Comments by "S Andersson" (@sandersson2813) on "Expedition Bible" channel.

  1.  @noahcole6856  Contemporary evidence is evidence from the time of Jesus life. There is no contemporary evidence of Jesus existing, which if he was so amazing is a bit strange isn't it? Why did no one bother writing about him if he was so amazing? No one wrote about him until he was long dead. There is no evidence whatsoever contemporary or otherwise of resurrection, divinity or miracles.
    1
  2.  @noahcole6856  Isn't what an argument from silence? If Jesus was so bloody amazing, why isn't there any contemporary evidence of him existing? At best all you have is there MIGHT have been an ordinary man to whom this myth is attributed. We have tons of contemporary evidence of most historical figures, but none of Jesus. Why do you think that might be? Perhaps because the story has been embellished and exaggerated?
    1
  3.  @noahcole6856  I said there's no evidence from the time he was alive which corroborates the story, and no evidence ANYWHERE of miracles, divinity or resurrection. There MIGHT have been an ordinary man called jesus, who was like some sort of cult leader, but there's nothing more than that.
    1
  4.  @noahcole6856  It really isn't. The point to believe something is when it is supported by evidence, and there is absolutely no evidence anywhere that Jesus wasn't just an ordinary man. There isn't any evidence in relation to divinity, miracles or resurrection anywhere at all, so at best, all you have is a myth, and an ordinary man called Jesus, by definition you don't have anything more credible than a fairy tale, just like Jews, Muslims, Mormons, scientologists, Catholics, JW's etc don't either. You all believe something for which you have no justification, which means you all believe on gullibility.
    1
  5.  @noahcole6856  Typology isn't evidence
    1
  6.  @noahcole6856  Typology isn't evidence, it's interpretation. Give me the best piece of evidence a god exists.
    1
  7.  @noahcole6856  First of all the bible isn't evidence, it's a claim and is not supported by evidence. It is a story, and a thoroughly debunked one at that. Secondly there is absolutely nothing prophetic in the bible, nothing specific, nothing that isn't vague, nothing that can't be misinterpreted and crucially, nothing that contains a date. What exactly are you claiming is prophetic?
    1
  8.  @noahcole6856  That's just a claim. It isn't a fact. You keep trying to avoid the question. Why can't you give me any evidence which supports your position of a god existing?
    1
  9.  @noahcole6856  Why don't you give me the best piece of evidence for a god existing?
    1
  10.  @souljat1131  Souls don't exist.
    1
  11.  @souljat1131  Stop making claims on things you can't possibly know. Do you believe such threats about other religions you reject? No, so unless you provide EVIDENCE for Christianity being true I can reject it the same way you reject other fairy tales like Santa Claus and fairies You're the one with a burden of proof Jerez and you have FAILED, and you have also failed your bible which DEMANDS you defend your faith, and you haven't.
    1
  12.  @DougFregia  It's an IDIOTIC statement. Reality is determined by evidence, and there is no evidence to support the aims of the video.
    1
  13.  @scsmity  First of all there is no evidence that 12 people died, and secondly don't you think people have died for all sorts of beliefs, especially ones you don't deem to be true. Dying for a belief doesn't make it true.
    1
  14. @tinamurphy3572  What are you claiming happened on the bible? Let's start with Genesis. Adam and Eve didn't happen, nor did the flood. Care to tell me what is actually real in the bible?
    1
  15. @ronallens6204  No bible is supported by evidence. They're all myths.
    1
  16. @michaelshved43  Like what? What wisdom and truth is unique to the Bible and what history does it document? How do you tell what might be true in the bible from what is flagrant lies? I presume you don't believe in nonsense such as Adam and Eve, Flood, Exodus, Talking snakes, burning bushes, non setting suns, miracles etc? So what actually do you believe in this wretched, immoral book?
    1
  17. There's no evidence Jesus even existed. At best all you can say is there MIGHT have been an ordinary man called Jesus. There is zero evidence of any miracles, divinity or resurrection.
    1
  18.  @love8331  You don't have ANY witnesses to the events. Not a single person who wrote about Jesus wrote about him during his life and there is no evidence of any miracles, resurrection or divinity. Even if you did have an eye witness, do you not realise that eye witness testimony is considered one of the WORST categories of evidence?
    1
  19.  @harrisoncrosley2131  They aren't classes, they're lies. He has no evidence.
    1
  20.  @kiwibushblock2564  This is known as confirmation bias. The Bible isn't evidence, it's a claim. I presume you don't accept there was Adam and Eve, Global flood, Exodus, Tower of Babel etc as science has demonstrated that these things didn't happen. This guy has a wall, and he is asserting, without evidence that this wall is one mentioned in the Bible and that it's current state is a result of what the bible said would happen to it. Are you really that gullible?
    1
  21.  @GirolamoZanchi_is_cool  The bible is LAUGHABLE.
    1
  22.  @kevinburke1325  Let's take just one. The Flood as described in the bible is a lie. It didn't happen. Care to disagree?
    1
  23. The Bible isn't remotely accurate.
    1
  24. You'll never prove him true.
    1
  25. It's just a fairy tale. It isn't true.
    1
  26.  @michaeldonnawilliams8613  Wow, what a genius response, and it's "you're", not "your"
    1
  27.  @michaeldonnawilliams8613  I'm not closed minded. Give me EVIDENCE your claims are true and I'll be forced to change my mind.
