General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

S Andersson
Expedition Bible
comments

Comments by "S Andersson" (@sandersson2813) on "Jericho Unearthed: The Archaeology of Jericho Explained" video.

What biblical events? The vast majority of them didn't happen.
14
@tempstep4058 Pick and bible event, and prove to me it happened to support a god is real. You can't. The bible is indistinguishable from a fairy tale.
9
It doesn't at all.
5
@seminolewarrior1626 I didn't say he didn't exist. I said there's no evidence of divinity, resurrection or miracles and no one wrote about him during his life. At best all you have is an ordinary man called Jesus. All religions do not mention Jesus. Hindusim, Sikhism or Buddhism don't mention him
3
@HelinhoNY Yes, An opinion founded on evidence is not worthless. There is NO EVIDENCE the bible is true or that this wall had anything to do with a god. If you believe the moronic claims of this charlatan, which has no evidence to support his claims, that makes you gullible. That isn't an opinion, that's a definition.
3
@aliced7505 there is MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE for evolution. You clearly don't know what evolution is or what a scientific theory is and how that differs from the colloquial use of the term theory. Not even sure why you brought it up, we're talking about your fairy tale beliefs, supported by zero evidence, not evolution. Please demonstrate what is true in the bible. If you say "prophecy" I will laugh.
3
@raygsbrelcik5578 Life in earth has evolved to the conditions, not the other way around. If conditions were different, we would be different. I'm sorry you don't know what evolution is and how to spot it but it doesn't mean it didn't happen and doesn't mean it isn't continuing to happen.
3
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
3
There is zero evidence at all.
2
@classicalvintagecollector The biblical account ISN'T true.
2
@TYbolicious Fossil record and DNA are examples. Plus we have evolution clearly shown in insects and in bacteria. Why do you doubt it?
2
@matswessling6600 No, biblical events are a matter of evidence, and they aren't supported by any.
2
@mowvu Like what? What biblical events were true? Maybe some people and some place names, but nothing else is true. For example there MAY have been an ordinary man called Jesus, but there isn't a shred of evidence anywhere of divinity, resurrection or miracles. There is places that exist like Jerusalem, but so what? London is in Harry Potter, New York is in Spiderman. It's meaningless.
2
@raygsbrelcik5578 Evolution has an equivalent level of scientific acceptance as gravity or germ theory of disease have. Considering you don't even know that ocean currents have NOTHING to do with the moon I can conclude you have no idea what you are talking about.
2
@noahcole6856 The point to believe something is when it is supported by evidence, and you don't have any evidence that Jesus wasn't just an ordinary man. What you believe is no more credible and has no more evidence than a fairy tale. Do you believe fairy tales?
2
@erinmboehm What in the bible happened? There was no flood, no Adam and Eve, no exodus, no tower of Babel, no resurrection, no miracles, no talking snakes, no burning bushes, so what exactly are you saying happened? New York was in Spiderman comics, doesn't make it a true story.
2
@fordprefect5304 This guy (cballen) probably believes there was a global flood or we all came from one man and a woman made out of one of his ribs too.
2
@zelmabotha1880 Give me THE BEST PIECE of evidence. There isn't any contemporary evidence that Jesus even existed. If he was so amazing why DID NO ONE write about him during his life?
1
@@badger519 Give me the BEST piece of evidence that it's true.
1
@@badger519 I'll take that non answer as definitive proof you don't have any evidence. I don't care that you believe. I care that your preposterous belief influences society, so can you prove a god exists?
1
@dragilxcom4176 Its not hate, I'm laughing at you beleving this obvious fairy tale.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 My point is that there is no evidence to support creation, and you have failed to justify why you believe it. I've asked several times for you to give me the best piece of evidence for such a claim and you have predictably failed to provide any, just like you have failed to give me any examples of a biblical prophecy you think meets the criteria and has come true.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Just the best piece of evidence, that's all you need.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 why is your punctuation so bad?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Well it doesn't work, it just looks ridiculous. Still waiting on your best evidence for a creator.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I didn't make a claim that god doesn't exist. Theists, like you have NEVER provided justification for your beliefs. You believe something exactly like a fairy tale. A god which is not supported by any evidence, like yours is the same as one who doesn't exist.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 There is mountains of evidence for evolution. We can see evidence in bacteria and virus evolution from one strain to a other, we can see it in fruit fly experiments, we can see it in the fossil record and in transitional species, we can see it in isolated species such as Scottish Crossbill and various other finches, we can see it from DNA. If we didn't evolve, why weren't humans around at the time of the dinosaurs? Why are they millions of years old and we are barely 200,000? We have evidence of evolution I our own body like appendix and coccyx. The trouble is I don't think you understand what evolution is. You think it's a dog turning into a horse.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Even if you could debunk evolution today, it doesn't make creationism true. DNA and fossil record are more than sufficient to accept evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life. Trouble is you don't understand what evolution is, or claims. You probably think you should be able to see it in front of your eyes.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I seem to know more than you, you don't even know what it says about slavery.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I'm sorry I know your bible better than you.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 You still haven't given me any evidence a god exists.
