Youtube comments of (@TheArklyte).

  1. 5200
  2. 1300
  3. 722
  4. 628
  5. 449
  6. 412
  7. 392
  8. 303
  9. 287
  10. 258
  11. 256
  12. 250
  13. 235
  14. 220
  15. 211
  16. 206
  17. 199
  18. 195
  19. 191
  20. 190
  21. 190
  22. 169
  23. 169
  24. 168
  25. 162
  26. 160
  27. 153
  28. 150
  29. 150
  30. 147
  31. 145
  32. 140
  33. 139
  34. 135
  35. 132
  36. 130
  37. 122
  38. 120
  39. @HALL_ VL убийство подразумевает невозможность возвращения убиенного, нет разве? Асгардцы, гномы и пара атак на Землю. Всех остальных вернули. Больше примеров массового истребления не заметил, а Локи(таки сама атака на Нью-Йорк, как минимум, а еще уничтожение ВСЕГО мира Ледяных Великанов. Полный геноцид целой расы) и Старк(привет Альтрон, привет геноцидные корабли Щита, привет дроны убийцы! И это без учета общей безответственности главы крупнейшего оружейного концерна в мире в течении нескольких десятилетий до попадания в пещеру) на пару пробили эту планку с легкостью. Тор тоже влетел на мир Ледяных Великанов и начал убивать местных ради веселья. Щит десятилетиями был единым целым с Гидрой, то есть вопрос уничтожения неугодных людей у них тоже не вызывал моральной диллемы. Это ж во имя свободы и демократии, а значит какая-нибудь африканская деревушка вырезанная до последнего свидетеля нивсчет. Баннер участвовал в эксериментах над людьми с целью создания суперсолдат и в разработке оружия массового уничтожения плюс неизвестно сколько полегло от его нрава случайно.
    120
  40. 112
  41. 111
  42. 111
  43. 111
  44. 109
  45. 109
  46. 108
  47. 107
  48. 105
  49. 100
  50. 97
  51. 96
  52. 94
  53. 93
  54. 93
  55. 91
  56. 90
  57. 88
  58. 87
  59. 87
  60. 86
  61. 86
  62. 84
  63. 83
  64. 82
  65. 80
  66. 79
  67. 79
  68. 78
  69. 78
  70. 75
  71. 74
  72. 73
  73. 70
  74. 70
  75. 69
  76. 67
  77. 67
  78. 65
  79. 65
  80. 64
  81. 64
  82. 64
  83. 62
  84. 62
  85. 61
  86. 61
  87. 60
  88. 60
  89. 59
  90. 59
  91. 59
  92. 57
  93. 55
  94. 55
  95. 55
  96. 53
  97. 53
  98. 53
  99. 52
  100. 52
  101. 52
  102. 51
  103. 51
  104. 51
  105. 50
  106. 50
  107. 50
  108. 49
  109. 49
  110. 48
  111. 48
  112. 47
  113. 47
  114. 46
  115. 46
  116. 46
  117. 46
  118. 45
  119. 44
  120. 44
  121. 44
  122. 44
  123. 43
  124. 43
  125. 43
  126. 42
  127. 42
  128. 42
  129. 41
  130. 41
  131. 41
  132. 39
  133. 38
  134. 38
  135. 38
  136. 37
  137. 37
  138. 37
  139. 37
  140. 37
  141. 37
  142. 37
  143. 36
  144. 36
  145. 36
  146. 36
  147. 36
  148. 36
  149. 36
  150. 36
  151. 35
  152. 35
  153. 35
  154. 35
  155. 35
  156. 35
  157. 35
  158. 35
  159. 34
  160. 32
  161. 32
  162. 32
  163. 31
  164. 31
  165. 30
  166. 30
  167. 30
  168. 30
  169. 30
  170. 28
  171. 28
  172. 28
  173. 27
  174. 27
  175. 27
  176. 27
  177. 27
  178. 26
  179. 26
  180. 26
  181. 26
  182. 26
  183. 25
  184. 25
  185. 25
  186. 25
  187. 25
  188. 25
  189. 25
  190. 25
  191. 25
  192. 25
  193. 25
  194. 25
  195. 25
  196. 25
  197. 25
  198. 25
  199. 24
  200. 24
  201. 24
  202. 24
  203. 24
  204. 24
  205. 24
  206. 23
  207. 23
  208. 23
  209. 23
  210. 23
  211. 23
  212. 23
  213. 23
  214. 23
  215. 23
  216. 23
  217. 22
  218. 22
  219. 22
  220. 22
  221. 22
  222. 22
  223. 22
  224. 22
  225. 22
  226. 21
  227. 21
  228. 21
  229. 21
  230. 21
  231. 21
  232. 21
  233. 21
  234. 21
  235. 21
  236. 21
  237. 20
  238. 20
  239. 20
  240. 20
  241. 20
  242. 20
  243. 20
  244. 20
  245. 20
  246. 20
  247. 20
  248. 20
  249. 19
  250. 19
  251. 19
  252. 19
  253. 19
  254. 19
  255. 19
  256. 19
  257. 19
  258. 19
  259. 19
  260. 19
  261. 19
  262. 18
  263. 18
  264. 18
  265. 18
  266. 18
  267. 18
  268. 18
  269. 18
  270. 18
  271. 18
  272. 18
  273. 18
  274. 18
  275. 18
  276. 18
  277. 18
  278. 17
  279. 17
  280. 17
  281. 17
  282. 17
  283. 17
  284. 17
  285. 17
  286. 17
  287. 17
  288. 17
  289. 17
  290. 17
  291. 17
  292. 17
  293. 17
  294. 17
  295. 17
  296. 17
  297. 17
  298. 17
  299. 17
  300. 17
  301. 17
  302. 17
  303. 17
  304. 16
  305. 16
  306. 16
  307. 16
  308. 16
  309. 16
  310. 16
  311. 16
  312. 16
  313. 16
  314. 16
  315. 16
  316. 16
  317. 16
  318. 16
  319. 16
  320. 15
  321. 15
  322. 15
  323. 15
  324. 15
  325. 15
  326. 15
  327. 15
  328. 15
  329. 15
  330. 15
  331. 15
  332. 15
  333. 15
  334. 15
  335. 15
  336. 15
  337. 15
  338. 15
  339. 15
  340. 15
  341. 15
  342. 15
  343. 15
  344. 15
  345. 15
  346. 15
  347. 15
  348. 15
  349. 15
  350. 15
  351. 14
  352. 14
  353. 14
  354. 14
  355. 14
  356. 14
  357. 14
  358. 14
  359. 14
  360. 14
  361. 14
  362. 14
  363. 14
  364. 14
  365. 14
  366. 14
  367. 14
  368. 13
  369. 13
  370. 13
  371. 13
  372. 13
  373. 13
  374. 13
  375. 13
  376. 13
  377. 13
  378. 13
  379. 13
  380. 13
  381. 13
  382. 13
  383. 13
  384.  @2008LethalMelody  "в чью пользу собрались "спасать" промышленность Беларуси" О, гении Луканомики подтянулись. В чью пользу ТЗ спасает АвтоВАЗ за чужой счет? В чью пользу все наши врачи уехали в РФ?(кстати, может вы своих учить начнете опять?). В чью пользу зазывали ребят с МЗКТ, чтобы "лучшие в мире и не имеющие аналогов" баллистические ракеты было на чем хотя бы возить во время очередной ссоры? В пользу Беларуси? Народ все понимает, но и ты пойми хоть что-нибудь разок. Пойми почему Лука в предверии выборов остановил запуск БелАЭС, который должен был произойти в январе. Почему его защищают ваши СМИ, когда он все еще приказывает закрывать российских граждан, которые оказались у нас и говорит о российских "террористах". Пойми, что смотря со своей колокольни, как "единственный посвященный в механизмы реальной политики в отличии от жалкого стада", ты сам позабыл слова старичка Макиавелли о страхе и ненависти. Ты хочешь поразглагольствовать на тему вражеского лобби, дорогой любитель софизма? "Подождите еще 25 лет и все будет еще лучше!". Но нет, мы же все глупые, мы не знаем, что основа бизнеса всегда идет по методу "черной стрелы". Один ты Д'Артаньян. Удачного дня вам дня.
    13
  385. 13
  386. 13
  387. 13
  388. 13
  389. 13
  390. 13
  391. 13
  392. 13
  393. 13
  394. 12
  395. 12
  396. 12
  397. 12
  398. 12
  399. 12
  400. 12
  401. 12
  402. 12
  403. 12
  404. 12
  405. 12
  406. 12
  407. 12
  408. 12
  409. 12
  410. 12
  411. 12
  412. 12
  413. 12
  414. 12
  415. 12
  416. 12
  417. 12
  418. 12
  419. 12
  420. 12
  421. 12
  422. 12
  423. 12
  424. 11
  425. 11
  426. 11
  427. 11
  428. 11
  429. 11
  430. 11
  431. 11
  432. 11
  433. 11
  434. 11
  435. 11
  436. 11
  437. 11
  438. 11
  439. 11
  440. 11
  441. 11
  442. 11
  443. 11
  444. 11
  445. 11
  446. 11
  447. 11
  448. 11
  449. 11
  450. 11
  451. 11
  452. 11
  453. 11
  454. 11
  455. 10
  456. 10
  457. 10
  458. 10
  459. 10
  460. 10
  461. 10
  462. 10
  463. 10
  464. 10
  465. 10
  466. 10
  467. 10
  468. 10
  469. 10
  470. 10
  471. 10
  472. 10
  473. 10
  474. 10
  475. 10
  476. 10
  477. 10
  478. 10
  479. 10
  480. 10
  481. 10
  482. 10
  483. 10
  484. 10
  485. 10
  486. 10
  487. 10
  488. 10
  489. 10
  490. 10
  491. 10
  492. 10
  493. 9
  494. 9
  495. 9
  496. 9
  497. 9
  498. 9
  499. 9
  500.  @randomly_random_0  my comment was the reason the older brother's role was constrained to 5 sentences and everyone was very surprised how Cameron was brave enough to kill off such a beloved character? First scenes with Quaritch in the movie show him acting in what gen Z calls cringe fashion. The script requires him to immediately show off how dangerous and predatory he is... so he starts speaking nonsense in that fashion before even asking for context of the situation he is in. Oh no, precious whale oil. It's so expensive and cool and we, a species that apparently can mass produce artificial beings ie avatars can never hope to synthesise on Earth from just a few samples delivered. Just as a cool space rock is so cool and expensive that it justifies flying to another matter on antimatter engines, the fuel for which would cost several orders of magnitude more then this damn rock and make phrase energy crisis sound as a bad joke. But ngl, the last two are mostly nitpicking since it's obvious that government of Earth is straight up lying to colonists and personnel. Earth isn't dying and all their resources, mined on Pandora cost nothing on Earth in reality, they just want to incite the war to justify destroying local population that would not survive terraforming. So the resource they'd call critical for that isn't important. And neither are sacrificial lamb colonists. Or full trains of arms shipments with equipment like MANPADs that are useful only against RDA own equipment, that lost in the jungle regularly despite there not being enough colonists to justify even a single such shipment even if you force every person to carry extra rifles with their teeth and buttcheeks. Besides I can bet that "Earth was lying" wouldn't be an angle Cameron is going for.
