, nuclear apocalypse; 3)to win, Bruce would have to abuse Kal's trust. And while he despised Kal's support of goverment, he was still his friend and cared about him. That's one of the reasons he's so pissed off when he finds about the nuke.
So all the preparations, radiation and "lack of sunlight"(that one was actually a bad part of comic. Several scenes later on happen during the day plus Kal can just fly somewhere else to recharge, simplest option - space itself) are secondary to main problem - Bruce was never willing and stupid enough to actually win that fight. Yes, with preparations it is possible to take Superman down, that's why Lex even exists. In fact most Superman enemies are this way. And to those, who aren't... Kal himself is becoming Batman of sorts. It is the only way he can fight Doomsday nowadays.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@aleksanderkorecki7887 My view on history, your view on history or actual history? That's 3 different histories, don't you think? No, wait, yours is objectively right.
I know that same excuse doesn't work for all 4. Spin it, but there is always one left that falls out. Which one would it be this time, enlighten me, oh wise one?:D
Once again, population data according to whom, German Empire? Certainly not bad™ lithuanians and ukranians? Wait, why does it sound exactly like russian revanchist rhetoric?
P.S.: I have Ad Hominems for days if you want only that, I mean, it's definitely a productive way to invest time.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@mrfattypancakes
here's the fun part. You can't offshore customers, subsidies, yourself.
Russian billionaires right now spend whole fortunes to try and get back to german, american and israeli hospitals incognito because none of them cared about russian healthcare.
Likewise none of the foreign engineers I knew about in China planned to start a family there. Work for some time and earn money - yes, raise kids - hard nope.
Every billionaire has property in Dubai, but none of them even stay there, not to mention live there.
Let's just say that I have a bit of "Spidey sense" moment that whispers into my ear that they don't want to spend their lives there? They want to be rich in EU, US, Australia, Japan and so on. You can quote Caesar about rather being first guy in some barbaric village then number two in Rome, but here's the thing, they're painfully aware that each dictatorship is lined up to number 50 on inheritance line at least and money doesn't give you power among robber barons, a pistol to your skull does.
US stands on a cliff, asking itself the same question - what if they'll leave if we raise taxes/cut subsidies/don't grant bailout? The answer already was seen during WWII taxation levels. They will start to run. Let them and burn the bridges behind them.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Проблема с мальчиком была в том, что на фоне мифа "чистого Вермахта", который процветает до сих пор, комбинация получалась не лучшей. Ему бы произнести речь вместе с делегациями Израиля и Польши, чтобы вермахтодрочеры с одной стороны и поцреоты с другой не пытались выкручивать слова.
Есть ещё вопрос в том, сколько этих невинных погнанных на войну погибло вместо откровенных уродов, которые таки вернулись, а потом бахвалились этим. До 90-х отлавливали и то, в основном делали это сами бывшие узники на "энтузиазме и костях" без поддержки государств, которые просто предали память всех погибших уже через пару лет. Победа во второй мировой обладает не меньшей долей отвратный черной иронии, чем трагедия в Версаля.
Что же до российской власти... вы сами понимаете КТО там сидит если сверху идёт заказ славить монархию, нацизм и фашизм и любыми средствами обгаживать демократию, социализм, коммунизм и любые другие формы "холопского" социального устройства.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@dgmt1
1)fair assessment if T-34, but...
2)T-44 WAS put into production. And I don't mean small series of 100-400 tanks that were made, but never used. No, I mean T-34-85 turrets here. All that was good in T-34-85 was coming from its turret, which was just T-44 turret.
I'll just copy the conclusion russian speaking community has outside people with severe propaganda brain rot. Ideal soviet tank for 1941-1945 would have been simplified T-34M hull(ie same torsion bar suspension, but flat sides) with KV-1S turret(and since KV-1S isn't around for a few years yet, KV-1 turret). The production cost would have been the same, maintenance would be much simpler, not to mention possible(the fact that no russian source mentions how much of a b//tch Christie suspension is to maintain when it's inside hull side is already a statement that T-34 in general wasn't surviving long enough to face even first round of general maintenance), it would have 3 men turret without gas build up problem and with proper optics arrangement for all crew members. Moreover, 85mm gun could be installed into this same turret as proven by KV-1G. Given availability of F-30 gun back in 1940, such version can be introduced fairly early on as soviet mirror image of Firefly and later on generally replace main version. If you look closely, this approach would have been basically soviet Sherman.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@anyways4438 угу, а Ильичу все на блюдечке приносили, верно? Как там миф про вагончик и немецких спонсоров, которые видите ли все сделали за революционеров? Эссеры тоже на вагончике приехали? Большой был вагон. Декабристов наверное тоже через границы закидывали.
Скоро выборы в Думу, Вам предложили вариант, как отследить свои голоса и помешать(вернее просто показать их масштаб и заткнуть лицемерность на пару дней) массовым подтасовкам. Но Вы НЕ будете этого делать просто потому, что идею предложил человек, имя которого боты в сети неумело рифмуют с унитазом. Поэтому продолжаем смотреть видео про Сингапур и гадать "почему у нас не так, ведь тоже Режим™?". Нет уж, Россия заслужила сегодняшнего и будущего Путина и я желаю ему ещё 40 лет правления РФ. Как евреям пришлось ходить по пустыне. И только РФ. Здоровья тоже желать не буду, хочу увидеть как будут петь пгимны овощу на аппаратах исскусственного жизнеобеспечения:))
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@depthcharge126 RPK uses intermediate ammo. Same as RPD. If you want to compare BAR designed in 1917 with it's rifle ammo, be my guest. Here, Fedorov Avtomat, 1913. A point made moot by good old Madsen from 19th century. Oh wait, you probably don't even recall which ammo all of those use;)
And which BAR do you mean? Good original one from WWI? Or the crappy M1918A2? Which had taken feed back from troops and instead of making two guns as was obviously required, they made one shitty? Troops wanted either a lighter gun with lower RPM and pistol grip for more control OR same RPM, but with heavier barrel, bipod and and bigger magazine. In other words automatic rifle OR LMG depending on how they've used their BARs. Result? Single gun with lower RPM, bigger weight, bipod, same small magazine and no change to stock. Make two separate guns, rechamber them for Swift cartridge and I might even agree with you. Until then, have a nice day.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@aaronlandry3934 "Yes, the problem is Capitalism. Clearly, we should be trying Communism. Just look at how prosperous and well off Communist nations like North Korea and Vietnam are! They are what the standard of living should be!
If not Communism, we should try Socialism so that we’ll all be billionaires like the Venezuelans.
I would make one for Fascism, but everyone hates it now, because of the Nazis, even though Communism and Socialism killed WAY more people as a direct result. The only difference is that the Nazis meant to kill everyone that they killed."
I feel like in your whining you've skipped the part about Julius Caesar, Octavian Augustus and death of democracy for over a thousand years. Until some north american bastards had ruined a perfect world of God given monarchy and did just that. How dared they? Don't they know that things should be tried once and only judged on their stated name? Oh, and btw, have you meant People's Democratic Republic of Korea? Oh, what an evil thing democracy is, how horrific must it be to live under one... oh, wait, right:\
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I guess nowadays all these weird guns(briefcase guns, shoot behind the corner guns, guns that collapse into a container, guns that can be concealed in a sleeve, etc.) would still find usage, but they would require updating to either similar PDW rounds to MP7 uses OR to heavy subsonic ammo like VAL or Whisper, depending on if the gun has space for silencer.
Besides nowadays for most of them you can get far better sighting equipment that would allow to use them "off hand" or in weird positions like lasers(existed, but were weak, fragile, bulky and too expensive), red dots(existed, but had same trouble) and even direct feed(technically exists nowadays, but we're not on smartgun level yet. But someone like secret service can probably afford and maintain it).
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@AlASokolov воевали долго потому, что ..бланы сами, а не потому, что немцы мегакруты. Поэтому миф про сверхнемцев процветал на обоих сторонах холодной войны - в том, что это был эпичный обосрамс были согласны все!
И потому, что долго оборонялась. Германия в лучшем случае шла вровень с Британией и СССР по технологиям ПО ОТДЕЛЬНОСТИ, у нее не было ресурсов, не было никаких сверхчеловеком среди командного состава. У всей Оси с трудом и БОЛЬШИМ ВЕЗЕНИЕМ может быть хватило бы силенок либо на Британию, либо на СССР в одиночку.
Япония тогда вообще на шагоходах воевала по твоему, а? 1937-1945 таки. Что, что говоришь? До 1941 это была локальная война против Китая? А кто тут сказал про 6 лет Рейха, хмм? Задал планку, прыгай:Р
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mikaelhyytiainen5466 1)by allowing soviets to continue rearmament and training their army which was planned to finish... in late 1942/early 1943. Thus instead of facing the bear with it's pants down, you're facing exactly the one you should have in 1944-45... but three years too early.
2)by not striking down on any of the soviet resource base on the ground as soviets outnumber your airforce even on the best days and now you've once again allowed them to use those reserves of trained pilots by taking your time.
3)Italy is dead btw, you allowed Allies to take it out too early and are now facing Western Front in 1942. Not to mention Allied navies are having a grand time at your expanse all over the place
4)you've lost popular support, there are mutinies in the army, assasination plots are much more likely to succeed now that there are more higher ups involved. Irl germany was facing the famine long before the "final soultion" and this shortage of food is one of the reasons why it was taken when proper preparations for invasion into USSR began. But here... here you've enforced famine on the germans themselves. In 1941. GG WP, Stalin approves.
5)not only have you failed to overtake Vichi France and take out it's fleet, but thanks to point #3 you're facing a serious probability of it defecting you. Same goes for Romania. Oh, and soviets occupied Finland btw.
Shall I continue, "Mr.People, who came to power are idiots, that's why I sit behind monitor"?