1
@nphipps9406 No, because it's just a story in the bible, a fictitious book. The point to believe something is when it's supported by evidence, not just supposition like this rubbish.
1
@GodAnsweredMeToLove It's perfectly possible there may have been a man who was attributed to being this Jesus character, but there is no contemporary evidence of his existence and there is no evidence whatsoever of divinity, miracles or resurrection. At best all you have is an ordinary man. Why would you even want to believe a ridiculous and immoral story based on a god demanding a human sacrifice? It's absurd.
1
@GodAnsweredMeToLove Considering we have no DNA of Jesus you can discount your latter definition, on the former definition not a single person wrote about jesus during his lifetime, and no one who even met him bothered to write about him . If he was so bloody amazing wouldn't you think they would write about his antics at the time instead of relying on third hand stories 40 years later?
1
What's incredible is that you believe this nonsense.
1
@MR-ub6sq Faith is worthless. You can believe anything on faith. All religious people have faith, but you don't think their faith is credible, so why is yours?
1
@MR-ub6sq Of course I'm not a religious person, how could I be? I can prove to you that you don't value the faith of someone's religion you don't follow because you don't believe that religion. By default that means that you view faith as an ineffective way to determine what is true. If you did accept faith then you'd believe ALL faith claims, but you only accept your own faith. Faith proves to me that you don't care what you believe, because if you cared you wouldn't believe UNTIL you had justification and evidence to support your beliefs, but by your own admission you only have faith, which is a synonym for gullibility.
1
@MR-ub6sq I don't have faith in anything. Faith is believing without evidence. It is gullibility. If you have a good reason, you cite that reason, believing something without it is just being gullible and tells everyone that you don't care if your beliefs are true, which you evidently do not. Why bring evolution into this? That is nothing to do with why you believe in god.
1
@nphipps9406 Nonsense. God is no lore likely to be true than Santa Claus.
1
@emmanuelochieke1645 It's you who is missing the point. This is archaeological proof of a wall. It tells you nothing about the wall or how it came to fall down or what caused it to fall down. There is no evidence this is the wall referred to in the bible. That's the point.
1
@jacksonodhiambo9668 Ha ha ha. Give me the BEST piece of evidence that a god exists. It's indistinguishable from a fairy tale. Just making a video about a wall in the middle east, doesn't mean it is the wall in the bible and nor does it tell you how that wall came to be in its current state. This is the problem with the religious and bible believers, EVERYTHING they believe is couched in "confirmation bias"
1
@seanmulcahy3243 My mind is convinced by EVIDENCE. Why would any one want to believe anything that wasn't supported by evidence? What sort of moronic god would expect people to believe on something as worthless, unreliable and gullible as faith? Your bible states categorically that WHATEVER is prayed for in Jesus name, will be granted, therefore pray for your god to reveal himself by the end of the day, when it doesn't happen I'll know your bible lies, your god doesn't care, or he doesn't exist, none of which is my problem.
1
@seanmulcahy3243 I didn't ask for words, I asked for evidence. Have you got any?
1
@gigiis526 Give me the BEST piece of evidence then. You Christians always day there's loads of evidence despite never presenting any. If Jesus was so bloody amazing why did NO ONE who ever met him bother to wrote about him?
1
@cecilspurlockjr.9421 A biblical event isn't an event until it can be proven to have happened and the Bible is NOT supported by evidence, they are claims. Without evidence it is the same as a Santa Claus event. It doesn't matter if you're a bemeiver or not, the Bible isn't a factual, historical book. It is a bunch of stories with almost zero evidence other than a few place names.
1
@mr.bojangles4461 How does that wall prove anything? It's just a wall. Doesn't by any stretch show that wall is the one being talked about in the bible or that a god has anything to do with it.