    9
  501. 9
  502. 9
  503. 9
  504. 9
  505. 9
  506.  @paint4pain  1938. 14,5x114 round was developed in 1938 along with the a few AT rifles for it. It was deemed excessive for production just like ZiS-2 57mm cannon in 1940. PTRS/PTRD is a second generation of AT rifles for this round. The closest comparison would be munitions used by 15mm versions of MG-151 autocannon. That one had 40mm of penetration even at 300m if german documents are to be believed. They thankfully they didn't make an AT rifle around it:D As I was saying, Boys was sabotaged by an attempt to cheapen out and use a derivative of .50 cal ammo necked to bigger bullet instead of developing new ammo. Mind you, they had 15x104mm BESA/Brno round in their hands since 1937. It had the same 33k joules as 14,5x114mm of soviets. So allies at the start of WWII in Europe could have had a VERY different AT rifle. And against 1939 german tanks it would have bordered on cruel overkill:D 25mm was still a mounted gun even if a light one. It would have much harder time to find and exploit said vulnerabilities compared to a gun that a 2 man team can handle on their own. Mounted gun that can't fight infantry or provide fire support. No, it is important. Majority of shells used by german and american AT gun crews and tankdestroyers were still HE shells. For example M10's in Italy had as much as 80% of their loaded ammo of pure HE shells. Soviets used HE shells even more often due to their preference for higher caliber guns instead of higher velocity ones, which was partially justified by shortages of high quality explosive filler. It wasn't a bad gun, but it was a gun without a role. As such it was a very niche and expensive tool. I'd actully suggest that better use for this round would be creating an AA autocannon and setting it up the same way as hungarians used Nimrod on tactical level as both SPAAG and tank destroyer. Problem was Nimrod was late.
    9
  507. 9
  508. 9
  509. 9
  510. 9
  511. 9
  512. 9
  513. 9
  514. 9
  515. 9
  516. 9
  517. 9
  518. 9
  519. 9
  520. 9
  521. 9
  522. 9
  523. 9
  524. 9
  525. 9
  526. 9
  527. 9
  528. 9
  529. 9
  530. 9
  531. 9
  532. 9
  533. 9
  534. 9
  535. 9
  536. 9
  537. 9
  538. 9
  539. 9
  540. 9
  541. 9
  542. 9
  543. 9
  544. 9
  545. 9
  546. 9
  547. 9
  548. 9
  549. 9
  550. 9
  551. 8
  552. 8
  553. 8
  554. 8
  555. 8
  556. 8
  557. 8
  558. 8
  559. 8
  560. 8
  561. 8
  562. 8
  563. 8
  564. 8
  565. 8
  566. 8
  567. 8
  568. 122mm was chosen because it simply was a more powerful gun. No ifs or buts about that. That's why it stayed on IS-3 and even T-10. And no, D-25 wasn't available in infinite numbers either, in fact it was a more expensive gun. Production of IS-2 caused shortages in production of ISU-122 and ISU-122s(even if only the latter uses D-25) whenever IS-2 had an above average monthly production. As a result in those months ISU-152 production was going up as well. Guess why? Because they used only different guns so any finished vehicles waiting for the gun was simply equipped with 152mm cannon-howitzer and added to those production numbers. There were even tests to put A-19(aka original without muzzle brake) onto IS-2 later one because D-25 wasn't produced in high enough numbers. D-10 maybe had a value as gun option for commander tanks, but that's mostly it. P.S.: You people are also forgetting that D-10 is actually harder to reload in IS-2 turret. It has comparable recoil distance to D-25 due to lack of muzzle brake and also as it uses single piece ammunition, the round is very long and heavy. D-25 takes longer to reload, but is actually easier. If you understand basics of geometry, take IS-2 blueprints available online and just look at the amount of space behind the breech you need when you use single piece ammo. And if you can reload D-10 at all once the axis of the breech crosses the back of the turret ring when the gun is elevated at certain degrees. This is why proposed 105mm gun on Tiger B had to be switched to two piece ammo to even fit in the turret. Same thing with 100mm gun on IS-2. It isn't much lighter, isn't recoiling less and definitely isn't easier on the loader to operate.
    8
  569. 8
  570. 8
  571. 8
  572. 8
  573. 8
  574. 8
  575. 8
  576. 8
  577. 8
  578. 8
  579. 8
  580. 8
  581. 8
  582. 8
  583. 8
  584. 8
  585. 8
  586. 8
  587. 8
  588. 8
  589. 8
  590. 8
  591. 8
  592. 8
  593. 8
  594. 8
  595. 8
  596. 8
  597. 8
  598. 8
  599. 8
  600. 8
  601. 8
  602. 8
  603. 8
  604. 8
  605. 8
  606. 8
  607. 8
  608. 8
  609. 8
  610. 8
  611. 8
  612. 8
  613. 8
  614. 8
  615. 8
  616. 8
  617. 8
  618. 8
  619. 8
  620. 8
  621. 8
  622. 8
  623. 8
  624. 8
  625. 8
  626. 8
  627. 8
  628. 8
  629. 7
  630. 7
  631. 7
  632. 7
  633. 7
  634. 7
  635. 7
  636. 7
  637. 7
  638. 7
  639. 7
  640. 7
  641. 7
  642. 7
  643. 7
  644. 7
  645. 7
  646. 7
  647. 7
  648. 7
  649. 7
  650. 7
  651. 7
  652. 7
  653. 7
  654. 7
  655. 7
  656. 7
  657. 7
  658. 7
  659. 7
  660. Question with a long context explanation: a decade or so ago Ukraine was developing an elongated T-72 and T-80 with a pseudo troop compartment in the back, behind turret, but in front of the engine with space for 3 people. It got an extra set of roadwheels so it was able to handle more mass and obviously was itself heavier then normal T-72 and T-80. Project was sort of cancelled since it was leading nowhere, but prototype remained. Then there was a project to install a "NATO compliant" 120mm gun into T-80 and put the autoloader into the turret bustle and equip it with blow out panels. It existed, it worked, but budget wasn't there so it was cancelled too. Seemingly unconnected stories. Until around 2017-2019 Ukraine showcased new recovery vehicle based on T-72 which for presentation was dragging around... elongated T-80 with said turret with bustle autoloader. Comments are closed under the original video, no info was given about that monstrosity outside of possible weight of 55 tons. Since bustle is above the former "dismount" hatches, those were obviously unusable and welded shut. So, what was that? Just a way to preserve two separate prototypes? Or was it a new tank development in itself? It has massive amount of unused space in the hull thanks to former crew compartment and removal of hull autoloader. And quite a hefty weight reserve if 55ton figure is true. So what was there? Attempt to install thicker frontal armor without overloading frontal roadwheels? Crew capsule experiment? Extra fuel tanks or ammo storages to avoid using external ones that everyone's trying to mount on T-80? What was that tank?
