Comments by "June VanDerMark" (@junevandermark952) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. 722
  2. 26
  3. 18
  4. 11
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. That there is only male and female stems from biblical interpretation, and from my perception that is archaic nonsense. If we are not transgender, we can't possibly know what a person who is transgender feels. To bully others who are not the same as us, is a very nasty habit, often carried out by people in the name of “God.” People have surgery on all parts of their bodies without others bothering them about "morals." Yet, the moment anyone wants to change his or her sexual organs, as in transgender, many people in religion preach that a god created male and female “only.” If you believe that a god created human bodies as he wanted them to stay, then you better not circumcise the penises of your sons. You better not have breast implants. You better not have growths removed. You better not have any type of cosmetic surgery whatsoever. You better not have treatment for diseases of any sort. After all, "God's" plan should not be messed with, lest he becomes annoyed with the tampering of the perfection he is certain he created. Once a person starts using religion to preach what is moral, and what is immoral, that person can end up in big trouble, not only with others, but also, ultimately ... with one's own conscience. From the book ... The Final Inequality, by L. J. Ludovici. "Morals at any given moment have always been as good, or as bad, as our imaginations credit them, for the morals (from the Latin, mores: customs) means simply customs, and they keep changing all the time in all the corners of the world."
    2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. I'm heterosexual and comfortable in my body. That doesn't mean that others feel the same about their bodies. If as adults they feel that they would be happier to change their sexual organs, that is their right, but from my perspective, they still won't fit anywhere in a society that believes there is only male and female. After all ... who is going to marry them, knowing that they changed their sexual organs? Who is going to be comfortable even having sex with them, knowing they changed their sexual organs from one gender to the opposite gender? In a world where so many people were taught "and believe" that a god created male and female ONLY ... it is almost impossible for those who are different to be accepted as "normal" ... or ... "moral." Following is but one example ... Note the religious input in the following article from Human Life International, about those who say they want to transition back to their original state, before they had their transgender operations … “Regardless of the numbers, regret is real—and the numbers don’t really matter to those affected by a decision that they now regret and who feel misled by either doctors or families. What they know is that they are hurting. And as stewards of our brothers and sisters in Christ, it is our job to treat them with empathy, understanding, and compassion. It is our job to help them see the inherent dignity in themselves. And in both love and charity, it is our job to assist them as they seek help in moving forward.”
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122.  Erik Everhard  When the Catholic physician, John Rock created the birth control pill ... the pope must have thought that John was not only extremely dumb ... but that (to go against 'GOD's will) John was pure evil. From the book … ABORTION IS NOT A SIN ... author ... Kent B. Welton Ironically, it was Dr. John Rock, a Roman Catholic physician, who developed the birth control pill. He was courageous enough to pursue the dictates of his conscience rather than the precepts of his Church - which he came to know to be dangerous and dismal. As a result, he sought to change the world for the better. Rock attributes his independent streak to a buggy ride he took in 1904 as a young lad of fourteen. A Roman Catholic priest of unusual independence took him along on a weekly visit to a poor farm. The clergyman then advised young Rock to "always stick to his conscience... never let anyone else keep it for you... and I mean anyone else." Given such inspiration, his independence never flagged, even after publication his book on contraception, The Time has Come, resulted in editorial denunciations from the Pilot, Boston's Archdiocesan paper, which cautioned him to "watch his step or else." It is a scandal that so many dissidents in the Church have had exactly these, mafia-like, warnings, or worse, after exercising their independence of thought - particularly in a public forum where they might embarrass the Church. These events only illustrate intolerance is a characteristic of true believers, and a sorry characteristic of this Church thru the centuries.
    1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1