1
@wichitadisciple9874 Proof of what? We know that we didn't come from Adam and Eve, we know there was no flood, no exodus, no tower of Babel. There is no contemporary evidence of Jesus even existing and no evidence whatsoever he was anything other than an ordinary man.
1
@GirolamoZanchi_is_cool Why are you quoting from a preposterous, immoral, discredited book?
1
@GirolamoZanchi_is_cool What is the latter with you?
1
@FirstLast-il6ok Who is?
1
@gkarenstratton The claim of "being made in his image" is just a claim. It isn't anything which has been supported by any evidence, besides, couldn't you design a better organism than a human? I could. What plan? That's something else you've just pulled out of your backside and have no evidence for. NOTHING prophesied on the bible has come true, because nothing in the bible meets the criteria to be a prophecy. It's all incredibly vague and not a single thing has a date on it. Our DNA is NOT vastly different from other animals. 96% of our DNA is shared by chimpanzees, and we share 40% of our DNA with a bloody banana. You need to try harder, your arguments are laughably weak.
1
@HankMeyer What biblical story is historically accurate?
1
@cassi5420 It isn't bias to say that the bible is not supported by evidence. There is no evidence for Adam and Eve, Flood, Exodus, Parting Red Sea, Burning Bushes, Miracles, Resurrection, Divinity etc. There is no justification to believe the bible is true.
1
@joerice4390 The Exodus' story has been thoroughly debunked.
1
@cassi5420 I'm simply asking theists to justify their beliefs when what they believe is indistinguishable from a fairy tale. Why can't they do this? You don't have a relationship with a god, you can't until you can demonstrate one exists. It is surely more "cringe" to be under the delusion that you have a "relationship" with an imaginary Jewish sky zombie than it is for me to ask you to justify why you believe such a disgusting and repulsive god. I haven't made a positive claim. I didn't say there is no god, I have said no evidence has ever been presented which separates the idea of a god from any other fairy tale. Faith tells you nothing by the way. You say you used to be an atheist, so what convinced you that there was a god?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I guarantee I do. You have clearly no idea why you believe what you do.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 First of all, the things you claim in the Bible to be prophecies, are not prophecies. In order to be a prophecy the prediction has to be: 1. Well described and attributable to a single event or named person 2. Not fulfilled by humans 3. Not vague or something which can be retrofitted. 4. Have a specific TIME attached. NOTHING in the Bible matches those criteria.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Give me your BEST piece of evidence for creation.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Cells are not perfect. Why do you think they are?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I didn't claim cells create themselves and NO ONE ever has but you DID claim it was perfectly created. You can't even remember what you wrote. Cells aren't perfect. . You clearly don't understand what evolution is. What did your god create the universe out of?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 You won't answer a simple question will you? Give me the BEST piece of evidence a god exists and tell me how that happens to be the disgusting, immoral god of the Bible.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Do you know what a scientific theory is? Seems you don't.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Yes evolution did evolve teeth, eyes, ears etc.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 That isn't evidence, it's a claim . Give me the best piece of evidence a god exists, evidence is demonstrable and testable. Then, show me how you get from that to a god of a religion. I won't hold my breath.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Clearly you don't know what the difference between a theory and a scientific theory is. It's laughable how badly informed you are.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 A scientific theory IS A FACT. Evolution is a demonstrable, testable fact. Evolution is not in doubt.
1
@raiftadehara9218 I said the moon has nothing to do with OCEAN CURRENTS. Ocean currents are related to the unequal heating of the water, NOT the tidal effect influenced by the moon.
1
@raiftadehara9218 I've already explained to you why NOTHING in the Bible fits the criteria for being a prophecy, ps don't you know that you aren't allowed to post links?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 We DO SEE transitional fossils in rock strata. However DNA alone is enough to confirm that we all share a common ancestor.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Lie down? You realise that I don't live in the same country as you and live in a completely different time zone?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 I'm still waiting for your singular BEST piece of evidence that a god exists and how you determined it is the god of your disgustingly immoral and easily debunked bible.
1
@raiftadehara9218 The tide is affected by the moon, ocean currents like the gulf stream, California current etc are primarily produced by SOLAR activity heating the surface of the earth UNEQUALLY. TIDES are not ocean currents. Tides are really only relevant in coastal and estuarine areas, not in oceans.