    7
  661. 7
  662. 7
  663. 7
  664. 7
  665. 7
  666. 7
  667. 7
  668. 7
  669. 7
  670. 7
  671. 7
  672. 7
  673. 7
  674. 7
  675. 7
  676. 7
  677. 7
  678. 7
  679. 7
  680. 7
  681. 7
  682. 7
  683. 7
  684. 7
  685. 7
  686. 7
  687. 7
  688. 7
  689. 7
  690. 7
  691. 7
  692. 7
  693. 7
  694. 7
  695. 7
  696. 7
  697. 7
  698. 7
  699. 7
  700.  @MisterFirst  P.S.: копипаста другого коммента для обьяснения контраста - "убийство подразумевает невозможность возвращения убиенного, нет разве? Асгардцы, гномы и пара атак на Землю. Всех остальных вернули. Больше примеров массового истребления не заметил, а Локи(таки сама атака на Нью-Йорк, как минимум, а еще уничтожение ВСЕГО мира Ледяных Великанов. Полный геноцид целой расы) и Старк(привет Альтрон, привет геноцидные корабли Щита, привет дроны убийцы! И это без учета общей безответственности главы крупнейшего оружейного концерна в мире в течении нескольких десятилетий до попадания в пещеру) на пару пробили эту планку с легкостью. Тор тоже влетел на мир Ледяных Великанов и начал убивать местных ради веселья. Щит десятилетиями был единым целым с Гидрой, то есть вопрос уничтожения неугодных людей у них тоже не вызывал моральной диллемы. Это ж во имя свободы и демократии, а значит какая-нибудь африканская деревушка вырезанная до последнего свидетеля нивсчет. Баннер участвовал в эксериментах над людьми с целью создания суперсолдат и в разработке оружия массового уничтожения плюс неизвестно сколько полегло от его нрава случайно." Уровень лицемерия - невинный Хирохито;)
    7
  701. 7
  702. 7
  703. 7
  704. 7
  705. 7
  706. 7
  707. 7
  708. 7
  709. 7
  710. 7
  711. 7
  712. 7
  713. 7
  714. 7
  715. 7
  716. 7
  717. 6
  718. 6
  719. 6
  720. 6
  721. 6
  722. 6
  723. 6
  724. 6
  725. 6
  726. 6
  727. 6
  728. 6
  729. 6
  730. 6
  731. 6
  732. 6
  733. 6
  734. 6
  735. 6
  736. 6
  737. 6
  738. 6
  739. 6
  740. 6
  741. 6
  742. 6
  743. 6
  744. 6
  745. 6
  746. 6
  747. 6
  748. 6
  749. 6
  750. 6
  751. 6
  752. 6
  753. 6
  754. 6
  755. 6
  756. 6
  757. 6
  758. 6
  759. 6
  760. 6
  761. 6
  762. 6
  763. 6
  764. 6
  765. 6
  766. 6
  767. 6
  768. 6
  769. 6
  770. 6
  771. 6
  772. 6
  773. 6
  774. 6
  775. 6
  776. 6
  777. 6
  778. 6
  779. 6
  780. 6
  781. 6
  782. 6
  783. 6
  784. 6
  785. 6
  786. 6
  787. 6
  788. 6
  789. 6
  790. 6
  791. 6
  792. 6
  793. 6
  794. 6
  795. 6
  796. 6
  797. 6
  798. 6
  799. 6
  800. 6
  801. 6
  802. 6
  803. 6
  804. 6
  805. 6
  806. 5
  807. 5
  808. 5
  809. 5
  810. 5
  811. 5
  812. 5
  813. 5
  814. 5
  815. 5
  816. 5
  817. 5
  818. 5
  819. 5
  820. 5
  821. 5
  822. 5
  823. 5
  824. 5
  825. 5
  826. 5
  827. 5
  828. 5
  829. 5
  830. 5
  831. 5
  832. 5
  833. 5
  834. 5
  835. 5
  836. 5
  837. 5
  838. 5
  839. 5
  840. 5
  841. 5
  842. 5
  843. 5
  844. 5
  845. 5
  846. 5
  847. 5
  848. 5
  849. 5
  850. 5
  851. 5
  852. 5
  853. 5
  854. 5
  855. 5
  856. 5
  857. 5
  858. 5
  859. 5
  860. 5
  861. 5
  862. 5
  863. 5
  864. 5
  865. 5
  866. 5
  867. 5
  868. 5
  869. 5
  870. 5
  871. 5
  872. 5
  873. 5
  874. 5
  875. 5
  876. 5
  877. 5
  878. 5
  879. 5
  880. 5
  881. 5
  882. 5
  883. 5
  884. 5
  885. 5
  886. 5
  887. 5
  888. 5
  889. 5
  890. 5
  891. 5
  892. 5
  893. 5
  894. 5
  895. 5
  896. 5
  897. 5
  898. 5
  899. 5
  900. 5
  901. 5
  902. 5
  903. 5
  904. 5
  905. 5
  906. 5
  907. 5
  908. 5
  909. 5
  910. 5
  911. 5
  912. 5
  913. 5
  914. 5
  915. 5
  916. 5
  917. 5
  918. 5
  919. 5
  920. 5
  921. 5
  922. 5
  923. 5
  924. 5
  925. 5
  926. 5
  927. 5
  928. 5
  929. 5
  930. 5
  931. 5
  932. 5
  933. 5
  934. 5
  935. Проблема с мальчиком была в том, что на фоне мифа "чистого Вермахта", который процветает до сих пор, комбинация получалась не лучшей. Ему бы произнести речь вместе с делегациями Израиля и Польши, чтобы вермахтодрочеры с одной стороны и поцреоты с другой не пытались выкручивать слова. Есть ещё вопрос в том, сколько этих невинных погнанных на войну погибло вместо откровенных уродов, которые таки вернулись, а потом бахвалились этим. До 90-х отлавливали и то, в основном делали это сами бывшие узники на "энтузиазме и костях" без поддержки государств, которые просто предали память всех погибших уже через пару лет. Победа во второй мировой обладает не меньшей долей отвратный черной иронии, чем трагедия в Версаля. Что же до российской власти... вы сами понимаете КТО там сидит если сверху идёт заказ славить монархию, нацизм и фашизм и любыми средствами обгаживать демократию, социализм, коммунизм и любые другие формы "холопского" социального устройства.
    5
  936. 5
  937. 5
  938. 5
  939. 5
  940. 5
  941. 5
  942. 5
  943. 5
  944. 5
  945. 5
  946. 5
  947. 5
  948. 5
  949. 5
  950. 5
  951. 5
  952. 5
  953. 5
  954. 5
  955. 5
  956.  @anyways4438  угу, а Ильичу все на блюдечке приносили, верно? Как там миф про вагончик и немецких спонсоров, которые видите ли все сделали за революционеров? Эссеры тоже на вагончике приехали? Большой был вагон. Декабристов наверное тоже через границы закидывали. Скоро выборы в Думу, Вам предложили вариант, как отследить свои голоса и помешать(вернее просто показать их масштаб и заткнуть лицемерность на пару дней) массовым подтасовкам. Но Вы НЕ будете этого делать просто потому, что идею предложил человек, имя которого боты в сети неумело рифмуют с унитазом. Поэтому продолжаем смотреть видео про Сингапур и гадать "почему у нас не так, ведь тоже Режим™?". Нет уж, Россия заслужила сегодняшнего и будущего Путина и я желаю ему ещё 40 лет правления РФ. Как евреям пришлось ходить по пустыне. И только РФ. Здоровья тоже желать не буду, хочу увидеть как будут петь пгимны овощу на аппаратах исскусственного жизнеобеспечения:))
    5
  957. 5
  958. 5
  959. 5
  960. 5
  961. 5
  962. 5
  963. 4
  964. 4
  965. 4
  966. 4
  967. 4
  968. 4
  969. 4
  970. 4
  971. 4
  972. 4
  973. 4
  974. 4
  975. 4
  976. 4
  977. 4
  978. 4
  979. 4
  980. 4
  981. 4
  982. 4
  983. 4
  984. 4
  985. 4
  986. 4
  987. 4
  988. 4
  989. 4
  990. 4
  991. 4
  992. 4
  993. 4
  994. 4
  995. 4
  996. 4
  997. 4
  998. 4
  999. 4
  1000. 4
  1001. 4
  1002. 4
  1003. 4
  1004. 4
  1005. 4
  1006. 4
  1007. 4
  1008. 4
  1009. 4
  1010. 4
  1011. 4
  1012. 4
  1013. 4
  1014. 4
  1015. 4
  1016. 4
  1017. 4
  1018. 4
  1019. 4
  1020. 4
  1021. 4
  1022. 4
  1023. 4
  1024. 4
  1025. 4
  1026. 4
  1027. 4
  1028. 4
  1029. 4
  1030. 4
  1031. 4
  1032. 4
  1033. 4
  1034. 4
  1035. 4
  1036. 4
  1037. 4
  1038. 4
  1039. 4
  1040. 4
  1041. 4
  1042. 4
  1043. 4
  1044. 4
  1045. 4
  1046. 4
  1047. 4
  1048. 4
  1049. 4
  1050. 4
  1051. 4
  1052. 4
  1053. 4
  1054. 4
  1055. 4
  1056. 4
  1057. 4
  1058. 4
  1059. 4
  1060. 4
  1061. 4
  1062. 4
  1063. 4
  1064. 4
  1065. 4
  1066. 4
  1067. 4
  1068. 4
  1069. 4
  1070. 4
  1071. 4
  1072. 4
  1073. 4
  1074. 4
  1075. 4
  1076. 4
  1077. 4
  1078. 4
  1079. 4
  1080. 4
  1081. 4
  1082. 4
  1083. 4
  1084. 4
  1085. 4
  1086. 4
  1087. 4
  1088. 4
  1089. 4
  1090. 4
  1091. 4
  1092. 4
  1093. 4
  1094. 4
  1095. 4
  1096. 4
  1097. 4
  1098. 4
  1099. 4
  1100. 4
  1101. 4
  1102. 4
  1103. 4
  1104. 4
  1105. 4
  1106. 4
  1107. 4
  1108. 4
  1109. 4
  1110. 4
  1111. 4
  1112. 4
  1113. 4
  1114. 4
  1115. 4
  1116. 4
  1117. 4
  1118. 4
  1119. Question with a long context explanation: a decade or so ago Ukraine was developing an elongated T-72 and T-80 with a pseudo troop compartment in the back, behind turret, but in front of the engine with space for 3 people. It got an extra set of roadwheels so it was able to handle more mass and obviously was itself heavier then normal T-72 and T-80. Project was sort of cancelled since it was leading nowhere, but prototype remained. Then there was a project to install a "NATO compliant" 120mm gun into T-80 and put the autoloader into the turret bustle and equip it with blow out panels. It existed, it worked, but budget wasn't there so it was cancelled too. Seemingly unconnected stories. Until around 2017-2019 Ukraine showcased new recovery vehicle based on T-72 which for presentation was dragging around... elongated T-80 with said turret with bustle autoloader. Comments are closed under the original video, no info was given about that monstrosity outside of possible weight of 55 tons. Since bustle is above the former "dismount" hatches, those were obviously unusable and welded shut. So, what was that? Just a way to preserve two separate prototypes? Or was it a new tank development in itself? It has massive amount of unused space in the hull thanks to former crew compartment and removal of hull autoloader. And quite a hefty weight reserve if 55ton figure is true. So what was there? Attempt to install thicker frontal armor without overloading frontal roadwheels? Crew capsule experiment? Extra fuel tanks or ammo storages to avoid using external ones that everyone's trying to mount on T-80? What was that tank?
