Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Willy OAM" channel.

  1. So he pretty much openly admits to be a CIA asset - or at least wants to be.
    177
  2. The fact alone to have a supply lane directly flanked by the enemy, no matter if direct control over it or not, is just desastrous.
    102
  3. Sorry, but in these days even faking high quality pictures is easy. And most of the time they don't even care to make it look realistic, like burn marks on the gruond and alike. The idea that weapon system of that size are destryod without any effect on the ground is utterly absurd. On top of that for such srike you clearly need some kind of monitoring - what thye could easily show, but you never see that. Ukraine and NATO are lying since start, both having a massiev industry that exists solely for propaganda. News from teh eastern front - we are winning so much. It's nothing new.
    65
  4. Blast of that obliterates concrete walls. Easy guess what it does to a squishy human body... @ FAB3000.
    62
  5.  @Norrs-fd6zr  Ask the USA, they trained and armed them for that - as they do since decades worldwide.
    61
  6. Was clear from the start. Such shit only works in movies an games, because then a bad writer just decides that it will work. In reality, this is sheer insanity over absolute nothing. Even in best cases: what exactly should they do there? What should they do that couldn't easily be done from the other side? This was 100% sacrificing humans lives by the hundreds and thousands just for an absurd PR victory of "look, we are at the other side of the river".
    53
  7. Ukraine is doing a lot of what you could call meatwave, just not in the typical offensive way. Take that small area across the river. Absolutely pointless to hold it in the first place. No way to go there with heavy equipment. But they kept sending in soldiers, no matter that many died just on THE WAY there and with ZERO chance to hold it. You could say the same about the towns - at least at that point where they were surrounded. To not pull out then and instead keep on sending soldiers into that 100% death trap, that's meat wave. A cauldron is the worst situation you can be in, but the coup regime tends to even create those for themselves when they attack. They even did that 2014 and 2015, when it was just against the people in Donbass, what was one of the main reasons they were not able to succeed. And likely all who go against that insanity they just get rid off.
    51
  8.  isrraelkumiko8214  Was western media who said that, not Russian one. Russia never gave ANY time plan. And the destroyed the coup regimes NATO proxy army meanwhile at least 2,5 times.
    47
  9. Ukraine is doing that when they attack civilians, not military. That's the difference.
    38
  10.  @gregchijoff9959  Indeed, it was the Soviet Union that reacted to NATO, not the other way around. And that MANY years later - at the same time where the USA stationed its nukes right at the eastern border of NATO in Europe. Soviet Union tried for ten years to get a peace treaty after 2.WW, what by the way include to draw back from most eastern European countries. Russia never wanted to keep those - they were forced to. Else the USA would have pushed their nukes up to Moscow - and they had just used such nukes some years ago back then. TWICE. On civil cities. Then few years later carpet bombed Korean cities with Napalm. They were KNOWN as monsters who did not care for genocide to reach their goals.
    38
  11. New to how fascism works?
    32
  12. If international law had any meaning, the coup in Ukraine would never have been accepted and the military violence from the coup regime against east Ukraine would have been condemned from day 1 - instead of delivering them money and weapons for it.
    29
  13.  @Perplexer1  See, you are typical example of propaganda that just lies to yourself.
    28
  14. lol? Hitting the bridge with these drones? They would literally do nothing. You need massive warheads to damage a bridged, especially one massive one as the Kherch bridge, which is build to withstand the sea. For drones to do anythign you would need to make them 10+ times biggers and even then you would maybe damage the surfcace a bit.
    26
  15. Was alread one of the reason they failed between 2014 and 2022. They had more forces and more and better equipment, but constantly went into these traps. It's likely that anyone who mentioned that on the coup regime's side simply lost their position (or life).
    23
  16. NATO fired over 300 HIMARS missiles into Belgorod and what you see is ONE destroyed air defense system. That's a horrible bad succes rate.
    23
  17.  @DonaldPrizwan  Russia does not caer to gain territory, they gain territory as side effect of your beloved Nazi front collapsing here and there. But even that is mainly movement in front of the actual frontline, which is far behind the lines on the map.