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ruslankazimov622 1)once again, they are copied from chinese copies or outright supplied by China. Why are you dodging this?
2)T-90 IS T-72BU, but no, neither it is the cheapest, nor the simplest. Otherwise it would have dominated the market. Instead it is in very serious competition with Leopard 2. And once again, packages and electronics are what matters. You ignored all of that. Cheapest tank on the market is modernised chinese copy of T-55, then updated T-60, then updated Leo 1. Not to mention all the parts contracts, recovery vehicles, bridge layers and so on.
3)is it the best tank in the world? Nope. Is it the worst? Nope. Will I waste my time explaining it on the phone to a guy, who doesn't even read my comment due to his nationalistic hard on? Nope.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
How dare you imply that there is any other solution as everybody kneeling to USA and kissing their ass?
And yes, it's not a game of two players.
There's also EU(diplomatic and economical superpower, two members of which are permanent seat in UNSC and have nuclear weapons. Even divided in opinion UK, France and Germany are a force to be reckoned with. Not to mention other members), China(same), India(minus the seat, but still in nuclear club. Also a major contributor to financing russian weapon developement).
Slightly below we can mention european powers separately and also Pakistan(regional and nuclear power. Major chinese ally against India and Russia), Iran(regional and economical power. Major indian and russian ally against Pakistan).
As well as Japan(regional and economical power), South Korea(regional and economical power), North Korea(nuclear club), Israel(regional power and nuclear club), South Africa(regional power and nuclear club), Brazil(regional and economical power), Saudi Arabia(regional and economical power).
So it's a rather busy lobby with overblown egos, too loud and high pitched voices and worst of all... cheap microphones and massive lag:D
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Their design philosophy is outdated in the world where thermals, drones and modern fire control exists. Completely outdated. Even China realized that that can't be allowed to continue like that and fixed many issues in their ZTZ99A(aka another pretender for the name of last descendant of soviet tank design school) like transmission having no real rear gears.
And with T-14 Russia tried to jump over the wall of the maze and once again fell down. They can't design a working engine-transmission group, they can't get a reliable camera view and worst of all, their unmanned turret and crew capsule are completely pointless since they still use old autoloader and NO blow out panels ie they made a giant pressure cooker. Capsule can't protect the crew if pressure has no easier way to escape. That's basics! You can't have blow out panels on the bottom as it'll make the tank very weak to mines, can't do them in the sides as it'll make sides weaker, capsule is up front, engine in the back and on top of that giant bomb called ammo is an unmanned turret without panels either. They took budget and time and made situation worse!
Tbh T-14 was an improvement in one direction - it no longer tries to pointlessly minimize target profile at expense of crew comfort and overall design as if it's still 50's. It isn't, your tank would be seen and it can be hit.
I'd say take T-14's hull, suspension(surprisingly no trouble there so at least something works as intended), beg chinese for help with getting a working engine/transmission unit and then go back to designing conventional turret with blow out panels for ammo and some breathing room for crew. Oh, wait, we've just reinvented Leopard II...
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Yes, the future of shotguns is insane, but no, it has no connection to FPV drones. Using shotguns vs FPVs is just as "practical" as using shotguns to shoot out grenades from mid air in WWI ie great news story to make more boys join, but having ZERO connection to reality.
The real future of shotguns is connected to them having high caliber, low velocity, low shock on projectile contents and being smoothbores. That always made them ideal for specialist munitions, similar to grenade launchers, mortars and howitzers in their respective weight classes. And what all those have? That's right, airburst, guided and rocket assisted two stage projectiles. Sometimes all at the same time. The future of shotgun is to adopt those techs and become bolter ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
ануар жанакаев это револьверы эпохи черного пороха, они безгильзовые, то есть заряжаются просто засыпанием пороха в барабан и заталкиванием пули вслед. На задней части барабана капсюли воспламенители, их у этой модели 10, зарядных камор же 5. В каждую камору заряжалось два выстрела(порох, пуля, порох, пуля), поэтому барабан такой длинный. Первый капсюль шел напрямую к задней части барабана, воспламеняя заряд второго "заднего" выстрела; второй же капсюль шел через специальное скрытое отверстие к передней части барабана и его воспламенение достигало заряда в каморе через маленькое боковое отверстие. Движения барабана рассчитаны по кол-вы камор, значит позиций у него 5, выстрелов же 10. При этом револьвер рассчитан на правую руку, т.к. курки у него разные для того, чтобы даже при нажатии на оба, выстрелы не происходили одновременно(и уж тем более, чтобы "задний" не выстрелил первым). Курок "первого" выстрела - левый, он шире и выдается вперед. При нажатии указательным пальцем правой руки, нажать правый курок "второго" выстрела до "первого" просто не получилось бы. Оружие получилось маломощным, ненадежным и дорогим, популярности не сыскало. Поэтому в голову при слове револьвер и приходит Кольт, а не Волш или еще кто-то:)
Канал отличный, но язык вам подтянуть стоит.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@GaryGang911
St. Browning: I can't, I'm either in Europe or dead depending on the year!
Jokes aside, IF he had ever received a proposition to make one, he surely would have made it. Military should have been making requests more careful.
BAR is a great gun with potential for being automatic rifle, battle rifle, LMG and GPMG all in one system as indicated by its worldwide use. Problem is... it was all done NOT in US service where BAR past WWI was turned into abomination by pooling feedback from troops, who wanted either automatic rifle or LMG into a single gun which couldn't be either.
We have seen swedish variants for lighter ammo and Colt Monitor with its pistol grip and muzzle brake, we had also seen quick change barrels, heavy barrels with ridges or fluting, compensators and flash hiders, belt fed versions and versions with RPM of 1000+ for aircraft use, alternate stocks and different magazines, different sights. That gun had SO MANY variations and possibilities... and all were NOT in US service:(
P.S.: BAR is an opposite of cheap, but can probably be made to be. Again, if Browning was asked to do so:D
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Komat0zz oh hey, another volunteer. I guess you'll be the one to answer?
Sorry in advance for reposting my own comment.
It's a long range chemical bomber. It's not suited for wartime use against enemy troops. Slow, flimsy, lacks proper bomb bay and precision capability, no armor or defensive armaments, no way to support it by fighter escorts. You got what I'm saying, eh?
It's a first strike weapon against civilian population that would be sent on one way trip BEFORE declaration of war. Ie 1930's WMD designed to kill millions of "enemy" civilians without any declaration of war. Back before radar interception was a thing. Now tell me, is it a war crime? It's not retaliatory weapon, it's not mutually assured destruction and it sure as heck isn't a combat worthy one, neither for offense, nor for defense as you like to call it. Come on, give me a justification why it won't be an act of planned ideologically and nationality driven genocide? I want to hear it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ты еще у КНДР с границей поиграй такими темпами, гений. Сами же говорите про конфликт интересов, наемников и солдат с двух сторон. Вы реально думаете, что в таких условиях у гражданских есть свобода перемещения? Ага, то туда съездить, то сюда. В прицеле не подсвечивается считаешь ты себя украинцем, россиянином или просто молодым балбесом, ты просто получишь пулю. Граница зоны конфликта есть граница зоны конфликта, там разбираться не будут. Особенно сейчас, когда в Китае "пропали" более 20 лямов сотовых абонентов за последний месяц, а в США мрут почти по тысяче человек в день. Ты биотеррорист и все тут.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SonsOfLorgar
List a source then, come on. There's none. Read comment above this one, I already mentioned patterns you've misread. Just open bolter or boltgun page on any of those sites, click "search/find on page" and enter .50. Good luck. Maybe you'd finally be the guy, who finds it! Because I didn't. Many, many, many times.
Yes, they mention Astartes using "hotter ammo", not higher caliber. IE they are handcrafted, use exotic rare materials and more advanced tech for both rounds and guns. But caliber is the same. That's why there was such a thing as mentions of Astartes pattern rounds being stolen and sold on black market to bounty hunters to be used in so called bolt carbines.
If you have no idea WHICH type of .30 M1 Carbine used then it's your problem. If you think that M1 Carbine is better then Colt Commando, then it's also your problem. However my "word salad" is simple example of lower caliber gun being MORE advanced then higher caliber one. Because bigger doesn't equal better all the time. Or maybe we should compare modern PDWs to Thompson SMG to get something to click in your head?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ivan4686 нда, нагонять атмосферу в сцену с молодым солдатом, чтобы "обмануть ожидания" о том, что он просто так убьет старушку было очень годно. А почему он это сделает? Да потому, что он из СССР, тут все на генетическом уровне социопаты же. Ну или сцена с вертолетом, вырезанная из контекста и переиначенная до невозможности лишь для эффекта "совки берут числом, засылая следующего смертника". Сериал конечно годный, но вот только он пытается еще и проехать, как равный реальности тех событий. 10 "Конвоев Смерти сделанных русскими солдатами" из 10. Иногда становиться при просмотре от тупости некоторых фильмов, когда тебя, как зрителя оскорбляют, считая идиотом. А иногда, когда тебя просто изначально за человека не считают в силу географии...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@HankScorpio64 I haven't said that they were bad, have I? I said that a lot of them were a bit too expensive for the war Japan was fighting. DP-28 is cheaper then the gun in the video and has a two different drum options. And if you have seen video on it, it is less fancy, but good enough to do its job.
Other example is PPSh-41 and especially PPS-43. Japan lacked SMGs in any serious capacity being too late to realize what their own gun designers were telling them. And once again, their SMGs were too expensive to produce compared to PPS-43(it wasn't STEN cheap, but it was better. Still loses to Owen though:))
Due to the condition of respective fronts, soviets developed equipment that would have made japanese army(that was thrown under the bus by japanese navy), salivate. Not by its technology in most cases, but by abundance of it. USSR didn't have to dedicate a lot of resources to naval development during the war after all!