1
@raiftadehara9218 We can't see your links. Do you not know how youtube comments work? You can see what you've posted, but dependent on what you post doesn't mean we can. I don't care about apologist excuses for prophecy, I want to know why YOU believe these are prophecies when they aren't remotely specific to an individual event and NONE contain a time.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Evolution has been proven. I'm sorry you don't believe it, but evolution is a fact. It's not even in doubt and further more we can see it. We have transitional fossils, we have fossil record, we have DNA, we have speciation, we have mountains of evidence. I sincerely doubt you even know what evolution is, or what it claims anyway.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You're wrong about Scientific Law, neither law or theory are higher. They are used to express different things. I'm sorry you don't understand this.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You should look up whether a law is higher than a theory. They aren't. They are on the same Venn diagram. They approach a subject from a different starting point. Anyway, stop diverting. What evidence have you got there is a god? NONE
1
@raiftadehara9218 Just look it up. You clearly aren't a scientist and don't understand science or the scientific method.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You haven't even bothered to look up the definition. One is not a graduation of the other, they are DIFFERENT things. Still waiting on evidence for a god.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You've misinterpreted it. Do you believe gravity is real? That is a SCIENTIFIC THEORY, it's not a law. This STILL isn't demonstrating that a god exists. God isn't even an hypotheses, it's a myth.
1
@raiftadehara9218 I didn't say Darwin's Theory is proven, Darwin's work was just the start, it isn't the definitive version of evolution, which isn't in doubt. How many times do I have to ask for the best bit of evidence for a god? Moment of creation? Ha ha ha. And you patronise me with a lack of education. Prove anything was created.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Not at all. You don't understand what a scientific theory is, bit it's largely irrelevant anyway because even if you could disprove evolution, it doesn't make god true by default. Why is it you can't give me your best evidence for god?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 What truth? You haven't demonstrated it is true, because you can't. You won't answer simple questions, because you can't. You believe an immoral fairy tale. That's embarrassing.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 It is not biblical prophecy Vs evolution. You brought up evolution as a straw man. Biblical prophecy doesn't fit prophecy criteria, so can't be considered prophetic. You still haven't named me one "prophecy" which came true.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Water going up and down on a tidal fashion isn't an ocean current. Currents are created by unequal heating. Just admit you got it wrong .
1
@raiftadehara9218 Copy and paste is a sure sign you don't understand anything. You've already proven you're wrong on ocean currents.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Why aren't you a Hindu, Sikh, Jew, Mormon, Muslim etc? You haven't addressed my question as to how you know your particular fairy tale is true.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Do you think it's moral to keep slaves? Perhaps you think human sacrifice is moral. Answer that first.
1
@raiftadehara9218 A god which hasn't been shown to exist has influence over my life in that religious groups like yours influence society, education, taxation and politics If it didn't I could care about what you believe, bit seeing as it does I'll stand up against it. Isn't that fair enough?
1
@raiftadehara9218 The fact you believe a fairy tale shamed YOU
1
@raiftadehara9218 Did I ever make a claim a god didn't exist? I said there is no evidence which supports ones existence.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You're confusing a tide with a current. You said tides cause OCEAN currents, they do not. A tidal current is not an ocean current. You got this wrong.
1
@raiftadehara9218 How dishonest of you. You claimed ocean currents are CAUSED by the moon. I was setting you straight that they are a function of unequal heating. You thought you were being clever because tides are affected by the moon, but a tide is not what we call an ocean current. You've got your definitions WRONG.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Stop diverting, you claimed the moon was THE cause of ocean currents. Ocean currents are the product of heating and wind, NOT tides. You are WRONG.
1
@raiftadehara9218 Why are you even talking about ocean currents? Is it because you think it's too coincidental that the moon is that close to the earth? You claimed the ocean currents were PERFECT because of the proximity of the moon. What you don't realise is that life evolved to the conditions, not that life exists because of what you call "perfect conditions" Still waiting to hear why you're not a Muslim or a Sikh. None of what you are saying gets you beyond deism .
1
@raiftadehara9218 You're a liar, you said the moon was the perfect distance from the earth to keep ocean currents stable. First of all, ocean currents aren't dictated by tides and what makes you think they are stable? Ocean currents have changed drastically over time, even in very recent history.