    4
  1120. 4
  1121. 4
  1122. 4
  1123. 4
  1124. 4
  1125. 4
  1126. 4
  1127. 4
  1128. 4
  1129. 4
  1130. 4
  1131. 4
  1132. 4
  1133. 4
  1134.  @thomasellysonting3554  yes on most of it except on comparison to heavy tank. It's a medium infantry tank. It doesn't need high speed to begin with, it doesn't need huge operational ranges because it's not operating independently and it doesn't need high penetration gun. But most importantly, it is cheap and easy to mass produce... relatively. You can try to argue that it was neither cheap, not produced in enough numbers by the british, BUT any actual modern heavy tank was just going to end up even more expensive to produce and would face even smaller production numbers. It was a bottleneck resulting in deficiencies of british tank industry, that was getting a fifth flute to all other services and for a good reason(at least they thought so). Infantry tanks aren't marvels of bleeding edge technology by design. The only downsides were 1)retention of small turret ring from Matilda which was useless since Matilda has no backwards compatibility with Churchill I turret due to suspension and transmission inability to survive added weight and lack of any modification reserve; 2)initial lack of reliability typical for new vehicles. Design reached Vauxhall too late and even then they've improved it considerably before production; 3)question of armament. I can see the point in calling NA75 as probably the best armed one even above 17 pounder of Black Prince prototype due to different priority(once again, for infantry tank penetration isn't that important), however I can also see why 2 pounder might have also had a point with its high RoF. But all of Churchill's armament lacked an ability to fire at upper levels of tall buildings, something that would highly benefit infantry tank.
    4
  1135. 4
  1136. 4
  1137. 4
  1138. 4
  1139. 4
  1140. 4
  1141. 4
  1142. 4
  1143. 4
  1144. 4
  1145. 4
  1146. 4
  1147. 4
  1148. 4
  1149. 4
  1150. 4
  1151. 4
  1152. 4
  1153. 4
  1154. 4
  1155. 4
  1156. 4
  1157. 4
  1158. 4
  1159. 4
  1160. 4
  1161. 4
  1162. 4
  1163. 4
  1164. 4
  1165. 4
  1166. 4
  1167. 4
  1168. 4
  1169. 4
  1170. 4
  1171. 4
  1172. 4
  1173. 4
  1174. 4
  1175. 4
  1176. 4
  1177. 4
  1178. 4
  1179. 4
  1180. 4
  1181. 4
  1182. 4
  1183. 4
  1184. 4
  1185. 4
  1186. 4
  1187. 4
  1188. 4
  1189. 4
  1190. 3
  1191. 3
  1192. 3
  1193. 3
  1194. 3
  1195. 3
  1196. 3
  1197. 3
  1198. 3
  1199. 3
  1200. 3
  1201. 3
  1202. 3
  1203. 3
  1204. 3
  1205. 3
  1206. 3
  1207. 3
  1208. 3
  1209. 3
  1210. 3
  1211. 3
  1212. 3
  1213. 3
  1214. 3
  1215. 3
  1216. 3
  1217. 3
  1218. 3
  1219. 3
  1220. 3
  1221. 3
  1222. 3
  1223. 3
  1224. 3
  1225. 3
  1226. 3
  1227. 3
  1228. 3
  1229. 3
  1230. 3
  1231. 3
  1232. 3
  1233. 3
  1234. 3
  1235. 3
  1236. 3
  1237. 3
  1238. 3
  1239. 3
  1240. 3
  1241. 3
  1242. 3
  1243. 3
  1244. 3
  1245. 3
  1246. 3
  1247. 3
  1248. 3
  1249. 3
  1250. 3
  1251. 3
  1252. 3
  1253. 3
  1254. 3
  1255. 3
  1256. 3
  1257. 3
  1258. 3
  1259. 3
  1260. 3
  1261. 3
  1262. 3
  1263. 3
  1264. 3
  1265. 3
  1266. 3
  1267. 3
  1268. 3
  1269. 3
  1270. 3
  1271. 3
  1272. 3
  1273. 3
  1274. 3
  1275. 3
  1276. 3
  1277. 3
  1278. 3
  1279. 3
  1280. 3
  1281. 3
  1282. 3
  1283. 3
  1284. 3
  1285. 3
  1286. 3
  1287. 3
  1288. 3
  1289. 3
  1290. 3
  1291. 3
  1292. 3
  1293. Their design philosophy is outdated in the world where thermals, drones and modern fire control exists. Completely outdated. Even China realized that that can't be allowed to continue like that and fixed many issues in their ZTZ99A(aka another pretender for the name of last descendant of soviet tank design school) like transmission having no real rear gears. And with T-14 Russia tried to jump over the wall of the maze and once again fell down. They can't design a working engine-transmission group, they can't get a reliable camera view and worst of all, their unmanned turret and crew capsule are completely pointless since they still use old autoloader and NO blow out panels ie they made a giant pressure cooker. Capsule can't protect the crew if pressure has no easier way to escape. That's basics! You can't have blow out panels on the bottom as it'll make the tank very weak to mines, can't do them in the sides as it'll make sides weaker, capsule is up front, engine in the back and on top of that giant bomb called ammo is an unmanned turret without panels either. They took budget and time and made situation worse! Tbh T-14 was an improvement in one direction - it no longer tries to pointlessly minimize target profile at expense of crew comfort and overall design as if it's still 50's. It isn't, your tank would be seen and it can be hit. I'd say take T-14's hull, suspension(surprisingly no trouble there so at least something works as intended), beg chinese for help with getting a working engine/transmission unit and then go back to designing conventional turret with blow out panels for ammo and some breathing room for crew. Oh, wait, we've just reinvented Leopard II...
    3
  1294. 3
  1295. 3
  1296. 3
  1297. 3
  1298. 3
  1299. 3
  1300. 3
  1301. 3
  1302. 3
  1303. 3
  1304. 3
  1305. 3
  1306. 3
  1307. 3
  1308. 3
  1309. 3
  1310. 3
  1311. 3
  1312. 3
  1313. 3
  1314. 3
  1315. 3
  1316. 3
  1317. 3
  1318. 3
  1319. 3
  1320. 3
  1321. 3
  1322. 3
  1323. 3
  1324. 3
  1325. 3
  1326. 3
  1327. 3
  1328. 3
  1329. 3
  1330. 3
  1331. 3
  1332. 3
  1333. 3
  1334. 3
  1335. 3
  1336. 3
  1337. 3
  1338. 3
  1339. 3
  1340. 3
  1341. 3
  1342. 3
  1343. 3
  1344. 3
  1345. 3
  1346. 3
  1347. 3
  1348. 3
  1349. 3
  1350. 3
  1351. 3
  1352. 3
  1353. 3
  1354. 3
  1355. 3
  1356. 3
  1357. 3
  1358. 3
  1359. 3
  1360. 3
  1361. 3
  1362. 3
  1363. 3
  1364. 3
  1365. 3
  1366. 3
  1367. 3
  1368. 3
  1369. 3
  1370. 3
  1371. 3
  1372. 3
  1373. 3
  1374. 3
  1375. 3
  1376. 3
  1377. 3
  1378. 3
  1379. 3
  1380. 3
  1381. 3
  1382. 3
  1383. 3
  1384. 3
  1385. 3
  1386. 3
  1387. 3
  1388. 3
  1389. 3
  1390. 3
  1391. 3
  1392. 3
  1393. 3
  1394. 3
  1395. 3
  1396. 3
  1397. 3
  1398. 3
  1399. 3
  1400. 3
  1401. 3
  1402. 3
  1403. 3
  1404. 3
  1405. 3
  1406. 3
  1407. 3
  1408. 3
  1409. 3
  1410. 3
  1411. 3
  1412. 3
  1413. 3
  1414. 3
  1415. 3
  1416. 3
  1417. 3
  1418. 3
  1419. 3
  1420. 3
  1421. 3
  1422. 3
  1423. 3
  1424. 3
  1425. 3
  1426. 3
  1427. 3
  1428. 3
  1429. 3
  1430. 3
  1431. 3
  1432. 3
  1433. 3
  1434. 3
  1435. 3
  1436. 3
  1437. 3
  1438. 3
  1439. 3
  1440. 3
  1441. 3
  1442. 3
  1443. 3
  1444. 3
  1445. 3
  1446. 3
  1447. 3
  1448. 3
  1449. 3
  1450. 3
  1451. 3
  1452. 3
  1453. 3
  1454. 3
  1455. 3
  1456. 3
  1457. 3
  1458. 3
  1459. 3
  1460. 3
  1461. 3
  1462. 3
  1463. 3
  1464. 3
  1465. 3
  1466. 3
  1467. 3
  1468. 3
  1469. 3
  1470. 3
  1471. 3
  1472. 3
  1473. 3
  1474. 3
  1475. 3
  1476. 3
  1477. 3
  1478. 3
  1479. 3
  1480. 3
  1481. 3
  1482. 3
  1483. 3
  1484. 3
  1485. 3
  1486. 3
  1487. 3
  1488. 3
  1489. 3
  1490. 3
  1491. 3
  1492. 3
  1493. 3
  1494. 3
  1495. 3
  1496. 3
  1497. 3
  1498. 3
  1499. 3
  1500. 3
  1501. 3
  1502. 3
  1503. 3
  1504. 3
  1505. 3
  1506. 3
  1507. 3
  1508. 3
  1509. 3
  1510. 3
  1511. 3
  1512. 3
  1513. 3
  1514. 3
  1515. 3
  1516. 3
  1517. 3
  1518. 3
  1519. 3
  1520. 3
  1521. 3
  1522. 3
  1523. 3
  1524. 3
  1525. 3
  1526. 3
  1527. 3
  1528. 3
  1529. 3
  1530. 3
  1531. 3
  1532. 3
  1533. 3
  1534. 3
  1535. 3
  1536. 3
  1537. 3
  1538. 3
  1539. 3
  1540. 3
  1541. 3
  1542. 3
  1543. 3
  1544. 3
  1545. 3
  1546. 3
  1547. 3
  1548. 3
  1549. 3
  1550. 3
  1551. 3
  1552. 3
  1553. 3
  1554. 3
  1555. 3
  1556. 3
  1557. 3
  1558. 3
  1559. 3
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. ануар жанакаев это револьверы эпохи черного пороха, они безгильзовые, то есть заряжаются просто засыпанием пороха в барабан и заталкиванием пули вслед. На задней части барабана капсюли воспламенители, их у этой модели 10, зарядных камор же 5. В каждую камору заряжалось два выстрела(порох, пуля, порох, пуля), поэтому барабан такой длинный. Первый капсюль шел напрямую к задней части барабана, воспламеняя заряд второго "заднего" выстрела; второй же капсюль шел через специальное скрытое отверстие к передней части барабана и его воспламенение достигало заряда в каморе через маленькое боковое отверстие. Движения барабана рассчитаны по кол-вы камор, значит позиций у него 5, выстрелов же 10. При этом револьвер рассчитан на правую руку, т.к. курки у него разные для того, чтобы даже при нажатии на оба, выстрелы не происходили одновременно(и уж тем более, чтобы "задний" не выстрелил первым). Курок "первого" выстрела - левый, он шире и выдается вперед. При нажатии указательным пальцем правой руки, нажать правый курок "второго" выстрела до "первого" просто не получилось бы. Оружие получилось маломощным, ненадежным и дорогим, популярности не сыскало. Поэтому в голову при слове револьвер и приходит Кольт, а не Волш или еще кто-то:) Канал отличный, но язык вам подтянуть стоит.