    22
  18.  @dustinhamabata902  "Funny" is, that majority of peopoe got zero clue of the Soviet-Afghan war and how US fascism pumped billions of dollars into creating a world wide connected network of extremist terrorist and did not even give much money, arms and training to Afghans, because those were too moderate and often talked to the soviets. Soviet Union also did not conquer Afghanistan, but just held certain positions and overall went in to prevent a collapst and abuse by NATO of that. Soviets were sure that the CIA and co tried to regime change Afghanistan to make it another proxy. And well, they were right, they tried. The reason Soviets went out of it was Gorbatchov trying to end Cold War in general - what was of course absolutely naive. NATO started Cold War and would never end it from their side.
    22
  19.  @ComradeR-44  No, Hamas is entraped in Gaza, they literally can't fight anywhere else (whole Israel is smaller than Crimea with Gaza just a small fraction of it). Ukraine got a giant country where they could fight instead and of course the only positive effect on hiding in cities is using civilians as meatshield. You can call that smart but since it plays with the lives of civilians it was made a warcrime for just that reason.
    22
  20. What you mean with "now"? They are Nazis, that's their main goal since start. And with "they" I'm not talking about tha Banderas cult alone, but especially about NATO.
    21
  21.  @Kofferr  It's always the main aggressors fault, which in the last decades was in 99% of cases NATO.
    20
  22. You see maybe something between 1% and 5% of what is happening in Ukraine on the internet.
    19
  23. For Ukraine to accumulate warfare experience, they would need to survive. When you send your troops to an early grave and just keep pumping in replacement from the street you force into uniform, you don't build up warfare experience. And you can see that very well, since Ukraine is absolutel not learning from their mistakes at all, still doing the same insane, suicidal bullshit since start. Why do you think they need to force civilians into uniform and need to beeg for another yearly GDP in weapons from NATO? Because they are so experienced?
    19
  24. The only real, unwanted withdrawal was from Kherson city, because the bombarding of the dam made it way to risky to stay. That's the only success you see there. Everything else was a switch to a war of attrition after it was clear that the coup regime is stupid and insane enough and NATO disgusting enough to just sacrifice Ukraine as so many other nations before and wouldn't stop. Kiev was clear, since you can't take a 3 millione peopel city with a few thousand soldier, so of course there was never the plan to conquer it to begin with. Kharkiv is clear, since they did not even care to build up any defense lines. Obvious reason for that: you overall want your frontline as short as possible, especially when you went in with limited troops. Getting out of Kharkiv was strategically unimportant, but reduced the length of the frontline massively.
    19
  25.  @davidjones3712  A test is a test. Tests of new system are often made to test out limits and not run it in save or even normal modi. Testing old systems is more about to check if stuff is still running. People can't stop cheering for space x and all their stuff blows up constantly.
    19
  26.  @storyteller5931  No, it's not. You got hundreds of others radars which are doing that much better.
    17
  27.  @JD-nf3rd  Sure, and the assassine that is sniping your wife did that from the house of your neighbor, so the neighbor killed your wife, yes? No?
    17
  28. There are diaries of Wehrmacht and SS soldiers. It's fascinating how pissed they are about every 'subhuman' who dares to fight back against their genocide.
    17
  29. USSR SAVED Poland by intervening when Poland fell. Else the germans would have marched through and could have finished their cleansing without much disturbance. Neither Poland nor any other eastern, likely not any European country would exist today without Russia, ohly the third Reich. UK and France could have done shit and without the massive sacrifice of the USSR it's even likel the germanys would have finished the nuclear bomb first.
    17
  30. Not even the problem. The main problem is, that this first line is of little meaning if you don't have the second and third line behind it. The first line is to slow down the attacker so the 2nd and 3rd can destroy them. And some drones are not enough for that, no matter how much you focos on filming it.
    16
  31.  @S7UAEU  No, that's just wrong and makes no sense. If anythign than the one being attacked takes more casualities, because, duh, they are getting attacked. This isn't a sword fight with two guys with swords stand in front of each other and the more careful fighter make have an advantage by not jumping right into to other ones blade. This is one side bombing the shit out of the other side. And overall: without NATO there would be no Ukraine left. Take NATO money and weapons away and you got people without arms and wages. Ukraine has lost over four full armies meanwhile.