1
@raiftadehara9218 You and the other guy talking nonsense seem indistinguishable. You could be the same person. Why are you a Christian then? Why aren't you a Hindu or a Sikh? In what way do you think the bible is true? And even if it was, how did you determine YOUR particular denominations is true? Given that Adam and Eve, Flood, Exodus etc have been proven NOT to be true and Jesus miracles, Jesus Resurrection, Jesus Divinity etc have absolutely no information to confirm them as true, what exactly do you think is true about the bible?
1
@raiftadehara9218 Why can't you answer a question. You believe a fairy tale, why?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Demonstrate you have a relationship with anything but your own imagination. If you can't even prove your god exists, you can't possibly justify your claim of a relationship. What you are claiming is like a child claiming it has a relationship with Santa Claus.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 There is absolutely zero evidence of a flood as described in the Bible at any time in human history. How can you possibly believe such a ridiculous story? If it were true there would be evidence everywhere, but there is absolutely none.
1
@gowhite Where did your god get the material to create the universe if there was nothing? After all, you claim something can't come from nothing right? What created your god? Something can't exist forever can it?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 There was no global flood as described in the bible.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Proof of what? You're the ones making the claims.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Geology shows us that there has never been a global flood as described in the bible, the evidence would correlate over the entire earth but there is absolutely nothing . There isn't enough water on earth and there are 8 million species on earth. The flood categorically did not happen. It is absolutely laughable to suggest there was a time in human history when there was 28,000 feet of water covering the entire earth. Adam and Eve, Exodus, 900 year old men , parting seas etc are also untrue.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 You can't even make an argument. What isn't there?
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 We have been addressing so many different things because you won't answer anything specific that you aren't being clear as to what you are referring. Bottom line is there isn't a shred of evidence which supports any of your claims about creation, a god, the bible or your theistic beliefs being true, and your claims about having a "relationship" with a god is frankly hysterical. Can you prove ANY of it? No, so you can't justify a belief in it.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Pray to your god to reveal himself to me by the end of the day .
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 The reason that creation by intelligent design is not considered credible is the same reason that a universe creating pixie is not considered credible. There is zero evidence which supports it. Creation as a concept is not even an hypothesis really.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Even if you could disprove evolution today, and you can't. It wouldn't make creation true by default. There are an many more conclusions you might consider without having to resort to creation.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 You dishonest liar. I did NOT say the moon had nothing to do with ocean tides, I said it had nothing to do with OCEAN CURRENTS. A tide and a current are NOT the same thing.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 We have transitional fossils.
1
@raygsbrelcik5578 Like a typical theist, running away when they can't answer a simple question they claim they have evidence for. Why am I not surprised?
1
@Joshua-dc1bs He was just another dishonest coward.
1
@chrischris3178 Your sarcasm is excellent.
1
@Tbevel Proof of what?
1
@JudyAnn17 It was a ridiculous comment. What matter is if the subject has any supporting evidence, and there isn't. This is just a wall. Nothing more nothing less.
1
@JudyAnn17 All religious beliefs are laughable
1
@calvinospina7307 Like what? Give me an example of a biblical archaeological event. We already know for example that Exodus didn't happen. Tower of Babel didn't happen, flood didn't happen, Adam and Eve didn't happen, parting red sea didn't happen. We know that Tyre was never destroyed, that the Nile never dried up, that there were no plagues of Egypt, So what exactly are you saying was actually true in the bible? Nothing in this video confirms that this wall featured is the wall of Jericho as described in the bible, and nothing in this video explains the current condition of that wall.
1
@garysims4128 I don't need to have been there. Evidence shows that it didn't happen.
1
@calvinospina7307 I'm not biased. I demand evidence before I hold a belief. That's the rational position. To not do so, like you do with biblical claims is no different than believing in Santa Claus. It's just gullibility. What biblical events are supported by evidence? There isn't even any contemporary evidence that Jesus even existed and none whatsoever that he wasn't just an ordinary man. There's certainly no evidence of divinity, resurrection or miracles so why you believe it?
1
@HIIMHUMAN23 I'm not denying Jesus existed if you'd bothered to read my post. I said there is no evidence he was anything other than an ordinary man. Not a single person bothered to write about jesus during his lifetime, not one, and no one who ever met him bothered to write about him. Isn't that odd if he was so great? Also there is absolutely no evidence anywhere of Jesus being divine, performing miracles or being resurrected. By the ways there is FAR more evidence of Caesar or Napoleon existing.
