Comments by "S Andersson" (@sandersson2813) on "7 Minutes of Pure Facts and Logic At Immigration Debate - Konstantin Kisin" video.

@silentnot4812 Ha ha ha. Whilst there is no doubt net immigration has increased. The UK population is at zero risk of being outnumbered unless indigenous population growth is drastically cut or death rate increases.
6
@johnclarke4647 Ha ha ha. What makes you think there is any credibility in that?
2
@darren09700 That is a RIDICULOUS claim for which you have ZERO evidence.
2
@darren09700 The UK is only 4.4% Muslim, or 3m people, in what way will that become a majority ? The growth rate is nowhere near meeting your claim. Grow up.
2
@johnnk3256 Then what you claimed isn't true. Your own statistics show that and there is nothing to suggest that they will continue rising at that rate or migrating to the UK.
2
@johnnk3256 Religious conversion? Ha ha ha. The biggest rise is the rise in ABANDONING religion, not Muslim rising.
2
Why would he take the wage cut?
1
@geoffn54 You don't hear independent voices from MPs. Why would he do it? Why would anyone?
1
That's conspiracy theory nonsense. In order for replacement to happen the indigenous people would have to leave. Do you see that happening at a sufficient scale? No.
1
@educational1651 Just making a claim on something doesn't mean it's a fact. You think that just because it's "on film" that it makes something "a fact" Just claiming that the UK indigenous population will be in the minority doesn't make it a fact. The population of the UK is around 68 million, less than 15% of that is immigrant.
1
@darren09700 Stop listening to conspiracy theories, you sound like an idiot. Don't accuse me of having no evidence when you haven't presented any. People saying something in the House of Lords doesn't mean it is factual, and considering that what he said was in 2011, and it's now 2024 and his predictions are clearly NOT on track should make you question your position. Only 4.4% of the UK is Muslim, that's only 3m, which means in order to become a majority that will have to increase by 32 million by 2050. Not remotely likely.
1
@johnnk3256 The illegal immigration is uncontrolled, the rest has been legal migration and statistics show that the rise in the Muslim population is MINOR.
1
@johnnk3256 The number of net immigrants was 700,000, which I agree is too high for the infrastructure, but that doesn't imply they are Muslim.
1
@benboothroyd1523 You are extrapolating that the current rate of immigration, which is based on ONE years figures by the way are in any way likely to be repeated year on year until 2100. If you had any logic in your head you'd have some very good reasons behind why there was a net immigration of 700,000 at the last count and why it isn't likely to be repeated. You are assuming all things stay equal when in fact there are far too many limiting factors which will preclude it from happening as well as policy led laws which are in place to stop it being repeated.
1
@johnnk3256 As I've previously already stated, the UK Muslim population is 4.4%, and the number of babies called Mohammed is about 6000 a year (or 0.008% of the population) how long do you think "replacement" will take at that rate? You're just being paranoid for no reason. Personally I'd rather ALL religion was banned and that we had fewer immigrants, but you're way over the top in your conspiracy AND I've already stated for many very obvious reasons that net migration figure WILL drop drastically, but you clearly aren't bright enough to work out why.
1
@johnnk3256 So what, do you realise actually how few people are born with the top name each year? It's about 6000, or 0.008% of the population. You still haven't answered why you think net migration will continue to grow at the figure of last year's rate. You haven't acknowledged WHY that happened to be an unusually high year.
1
@johnnk3256 Ha ha ha. You've gone from worrying about Muslims to worrying about everyone. Name one country on the world where the number of immigrants exceeded indigenous people, yet again you are ignoring the reasons for immigration and pretending these rates will continue. It DOESN'T point to the fact Muslims are having more children, it points to the fact that Muslims are incredibly UNIMAGINATIVE in regards to naming male babies. Where is the highest female Muslim name in the list? There are NONE in the top 10, which tells you that your claim is nonsense.
1
@johnnk3256 Immigration will always occur, but it won't be at that rate of net 700,000. Why would you want a country with no immigration? Muslims aren't having more children, they just have no imagination for naming male babies. How do we know? Because there isn't a Muslim female baby name in the top 50.
1
@johnnk3256 Ha ha ha. Guess what, Muslims have no imagination for baby names for boys, where are the Muslim female names?
1
@johnnk3256 You seem to be having a problem thinking out reasons. You have a knee jerk reaction to everything. Please try and understand why Mohammed is #1 boys name, bit no equivalent exists in females baby names. It's not that they are having more babies, it's a lack of imagination and a lack of variety in names in that culture. Take a step back and consider the many reasons why something may be the case. Also, the % of immigrants in UK is LOWER than in Germany, Belgium, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Spain, US, Canada etc.
1
@johnnk3256 Are you really so silly you don't understand why that name is #1?
1
@johnnk3256 I can only laugh at your response. Muslims are not the biggest group either. Indians and Poles are.
1
@johnnk3256 That wasn't the question. The question was who makes up the largest proportion of IMMIGRANTS. Most of the Muslims in Britain are people who are BORN HERE. Also, you still haven't worked out why Mohammed is the most popular name have you?
1
@16m49x3 You don't understand the term "replaced" do you?
1
@16m49x3 Ha ha ha ha. London has long been a place where people have moved into. Probably hasn't been an indigenous majority in London since about WW2
1
@16m49x3 Seems you're confused if you don't even know difference between native Brits and white English and that you've conflated the two. Skin colour has nothing to do with this.
1