Comments by "S Andersson" (@sandersson2813) on "Richard Dawkins vs Piers Morgan On Religion and Gender | The Full Interview" video.

  1.  @Christian.Batman  Your threats aren't backed up by anything than a fairy tale. Believing in God is like believing in Santa Claus.
    5
  2.  @Christian.Batman  There is ZERO evidence in nature of intelligent design.
    4
  3.  @tamashumi7961  There's no evidence of the spiritual
    4
  4. No he isn't. Why would anyone believe in an afterlife
    3
  5.  @pauls7803  Exactly. If design was intelligent, why is it I could design a better human being?
    3
  6.  @bennyhillschineseblokechar3689  What god?
    2
  7.  @bennyhillschineseblokechar3689  That doesn't mean it is describing the big bang at all. Osmosis is the process by which liquid travel through a semi permeable membrane. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
    2
  8.  @earlysda  How would having a son make it true?
    2
  9.  @Jack-fs2im  Genesis doesn't say anything like that.
    2
  10.  @Christian.Batman  You can't get to know something indistinguishable from a fairy tale. It's mile stating you know a Leprechaun or Santa Claus. A Hindu would claim they "know" their god, but you'd dismiss their claim, so why would I believe YOUR DELUSION?
    2
  11. Fossil record, transitional species, DNA, geographically remote species, bacteria, viruses etc What evidence have you of god?
    2
  12.  @kaygoski  It isn't sad to not believe in a skirt. Why would it be. It is sad to believe things like spirit which have no basis in fact.
    2
  13. You simply don't understand the argument. There is no evidence of a creator pr any intelligent design.
    2
  14. @Rita Maid Because there's absolutely no reason to and no evidence to support one. It is indistinguishable from a fairy tale and you wouldn't advocate for believing in one of those, so why believe in an afterlife. Do you just believe things without reason?
    1
  15.  @Christian.Batman  Atheism is the NON belief in a god. It says NOTHING about the origin of life on earth.
    1
  16.  @Jack-fs2im  Not it really isn't. What a pathetic answer. Nature is proof of nature, it says NOTHING about design whatsoever. Physics and cosmology also don't prove a god and even if they did, how did you get from a deistic position to Christianity? By the way, i could design a better human being than your god, couldn't you?
    1
  17.  @centaur7607  People believe all sort of shit, doesn't make it true. We used to believe on Greek or Norse gods, does that make it true? The argument ad populum is a well known FALLACY. No religion has EVER justified itself as being anything other than a fairy tale. Grow up
    1
  18.  @Jack-fs2im  That is BULLSHIT. You haven't even read Genesis as it gets the order LAUGHABLY wrong.
    1
  19. Your Bible is an immoral fairy tale
    1
  20.  @SwissCheese112  What do you disagree with?
    1
  21.  @SwissCheese112  Ha ha. What a naive fool you are acting like. Perhaps you'll do the the credit of telling me what changed your mind to a religious belief being a better explanation of reality. It's funny you mention 2000 years because religious people have NEVER been able to meet their burden of proof. Do you just not care if your beliefs are true?
    1
  22.  @Christian.Batman  Physics doesn't explain a god.
    1
  23.  @Christian.Batman  If you claim to "know" god, please demonstrate it exists. Can you? No. There is zero evidence intelligence exists outside time and space at all. These are bullshit claims you can't back up.
    1
  24.  @2fast2block  Dawkins hasn't claimed the universe came from nothing. You clearly didn't watch the video or know anything about what Dawkins says. He is very clear that he doesn't know how the universe or life began. Stop being a dishonest liar. There is NO EVIDENCE of a supernatural source at all. Where did your god get the material for the universe?
    1
  25.  @earlysda  And a Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Catholic, Mormon, Scientologist, Jane, Buddhist will all say something different, yet you don't care about the threats of their beliefs, so why would Dawkins give a shit about your weak, empty, evidence free threats?
    1
  26.  @2fast2block  No, he didn't say that. He said equivocally that he didn't know why how the earth came about or why there is something rather than nothing. Not being able to answer this doesn't mean a god did it.
    1
  27.  @hamzaadib7755  You clearly don't understand what evolution is.
    1
  28.  @hamzaadib7755  NO ONE has claimed something can come from nothing EXCEPT YOU. If there was nothing, what did your god make the universe out of? We have TRANSITIONAL fossils. Even if you disproved evolution today, it doesn't mean by default that a god is true or responsible.
    1
  29.  @hamzaadib7755  There is no such thing as micro and macro evolution, it's all just evolution. Evolution is simply change over time, trouble is naive and gullible people like you think it's a dog changing into a horse or something like that. You believe a man rode to heaven astride two horses and cleaved the moon in half, so who cares what you think
    1
  30.  @baylorsailor  Atheism is nist the job belief in a god, it isn't the claim there isn't one.
    1
  31.  @lomue007  Says the complete lack of evidence for any religious belief being true.
    1
  32. @Sam M Dawkins has NEVER made a claim on the origin of life.
    1
  33. Dawkins didn't say something can come from nothing. However, where did your god come come from and where did it get the material to make the universe?
    1
  34. One of the worst apologetics ever. You have no other universe to compare it to so you cannot come up with such odds. Hoyle has been largely ridiculed for this preposterous claim.
    1
  35. Drake equation. Very simple. He said it's highly likely other life exists in the universe, why is that surprising?
    1