And it also connects with the fact that japanese carried out all the WRONG lessons from Battle of Khalkin-Gol(ok, not screwing around with USSR might have been a good one, but the rest were counter productive and one sided).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@abandonedchannel281
BT-2/5/7 were outdated in concept tanks. They were de facto cavalry tanks. In soviet doctrine that had no place for cavalry tanks. For a light tank they were massive, too expensive and not armed good enough to justify the previous points. They did great against Japan, but that was mostly up to the doctrine used and the training of the crews. Needed stepping stone for T-34, but not much more.
KV-2 was a mess. Completly unusable. But a needed stepping stone for soviet heavy tank and assault gun developement.
T-34 and KV-1 are a complicated topic, so I'll talk about only a few points about original early production that was mostly fixed by 1942.
Early T-34 was a mess. It retained a turret that was designed back on A-20, inherited later by A-32 with some modifications and ended up on T-34. The problem? It was a 2 man turret for 45mm gun. They installed 76mm cannon into it. Not a howitzer with short barrel, but a full blown cannon. For medium tanks of the time it was an equivalent of jumping the shark. Massive rise in firepower, but comparable drop in usability of the turret. It was too cramped, gases were collecting too fast and visibility was abyssmal. And that not the end. Grabin was being late with his F-34 and ZiS-5 cannons for T-34 and KV-1 respectively. So instead they installed L-11. It was a really shitty gun to say the least. Next trouble was the armor thickness and it's quality. Soviet industry had experience with producing plates thicker then 60mm for navy and thinner then 30 for most purposes. 45mm of T-34 was right in between. That meant that rolling process wasn't finalised. And in early stages of the war, armor of those was prone to cracking just as much as german one. In fact most photos of T-34 with extra plates welded on the front have those added to prevent cracking upon impact. The thickness was still holding up at that moment. There are also two secondary points about Christie suspension being obsolete by that point and turret ring being too small. All of the above were pointed out during military trials and T-34M project was prepared. However it was planned for autumn of 1941... most of T-34M fixes were applied to 1942 production model though. Step by step. Except suspension. That was the bane that limited the modification potential of many tanks, T-34 included. It meant that T-34-85 couldn't get extra armor due to weight issues even if it got bigger turret ring and new turret with new gun.
SU-100 comes into here too. It had revised hull compared to SU-85 which was somewhat based on problems experienced in previous model, but also had a few compromises to fit bigger gun. It also suffered from weak lack of suspension reserve and especially because they couldn't spare time to readjust production process for them - weight imbalance at vehicle front could have been fixed by adjusting positions of 2 forward wheels however as SU-100 had shared production with T-34 on the same line, it was impossible to do without stopping production of parent vehicle. And so those 2 forward most wheels on both sides were being used at critical conditions and prone to giving up long before others.
KV-1. Same problem with weight and L-11 gun. KV-1S lightened version was created solely to fix problems with suspension not being up to vehicles weight.
Oh, I also forgot an engine and transmission. Both T-34 and KV-1 had problem with both. They were both supposed to receive new engine and new transmission for it, but due to time constraints they were first being produced with different older engine. Not suitable for new transmission. And thus prone to breaking(you're seeing parallels with Panther now? Yeah, that what happens when you don't have an ocean between you and enemy and you have to produce new tanks without the luxury of time and safety to test them). And new engines were also not completly finished so new examples had very short lifespan of just a few hundred hours before the little "bugs and glitches" were fixed. What that meant? That crews were NOT ALLOWED to train with new vehicles just so that they won't wore them down.
Both great tanks those T-34 and KV-1... in late 1942 or 1943. Back when germans also bounced back with F2 and Tiger.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sadly Stalker didn't have jam animations like New Vegas and Far Cry 2. And sadly all of this games will stay one timers. Far Cry decided that details don't sell as good as expensive hyperaggressive marketing(story wasn't added in later games either:P), Bethesda decided to fallback on a more casual crowd, who want to have fun, not invest time into learning it after they've already invested money in buying the game and Stalker... well, it just sort of died. Even if it was supported by years by modders(same as NW), became a cult classic(all of them actually are), brought to live a dozen attempts to copy it's experience like Survarium or EfT and we even got possible news of next parts development finally starting again(after previous devs left company with already finished parts like concept arts that they've later used in that abysmal Survarium). Metro doesn't have jamming, but oh, those idle animations...
And ArmA, well, it stays ArmA. No one can compete or copy it. Or maybe no one is trying.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Correction - our planet isn't called US;)
P.S.: no, I can't speak for places like Luxembourg or New Zealand, but it's the same in Poland, Ukraine, Russia, China, US, Australia, Japan, Spain, Brazil so I have a reason to assume corporate culture is the same everywhere. But feel free to prove me wrong with uplifting counter example. I'm starving for good news...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vic5015 the problem is that when people joke that Russia doesn't care about losses is that... Russia doesn't care about losses. It's like they're not realising what they're saying themselves is true even if they fully believe it is and it in fact is. Ukraine can HOLD only with constant support, but instead we see Ukraine try to reclaim the lost territories without any resources to do so while isolationist-populists all over the world use situation and try to get to power by false claims, going as far as suggesting to abolish NATO, IMF, UN and any other organisation and throw the world into Great Depression 2.0 or outright WW3 as global trade will cease and all treaties and guarantees would become void, including nuclear ones. In such background Russia can lose half a million, a million or even 5 millions. They don't care that they're losing resources and men, that they will gain nothing. The only thing they always cared for is to prevent existence of Ukraine. Because Russia survives solely on claimed monopoly on russian language, culture, religion and so on. Primarily russian speaking Ukraine was a grave danger to that by giving an example of russian people(and I don't talk about people, who view themselves as ukranians or are ukranians, I talk about people, who view themselves as russians, but still supported Ukraine over Russia, no matter where they lived) surviving and even thriving WITHOUT Putin, Kremlin, Russia, authoritarian rule and all that crap. Kremlin needs a myth that "authoritarian rule is natural for russian people" to continue existing. So they will not accept any evidence to the contrary. Resources, territories, population, buffer zones, missile flight times, NATO bases and so on, NONE of it mattered. The only thing they wanted is to prevent formation of proof of different path. And sadly they achieved that...
And yes, they don't care about losses.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ivanmonahhov2314
1)для поражения огневой точки хватает и 30мм гранаты из АГЛ. 76мм справляется со всем, что крупнее за глаза. Единственное где нужен более крупный калибр это фугасный рубеж 150+мм - он позволяет полностью снести кирпичное здание в 3-5 этажей(привет всем городам, которые встретили ИСУ-152). За это платят габаритами орудия и унизительно маленьким боезапасом. Настолько маленьким, что даже не смешно.
76мм был старый калибр и его использовали "по привычке" ввиду наличия запаса боеприпасов. А отказ от него еще более банален - разрывы 76мм не видны уже на 4км, то есть корректировка была не возможна. Это еще при Тухаче поняли и поэтому разработали 85мм и 95мм дивизионки, настоящие. Но т.к. Тухача и Ко надо было обвинить во всем и вся, а запасы 76мм куда-то девать, то нате вам ЗиС-3. Первая настоящая дивизионка кстати была создана французами по заказу российской императорской армии, эта та самая 105-107мм пушка Шнайдера. Двадцать лет вперед, два шага назад.
2)не была. Бронебойный для 100мм разрабатывали очень долго, она банально не была готова на момент создания ИС-2. А по пробития догнала лишь на послевоенных бронебойных. У нее кстати заряжание цельное, ее труднее уместить в погон башни, чем А-19 с раздельным заряжанием. Но за это у А-19 скорострельность гораздо ниже.
3)угу, при этом ИС-3 не получил ни дальномера(разработали два, ни один не дали), ни дульного эвакуатора, ни избавился от дульного тормоза(привет демаскирующее облако пыли и проблемы с "раскрытием" ранних ломов), ни более современные боеприпасы в боекомплект(СУ-122-54 и Т-10Б использовали ту же А-19 в виде Д-49 и Д-25ТС/ТУ, у них были ломы и современные кумулятивы. А из-за раздельного заряжания можно и невращающийся кумыс с Т-10М зарядить). Но ничего из этого не сделали. Израильтяне захваченные ИС-3 посчитали хламом, поставили на надолбы и отстреляли боекомплект(а вот Т-55 использовали долго), а сами советы одновременно с "устранением дефектов"(надо было сразу на переплавку отправить) ИС-3, возродили и даже форсировали программу ИС-5(будущего Т-10 после кучи переименований), чтобы поскорее заменить убожество коим был ИС-3.
Итог: фалометрия 120мм и выше ничего за собой не имеет. Пробитие зависит от материала, структуры и ДЛИНЫ лома и его кинетической энергии, то есть в основном скорости т.к. лом ты толще делать не будешь из-за повышенного сопротивления и воздуха, и среды брони. Фугасов и так за глаза хватает, а ПТУРы из ствола можно пускать и на меньшем калибре, да только ирл их никто особо и не стал по итогу использовать. А за все это платишь насилованием габаритов танка и малюсеньким боезапасом. Все эти разговоры про 130, 140, 152 мм дилдари не более, чем глупости и распил. Калибр останется 120-122мм, будет расти скорость. В идеале будет возвращение к 100-105мм орудиям после перехода к электротермохимическим зарядам и телескопическому размещению дротиков, ради повышения возимого боекомплекта.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Great, it took just 40 years to match the trick demostrated by Leopard 2(actually not, Leo2 wasn't the first either).