    2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787.  @abandonedchannel281  BT-2/5/7 were outdated in concept tanks. They were de facto cavalry tanks. In soviet doctrine that had no place for cavalry tanks. For a light tank they were massive, too expensive and not armed good enough to justify the previous points. They did great against Japan, but that was mostly up to the doctrine used and the training of the crews. Needed stepping stone for T-34, but not much more. KV-2 was a mess. Completly unusable. But a needed stepping stone for soviet heavy tank and assault gun developement. T-34 and KV-1 are a complicated topic, so I'll talk about only a few points about original early production that was mostly fixed by 1942. Early T-34 was a mess. It retained a turret that was designed back on A-20, inherited later by A-32 with some modifications and ended up on T-34. The problem? It was a 2 man turret for 45mm gun. They installed 76mm cannon into it. Not a howitzer with short barrel, but a full blown cannon. For medium tanks of the time it was an equivalent of jumping the shark. Massive rise in firepower, but comparable drop in usability of the turret. It was too cramped, gases were collecting too fast and visibility was abyssmal. And that not the end. Grabin was being late with his F-34 and ZiS-5 cannons for T-34 and KV-1 respectively. So instead they installed L-11. It was a really shitty gun to say the least. Next trouble was the armor thickness and it's quality. Soviet industry had experience with producing plates thicker then 60mm for navy and thinner then 30 for most purposes. 45mm of T-34 was right in between. That meant that rolling process wasn't finalised. And in early stages of the war, armor of those was prone to cracking just as much as german one. In fact most photos of T-34 with extra plates welded on the front have those added to prevent cracking upon impact. The thickness was still holding up at that moment. There are also two secondary points about Christie suspension being obsolete by that point and turret ring being too small. All of the above were pointed out during military trials and T-34M project was prepared. However it was planned for autumn of 1941... most of T-34M fixes were applied to 1942 production model though. Step by step. Except suspension. That was the bane that limited the modification potential of many tanks, T-34 included. It meant that T-34-85 couldn't get extra armor due to weight issues even if it got bigger turret ring and new turret with new gun. SU-100 comes into here too. It had revised hull compared to SU-85 which was somewhat based on problems experienced in previous model, but also had a few compromises to fit bigger gun. It also suffered from weak lack of suspension reserve and especially because they couldn't spare time to readjust production process for them - weight imbalance at vehicle front could have been fixed by adjusting positions of 2 forward wheels however as SU-100 had shared production with T-34 on the same line, it was impossible to do without stopping production of parent vehicle. And so those 2 forward most wheels on both sides were being used at critical conditions and prone to giving up long before others. KV-1. Same problem with weight and L-11 gun. KV-1S lightened version was created solely to fix problems with suspension not being up to vehicles weight. Oh, I also forgot an engine and transmission. Both T-34 and KV-1 had problem with both. They were both supposed to receive new engine and new transmission for it, but due to time constraints they were first being produced with different older engine. Not suitable for new transmission. And thus prone to breaking(you're seeing parallels with Panther now? Yeah, that what happens when you don't have an ocean between you and enemy and you have to produce new tanks without the luxury of time and safety to test them). And new engines were also not completly finished so new examples had very short lifespan of just a few hundred hours before the little "bugs and glitches" were fixed. What that meant? That crews were NOT ALLOWED to train with new vehicles just so that they won't wore them down. Both great tanks those T-34 and KV-1... in late 1942 or 1943. Back when germans also bounced back with F2 and Tiger.
    2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 2
  1873. 2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. ​ @vic5015  the problem is that when people joke that Russia doesn't care about losses is that... Russia doesn't care about losses. It's like they're not realising what they're saying themselves is true even if they fully believe it is and it in fact is. Ukraine can HOLD only with constant support, but instead we see Ukraine try to reclaim the lost territories without any resources to do so while isolationist-populists all over the world use situation and try to get to power by false claims, going as far as suggesting to abolish NATO, IMF, UN and any other organisation and throw the world into Great Depression 2.0 or outright WW3 as global trade will cease and all treaties and guarantees would become void, including nuclear ones. In such background Russia can lose half a million, a million or even 5 millions. They don't care that they're losing resources and men, that they will gain nothing. The only thing they always cared for is to prevent existence of Ukraine. Because Russia survives solely on claimed monopoly on russian language, culture, religion and so on. Primarily russian speaking Ukraine was a grave danger to that by giving an example of russian people(and I don't talk about people, who view themselves as ukranians or are ukranians, I talk about people, who view themselves as russians, but still supported Ukraine over Russia, no matter where they lived) surviving and even thriving WITHOUT Putin, Kremlin, Russia, authoritarian rule and all that crap. Kremlin needs a myth that "authoritarian rule is natural for russian people" to continue existing. So they will not accept any evidence to the contrary. Resources, territories, population, buffer zones, missile flight times, NATO bases and so on, NONE of it mattered. The only thing they wanted is to prevent formation of proof of different path. And sadly they achieved that... And yes, they don't care about losses.
    2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911. 2
  1912. 2
  1913. 2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. 2
  1917. 2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945.  @ivanmonahhov2314  1)для поражения огневой точки хватает и 30мм гранаты из АГЛ. 76мм справляется со всем, что крупнее за глаза. Единственное где нужен более крупный калибр это фугасный рубеж 150+мм - он позволяет полностью снести кирпичное здание в 3-5 этажей(привет всем городам, которые встретили ИСУ-152). За это платят габаритами орудия и унизительно маленьким боезапасом. Настолько маленьким, что даже не смешно. 76мм был старый калибр и его использовали "по привычке" ввиду наличия запаса боеприпасов. А отказ от него еще более банален - разрывы 76мм не видны уже на 4км, то есть корректировка была не возможна. Это еще при Тухаче поняли и поэтому разработали 85мм и 95мм дивизионки, настоящие. Но т.к. Тухача и Ко надо было обвинить во всем и вся, а запасы 76мм куда-то девать, то нате вам ЗиС-3. Первая настоящая дивизионка кстати была создана французами по заказу российской императорской армии, эта та самая 105-107мм пушка Шнайдера. Двадцать лет вперед, два шага назад. 2)не была. Бронебойный для 100мм разрабатывали очень долго, она банально не была готова на момент создания ИС-2. А по пробития догнала лишь на послевоенных бронебойных. У нее кстати заряжание цельное, ее труднее уместить в погон башни, чем А-19 с раздельным заряжанием. Но за это у А-19 скорострельность гораздо ниже. 3)угу, при этом ИС-3 не получил ни дальномера(разработали два, ни один не дали), ни дульного эвакуатора, ни избавился от дульного тормоза(привет демаскирующее облако пыли и проблемы с "раскрытием" ранних ломов), ни более современные боеприпасы в боекомплект(СУ-122-54 и Т-10Б использовали ту же А-19 в виде Д-49 и Д-25ТС/ТУ, у них были ломы и современные кумулятивы. А из-за раздельного заряжания можно и невращающийся кумыс с Т-10М зарядить). Но ничего из этого не сделали. Израильтяне захваченные ИС-3 посчитали хламом, поставили на надолбы и отстреляли боекомплект(а вот Т-55 использовали долго), а сами советы одновременно с "устранением дефектов"(надо было сразу на переплавку отправить) ИС-3, возродили и даже форсировали программу ИС-5(будущего Т-10 после кучи переименований), чтобы поскорее заменить убожество коим был ИС-3. Итог: фалометрия 120мм и выше ничего за собой не имеет. Пробитие зависит от материала, структуры и ДЛИНЫ лома и его кинетической энергии, то есть в основном скорости т.к. лом ты толще делать не будешь из-за повышенного сопротивления и воздуха, и среды брони. Фугасов и так за глаза хватает, а ПТУРы из ствола можно пускать и на меньшем калибре, да только ирл их никто особо и не стал по итогу использовать. А за все это платишь насилованием габаритов танка и малюсеньким боезапасом. Все эти разговоры про 130, 140, 152 мм дилдари не более, чем глупости и распил. Калибр останется 120-122мм, будет расти скорость. В идеале будет возвращение к 100-105мм орудиям после перехода к электротермохимическим зарядам и телескопическому размещению дротиков, ради повышения возимого боекомплекта.