    1
  28. You realise the majority of the Bible, apart from a few places names and a few people is largely debunked as nonsense?
    1
  29. Grow up. You don't have any DNA to compare it to.
    1
  30.  @justiceneeded01  because its unscientific lies.
    1
  31.  @greggibbs8641  Being born again is just "being gullible".
    1
  32.  @greggibbs8641  What biblical proof? The Bible isn't evidence, it's a claim. What are you saying is true in the Bible, because let's start with genesis, that's a lie
    1
  33.  @greggibbs8641  Ha ha ha ha. The Bible isn't evidence Greg, it's a disgustingly, immoral fairy tale.
    1
  34. What suffering?
    1
  35. Is this the gullibility channel?
    1
  36.  @berenlevia8486  Faith is worthless, it's the excuse people give when they haven't got a good reason to believe in god.
    1
  37. Archaeologist don't research myths, they research EVIDENCE, and there is none of this being true.
    1
  38. The bible is not 100% true. What a laughable claim.
    1
  39.  @berenlevia8486  Yes. It isn't bias that we know we didn't come from Adam and Eve, it isn't bias that there is zero evidence of a flood described in the bible. It isn't bias that the Exodus was impossible to take place as described. It isn't bias to know that languages didn't come from the tower of Babel. It isn't bias that there is zero evidence that Jesus wasn't just an ordinary man. It isn't bias that there is zero evidence of divinity, miracles or resurrection What exactly are you claiming is factual in the bible?
    1
  40.  @craigbhill  bible isn't even 1% true. Only true things are a few place names and possibly a few people.
    1
  41.  @berenlevia8486  The bible does not have a 100% prediction rate at all. NOTHING in the bible fits the criteria of a prophecy anyway, it is vague and not specific. The bible claims that Israel will live in peace with its neighbours, that's a failure as that's never happened. The bible predicts the Nile will dry up, Failure, has never happened. The bible claimed Tyre would be destroyed under the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, and it wasn't, so there's three things which show the bible is not 100% true. In order to give you evidence the Bible is not 100% accurate I only have to give you one thing. I've given you loads. Ps no one who met met this Jesus character ever wrote about him, so how can you trust what was written about him when there is zero contemporary evidence of him even existing?
    1
  42.  @berenlevia8486  You claimed the bible was 100% accurate. I gave you examples where it has FAILED, demonstrating that the bible is absolutely not 100% accurate. What are you claiming the bible has predicted, what verse and where in tje bible is it specific and where does it contain a date when this will happen? There is none. In order to be a prophecy, it has to be SPECIFIC, relate only to a single event, not something that man can make happen ( such as reading a prophecy and fulfil it) and it MUST contain a date and it must not be something which can be retrofitted, such as the Jesus story . Then i gave you examples of other things such as Adam and Eve and The Flood, which demonstrably are not true.
    1
  43.  @berenlevia8486  Yes, I gave you SPECIFIC examples of where the bible has FAILED to be true. Was Tyre destroyed under the reign of Nebuchadnezzar? No it wasn't. The bible claimed it would be so it FAILED in it's "prophecy" clearly demonstrating it is NOT 100% accurate. Has Israel ever lived in peace with its neighbours? No, that's not my opinion. It isn't my opinion it wasn't destroyed, it wasn't destroyed. That's a fact, not my opinion. It is also a fact we didn't come from Adam and Eve. It is a fact the flood didn't happen. Those are not my opinions. Those are DEMONSTRABLE facts.
    1
  44.  @berenlevia8486  Give me your BEST biblical prophecy and the verse from whence it came. I'll show you how it hasn't come true.
    1
  45.  @berenlevia8486  Ha ha ha. HUMANS actively worked to make that happen. Plus EVERY country that is "reborn as a nation" is done in one day. See Slovenia, Slovakia, Czech Republic , Denmark etc. It DOES NOT contain a date, and is not specific. Is that seriously the best you can do? Isaiah 66 7-9 doesn't even mention Israel and it doesn't day a country WILL be reborn in a day it asks if it CAN BE. It is not prophetic IN THE SLIGHTEST.
    1
  46.  @berenlevia8486  I've just shown you it hasn't. Do you believe we came from Adam and Eve? That's a biblical claim that science has proven to be false. Do you believe in a flood as described by the Bible? Again that did not happen and that has been proven Has the Nile EVER dried up? No, so biblical prophecy has FAILED and by default that means that the Bible is not 100% accurate. It's not even a debate, you've lost. Again, you're dodging my questions and are simply a liar. Israel also wasn't resorted in a single day. You should actually go and read some history. It took years of planning post WW2
    1
  47.  @berenlevia8486  Would that make it alright? The Ten Commandments says a child who doesn't honour its parents should be killed. Do you follow that?
    1
  48.  @berenlevia8486  You don't appear to have any biblical knowledge and as for god's authority, please demonstrate one exists and that it is the god of the Bible.
    1
  49.  @j.p.vanbolhuis8678  The bible isn't true.
    1
  50.  @berenlevia8486  I've clearly shown that the Bible is not 100% accurate but you keep saying that it is just my opinion. Tell me you know a god exists and how you know it is the god of the bible . This should be funny None of what you listed so far proves a god exists or proves the bible to be true. How could you possibly believe the Bible is true when it is so easy to prove it is false?
    1