Still waiting to see that laser return mirror on the end of the barrel on the same spot as that plate for beer that is needed to calculate barrel bend because modern fire control systems are precised enough to take it into account. Something that NATO had in widespread use... and Russia has on like 30 T-90M's made since 2016. Meanwhile NATO tanks sent to Ukraine are all going to have that one and that's not considered something special. Ukraine has an excuse of being invaded and in a state of war to much bigger country for the last 8 years. What's your excuse, tankies? Chinese fixed transmissions, chinese fixed fire control systems, chinese produced their own thermals and GPS(well, not GPS per say, but local pseudoequivalent to what GPS was a decade or so ago). What's your excuse if in your bravado you place yourself about US, PRC and EU? The truth is that in the past year Russia had shown itself to be a minor power compared to Brazil, Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Both in independent economic capabilities and self sufficiency of your technological sector. I for one welcome our egyptian overlords. You're ridiculed by merit of your own claimed merits and promises. So far your perfomance doesn't match your resume. And it's not just Ukraine, Belarus, russian population and NATO, who noticed that. But that's the thought you're not yet ready for. Ever heard about what China calls a "Century of Humiliation"?💀
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ДмитрийГородец39
пропаганда это когда кто-то считает, что на аналоговом железе был создан Скайнет, который сможет отправить терминаторов ко всем установкам, шахтам, подлодкам, надводным кораблям и аэродромам стратегического базирования, захватить командование, подготовить снаряжение и произвести удары. Вернее это уже диагноз. Мертвая Рука не более, чем обходной свич в процедуре запуска. Аналоговый вариант строки [Если нет сигнала из Кремля>Решение лежит полностью на командире/капитане самой установки].
Кстати да, я тоже искусственный интеллект, который говорит с тобой и охуевает от твоего тупизма. И сделан я из двух вакумных ламп и болта на коленке:\
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Pfft, no, it's not enough. We should go back to 12 hour work days and hide even more unemployment statistics!
Sad truth is that humanity produces more (MUCH MORE) then enough goods to cover all basic needs of whole population of Earth and enough to cover luxury requirements of vast majority. The world we live in today instead boils down to ideologies, racism, selfserving politics, inefficient economies and basic logistics. The last thankfully doesn't make me ill:\ Every f//cking nation and ideology cosplays Hitler and believes that they are here to stay for a thousand years just because they exist and some sort of higher power wills it and justifies all they do. (don't be like Hitler, kids, don't do drugs and start believing your own propaganda you have written under influence of drugs based on your time analogue of DnD)...
hmm, where the heck was I going with this? Ok, let's stop at not doing drugs, good message.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Depends on interpretation.
A lot of people mistake Centurion for being a first MBT because it was universal aka both infantry and cruiser at the same time, tank. Which was made alongside also universal HEAVY tank Caernarvorn/Conqueror.
Look at soviet plans for their heavy tanks like Object 777 and their T-64 MBT that came later or compare Chieftain to Conqueror. MBTs ARE heavy tanks. With price tag of superheavy ones:D That's why a lot of countries seek to purchase or develop smaller, cheaper and more expendable vehicles, be their IFVs, light and medium tanks of IFVs platform or modernizations of old last gen medium tanks like T-62, Vickers(I can't recall indian name), Olifant and M60. Because not everybody has budget for M1A2 or Leclerc. Most countries don't even have budget for T-72 and Leopard 1. And that's just for having them, not properly running, maintaining and training in them.
TL:DR they're still right here, it's just that classification purists are too far up their own [Redacted] to admit it. Just like people demanding to call BAR or Fedorov Avtomat a battle rifle, a term invented in the 90's... or the opposite, saying that you can't classify thwm as that because the term is so new. IE whenever you have to argue with "classificationboos"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TK421-53 Chad KV-1S >>>>>> virgin T-34:P
And I guess KV-1, KV-1S, T-70, KV-85, IS-1, SU-76, IS-2, ISU-152, ISU-122, T-43, KV-13 and dozen others are all american tanks, right? Or maybe it's just T-34 that is piece of sh//t? Let's see how many post war soviet tanks had used Christie suspension? None? Let's see how many post war soviet tanks used sloped side armor? Also none? Let's see how many post war soviet tanks made commander work as loader? Some, but not really? Oh, I'm sure that T-34 was a great tank and the fact that it was supposed to be replaced by T-34M ASAP or that it costed almost exactly as much to produce as KV-1 due to the use of shared bottleneck components isn't telling a different story.
Such a pity that all soviet reports and archives are still in place about pre war testing and all the attempts to replace that "tank". Otherwise some kid would have even believed you:D
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@adk1544 если уж копать, то у Марвел и Winter Guard есть, со своим медведем-оборотнем. Ирония в том, что эта хрень "не марвел" настолько, что Марвел их засудить могли бы. Кстати когда вышел первый трейлер(в котором ничего не было), многие люди высказали предположение, что на волне хайпа создатели этой хрени включили логику, пошли к Марвел, получили бабла и оформили не клюквенный вариант Зимней Стражи. Но нет, логика проиграла, карман российских налогоплательщиков тоже, сюжет и подавно. Второй трейлер уже все объяснил:(
Зато сейчас получим Красного Стража в Черной Вдове. Минут на 20. Потом он либо окажется злодеем из-за национальности, либо его убьют потому, что он наставник/преемный отец главной героини. До середины фильма он не дотянет.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Remember F.A.A.N.G. bs? Uncontested, ground breaking, too big to fail tech giants that changed the world blablabla? Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google. Later on people wanted to add Tesla to abbreviation, but it didn't fit the cool naming doctrine 😂
So, remember how it turned out that Netflix is just another name for cable channel and is an evolutionary product instead of revolutionary? Well, the fall of Netflix and rise of other streaming services, including Disney plus has two conclusions made by their owners, boards, shareholders and their investors - 1)streaming services aren't as big as they pose themselves to be as they rely too much on licensed content available by other means; 2)they want to see their name in the abbreviations instead of Netflix. Or in case of Netflix, keep it there.
So, what had it lead to? Mad rush in Netflix, Disney and several other streaming companies to greenlit almost anything just to produce the most "original" content by quantity, not quality. And the ideas that are pitched the fastest is the ideas usually mentioned in the same room as they stroke their own egos. This is why there's too much scripts written after the decision to make something marketable instead of scripts that were written and refined over a decade and pitched to the companies.
This is why Eternals exists and wastes so much potential and such a massive event for a fart nobody even recalls in-universe, this is why She-Hulk was such a rush hack job that didn't knew which audience it was for despite everyone knowing that even CGI wasn't on the required level yet.
Netflix had a head start as a service, Disney has a head start as production and effects leader in the industry, Amazon has money. And everyone and their grandma want to be THE streaming service to "X and chill".
This is the "why?".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@shawnfromstatefarm8822
or they simply don't know about the dirty colonial history of Russia and all the genocides(cultural and literal) commited. Ironic that they know about US and UK crimes mostly from US and UK documentaries that criticize their own countries because it's bloody allowed! Not so much in countries that "oppose the West™". Interestingly enough said "the West™" composes from a lot of countries from the east and south, while european colonial powers like Russia are ignored. "Oh, Russia isn't a western country!" It bloody calls itself The Third Rome! Culturally Russia prides itself on viking and byzantium influence on it's history(the tatar and mongol influence isn't mentioned and natives are purged). It's mostly atheist(not ideological atheism, but simply lack of care) country with main religion being orthodox christianity. Or at least a parody of it. How much more stereotypically "western" can this opposition to "the West™" get?:D People should learn what Russian Empire did to natives on all conquered territories(there's 5000+ native languages on territory that composed Russian Empire. Or rather were. What happened to their cultures?). For example how Russia for centuries treated Caucasus. Mass graves for local civilians in any century Russia was there, including both Chechen Wars. But since the only time it was legal to self reflect, doubt, question and criticize in Russia was a short period in late 1980's and 1990's, there's not much of that coming out. The myth of "bad 90's" propagated by Putin when there was a start to at least some political, informational and economical freedom, but nobody is allowed to talk about those and must instead talk how bad they were on criminal and the economical crisis that happened... economical crisis that was caused and exploited by same oligarchs in government of current Russia and criminal climate that was composed of bandits, who also became part of political sphere of modern Russia. Both reasons that the 90's were "bad" were literary pardoned and legalized by Putin and are pillar of his power over Russia, lol:D
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ramjb good of you to talk about apples and oranges as it'll make things easier for me now.
Walking fire as well as constant advance of the gunner behind the advancing troops and hipfire on the stops using the slings was integral part of german infantry offensive tactics through the whole WWII. Which haven't ended in 1914. And this still holds true for modern LMGs and SAWs which are supposed to be able to be fired from the shoulder. Because this REQUIREMENT for the support role haven't vanished, it is still needed to be filled on the battlefield even in an era of avtomats and assault rifles. If your gun is incapable of filling this niche, maybe it's your problem, huh?
And why had that paratrooper fiasco happened, dear? In your opinion MG42 is an LMG so that means that it is fully operated by single person and all the ammo(and spare barrel) is also carried by the same person. Landing with it and not breaking your knees and spine is once again just a question of you viewing it as LMG and thus all german troopers as 196cm, 120kg muscle bound monsters, who can take it. Reality proved different, but ok, keep going.
Apples to oranges indeed. What was the role of AR in german tactics of 1944-45? What is the role of AR nowadays? And since you've been kind enough to make a huge mistake and mentioned SAWs and modern classification, lift that MG42 to your shoulder and operate it on the move, please?
Nice of you to mention that it german doctrine needed LMG and substituted by using MG42 as one and there were never enough MG42 and MG34 to walk around in two close to each other paragraphs. That once again makes it easier for me. Just a little question - have it ever occured to you that the role was filled by MG42 because it was what they had at the moment and even then in not high enough numbers and not because it was actual LMG or being capable of filling LMG role and niche fully?
All in all, thanks for making it easier;) I can even direct you to you own quote about gnashing teeth now. GG WP.