    2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948. 2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. Great, it took just 40 years to match the trick demostrated by Leopard 2(actually not, Leo2 wasn't the first either). Still waiting to see that laser return mirror on the end of the barrel on the same spot as that plate for beer that is needed to calculate barrel bend because modern fire control systems are precised enough to take it into account. Something that NATO had in widespread use... and Russia has on like 30 T-90M's made since 2016. Meanwhile NATO tanks sent to Ukraine are all going to have that one and that's not considered something special. Ukraine has an excuse of being invaded and in a state of war to much bigger country for the last 8 years. What's your excuse, tankies? Chinese fixed transmissions, chinese fixed fire control systems, chinese produced their own thermals and GPS(well, not GPS per say, but local pseudoequivalent to what GPS was a decade or so ago). What's your excuse if in your bravado you place yourself about US, PRC and EU? The truth is that in the past year Russia had shown itself to be a minor power compared to Brazil, Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Both in independent economic capabilities and self sufficiency of your technological sector. I for one welcome our egyptian overlords. You're ridiculed by merit of your own claimed merits and promises. So far your perfomance doesn't match your resume. And it's not just Ukraine, Belarus, russian population and NATO, who noticed that. But that's the thought you're not yet ready for. Ever heard about what China calls a "Century of Humiliation"?💀
    2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. 2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151. 2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. 2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. 2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189. 2
  2190. 2
  2191. 2
  2192. 2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. 2
  2203. 2
  2204. 2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. 2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. Remember F.A.A.N.G. bs? Uncontested, ground breaking, too big to fail tech giants that changed the world blablabla? Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google. Later on people wanted to add Tesla to abbreviation, but it didn't fit the cool naming doctrine 😂 So, remember how it turned out that Netflix is just another name for cable channel and is an evolutionary product instead of revolutionary? Well, the fall of Netflix and rise of other streaming services, including Disney plus has two conclusions made by their owners, boards, shareholders and their investors - 1)streaming services aren't as big as they pose themselves to be as they rely too much on licensed content available by other means; 2)they want to see their name in the abbreviations instead of Netflix. Or in case of Netflix, keep it there. So, what had it lead to? Mad rush in Netflix, Disney and several other streaming companies to greenlit almost anything just to produce the most "original" content by quantity, not quality. And the ideas that are pitched the fastest is the ideas usually mentioned in the same room as they stroke their own egos. This is why there's too much scripts written after the decision to make something marketable instead of scripts that were written and refined over a decade and pitched to the companies. This is why Eternals exists and wastes so much potential and such a massive event for a fart nobody even recalls in-universe, this is why She-Hulk was such a rush hack job that didn't knew which audience it was for despite everyone knowing that even CGI wasn't on the required level yet. Netflix had a head start as a service, Disney has a head start as production and effects leader in the industry, Amazon has money. And everyone and their grandma want to be THE streaming service to "X and chill". This is the "why?".
    2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293. 2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. ​ @shawnfromstatefarm8822  or they simply don't know about the dirty colonial history of Russia and all the genocides(cultural and literal) commited. Ironic that they know about US and UK crimes mostly from US and UK documentaries that criticize their own countries because it's bloody allowed! Not so much in countries that "oppose the West™". Interestingly enough said "the West™" composes from a lot of countries from the east and south, while european colonial powers like Russia are ignored. "Oh, Russia isn't a western country!" It bloody calls itself The Third Rome! Culturally Russia prides itself on viking and byzantium influence on it's history(the tatar and mongol influence isn't mentioned and natives are purged). It's mostly atheist(not ideological atheism, but simply lack of care) country with main religion being orthodox christianity. Or at least a parody of it. How much more stereotypically "western" can this opposition to "the West™" get?:D People should learn what Russian Empire did to natives on all conquered territories(there's 5000+ native languages on territory that composed Russian Empire. Or rather were. What happened to their cultures?). For example how Russia for centuries treated Caucasus. Mass graves for local civilians in any century Russia was there, including both Chechen Wars. But since the only time it was legal to self reflect, doubt, question and criticize in Russia was a short period in late 1980's and 1990's, there's not much of that coming out. The myth of "bad 90's" propagated by Putin when there was a start to at least some political, informational and economical freedom, but nobody is allowed to talk about those and must instead talk how bad they were on criminal and the economical crisis that happened... economical crisis that was caused and exploited by same oligarchs in government of current Russia and criminal climate that was composed of bandits, who also became part of political sphere of modern Russia. Both reasons that the 90's were "bad" were literary pardoned and legalized by Putin and are pillar of his power over Russia, lol:D
    2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374.  @ramjb  good of you to talk about apples and oranges as it'll make things easier for me now. Walking fire as well as constant advance of the gunner behind the advancing troops and hipfire on the stops using the slings was integral part of german infantry offensive tactics through the whole WWII. Which haven't ended in 1914. And this still holds true for modern LMGs and SAWs which are supposed to be able to be fired from the shoulder. Because this REQUIREMENT for the support role haven't vanished, it is still needed to be filled on the battlefield even in an era of avtomats and assault rifles. If your gun is incapable of filling this niche, maybe it's your problem, huh? And why had that paratrooper fiasco happened, dear? In your opinion MG42 is an LMG so that means that it is fully operated by single person and all the ammo(and spare barrel) is also carried by the same person. Landing with it and not breaking your knees and spine is once again just a question of you viewing it as LMG and thus all german troopers as 196cm, 120kg muscle bound monsters, who can take it. Reality proved different, but ok, keep going. Apples to oranges indeed. What was the role of AR in german tactics of 1944-45? What is the role of AR nowadays? And since you've been kind enough to make a huge mistake and mentioned SAWs and modern classification, lift that MG42 to your shoulder and operate it on the move, please? Nice of you to mention that it german doctrine needed LMG and substituted by using MG42 as one and there were never enough MG42 and MG34 to walk around in two close to each other paragraphs. That once again makes it easier for me. Just a little question - have it ever occured to you that the role was filled by MG42 because it was what they had at the moment and even then in not high enough numbers and not because it was actual LMG or being capable of filling LMG role and niche fully? All in all, thanks for making it easier;) I can even direct you to you own quote about gnashing teeth now. GG WP.
    2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. 2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. Remember F.A.A.N.G. bs? Uncontested, ground breaking, too big to fail tech giants that changed the world blablabla? Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google. Later on people wanted to add Tesla to abbreviation, but it didn't fit the cool naming doctrine 😂 So, remember how it turned out that Netflix is just another name for cable channel and is an evolutionary product instead of revolutionary? Well, the fall of Netflix and rise of other streaming services, including Disney plus has two conclusions made by their owners, boards, shareholders and their investors - 1)streaming services aren't as big as they pose themselves to be as they rely too much on licensed content available by other means; 2)they want to see their name in the abbreviations instead of Netflix. Or in case of Netflix, keep it there. So, what had it lead to? Mad rush in Netflix, Disney and several other streaming companies to greenlit almost anything just to produce the most "original" content by quantity, not quality. And the ideas that are pitched the fastest is the ideas usually mentioned in the same room as they stroke their own egos. This is why there's too much scripts written after the decision to make something marketable instead of scripts that were written and refined over a decade and pitched to the companies. This is why Eternals exists and wastes so much potential and such a massive event for a fart nobody even recalls in-universe, this is why She-Hulk was such a rush hack job that didn't knew which audience it was for despite everyone knowing that even CGI wasn't on the required level yet. Netflix had a head start as a service, Disney has a head start as production and effects leader in the industry, Amazon has money. And everyone and their grandma want to be THE streaming service to "X and chill". This is the "why?".
    1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812.  @PeterMuskrat6968  You know why ISU-152 was the longest serving armored vehicle in soviet arsenal and why it's tracks were modernized to be compatible with T-10M ones? Because 152mm HE round had an interesting capability to drop brick 5 storey tall building in single shell. The other story from the same time, do you know what was the shell that was used 80% of the time by US tank destroyers in Italy in WWII? It was HE shell. Meanwhile AP and APCR shells were just sitting there, making up the majority of ammo load and never being used. This one has a bit of connection to aforementioned by another commenter fact that NATO views the prime task of MBTs to hunt other MBTs, however they didn't mention that every other NATO vehicle is also tasked with carrying ATGM and hunting MBTs. And it was these ATGMs that wrecked havoc upon T-72's on multiple occasions, not APFSDS rounds that were riding in ammo storage for 40 years without use. It's also funny how for the last 20 years US was stuck in conflicts with barely any AFVs on opposing side and yet it was once again driving around APFSDS in ammo storages. The situation was comical enough that US army had ordered development and fielded a shrapnel round BEFORE it had "stooped down" to file an order for delivery of already existing HE ammo. Though you can argue that inability to get ammo matching the challenges of new urban combat environment indirectly led to lower civilian casualties. So there's at least some good in it. HE round can also be equipped with programmable fuze to work in different modes, including HESH. Which one is more effective against concrete? I'm not going to make a conclusion to these random data points I've mentioned, just let you dwell on if there is anything they have in common with the topic. P.S.: unlike APFSDS, HE ammo doesn't lose effectiveness with range. On modern battlefield with proliferation of FPV drones, tank commander can observe and lead his shot over distances far beyond normal combat ranges for tungsten and DU rods.
    1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898.  @igorivanov3362  спасибо, капитан очевидность. Главным продвиженцем "коммунизма" в СССР внезапно был усатый поп, которому нужна была новая монополизированная трактовка сказки про "новую землю и 72 девственницы для послушных холопов". Что же до смены власти, которой не будет, и забастовок, которых не будет... Фраза заезженная, но "бардак в головах". Коммунизм по определению общество БЕЗ государства и идут к нему через сотни лет социализма, чтобы достичь который надо сначала добраться до ступени "постдефицитного/постпотребленческого общества" до которого нам еще сотни лет, причем как в плане технологий, так и в плане общественного развития(если не тысячи, "благодаря" постоянным диктаторам тут и там). А что бессмертие, сотни лет жизни в таком обществе и обыденная генная инженерия сделают с "людьми" в таком обществе, вообще представить трудно. У нас с ними ничего общего уже не будет. Мы их даже не поймем, а они на нас разве что с жалостью смотреть будут. Так, стоп, куда меня понесло...
