Comments by "Sunoo Peek" (@Sunopeek) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

3:23 Israel estimated cost around 1 to 1.3 billion usd to defend that strike
28
@TyCook-s1c Not really. You only won 2 wars against 3 of your poor 3rd world country neighbors (Egypt, Syria, and Jordan). So only 1948 and 1967. And you only won 67 because Egypt was suffering from its own "Vietnam" moment from its involvement in Yemen. You lost 1956 despite the UK and France helping you. You got humbled in 1973 by the vastly inferior Egyptian army. You lost every war since. 2006 Lebanon war comes into mind. Not to mention, the humiliation of October 7th will take two generations to forget. Who the hell allows a bunch of radicals in slippers to go on a rampage for six hours? You guys are supposed to be a regional superpower, lol. All your victories were against 3rd world countries. As soon as they gained a little development they gave you serious trouble like in 1973. You guys are welcome to try and repeat 1967 against your neighbors. Egypt is very powerful now despite being a very poor and underdeveloped nation. Imagine their power in 20 years when they're fully developed? You're allowed to boast when you fight and beat a real army buddy.
17
@maxlumens9085 AIPAC is their best investment and invention.
15
7:21 Hitting an embassy was unprecedented so Iran had to plan a response without starting WW3. They also waited for the UNSC to condemn the strike. Those missiles are their only strategic deterrent at the moment. Rapid deployment should be assumed to be the standard for them.
9
 @pugster73 I think he means China is capable of much more than 1 million annually?
3
Another factor is that Iran likely used its old and close to expired weaponary. Those weapons were going to waste either way so technicality it cost Iran almost nothing.
3
@Bob-l4q6f You failed to achieve any objection in 1956, so you lost. You may have "won" in 1973, but you got humbled by the vastly inferior Egyptian army. Your victories on the battlefield did not translate into political or strategic victories, unlike Egypt. You only gave up the Sinai once you realized you couldn't guarantee a future victory against Egypt. Only after Egypt barely learned how to fight were you interested in a peace treaty with them at any cost. Go figure.
2
5:29 No way that's true. The two are not comparable in the slightest. Israel has the most concentrated and advanced defense network in the world due to its small size. Ukraine is massive and is stretched too wide. Iran predicted a minimum 90-95% interception rate, hence the size of the attack. They were all aimed at military targets not civilian.
2
They learned nothing from Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan? Iran is no pushover and doesn't give up easily. They have the advantage of decades of preparation and full support by Russia and China. This will only set the region on fire and achieve nothing. The US better be ready to handle this mess because it will just be another Vietnam but x10
1
@LucharPS I'm not familiar with that. But if you want to compare atrocities and violations of norms and international law, then Israel is the world champion.
1
@carloshenriquezimmer7543 Take all their atrocities, and they still pale in comparison to atrocities Israel and the West committed in general. Are you really gonna lecture Iran when you guys are responsible for WWI and WWII, the deadliest conflicts in recorded history?
1
@carloshenriquezimmer7543 who did Wwi? Who did ww2? Who did Iraq? Afghanistan? Libya? Who did Vietnam? The list goes on. Compare the terror, suffering, and crimes the West did from those events to Iran's.
1
@grine6966 The people lecturing other nations about war and instability are themselves hypocrites responsible for some of the greatest wars, suffering, and instability in human history. For example, WWI, WW2, Vietnam, Iraq, and so on. Which part of that is wrong?
1
@grine6966 Google search shows that WWI and WWII were started by European. Another Google search shows that the Korean War, Vietnam War, Kosovo War, Afghanistan War, and the Iraq War were started by the USA. Another Google search shows the only war Iran fought was a war of survival against Iraq. Iraq invaded them with full support from the USA. All this suffering and terror was not caused by Iran. All this is thousands of times less severe than anything evil Iran ever did.
1
@grine6966 Google search shows that WWI and WWII were started by Europeans. Another Google search shows that the Korean War, Vietnam War, Kosovo War, Afghanistan War, and the Iraq War were started by the USA. Another Google search shows the only war Iran fought was a war of survival against Iraq. Iraq invaded them with full support from the USA. All this suffering and terror was not caused by Iran. So what's your point?
1
11:40 No one in the world saw October 7 coming. How could they claim anyone helped plan it besides the attackers themselves?