2
-
2
-
@543soldier USSR did its part. There was not just a planned invasion, it was an EXECUTED invasion. But of continental territories! With what were we supposed to invade the islands themselves, huh? T-34-85's don't float, you know? We had neither the (surface) fleet, nor strategic and long range aviation required for it. Explain to me how USSR would invade Japan itself, please? It's just a myth. We had done all we could to fight Japan, the rest was ONLY up to americans. And if you mean provide troops for landing with american support, then why us? There are dozens of millions of chinese, who hated Japan. Arm, train, deliver. Maybe this way China wouldn't suffer such an inglorious continuation of its civil war where not just nationalists as usually seen, but de facto everyone lost and China was denied recovery help.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@NuryPPanaligan I am a eastern European and I indeed laugh... at you though, not him:D
I guess I have to specify.
A lot of high paying jobs here are result of income disparity between the countries. So most people, who have fluent english and upper education end up working in offices of international corporations. So what else do we see? We see workers from same corporations coming here to help set up work and... staying. Because they are still paid at a rate of their original office, but costs of living here are much cheaper. So they have an incentive to actually stay as that de facto increases their social standing by same income rate. And people, who can actually work online are doing basically the same - finding jobs with companies from countries with higher income and then going somewhere they feel better. I know people, who just emigrated to Canada, New Zealand or Israel, those who stayed here, but work western companies, those who work for russian companies, but decided to emigrate to cheaper asian countries like Malaysia while retaining their work, german specialists slowly moving to eastern Germany with its lower property costs or to Poland and so on. So nope, it does happen a lot. Your job doesn't have to be a grave of your life.
You're probably talking about unskilled manual labor, who can't work on distance:D
I can't speak for Latin America, Asia or Africa though.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cnlbenmc there is an old anecdote from the 60-70's:
Border between West and East Germany in the open field.
Out of nowhere a tank bristling with antennas and cameras rides out from western side, crosses the field, makes a loop and goes back. There was alarm, there was small arms fire, there were a few shots, but all missed. Nobody got hurt. Apparently that tank is an unmanned drone. Commander comes in evening and berates everyone.
Next morning same tank reappears with slightly changed equipement arrangement, crosses the border, makes the loop and goes back. Now it got hit a few times, but it didn't care. Commander berates everyone again then gets a call from higher ups berating him.
Next morning situation repeats. More hits, but results are just as empty. A party member arrives and talks to commander.
Next morning is the repeat. Party member observes it and tells something to commander. Commander leaves and returns in the evening in a truck. Hauling an old long barreled high velocity 15cm AA gun. During the night soldiers and sappers construct a position for the beast.
Next morning the tank reappears, crosses the border and vanishes from this Earth. Party members leaves, commander gets a recommendation, soldiers get praised for high readiness and accuracy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Remember F.A.A.N.G. bs? Uncontested, ground breaking, too big to fail tech giants that changed the world blablabla? Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google. Later on people wanted to add Tesla to abbreviation, but it didn't fit the cool naming doctrine 😂
So, remember how it turned out that Netflix is just another name for cable channel and is an evolutionary product instead of revolutionary? Well, the fall of Netflix and rise of other streaming services, including Disney plus has two conclusions made by their owners, boards, shareholders and their investors - 1)streaming services aren't as big as they pose themselves to be as they rely too much on licensed content available by other means; 2)they want to see their name in the abbreviations instead of Netflix. Or in case of Netflix, keep it there.
So, what had it lead to? Mad rush in Netflix, Disney and several other streaming companies to greenlit almost anything just to produce the most "original" content by quantity, not quality. And the ideas that are pitched the fastest is the ideas usually mentioned in the same room as they stroke their own egos. This is why there's too much scripts written after the decision to make something marketable instead of scripts that were written and refined over a decade and pitched to the companies.
This is why Eternals exists and wastes so much potential and such a massive event for a fart nobody even recalls in-universe, this is why She-Hulk was such a rush hack job that didn't knew which audience it was for despite everyone knowing that even CGI wasn't on the required level yet.
Netflix had a head start as a service, Disney has a head start as production and effects leader in the industry, Amazon has money. And everyone and their grandma want to be THE streaming service to "X and chill".
This is the "why?".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, the future of shotguns is insane, but no, it has no connection to FPV drones. Using shotguns vs FPVs is just as "practical" as using shotguns to shoot out grenades from mid air in WWI ie great news story to make more boys join, but having ZERO connection to reality.
The real future of shotguns is connected to them having high caliber, low velocity, low shock on projectile contents and being smoothbores. That always made them ideal for specialist munitions, similar to grenade launchers, mortars and howitzers in their respective weight classes. And what all those have? That's right, airburst, guided and rocket assisted two stage projectiles. Sometimes all at the same time. The future of shotgun is to adopt those techs and become bolter ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Silver_Prussian a lot of derailments into other armament types, modern events(or rather claim about said developments), what ifs and outright bs, when in reality ICBM as a nuclear deterrence tool has only 2(3 if modern) components - ICBM and warheads(and geolocation system, but Russia still has a problem with that, unable to produce domestic components😅).
Warheads were present in Ukraine, that's the topic of this discussion.
But what about missiles? Indeed, what about them, their connection to Ukraine, one of the biggest(if not the biggest and most advanced) design bureau's in all of USSR aka КБ Южное and it's legendary father Янгель, the man who developed not only staples of soviet nuclear arsenal like R-36, but also one of the three soviet lunar rockets ie R-56? Same design bureau that to this day developed and produced commercial rockets based on their older military designs. It'd be a shame if they existed in 1990's despite your insane claims to the opposite, right?😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@igorivanov3362 спасибо, капитан очевидность. Главным продвиженцем "коммунизма" в СССР внезапно был усатый поп, которому нужна была новая монополизированная трактовка сказки про "новую землю и 72 девственницы для послушных холопов".
Что же до смены власти, которой не будет, и забастовок, которых не будет... Фраза заезженная, но "бардак в головах". Коммунизм по определению общество БЕЗ государства и идут к нему через сотни лет социализма, чтобы достичь который надо сначала добраться до ступени "постдефицитного/постпотребленческого общества" до которого нам еще сотни лет, причем как в плане технологий, так и в плане общественного развития(если не тысячи, "благодаря" постоянным диктаторам тут и там). А что бессмертие, сотни лет жизни в таком обществе и обыденная генная инженерия сделают с "людьми" в таком обществе, вообще представить трудно. У нас с ними ничего общего уже не будет. Мы их даже не поймем, а они на нас разве что с жалостью смотреть будут.
Так, стоп, куда меня понесло...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Вместо мифологии возможно стоило бы нажать на рост уровня слежки и милитаризацию полиции и показать, что произошла слишком сильная эскалация конфликта между легальным и преступным миром. И что вместо открытой войны аля Дредд, произошло создание сего договора. А вследствие чего повышение качества услуг. В нашей реальности был период когда патрульные в США за свои деньги покупали штурмовые винтовки и бронежилеты более высокого класса, просто для того, чтобы не отстать в гонке вооружений с наркоторговцами, а рейды ничем не уступали перестрелкам где-нибудь в Сирии. Если полиция в мире Джона уже ничем не отличается от морпехов, то и спрос на местных балбесов, которые не умеют стрелять не повернув пистолет на 90 градусов, но могут легко впутать полицию уже гораздо меньше. А если гражданские не страдают о сравнению с открытой войной прошлого десятилетия и не требуют срочно вмешаться, то пусть киллеры мочат друг друга и своих клиентов да заказчиков. Ну, а повышение доли рынка и спроса на профессионализм привело к формированию Континенталя... но увы, бэк писать им было некогда:D
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mansonsacidtrip6862 probably. But I'd say that opposite is also true. Invasion of Cuba? Their idea and false information. Number of soviet missiles on Cuba, in general, their range and capability to stay in ready state for longer then 3 days? Inflated by ORDERS of magnitude by CIA, we literary had around 10-20% of numbers of missiles their reports had, our gyroscopes were running themselves to death in 3-5 days if missile was in ready for launch state, we had barely any missiles capable of reaching US,even some missiles in Cuba were too short ranged and we were behind on production so not every missile had a proper warhead. From Khrushev's position it was a massive bluff, if we were called for it we would have to pass or worse, if push came to shove we would be wiped out. And yet, it worked. Missiles in Turkey were removed, US-USSR relations started to balance out and... then Khrushev was removed by stalinist reactionaries. They even wanted to declare him a traitor and all documents that were showing the atrocities of Stalin as falsified ones. I wonder if they had wished to restart the camps too then? Almost pulled a Mao there:D But thankfully it was far too late to pull the breaks on destalinization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LOL-zu1zr cope... from whom? It's not me, who bought russian equipment and then put it in service among the best of my own thus revealing how little that "best" actually means:D
So yeah, cope harder.
Jets, engines, transport planes, autocannons, ammo, SPAA, body armor. All except jet engines are bought because they pity russians? Or maybe Russia can suddenly undersell with lower cost compared to chinese production? Or maybe, just maybe, chinese have actual production and development trouble meanwhile their superiors have fetish for soviet stuff and bought into false advertisements?