    1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. Вместо мифологии возможно стоило бы нажать на рост уровня слежки и милитаризацию полиции и показать, что произошла слишком сильная эскалация конфликта между легальным и преступным миром. И что вместо открытой войны аля Дредд, произошло создание сего договора. А вследствие чего повышение качества услуг. В нашей реальности был период когда патрульные в США за свои деньги покупали штурмовые винтовки и бронежилеты более высокого класса, просто для того, чтобы не отстать в гонке вооружений с наркоторговцами, а рейды ничем не уступали перестрелкам где-нибудь в Сирии. Если полиция в мире Джона уже ничем не отличается от морпехов, то и спрос на местных балбесов, которые не умеют стрелять не повернув пистолет на 90 градусов, но могут легко впутать полицию уже гораздо меньше. А если гражданские не страдают о сравнению с открытой войной прошлого десятилетия и не требуют срочно вмешаться, то пусть киллеры мочат друг друга и своих клиентов да заказчиков. Ну, а повышение доли рынка и спроса на профессионализм привело к формированию Континенталя... но увы, бэк писать им было некогда:D
    1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990.  @johnd.1618  it would. Because somalian pirates had already proven that small boat with less then a dozen barely armed people and a bit of rope is enough to capture one. Now increase number of boarders to 50 people. You're one of 12 crewmen, would you oppose 50 buff guys with knives? You yourself highlight obvious parts of its civilian construction like lack of armor. I didn't see guns on the ship either, I've seen explosive charge projectors with very small range and nonexistant accuracy which clearly wouldn't work as weapons in space. Support? You mean drilling drones that have no ranged weapons of their own? Shield that works only for area denial to keep natives away from prospector's camp like an electric fence would with humans from 10000BC? I also haven't seen personal weapons, only exosuits for handling heavy cargo and protecting from enviroment. Or how they constantly leave humans to regroup or run away once they were "scared off". Face it, even if by accident on screenwriters and directors parts, aliens in the movie are civvies that came for geological studies. They've lost their communications vessel in collision with local sattelite and they had no idea if it was an accident or if it was shot down. What would you do in their place? Try to restore communication and call for help, while doing your best to protect yourself from natives. Even if that means weaponizing dynamite sticks and nailguns you had. Because the only thing that separates majority of tools from being (mostly bladed and blunt) weapons is ONLY the intent of the user. Pliers might not work, but screwdriver was born for good shanking;)
    1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1)WWII started in 1937 with Sino-Japanese War and americans were supplying chinese with weapons, other equipment and provisions, putting embargo on Japan and having reporters cover the events in the news. What was Poland doing in 1937-1938? Demonstrating the most incompetent foreign policies imaginable by helping Germany put a squeeze on czechs. 2)Finland realised the importance of military readiness, while Poland in 1939 had a parade military. When UK advisors told polish high command to retreat and entrench behind rivers, poles said that they know better. Finns meanwhile accepted all the advice they could get and already incorporated most of it beforehand because they were competent. 3)in 1991 Poland, Ukraine, Georgia, Romania and many other finally independent Warsaw Pact and USSR states had a chance to create a joint military commission to modernize their militaries and provide a competition to russian arms industry on global market. You preferred your petty squabbles instead. Instead all we hear about are fake projects like PL-01 that are aimed to steal budget funds. 4)Russia already attacked 2 GUAM members and haven't attacked Moldova only because Ukraine held. For now. If it keeps holding, they'll attack it again in 4 years. After that their sights would be on Baltics. Will Poland help defend Baltics, all of which ARE NATO members? Idk. But what I do know is that when russian cruise missile hit polish farmers, you've lied about it being ukranian SAM, which can't even glide and is optimized for fragmentation ie there would be no tractor left. You lied because you didn't want conflict with Russia. So where does that leave us, eh? After decades polish government decided to finally have military budget, but it remains to be seen if all those weapons bought from US and South Korea would help you get an actual military or if it'll be a parade one like in 1939. And if your foreign policy attitude has changed or if you'll help Russia put a squeeze on Baltics when it'll attack. You scream on top of your lungs about remembering lessons of history instead of getting up and DOING something. I'll believe it when I see it.
    1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. Except that their design philosophy is outdated in the world where thermals, drones and modern fire control exists. Completely outdated. Even China realized that that can't be allowed to continue like that and fixed many issues in their ZTZ99A like transmission having no real rear gears. And with T-14 Russia tried to jump over the wall of the maze and once again fell down. They can't design a working engine-transmission group, they can't get a reliable camera view and worst of all, their unmanned turret and crew capsule are completely pointless since they still use old autoloader and NO blow out panels ie they made a giant pressure cooker. Capsule can't protect the crew if pressure has no easier way to escape. That's basics! You can't have blow out panels on the bottom as it'll make the tank very weak to mines, can't do them in the sides as it'll make sides weaker, capsule is up front, engine in the back and on top of that giant bomb called ammo is an unmanned turret without panels either. They took budget and time and made situation worse! Tbh T-14 was an improvement in one direction - it no longer tries to pointlessly minimize target profile at expense of crew comfort and overall design as if it's still 50's. It isn't, your tank would be seen and it can be hit. I'd say take T-14's hull, suspension(surprisingly no trouble there so at least something works as intended), beg chinese for help with getting a working engine/transmission unit and then go back to designing conventional turret with blow out panels for ammo and some breathing room for crew. Oh, wait, we've just reinvented Leopard II...
    1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506.  @teemuvesala9575  охуенные история, паря, а теперь все же вернёмся к реальности. A-10 never was spherical example of CAS in vacuum. The role of CAS in US military and navy structure in era of A-10 was filled by 3 dedicated CAS planes each having their own niche: A-10, Harrier and Corsair II. A-10 was never independent or best in this trio. In USSR we have abolished the role of pure attack aircraft after IL-40, basically IL-10 with jet engines. After that the multirole attack aircraft filled the role. Su-7/17/22. But then we decided that, hey, we can make precision weapons too, so why not make an attack plane DESIGNED for them? For that role MIG-27 was designed. Yes, it used MiG-23 as basis. Same as Corsair II was also based on fighter craft. Of course you didn't know that either. MiG-27 was designed to work in duo with heavier bomber/striker plane Su-25 with which it shared the engine and several types of avionics. While MiG-23 covered them. All was well. Except our economy. So first they started to simplify MiG-27. And that's when the technical requirements for Su-25 appeared. Remember what they stated? Simple, cheap, easy to maintain armoured aircraft that can be used by low skilled(referred to as medium skilled in document, lol) pilots from dirt airstrips near the frontline. Woopsie, we're back to IL-2 with jets category:D So of course first submitted design was IL-102, refined project of one of IL-40 variants. It didn't sit well, so they chose single pilot Su-25 instead. What the problem? It's piece of manure. MiG-27 was capable of supersonic flight, it was all weather capable, it was designed for precision weapons, it had GREATER operational range then his "bigger brother" Su-24. USSR fell over and yet it was MiG-27 that was butchered. Sukhou design bureau belched out an abomination called Su-39 and promised that they'd make all Su-25 like it, all weather and ideal for precision armaments. It'll be just as good as MiG-27(ignoring everything that made MiG-27 good). Guess how many Su-39 was ever made? 4. Guess how many NEW MiG-27 were scrapped? Hundreds. And in the end we're left with cheap and expendable piece of crap because it was DESIGNED to be cheap and expendable piece of crap, that stopped being cheap and easy to maintain due to corruption and internal lobbies and never had gotten anywhere near promised capabilities. But at least it's advertised in internet as cool, right? That makes up for what it is, right? I'm fully aware what a PoS Su-25 is so by extrapolating its situation and history to A-10 and F-35 I have to tell you to go screw yourself and learn what close air support even means. Spoiler alert: it's NOT about plane getting close to attack enemy combatants with autocannons and unguided munitions, it's called this way because attack happens CLOSE to your own troops. Precision weapons remove the need for aircraft to get close itself while filling the CAS role. That's the lowest of the basics and you don't know even that. Congrats, you've played yourself. Прежде, чем называть кого-то дурачком, прочитай хоть одну(1!) книгу по теме. А потом пались своим незнанием:))
    1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. Lol. Being muslim =/= liking and helping other muslims. Heck, saudis hate Iran more then Israel does. Why? Because they're competing! Same goes for the defense pacts. Pakistan is a chinese ally(to backstab India in case of Indian-Chinese war), Iran is indian and russian ally(to counter Pakistan), Saudi Arabia is american ally(and ironically so also an ally of Israel. Yes, they're on the brink of war, they hate each other, but technically they're allies through USA. Not to mention that they make billions through trade with each other while publicly calling each other abominations to be eradicated). And the prize in that competition? Being de facto leader of all muslims in the world. That title is kind of a big deal. Imagine US losing the image of the main "western country"? Yes, trillions of dollars are gained and depend on upholding such an image alone. And here's the thing. While all compete for muslim primacy, they also uphold nationalistic views of population to keep themselves independent from others. Saudi speak about arab brotherhood, Iran calls back to persian roots, Pakistan views itself as the only true descendant of all things that ever was great in India and Turkey is going for osmanic legacy claim. Not arabic, mind you! And they all view themselves as ONLY rightfull rulers of unified Middle East. A culturaly and historically impossible, but so lucrative new superpower that could easily overshadow Russia and be actually recognised as serious competitor by US and China(the fact that it won't just be a summ of all statistics and parameters of all ME states, but be a much weaker state doesn't come to minds of most people).
    1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. @jimmcneal5292  this IS modest remilitarization. This is what Israel, Taiwan and South Korea do to survive. Every european state from Bulgaria to Portugal has to be preparing like Poland, Finland, Turkey and Switzerland. The latter aren't even in EU and NATO. "Holding off" is not enough. The alliance needs to be capable of retaking occupied territories of its members and inflicting lasting strategical impact on opposing force. If US were to remove divisions from the Baltics and Russia were to occupy those countries, Russia would gain several million people and some territory once again, negating their manpower losses. Yeah, EU won't fall. But it won't be able to push Russia out, the front will become static, time will run, NATO will get bored, there will be peace talks and Russia would get Baltics in return for fake peace for a few years while it prepares to take the next bite out of EU. NATO won't be serious about nukes until Russia is done with Balkans and is halway through Germany either. Ao why should Russia ever stop? It is facing demographic and economical catastrophe even without sanctions due to corruption and ineffective rule, but this way they're gaining population capable of working and paying taxes in exchange to losing impoverished, criminals and drunks desperate and delusional enough to go to front. And they're gaining developed territories with better climate. So even if they'll demolish 90% of buldings, they'll still be able to resettle russians from Siberia in new land to gain more support and better control over it. And a person getting to live in better conditions would rarely be bold enough to protest how they got there. Which would free Putin's hand to give out more and more of Siberia back to chinese companies, who would develop it and fuel his economy, while also ensuring that China is not an enemy. And if EU and NATO are facing Russia at their throat, would they really try something to stop Russia and China carving up Central Asia? Russia had learned that it can get away with biting and that math of such conflicts would always be positive for it since it doesn't see value in russian lives to begin with. NATO has no leverage to stop or even slightly oppose it as of right now. I gave a list how that leverage can be gained.