1
@chocolatecosmos1424 It's not. But they have to spin it as a massive failure so Israel isn't humilitated too much internationally. Otherwise, Israel will retaliate more and cause WW3.
1
@Bob-l4q6f "Cease to exist"? Cut the drama. You lost every war since 1973 and nothing happened.
1
@Bob-l4q6f There is no comparison to 9/11. USA shoreline borders are 12,383 miles and are largely unmonitored. The Gaza border is 37 miles and is considered one of the most guarded and monitored fences in the world. That's 0.3% of US borders. It was done by radical foreigners who were pissed at the US support for Israeli atrocities. The extremist radical Humus, on the other hand, are still the indigenous people suffering from decades under your Apartheid rule after you colonized them. You had multiple warnings in advance, but your army leadership ignored them all. Who the hell does that? Oct 7th was preventable. All that could have been prevented if your army listened to the warnings. The September attack was almost instanteous, while Oct 7th was allowed for several hours before any interception was allowed. I've never heard of the army in history that allows a rampage to continue for several hours without a response. We're talking about a highly advanced technological powerhouse against extremist pissed off grieving orphans in flip flops. You have 89,000 airforce personnel and 614 aircraft, and not a single aircraft could be scrambled in time to intercept such a small area?
1
@Bob-l4q6f Oh, well, you certainly sounded like one. Especially with your melodramatic expressions on Israeli survival. Most Israelis equate winning a battlefield with winning a war. You can lose every battle but still win a war. Look at Vietnam and Afghanistan.
1
@Bob-l4q6f You shouldn't call others bots, not with a username like that lol.
1
 @Bob-l4q6f Wait, were you offended when I called an Israeli? I apologize. That was uncalled for. Not everyone is a genocidal maniac like them.
1
 @Bob-l4q6f Wait, were you offended when I called you an Israeli? I apologize. That was uncalled for.
1
@Bob-l4q6f The whole point of a debate is to have a civil conversation. If I made you mad, then I have failed in the civil part. I'll drop this, and we can move on. Since I offended you, we can call this debate your win.
1
@Bob-l4q6f Regardless, that was not my intention. Everyone is exposed to history through different one sided sources ("our" side). They're always presented as fact by the source we learn them from. Debates pit these different "sources of facts" against on another to see which is more legitimate or logical. When you insult someone it becomes a "me vs you" instead of "source 1 vs source 2" and the debate loses its purpose. There's enough anger in the world already. I don't want to add to it lol. Have a nice day.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 If they could have, they would have. Israel stopped for a reason. They couldn't do it out of fear of what would happen next. "Pressure" from the US is the excuse they gave to their domestic audience.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 Israelis who fought in that war openly admit Israel was humbled by the inferior Egyptian army. They only gave the Sinai back out of fear of not winning future conflicts. Why did they give the Sinai back to Egypt but not the Golan heights to Syria? They respected Egypt after the 1973 war.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 This is the problem when you get all your info from Wikipedia. Hasbara (lies) is employed there to flood the site with one-sided Israeli propaganda instead of both sides of the story.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 Egypt had Soviet controlled nukes on its territory. What do you think would have happened if Israel reached Cairo or the third army was gone?
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 This is what happens when you get all your info from Wikipedia. There's a dedicated hasbara (lies) unit that spreads one-sided propaganda there instead of giving both sides of the story.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 But they didn't. If they could have defeated the third army, they would have. If they could have marched into Cairo, they would have. It was empty threats by Israel because they too wanted a ceasefire but wanted an excuse. They didn't want to risk a nuke response by Egypt or cause the war to spread into a bigger regional or world War.
1
@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 Do you get all your info from Wikipedia? That's flooded with hasbara (lies) and not both sides of the story.
1
Only rocket artillery has ranges greater than 50km.
1
@maxlumens9085 Getting billions after spending millions on the politicians (AIPAC) has got to be the best investment in history by Israel
1
In any other country, placing a foreign nation above your own is usually considered treason.
1
So they tried decades of peaceful protest against Israel before becoming militant in 1991? You never hear this level of insight from corporate media. I wonder why.
1
14:02 I thought they only destroyed the radar and not the battery itself?
1
3:30 Their attack cost around 75 million in the high end. They can't afford to drop 200 million for a limited strike. 200 million would include a 900 item strike package, not 300 or so
1
 @cattysplat Russia was cut off from the "world" but still could easily procure all its required resources. Western supply lines are convenient, not a necessity.
1