P.S.: I'm willing to give PLA the benefit of the doubt just because they didn't fall for Su-25 fallacy and instead continued with their own MiG-27 equivalent - JH-7. So they already had more braincells then our military combined.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@streamlinedengine imagine how much worse it could have been if Stalin hadn't died? People blame Khrushev for Cuban Crisis, but that man consolidated all the available resources to get USSR a retaliation capability and THEN used said technological potential not for war, but to create majority of positive political and reputation reserve USSR enjoyed through its existence with space program and his visits to USA. Meanwhile post-WWII era under Stalin was nonstop provocations of one proxy war after another. And while USSR did support NVA, it had neither provoked the conflict, nor take part in it directly, nor undermined everyone and planned to conquer the region like PRC. If the world was unlucky enough to have a doctor with very low morals around that door in 1953, whole of Asia(and likely a lot of Africa and South America) would have been divided and drowned in blood like Korea:(
Но нет же, ..ять, Хрущев у них "кукурузник", а Сталин святой. Выблядки авторитарные:(
P.S.: ignore the part in russian, just my rage towards Stalin fanboys and authoritarian fetishists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesgornall5731 mostly yes. Though a lot of tanks were lost back in 2014-2015.
But here comes the difference - Ukraine was restoring all available tanks and training crews since said 2014, for 8 years. And you can see that number pop up a lot, for example in mentions of numbers of trained infantrymen with combat experience. Ukraine had put several rotation of conscripts through "low intensity" conflict on border with occupied territories. That's the reason they held to begin with, they were preparing for Russia to try the second time. Sadly preparing not as competently as they should have goven the size of the opponent, but given the circumstances, it's hard to blame them.
The other point worth mentioning is how Russia and all other operators of soviet equipment use them differently. You might have heard about why non-russian T-72 suffer ammo explosions less frequently - they leave ammo only in autoloader as Morozov himself intended. 22 rounds out of maximum capacity of 48, less then a half(numbers from my memory, if I recall right those are for T-80). Russian officers don't want to deal with logistics and organize the supply truck delivery of extra ammo so they load tanks with ammo to the brim. So any penetration is a guaranteed turret flip. It was that way in Chechnya, it was that way in Georgia, in Syria and in Ukraine. Crews KNOW that they shouldn't do it for their own safety, but officers apparently don't care about crews ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1)WWII started in 1937 with Sino-Japanese War and americans were supplying chinese with weapons, other equipment and provisions, putting embargo on Japan and having reporters cover the events in the news. What was Poland doing in 1937-1938? Demonstrating the most incompetent foreign policies imaginable by helping Germany put a squeeze on czechs.
2)Finland realised the importance of military readiness, while Poland in 1939 had a parade military. When UK advisors told polish high command to retreat and entrench behind rivers, poles said that they know better. Finns meanwhile accepted all the advice they could get and already incorporated most of it beforehand because they were competent.
3)in 1991 Poland, Ukraine, Georgia, Romania and many other finally independent Warsaw Pact and USSR states had a chance to create a joint military commission to modernize their militaries and provide a competition to russian arms industry on global market. You preferred your petty squabbles instead. Instead all we hear about are fake projects like PL-01 that are aimed to steal budget funds.
4)Russia already attacked 2 GUAM members and haven't attacked Moldova only because Ukraine held. For now. If it keeps holding, they'll attack it again in 4 years. After that their sights would be on Baltics. Will Poland help defend Baltics, all of which ARE NATO members? Idk. But what I do know is that when russian cruise missile hit polish farmers, you've lied about it being ukranian SAM, which can't even glide and is optimized for fragmentation ie there would be no tractor left. You lied because you didn't want conflict with Russia.
So where does that leave us, eh? After decades polish government decided to finally have military budget, but it remains to be seen if all those weapons bought from US and South Korea would help you get an actual military or if it'll be a parade one like in 1939. And if your foreign policy attitude has changed or if you'll help Russia put a squeeze on Baltics when it'll attack. You scream on top of your lungs about remembering lessons of history instead of getting up and DOING something. I'll believe it when I see it.
1
-
1
-
@peterj5083 kiddo, since you have internet, I'll give you simple directions - open Wikipedia, open WWII article, open list of conflicts that comprised WWII, open Second Sino-Japanese War in that very list and look at when said conflict started. It's 1937. If you disagree with that, all the pages have sources listed below. You're free to send letters describing your disagreement with them to all the (still living) authors. Until then, WWII started in 1937 and lasted until 1945(though some may say that WWII didn't truly end until Korean War). And as south and east asian economies grow, more people there can afford higher education, more and more historians would have more incentive to not focus on Europe alone, more and more sources would admit that it was 1937.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Except that their design philosophy is outdated in the world where thermals, drones and modern fire control exists. Completely outdated. Even China realized that that can't be allowed to continue like that and fixed many issues in their ZTZ99A like transmission having no real rear gears.
And with T-14 Russia tried to jump over the wall of the maze and once again fell down. They can't design a working engine-transmission group, they can't get a reliable camera view and worst of all, their unmanned turret and crew capsule are completely pointless since they still use old autoloader and NO blow out panels ie they made a giant pressure cooker. Capsule can't protect the crew if pressure has no easier way to escape. That's basics! You can't have blow out panels on the bottom as it'll make the tank very weak to mines, can't do them in the sides as it'll make sides weaker, capsule is up front, engine in the back and on top of that giant bomb called ammo is an unmanned turret without panels either. They took budget and time and made situation worse!
Tbh T-14 was an improvement in one direction - it no longer tries to pointlessly minimize target profile at expense of crew comfort and overall design as if it's still 50's. It isn't, your tank would be seen and it can be hit.
I'd say take T-14's hull, suspension(surprisingly no trouble there so at least something works as intended), beg chinese for help with getting a working engine/transmission unit and then go back to designing conventional turret with blow out panels for ammo and some breathing room for crew. Oh, wait, we've just reinvented Leopard II...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, the future of shotguns is insane, but no, it has no connection to FPV drones. Using shotguns vs FPVs is just as "practical" as using shotguns to shoot out grenades from mid air in WWI ie great news story to make more boys join, but having ZERO connection to reality.
The real future of shotguns is connected to them having high caliber, low velocity, low shock on projectile contents and being smoothbores. That always made them ideal for specialist munitions, similar to grenade launchers, mortars and howitzers in their respective weight classes. And what all those have? That's right, airburst, guided and rocket assisted two stage projectiles. Sometimes all at the same time. The future of shotgun is to adopt those techs and become bolter ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@teemuvesala9575 охуенные история, паря, а теперь все же вернёмся к реальности.
A-10 never was spherical example of CAS in vacuum. The role of CAS in US military and navy structure in era of A-10 was filled by 3 dedicated CAS planes each having their own niche: A-10, Harrier and Corsair II. A-10 was never independent or best in this trio.
In USSR we have abolished the role of pure attack aircraft after IL-40, basically IL-10 with jet engines. After that the multirole attack aircraft filled the role. Su-7/17/22. But then we decided that, hey, we can make precision weapons too, so why not make an attack plane DESIGNED for them? For that role MIG-27 was designed. Yes, it used MiG-23 as basis. Same as Corsair II was also based on fighter craft. Of course you didn't know that either. MiG-27 was designed to work in duo with heavier bomber/striker plane Su-25 with which it shared the engine and several types of avionics. While MiG-23 covered them. All was well. Except our economy. So first they started to simplify MiG-27. And that's when the technical requirements for Su-25 appeared. Remember what they stated? Simple, cheap, easy to maintain armoured aircraft that can be used by low skilled(referred to as medium skilled in document, lol) pilots from dirt airstrips near the frontline. Woopsie, we're back to IL-2 with jets category:D So of course first submitted design was IL-102, refined project of one of IL-40 variants. It didn't sit well, so they chose single pilot Su-25 instead. What the problem? It's piece of manure. MiG-27 was capable of supersonic flight, it was all weather capable, it was designed for precision weapons, it had GREATER operational range then his "bigger brother" Su-24. USSR fell over and yet it was MiG-27 that was butchered. Sukhou design bureau belched out an abomination called Su-39 and promised that they'd make all Su-25 like it, all weather and ideal for precision armaments. It'll be just as good as MiG-27(ignoring everything that made MiG-27 good). Guess how many Su-39 was ever made? 4. Guess how many NEW MiG-27 were scrapped? Hundreds. And in the end we're left with cheap and expendable piece of crap because it was DESIGNED to be cheap and expendable piece of crap, that stopped being cheap and easy to maintain due to corruption and internal lobbies and never had gotten anywhere near promised capabilities. But at least it's advertised in internet as cool, right? That makes up for what it is, right?
I'm fully aware what a PoS Su-25 is so by extrapolating its situation and history to A-10 and F-35 I have to tell you to go screw yourself and learn what close air support even means. Spoiler alert: it's NOT about plane getting close to attack enemy combatants with autocannons and unguided munitions, it's called this way because attack happens CLOSE to your own troops. Precision weapons remove the need for aircraft to get close itself while filling the CAS role. That's the lowest of the basics and you don't know even that. Congrats, you've played yourself.
Прежде, чем называть кого-то дурачком, прочитай хоть одну(1!) книгу по теме. А потом пались своим незнанием:))
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lol. Being muslim =/= liking and helping other muslims. Heck, saudis hate Iran more then Israel does. Why? Because they're competing! Same goes for the defense pacts. Pakistan is a chinese ally(to backstab India in case of Indian-Chinese war), Iran is indian and russian ally(to counter Pakistan), Saudi Arabia is american ally(and ironically so also an ally of Israel. Yes, they're on the brink of war, they hate each other, but technically they're allies through USA. Not to mention that they make billions through trade with each other while publicly calling each other abominations to be eradicated).