    1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669.  @fokka6010  thanks for trying to lecture me on history of my own country. And have it also ever occured to you that a people with certain type of interest and at least nomnal knowledge are subscribed to this channel? 1)quote me on saying "ditch the ammo", please. I might not like rimmed cartridges, but I'd leave that topic to people screaming on MG-81 vs ShKAS forums and their RoF's. My goal is better bolt action by the time of WWII. Leaving the same ammo as is in reserves is an obvious(to sane people at least) requirement; 2)it's 1930's and the decision to scrap Mosin was already taken. Army wants nothing to do with it again and hopes to hop over any replacement straight to semiautos and SMGs. Only in 1938 when the upcoming war became obvious for USSR was it put into large scale production again. I'm only merely proposing to include reservist/back up rifle into this plan. The same way as SKS was put into production to back up revolutionary for soviet army AK which had left too many people sceptical at first. It'd be different to sell as an idea back in 1934-36, but for completly different or even opposite set of reasons. It was a time of infectuos futurism in soviet military circles; 3)it requires the same production lines. Majority of equipement depends on the cartridge and caliber, not on the rifle itself. Nagant revolver is in 7.62mm to utilize the same tooling that for making barrels as Mosin-Nagant rifle. Sorry, but adopting simply different bolt action for same cartridge won't suddenly require exotic martian wood or hexagonal vibranium screws. Or whatever you have just imagined to yourself; 4)it means that production will spike in 1934-38, not in 1942. Soviet army will have overall better service rifle in plenty when it'll need it. And it'll be still reliable and cheap. We can modernize Brown Bess too, it still won't mean that it's better then gun specifically designed for requirements of current moment; 5)as mentioned in point №2, it wasn't decent in any way, shape or form. By the 20's Mosin is an ugly moronic duckling. It doesn't run smoothly, it's large, it's slow, it has small magazine. And worst of all, it doesn't deserve any of it's good reputation compared to it's immediate competition. And that costed us.
    1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831.  @AbdulAziz-nd3pu  1)Bucky also uses "normal" firearms. As does Warmachine. Problem is that you can't tell what ammo is anybody using. Maybe they're using gyrojet rounds with antimatter warheads and ECM initiator propellant to give it more velocity before rocket properly accelerates it?(yes, I HAVE just described ammo of Space Marine bolter. Yes, it's 20mm, not 9mm. Doesn't matter with Iron Man's fantasy tech and antimatter being equally powerfull either way since you're using only a few "atoms" of it and the rest is containment chamber the size of which is based on your tech level). Oh, wait, it's 6+ movies, you can't have handguns scaring children in the theatres with loud banging noizes and tearing enemies into a gory mess before their eyes!:)) 2)do Asgardians, other "human looking aliens" and even Thanos minions count as having human anatomy? What happens if you cut off half of asgardian ballsack and only THEN start asking questions while mentioning the rest of his anatomy? Though I admit, in myth Loki is quite used to being a woman... and not even a human one;) 3)Stark had made optical camo for helicarrier even BEFORE first Avengers movie. Then we see him, Parker(instead of Miles for some reason) and even his transport planes using it. Giving it to Black Widow was that hard? Or authors being dumbasses forgetting about two characters is characters fault? 4)Black Widow was augmented with superserum just like Captain America and Bucky(and Red Skull. And Hydra agents. And Black Cat, who also gets her serum "forgotten" nowadays. Time to joke about sexism... or not joke?). Once again, she can do ANYTHING those two(16?) can in physical terms and have better CQC skills. Nolan was able to make Batman cool in grounded tech level and without any serum and in animated movies people like him when he interrogates metahumans with words alone or stares down literal gods. Care to repeat all your BS about metahuman enemies, pointless interrofation and infiltration and lack of superhuman abilities? Just copy Batman if you fail to be creative and original yourself!:D
    1
  3832.  @yeepeekaye1  "Tony Stark too. I mean, he has the suit, but anyone can wear it". Not "can", but SHOULD! Earth is in the middle of interstellar war, not augmenting other Avengers with Stark tech was a mistake. Even Thor and Hulk would greatly benefit from having a HUD and proper intercom. Authors of comics, shows and movies however are afraid that it'll take away from Stark thus ironically proving a point that in their creations, he is nothing without the suit. Rings a bell? Better writers were able to distinguish the whole "Iron Family" by their strong skills - Tony is the hothead creator of the suits so he uses the bleeding tech ie word for untested prototypes and he can repurpose said suit's tools for other tasks on the fly, Pepper as Rescue has her own skills in use like multitasking having her directly control several suits or drones alongside her own and Rhodes was the only one trusted with WMD equipped and other morally questionable creations of Stark as Warmachine. Yes, in comics Warmachine suit is armed with nukes as last resort. Only once on my memory had Tony constructed "augmentor" suit alongside his usual "[Insert]buster" line. Though there was a development in newest comics where Busters are mentioned as being dual purpose ie both to counter said person AND help them if worn in case of "Avengerbuster" suits(which is quite logical since if the suit is build to counter strengths and exploit said persons weaknesses, it would already have tech to do reverse aka counter weaknesses and augment abilities). But I can bet it was dropped right after that mention.
    1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933.  @levilastun829   @levilastun829  I'm not going to open up the whole comment chain to look up what changed in several months, but in case I didn't mention it or you somehow overlooked it: 1)M900 has much longer penetrator. If I was talking on this topic, I likely mentioned that I specifically mean 2A46Msomething on T-72 ie when it was heavily limited to rod length. T-90A has de facto the same gun, but due to reworked autoloader it doesn't have the same problem. Idk why people find it so hard to comprehend something as basic. Okay, I'll give an easy example. Think of it this way, if it'll be easier for you - you can install 100mm D-10 in turret of T-34/76(1942), you will just need massive muzzle break, massive counterweight, you would be limited to using only low pressure ammo, you will need to cut a hole in the back of the turret for recoiling gun breach, you will be able to reload it only from outside because there is no space for human left inside the turret and you will need to pray before each shot. Does it make D-10 a worse gun on T-54 or SU-100? Nope. But we're not talking about T-54 or SU-100. Warning! This is an analogy, an example to explain what I've meant. Please don't derail the conversation into it. 2)MRD stands for muzzle reference device, yes. First ever use by Russia was on T-90M in 2016, almost 3 decades after it became standard for NATO even on old refurbished tanks due to the requirements of increased FCS accuracy. Double posting this wall of text since YT will lilely shadowban any comment about weapons at random. Maybe second one will be visible.
    1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155.  @TheDoomega  за время этой цепочки комментов я упомянул Наполеона, Кутузова, Суворова, Минина, Пожарского, Сталина, Гитлера и ещё несколько человек. Кого "его"? На какой коммент вы отвечали?:)) Да и в любом случае разницы нет, это вам не Great War или Forgotten Weapons, фильмы это развлекательная индустрия. Даже Discovery и National Geographic как оказалось любили оперировать мифами и не утруждались полностью проверить материал(Дискавери например знатный распространитель мифов о том, что Шерман горел чаще немцев и прочих бензиновых танков и о том, что ИС-2 не мог перезаряжать орудие не приведя его в горизонтальное положение). В русскоязычной среде даже на Ютуб достоверных каналов по истории вообще фиг найдешь, англоязычные можно посчитать по пальцам фрезеровщика. Вот и вся история. В остальном в мире все изучение истории сводиться до пропаганды, которая угодна властям страны в которой вы живёте в данный момент и к развлекательному сектору, который строится на мифах и стереотипах, т.к. их проще продать. Все помнят дешёвые исторические книги и их качество? Брали количеством. Документалистика это жанр не имеющий иммунитета к опусканию до туалетного чтива, к сожалению:(
    1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276.  @piotrmalewski8178  pretty much. However when not crancked up by soviet factories without any quality control or skilled workers, it wasn't the worst design ever. I just heavily dislike original turret(designed for 45mm gun back on A-20 and then upgunned to 76mm without increasing its size), Christie suspension(screw maintaining that, be it on T-34/85 or even Comet), angled sides, forward turret position, vulnerable driver hatch and the fact that it uses the same bottleneck components as KV-1 thus defeating the whole purpose and putting the "it was cheap argument" in its grave. Otherwise(is there anything good left) it wasn't that bad;) My favourite soviet medium tank among produced ones was KV-1S, which technically was called heavy, but was closest to being "soviet Sherman". T-43 and KV-13 were also cool, but they remained just prototypes. By same margin US had T20-T23 prototypes with gun stabilisation and autoloading back during the WWII so it's pointless to mention such fantasies as "if they could have been produced en masse". Though yes, if fantasies are allowed, just scrap both T-34 and KV-1 and produce T-34M chassis with straight hull sides buffed to 55mm, perpendicular engine placement and turret of KV-1. Ie T-44 at home model 1940:D However I talked about brits. And they literally produce such tanks, just not with such bad production quality. Put infantry Valentine XI hull onto cruiser Cromwell engine and suspension and you literally get T-34/76 with abysmally cramped turret and that damn suspension. So further studies of another de facto cruiser tank could have influenced the change in british cruiser line.
    1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283.  @evthink  1)if you're so proecology that you are bolting into random rant trying to ignore what I've said and derail conversation, then you would hate Tesla simply for reason of it producing sedans instead of being focused on public transportation. Which you are not, so don't try to pretend and waste our time. 2)have I talked about ICE cars? My father grew up in a countryside village and used horses for transport and work in his teens. Mind you, it was already 70's. And this is where I've also spent most of my summers as a kid. So fuck off with trying to bullshit me with my right "to fresh air", you have never breathed it to begin with and can't imagine your life without said ICE cars and conveniences they provide. How many times have you used two man saw? Slaughtered a pig? Cleared out a barn form all the shit, Mr.Ecology? And yet humans survived and thrived without personal transportation. Tractors, semis(announcement getting further and further away), service vehicles(cybertruck can be usefull at least here) and public transport make the most difference. Personal sedans are a fucking luxury, if you don't get it. Want to save enviroment and right to fresh air? Ok, let's ban personal transport. I'd survive. Will you, pretender? 3)get back on point, Ford cultist 2.0. What's your gripe with right to repair? What makes you think that you can continue taking away people's property they payed for? And this time stop drooling and running away. You asked to be adressed in this tone, you're getting it.
    1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1