1
@bluelightmoon777 I didn't claim anything about how life came about. My point is there is absolutely no evidence which supports there being a god or ANY religion being true. Believing in a god, is as worthless as believing in Santa Claus. It's a man made story not supported by a single fact and as such you have no business or justification believing it.
1
@emmanuelochieke1645 This STORY is a fairy tale. This archaeological site isn't proof it's the wall in question or that it fell according to what is said in the bible. The video maker has found a wall and ASSERTED this is the wall in question and how it came to be in its current state. Can't you see the problem? He isn't providing ANY evidence.
1
@emmanuelochieke1645 NO BIble prophecies have come true because NOTHING in the bible fits the criteria for a prophecy. No biblical prediction is sufficiently clear or has a time set to it and if you leave something open ended and make things as vague as the bible does then it isn't a prophecy.
1
@paymeback10 That's just a claim you have no evidence to support. And FFS, use paragraphs.
1
@glheath11 No there isn't. There is no contemporary evidence of Jesus even existing. Imagine no one wrote about WW2 until 1985, that's what you're expecting me to believe about jesus. If he was so great, why is there no contemporary evidence of him existing? Nothing in the bible is prophetic because none of it contains a date or is anything but vague retro fitting. Funny how you accept carbon dating for this, but reject it when it doesn't suit you IE radiometric dating of the age of the earth, Turin shroud etc.
1
@noahcole6856 Think what?
1
@noahcole6856 Contemporary evidence is evidence from the time of Jesus life. There is no contemporary evidence of Jesus existing, which if he was so amazing is a bit strange isn't it? Why did no one bother writing about him if he was so amazing? No one wrote about him until he was long dead. There is no evidence whatsoever contemporary or otherwise of resurrection, divinity or miracles.
1
@noahcole6856 Isn't what an argument from silence? If Jesus was so bloody amazing, why isn't there any contemporary evidence of him existing? At best all you have is there MIGHT have been an ordinary man to whom this myth is attributed. We have tons of contemporary evidence of most historical figures, but none of Jesus. Why do you think that might be? Perhaps because the story has been embellished and exaggerated?
1
@noahcole6856 I said there's no evidence from the time he was alive which corroborates the story, and no evidence ANYWHERE of miracles, divinity or resurrection. There MIGHT have been an ordinary man called jesus, who was like some sort of cult leader, but there's nothing more than that.
1
@noahcole6856 It really isn't. The point to believe something is when it is supported by evidence, and there is absolutely no evidence anywhere that Jesus wasn't just an ordinary man. There isn't any evidence in relation to divinity, miracles or resurrection anywhere at all, so at best, all you have is a myth, and an ordinary man called Jesus, by definition you don't have anything more credible than a fairy tale, just like Jews, Muslims, Mormons, scientologists, Catholics, JW's etc don't either. You all believe something for which you have no justification, which means you all believe on gullibility.
1
@noahcole6856 Typology isn't evidence
1
@noahcole6856 Typology isn't evidence, it's interpretation. Give me the best piece of evidence a god exists.
1
@noahcole6856 First of all the bible isn't evidence, it's a claim and is not supported by evidence. It is a story, and a thoroughly debunked one at that. Secondly there is absolutely nothing prophetic in the bible, nothing specific, nothing that isn't vague, nothing that can't be misinterpreted and crucially, nothing that contains a date. What exactly are you claiming is prophetic?
1
@noahcole6856 That's just a claim. It isn't a fact. You keep trying to avoid the question. Why can't you give me any evidence which supports your position of a god existing?
1
@noahcole6856 Why don't you give me the best piece of evidence for a god existing?
1
@souljat1131 Souls don't exist.
1
@souljat1131 Stop making claims on things you can't possibly know. Do you believe such threats about other religions you reject? No, so unless you provide EVIDENCE for Christianity being true I can reject it the same way you reject other fairy tales like Santa Claus and fairies You're the one with a burden of proof Jerez and you have FAILED, and you have also failed your bible which DEMANDS you defend your faith, and you haven't.
1
@DougFregia It's an IDIOTIC statement. Reality is determined by evidence, and there is no evidence to support the aims of the video.
1
@scsmity First of all there is no evidence that 12 people died, and secondly don't you think people have died for all sorts of beliefs, especially ones you don't deem to be true. Dying for a belief doesn't make it true.
1
@tinamurphy3572 What are you claiming happened on the bible? Let's start with Genesis. Adam and Eve didn't happen, nor did the flood. Care to tell me what is actually real in the bible?