And the prize in that competition? Being de facto leader of all muslims in the world. That title is kind of a big deal. Imagine US losing the image of the main "western country"? Yes, trillions of dollars are gained and depend on upholding such an image alone. And here's the thing. While all compete for muslim primacy, they also uphold nationalistic views of population to keep themselves independent from others. Saudi speak about arab brotherhood, Iran calls back to persian roots, Pakistan views itself as the only true descendant of all things that ever was great in India and Turkey is going for osmanic legacy claim. Not arabic, mind you! And they all view themselves as ONLY rightfull rulers of unified Middle East. A culturaly and historically impossible, but so lucrative new superpower that could easily overshadow Russia and be actually recognised as serious competitor by US and China(the fact that it won't just be a summ of all statistics and parameters of all ME states, but be a much weaker state doesn't come to minds of most people).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Единственное, что жутко бесит, когда люди упоминают Орвелла и подобных, это комменты типа "он предвидел". Он ...ять про происходящее писал. Вам ярый социалист, который сражался за испанскую республику в 30-х годах(хотя именно 1984 это конец 40-х) прямым языком все рассказал про национал "социалистов", "социализм" в одной стране, "социализм" для одной нации, военный "коммунизм" и многое другое. "Предвидел"©®™... нет уж, просто до кого-то слишком долго доходит, что на написание и производство любой книги, фильма или чего угодно уходит десятилетие. Вам кричат из прошлого о том, что уже произошло.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimmcneal5292 this IS modest remilitarization. This is what Israel, Taiwan and South Korea do to survive. Every european state from Bulgaria to Portugal has to be preparing like Poland, Finland, Turkey and Switzerland. The latter aren't even in EU and NATO.
"Holding off" is not enough. The alliance needs to be capable of retaking occupied territories of its members and inflicting lasting strategical impact on opposing force. If US were to remove divisions from the Baltics and Russia were to occupy those countries, Russia would gain several million people and some territory once again, negating their manpower losses. Yeah, EU won't fall. But it won't be able to push Russia out, the front will become static, time will run, NATO will get bored, there will be peace talks and Russia would get Baltics in return for fake peace for a few years while it prepares to take the next bite out of EU. NATO won't be serious about nukes until Russia is done with Balkans and is halway through Germany either. Ao why should Russia ever stop? It is facing demographic and economical catastrophe even without sanctions due to corruption and ineffective rule, but this way they're gaining population capable of working and paying taxes in exchange to losing impoverished, criminals and drunks desperate and delusional enough to go to front. And they're gaining developed territories with better climate. So even if they'll demolish 90% of buldings, they'll still be able to resettle russians from Siberia in new land to gain more support and better control over it. And a person getting to live in better conditions would rarely be bold enough to protest how they got there. Which would free Putin's hand to give out more and more of Siberia back to chinese companies, who would develop it and fuel his economy, while also ensuring that China is not an enemy. And if EU and NATO are facing Russia at their throat, would they really try something to stop Russia and China carving up Central Asia?
Russia had learned that it can get away with biting and that math of such conflicts would always be positive for it since it doesn't see value in russian lives to begin with. NATO has no leverage to stop or even slightly oppose it as of right now. I gave a list how that leverage can be gained.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
abe Lincoln imagine being one of 40 millions(by South Korean and Taiwanese estimates!) chinese, philipinos, koreans, thai, vietnamese and many other civilians, who died due to "innocent" Hirohito. Japan never admitted, never apologized, overwhelming majority of war criminals(almost all of high ranking ones) were never prosecuted, it is hailed in US, pictured as a victim, teached pure lies about the conflict for generations, all critique in media is villified and 1937 is never seen as start of WWII.
Germany did a lot to try to make amends in those 80 years, Japan did nothing and had just only proven that you can be the biggest bastard and no one will care. Because to US and Europe, asians are to this day viewed as subhuman. Just look at this whole comment chain! Wow, such horror, such casualties!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fokka6010 thanks for trying to lecture me on history of my own country. And have it also ever occured to you that a people with certain type of interest and at least nomnal knowledge are subscribed to this channel?
1)quote me on saying "ditch the ammo", please. I might not like rimmed cartridges, but I'd leave that topic to people screaming on MG-81 vs ShKAS forums and their RoF's. My goal is better bolt action by the time of WWII. Leaving the same ammo as is in reserves is an obvious(to sane people at least) requirement;
2)it's 1930's and the decision to scrap Mosin was already taken. Army wants nothing to do with it again and hopes to hop over any replacement straight to semiautos and SMGs. Only in 1938 when the upcoming war became obvious for USSR was it put into large scale production again. I'm only merely proposing to include reservist/back up rifle into this plan. The same way as SKS was put into production to back up revolutionary for soviet army AK which had left too many people sceptical at first. It'd be different to sell as an idea back in 1934-36, but for completly different or even opposite set of reasons. It was a time of infectuos futurism in soviet military circles;
3)it requires the same production lines. Majority of equipement depends on the cartridge and caliber, not on the rifle itself. Nagant revolver is in 7.62mm to utilize the same tooling that for making barrels as Mosin-Nagant rifle. Sorry, but adopting simply different bolt action for same cartridge won't suddenly require exotic martian wood or hexagonal vibranium screws. Or whatever you have just imagined to yourself;
4)it means that production will spike in 1934-38, not in 1942. Soviet army will have overall better service rifle in plenty when it'll need it. And it'll be still reliable and cheap. We can modernize Brown Bess too, it still won't mean that it's better then gun specifically designed for requirements of current moment;
5)as mentioned in point №2, it wasn't decent in any way, shape or form. By the 20's Mosin is an ugly moronic duckling. It doesn't run smoothly, it's large, it's slow, it has small magazine. And worst of all, it doesn't deserve any of it's good reputation compared to it's immediate competition. And that costed us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@valerianaerospace3268 @valerianaerospace3268
1)soviet invasion of Iran in 1941, soviet support to "revolution" and its crimes against iranian people, soviet bombers and long range missile dropping chemical weapons on iranian civilians;
2)USSR invading China, USSR invading China, USSR helping Japan invade China to distract from soviet invasion of China, USSR helping Mao occupy China and install his regime, his crimes against chinese people, USSR having a dozen border conflicts with China;
3)soviet invasion of Korea, soviet dismantling of independent korean government, soviet puppet regime and its crimes against korean people, Korean War.
Also, please DO mention other powers with whom USSR was an accomplice in these instances. Said accomplices Russia tries to "oppose" now before it does 180 once again. And people joke about Italy 🤣
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rcons1g262 dear empty profile that isn't even a year old, WHEN HAD RUSSIA HONOURED ANYONE'S NEUTRALITY? In less then a decade it openly violated sovereignty of four of it's neighbours(invasion of Georgia, invasion of Ukraine, support of dictatorial puppet regime in Belarus, literal killsquads sent to break protesters in Kazakhstan). Yeah, cry me a river on how Israel, South Korea, Taiwan and (greek part most of the time) Cyprus decided not to be neutral. Yeah, suuuuure.
Learn history, tankie. Your precious Stalin robbed and betrayed spanish socialists, he used french communists as a ploy to undermine french war effort in 1940, he tried to assassinate Tito multiple times and he invaded China in 1929, 1934 and 1937, with last time being simultaneous with maoist sabotage of a certain bridge that gave japanese excuse to invade China from the other side and cause one of the worst genocides in history. And then in 1945-1949 he provided massive amounts of military support to install the same Mao into power and tried to repeat that with Korea too.
There is no neutrality as long as your damned neighbor is tsarist Russia under whatever name and ideology it rebranded itself this time to justify its own rabid imperialism and racism. Пшел вон, Капустин.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Michal235 I'd prefer not to be either western or eastern world, but belarussian. Seriously, keep UN SC veto "overlords" away from here, be they from London, Moskow, Beijing or Washington. I know it's too much to ask being stuck in the eye of the storm, but it'd be better if you have figured it all out between yourselves without military bases on our territory and nukes aimed at us. Again.
P.S.: I would have given France a pass on not being warmongering backstabbing imperialistic pricks out of all 5 of them knowing their history, but am still cautious knowing their history. So it's better to be safe and view all 5 veto members as danger to humanity. Just like any other government that calls itself "hegemon", "superpower", "empire", "local power", "leader of [inserthere]" and some others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yopiee8342 I suggest you to use Google translate in case you don't know russian -
topwar_ru/27613-f-22-raptor-i-realnye-problemy-vvs-rossii.html
Replace _ to . to make the link work. Mind you, this one is from 2013. Before all the sanctions that prevented imports of electronics and new production equipment, before tooling shortages, before braindrain acceleration, before shortages of skilled pilots and machinists. All those Pak Fa's, T-50, T-14's, T-15's are just market tricks, it's far better to have more Su-35 and T-90 with proper support equipment, ground crews, spare parts and skilled crews, then have half(or much less) of their number in various "wunderwaffels" just for show. What Russia NEEDS is to restore all pilot schools that were closed down after collapse of USSR. In comparison to that Su-57/75 are just expensive toys with no use. They are pursued for one reason only - those projects allow to hide that real money from military budget get stolen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AbdulAziz-nd3pu
1)Bucky also uses "normal" firearms. As does Warmachine. Problem is that you can't tell what ammo is anybody using. Maybe they're using gyrojet rounds with antimatter warheads and ECM initiator propellant to give it more velocity before rocket properly accelerates it?(yes, I HAVE just described ammo of Space Marine bolter. Yes, it's 20mm, not 9mm. Doesn't matter with Iron Man's fantasy tech and antimatter being equally powerfull either way since you're using only a few "atoms" of it and the rest is containment chamber the size of which is based on your tech level). Oh, wait, it's 6+ movies, you can't have handguns scaring children in the theatres with loud banging noizes and tearing enemies into a gory mess before their eyes!:))
2)do Asgardians, other "human looking aliens" and even Thanos minions count as having human anatomy? What happens if you cut off half of asgardian ballsack and only THEN start asking questions while mentioning the rest of his anatomy? Though I admit, in myth Loki is quite used to being a woman... and not even a human one;)
3)Stark had made optical camo for helicarrier even BEFORE first Avengers movie. Then we see him, Parker(instead of Miles for some reason) and even his transport planes using it. Giving it to Black Widow was that hard? Or authors being dumbasses forgetting about two characters is characters fault?
4)Black Widow was augmented with superserum just like Captain America and Bucky(and Red Skull. And Hydra agents. And Black Cat, who also gets her serum "forgotten" nowadays. Time to joke about sexism... or not joke?). Once again, she can do ANYTHING those two(16?) can in physical terms and have better CQC skills.
Nolan was able to make Batman cool in grounded tech level and without any serum and in animated movies people like him when he interrogates metahumans with words alone or stares down literal gods. Care to repeat all your BS about metahuman enemies, pointless interrofation and infiltration and lack of superhuman abilities? Just copy Batman if you fail to be creative and original yourself!:D
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@disposabull you were talking crap about us, millenials, for decades too. We grew up and found out the previous generations to be dimwitted, incompetent, lazy, greedy and ready to kiss any ass that has money or power. Now we make up majority of taxpayers, war veterans, workers, artists, scientists and parents around the globe. And you switched to talking crap about our kids and younger siblings? Oh, that's rich🤣👍
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@badwolf9956 context, dear, context! Instead you have just proven that you have NO idea what you're talking about.
1)Kar98 is using inflated round damage like all other Scout rifles. You deal almost three times more damage then you should. G43 and MG34/42 is using the SAME round and comparable barrel length. So by definition, you're ALREADY using the fact that devs took pity on you and gave you an advantage in damage. There is less difference in damage and recoil between this gun and your Kar98 then between Kar98 and G43 which differ between themselves only by being bolt and gas action.
2)both Boys and Panzerbuchsse are TOO big and heavy to be used in hipfire, in standing position, to run with them in your hands and many other things. Have they gotten special mechanics for that? Nope, DICE just took the same code that they use for bolt actions and added a few points of damage. Sure, new model and animation looks great, but it's just your typical Scout rifle inflated. Here, want another proof? AT rifles DON'T mount optics! They're used at extreme CLOSE range where they have maximum penetration.
So all in all, DICE had just given you a bigger Kar98... and if you've played BF1 and seen other AT rifles on this channel, you'd also understand what I mean:\
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@levilastun829 I'm not going to open up the whole comment chain to look up what changed in several months, but in case I didn't mention it or you somehow overlooked it:
1)M900 has much longer penetrator. If I was talking on this topic, I likely mentioned that I specifically mean 2A46Msomething on T-72 ie when it was heavily limited to rod length. T-90A has de facto the same gun, but due to reworked autoloader it doesn't have the same problem. Idk why people find it so hard to comprehend something as basic.
Okay, I'll give an easy example. Think of it this way, if it'll be easier for you - you can install 100mm D-10 in turret of T-34/76(1942), you will just need massive muzzle break, massive counterweight, you would be limited to using only low pressure ammo, you will need to cut a hole in the back of the turret for recoiling gun breach, you will be able to reload it only from outside because there is no space for human left inside the turret and you will need to pray before each shot. Does it make D-10 a worse gun on T-54 or SU-100? Nope. But we're not talking about T-54 or SU-100.
Warning! This is an analogy, an example to explain what I've meant. Please don't derail the conversation into it.
2)MRD stands for muzzle reference device, yes. First ever use by Russia was on T-90M in 2016, almost 3 decades after it became standard for NATO even on old refurbished tanks due to the requirements of increased FCS accuracy.
1
-
@levilastun829 @levilastun829 I'm not going to open up the whole comment chain to look up what changed in several months, but in case I didn't mention it or you somehow overlooked it:
1)M900 has much longer penetrator. If I was talking on this topic, I likely mentioned that I specifically mean 2A46Msomething on T-72 ie when it was heavily limited to rod length. T-90A has de facto the same gun, but due to reworked autoloader it doesn't have the same problem. Idk why people find it so hard to comprehend something as basic.
Okay, I'll give an easy example. Think of it this way, if it'll be easier for you - you can install 100mm D-10 in turret of T-34/76(1942), you will just need massive muzzle break, massive counterweight, you would be limited to using only low pressure ammo, you will need to cut a hole in the back of the turret for recoiling gun breach, you will be able to reload it only from outside because there is no space for human left inside the turret and you will need to pray before each shot. Does it make D-10 a worse gun on T-54 or SU-100? Nope. But we're not talking about T-54 or SU-100.
Warning! This is an analogy, an example to explain what I've meant. Please don't derail the conversation into it.
2)MRD stands for muzzle reference device, yes. First ever use by Russia was on T-90M in 2016, almost 3 decades after it became standard for NATO even on old refurbished tanks due to the requirements of increased FCS accuracy.
Double posting this wall of text since YT will lilely shadowban any comment about weapons at random. Maybe second one will be visible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PAINNN666 ну да, я ж тут в комментах главный защитник:\ Кто не с нами, тот против нас, верно? Нда, пожалуй я все же действительно против таких, как вы. Не с теми, кого вы считаете своими противниками, дорогой мой борцун интернетный, просто вас бы с ними в одну шеренгу поставил. Видишь ли... у меня нет контрактных обязательств любить свое правительство, наших соседей и любую страну, которая мощнее нас в каком-то плане и пытается этим пользоваться. А главное нет запрета не доверять вам всем СРАЗУ. И так уж вышло, что против одних для меня не значит за других на автомате. В политике нет друзей, только временные союзники, как говаривал один умный, но империалистичный человек;)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheDoomega за время этой цепочки комментов я упомянул Наполеона, Кутузова, Суворова, Минина, Пожарского, Сталина, Гитлера и ещё несколько человек.
Кого "его"? На какой коммент вы отвечали?:))
Да и в любом случае разницы нет, это вам не Great War или Forgotten Weapons, фильмы это развлекательная индустрия. Даже Discovery и National Geographic как оказалось любили оперировать мифами и не утруждались полностью проверить материал(Дискавери например знатный распространитель мифов о том, что Шерман горел чаще немцев и прочих бензиновых танков и о том, что ИС-2 не мог перезаряжать орудие не приведя его в горизонтальное положение). В русскоязычной среде даже на Ютуб достоверных каналов по истории вообще фиг найдешь, англоязычные можно посчитать по пальцам фрезеровщика. Вот и вся история. В остальном в мире все изучение истории сводиться до пропаганды, которая угодна властям страны в которой вы живёте в данный момент и к развлекательному сектору, который строится на мифах и стереотипах, т.к. их проще продать. Все помнят дешёвые исторические книги и их качество? Брали количеством. Документалистика это жанр не имеющий иммунитета к опусканию до туалетного чтива, к сожалению:(
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
US during height of Cold War: 10% of GDP goes to defence budget, people can afford housing on one job, healthcare and education are top notch even if they're not free.
US now: 3% of GDP goes to defense budget, nothing is affordable or worth it.
By manipulating data I can likewise claim that US needs to triple defense budget to fix the economy and government.
But it's okay, advocate for lowering pants and assuming position. I win in either case just due to my национальности, гражданства и родного языка. Если СШП перестают жевать песок и становятся мировым оплотом либерализма, который таки начинает противостоять империализму и тоталитаризму, то для меня это победа и светлое будущее. Если же вы вместо этого поджигаете свою страну и отдаете всю Европу на блюдечке России, тоже моя победа и стабильное будущее. So, yeah, just pick the road 😂
1
-
1
-
@piotrmalewski8178 pretty much. However when not crancked up by soviet factories without any quality control or skilled workers, it wasn't the worst design ever. I just heavily dislike original turret(designed for 45mm gun back on A-20 and then upgunned to 76mm without increasing its size), Christie suspension(screw maintaining that, be it on T-34/85 or even Comet), angled sides, forward turret position, vulnerable driver hatch and the fact that it uses the same bottleneck components as KV-1 thus defeating the whole purpose and putting the "it was cheap argument" in its grave. Otherwise(is there anything good left) it wasn't that bad;)
My favourite soviet medium tank among produced ones was KV-1S, which technically was called heavy, but was closest to being "soviet Sherman". T-43 and KV-13 were also cool, but they remained just prototypes. By same margin US had T20-T23 prototypes with gun stabilisation and autoloading back during the WWII so it's pointless to mention such fantasies as "if they could have been produced en masse". Though yes, if fantasies are allowed, just scrap both T-34 and KV-1 and produce T-34M chassis with straight hull sides buffed to 55mm, perpendicular engine placement and turret of KV-1. Ie T-44 at home model 1940:D
However I talked about brits. And they literally produce such tanks, just not with such bad production quality. Put infantry Valentine XI hull onto cruiser Cromwell engine and suspension and you literally get T-34/76 with abysmally cramped turret and that damn suspension. So further studies of another de facto cruiser tank could have influenced the change in british cruiser line.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@evthink 1)if you're so proecology that you are bolting into random rant trying to ignore what I've said and derail conversation, then you would hate Tesla simply for reason of it producing sedans instead of being focused on public transportation. Which you are not, so don't try to pretend and waste our time.
2)have I talked about ICE cars? My father grew up in a countryside village and used horses for transport and work in his teens. Mind you, it was already 70's. And this is where I've also spent most of my summers as a kid. So fuck off with trying to bullshit me with my right "to fresh air", you have never breathed it to begin with and can't imagine your life without said ICE cars and conveniences they provide. How many times have you used two man saw? Slaughtered a pig? Cleared out a barn form all the shit, Mr.Ecology? And yet humans survived and thrived without personal transportation. Tractors, semis(announcement getting further and further away), service vehicles(cybertruck can be usefull at least here) and public transport make the most difference. Personal sedans are a fucking luxury, if you don't get it. Want to save enviroment and right to fresh air? Ok, let's ban personal transport. I'd survive. Will you, pretender?
3)get back on point, Ford cultist 2.0. What's your gripe with right to repair? What makes you think that you can continue taking away people's property they payed for? And this time stop drooling and running away. You asked to be adressed in this tone, you're getting it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1