1
@ronallens6204 No bible is supported by evidence. They're all myths.
1
@michaelshved43 Like what? What wisdom and truth is unique to the Bible and what history does it document? How do you tell what might be true in the bible from what is flagrant lies? I presume you don't believe in nonsense such as Adam and Eve, Flood, Exodus, Talking snakes, burning bushes, non setting suns, miracles etc? So what actually do you believe in this wretched, immoral book?
1
@harrisoncrosley2131 They aren't classes, they're lies. He has no evidence.
1
@kiwibushblock2564 This is known as confirmation bias. The Bible isn't evidence, it's a claim. I presume you don't accept there was Adam and Eve, Global flood, Exodus, Tower of Babel etc as science has demonstrated that these things didn't happen. This guy has a wall, and he is asserting, without evidence that this wall is one mentioned in the Bible and that it's current state is a result of what the bible said would happen to it. Are you really that gullible?
1
@GirolamoZanchi_is_cool The bible is LAUGHABLE.
1
@kevinburke1325 Let's take just one. The Flood as described in the bible is a lie. It didn't happen. Care to disagree?
1
The Bible isn't remotely accurate.
1
You'll never prove him true.
1
You realise the majority of the Bible, apart from a few places names and a few people is largely debunked as nonsense?
1
@justiceneeded01 because its unscientific lies.
1
@greggibbs8641 Being born again is just "being gullible".
1
@greggibbs8641 What biblical proof? The Bible isn't evidence, it's a claim. What are you saying is true in the Bible, because let's start with genesis, that's a lie
1
@greggibbs8641 Ha ha ha ha. The Bible isn't evidence Greg, it's a disgustingly, immoral fairy tale.
1
@berenlevia8486 Faith is worthless, it's the excuse people give when they haven't got a good reason to believe in god.
1
The bible is not 100% true. What a laughable claim.
1
@berenlevia8486 Yes. It isn't bias that we know we didn't come from Adam and Eve, it isn't bias that there is zero evidence of a flood described in the bible. It isn't bias that the Exodus was impossible to take place as described. It isn't bias to know that languages didn't come from the tower of Babel. It isn't bias that there is zero evidence that Jesus wasn't just an ordinary man. It isn't bias that there is zero evidence of divinity, miracles or resurrection What exactly are you claiming is factual in the bible?
1
@craigbhill bible isn't even 1% true. Only true things are a few place names and possibly a few people.
1
@berenlevia8486 The bible does not have a 100% prediction rate at all. NOTHING in the bible fits the criteria of a prophecy anyway, it is vague and not specific. The bible claims that Israel will live in peace with its neighbours, that's a failure as that's never happened. The bible predicts the Nile will dry up, Failure, has never happened. The bible claimed Tyre would be destroyed under the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, and it wasn't, so there's three things which show the bible is not 100% true. In order to give you evidence the Bible is not 100% accurate I only have to give you one thing. I've given you loads. Ps no one who met met this Jesus character ever wrote about him, so how can you trust what was written about him when there is zero contemporary evidence of him even existing?
1
@berenlevia8486 You claimed the bible was 100% accurate. I gave you examples where it has FAILED, demonstrating that the bible is absolutely not 100% accurate. What are you claiming the bible has predicted, what verse and where in tje bible is it specific and where does it contain a date when this will happen? There is none. In order to be a prophecy, it has to be SPECIFIC, relate only to a single event, not something that man can make happen ( such as reading a prophecy and fulfil it) and it MUST contain a date and it must not be something which can be retrofitted, such as the Jesus story . Then i gave you examples of other things such as Adam and Eve and The Flood, which demonstrably are not true.
1
@berenlevia8486 Yes, I gave you SPECIFIC examples of where the bible has FAILED to be true. Was Tyre destroyed under the reign of Nebuchadnezzar? No it wasn't. The bible claimed it would be so it FAILED in it's "prophecy" clearly demonstrating it is NOT 100% accurate. Has Israel ever lived in peace with its neighbours? No, that's not my opinion. It isn't my opinion it wasn't destroyed, it wasn't destroyed. That's a fact, not my opinion. It is also a fact we didn't come from Adam and Eve. It is a fact the flood didn't happen. Those are not my opinions. Those are DEMONSTRABLE facts.
1
@berenlevia8486 Give me your BEST biblical prophecy and the verse from whence it came. I'll show you how it hasn't come true.
1
@berenlevia8486 Ha ha ha. HUMANS actively worked to make that happen. Plus EVERY country that is "reborn as a nation" is done in one day. See Slovenia, Slovakia, Czech Republic , Denmark etc. It DOES NOT contain a date, and is not specific. Is that seriously the best you can do? Isaiah 66 7-9 doesn't even mention Israel and it doesn't day a country WILL be reborn in a day it asks if it CAN BE. It is not prophetic IN THE SLIGHTEST.
1
@berenlevia8486 I've just shown you it hasn't. Do you believe we came from Adam and Eve? That's a biblical claim that science has proven to be false. Do you believe in a flood as described by the Bible? Again that did not happen and that has been proven Has the Nile EVER dried up? No, so biblical prophecy has FAILED and by default that means that the Bible is not 100% accurate. It's not even a debate, you've lost. Again, you're dodging my questions and are simply a liar. Israel also wasn't resorted in a single day. You should actually go and read some history. It took years of planning post WW2
1
@berenlevia8486 Would that make it alright? The Ten Commandments says a child who doesn't honour its parents should be killed. Do you follow that?
1
@berenlevia8486 You don't appear to have any biblical knowledge and as for god's authority, please demonstrate one exists and that it is the god of the Bible.
1
@j.p.vanbolhuis8678 The bible isn't true.
1
@berenlevia8486 I've clearly shown that the Bible is not 100% accurate but you keep saying that it is just my opinion. Tell me you know a god exists and how you know it is the god of the bible . This should be funny None of what you listed so far proves a god exists or proves the bible to be true. How could you possibly believe the Bible is true when it is so easy to prove it is false?
1
@berenlevia8486 Do you believe the flood happened as described in the bible?
1
@berenlevia8486 Trying to get you to justify why you believe it. Why aren't you a muslim, sikh, Hindu, Jew etc? How did you decide your belief is true and there's isn't?
1
Do you believe everything people tell you? There is no substance to any of these claims.
1
There is no evidence that it is right. It's a book of fiction. There is no evidence for example of floods, Exodus, tower of Babel, noah, moses, miracles etc In fact it has been proven to be almost entirely false.
1
Virtually none of the Bible is literal, so why believe any of it? Especially when there is no evidence which supports it.
1
The bible is not true. What is true about it?
1
You're so gullible.
1
It doesn't validate anything. It's a collapsed wall.
1
Religious texts aren't reliable though and are not supported by evidence, that's why people don't accept them.
1
@tempstep4058 It is not the case that historical documents are religious books. We don't consider ANY religious books to be history books. Do you consider the Torah, Koran, Book of Mormon, Four Vedas, Granth Sahib to be historical books? No you don't, so what are you on about.
1
@tempstep4058 No, i disagree with your claims that historical documents are mostly religious. For example what exactly are you claiming is historical in the bible ?
1
@tempstep4058 Faith is WORTHLESS because faith tells you nothing. If a Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Muslim, Jew etc all believe on faith then it tells me that you don't care of your beliefs are true. Faith is the excuse people give when you don't have a good reason to believe, if you did, you'd give the reason. Religious texts are NOT reliable. They are FULL of lies, such as The Flood, Adam and Eve, Moses, Noah, Exodus etc.
1
@tempstep4058 No it is not true. For example The Flood didn't happen, the earth has NEVER been flooded as described in the bible at any point in human history, we didn't come from Adam and Eve either. Those are two things which have been PROVEN false. Do you seriously think different languages cane from The Tower of Babel? There isn't even any contemporary evidence that Jesus existed, and absolutely ZERO of his divinity, resurrection or miracles.
1
@wangmary888 You clearly don't understand evolution.
1
@randelrobbins1408 Science has disproven Adam and Eve, Flood, Exodus, Tower of Babel, Talking snakes, non setting suns, "miracles" etc, so why would anyone believe anything in the bible? If Jesus was so amazing, why did NO ONE who ever met him bother to wrote about him? At best, all you have is there was an ordinary man called Jesus. You have zero evidence of divinity, resurrection or miracles.
1
@codelessunlimited7701 If you're going to make a comment in a thread of 300+comments at least mention who you are replying to and on what context
1
@SmoothOperator319 Prove to me this is anything but a collapsed wall.
1
@SmoothOperator319 Prove to me it's not just a bog standard wall.
1
The bible? You trust a book which is routinely debunked as being untrue? How do you differentiate between what is untrue and what is true in this book?
1