    16
  32. People get the stupid idea, that those navy drones are some cheap crap with explosives. Those are NATO drones with a hell lot of high tech on board, so you can control them at that range plus anti ECM and of course you need the whole infrastructure of NATO to control them, that's not some guys from their home pc. But even with all that, they are only good enough for low value targets. If this wouldn't be the case, they would send those after the actual warships and not some patrol boats or landing ships. They attack those, because those are weak enough targets that it is enough to overwhelm them. But of course the impact of these strikes is borderline zero. None of these ships plays a role. Overall the whole navy isn't of importance, since even the missile strikes can be done by everything else. With Crimea now Russian, they got something far better now anyway. The Black Sea Fleet was needed as defense. But Crimea itself is like a giant carrier in the middle of Black Sea and something you can't sink. Everything the Black Sea Fleet can fire all the system on Crimea can fire, too. So even if NATO would spend many billions more to really sink the Black Sea Fleet, it would change nothing. And of course Russia won't let this happen anyway. They already gave NATO a warning with the interception, that this patrol boat was enough now. And of course the strike against the soldiers Zelensky visited, likely those who were part of that navy drone attack was another message and the timing absolutely on purpose. Russia saw that visit. And they could have just done that strike 10 minutes earlier.
    16
  33. When you call tear gar as chemical weapon, you take all meaning out of the word. It's the same as when you say "sexual assault", but this is everything, from the sheer existenec of someone you don't want to have around you up to crimes like rape. Especially absurd to go full screech propaganda about tear gas as "war crime", when it is constantly used against citizens because they protest against things.
    16
  34. They make the same mistakes since 10 years meanwhile, see no reason why this should change all of sudden, especially not for the better.
    16
  35.  @1k20a  You mean those fictionals guys from coup regime fiction stories?
    16
  36. "Tying up Russian forces" also simply ignores how much of the coup regime's forces are tied up there... Such a strategy only works out if you use way less forces than the enemy or threaten something of most importance - like Russia did when they sent those few thousands soldiers to Kiev. Since Kiev is the capitol, the coup regime HAD TO react to that. Of course some few thousand soldiers would not be able to take over a city the size of Kiev, but it's way to important to not focus most of your forces to defend it. Meanwhile Kursk is just some open field and villages and it binds at least as many coup regime forces as Russian ones, so what's the point?
    16
  37. ""Suddenly everyone fell in love with rare earth metals", is such a stupid thing to say. This has ALWAYS been about resources. ALL wars are.
    15
  38. You can literally see the secondary explosions and also hear them when you got videos with sounds. And nothing in a home depot explodes like that.
    15
  39. Russia conscripted 300k, but there were also additiona volunteers which are around 100k+ and Wagner and Czechs are also not counted in. So overall this can easily reach 500k additional(!) troops from that alone, though not all of these troops are fighting forces. Many will work in anti terror, security and support for the new Donbass areas and of course logistics.
    15
  40.  @sneakyviewing4391  US wars mainly kill more civilians than militias. So accuracy is the last thing US military is about.
    15
  41. Anymore? It never did.
    14
  42. @Pax.Alotin Communism and Nazism are the EXACT opposite, kid. You clearly neitehr got clue what Nazism is nor what communism means. Nazism is ultra right wing, driven by mass murderous racism (right wing), capitalism (right wing), warmongering (right wing). But you likely also don't know what left (egalitarian = all humans are equal in worth) and right (elitism = servants and rulers, class systems) means.
    14
  43. That's a propaganda movie not even close to the truth. If you want to know about Mariupol there are hundreds if not thousands of interviews with the people there, including now, while it is rebuild.
    14
  44. It's actually normal that people unite behind the government when there is a threat from outside. Western governments love to abuse this (since pretty much centuries) for just that reason, mostly making up threat. In case of Russia, its government does not need to make anything up. Russian people DO look at western press and what it says about Russia and of course hear when western politicians talk about how Russia must be brought down, ruined, destroyed and alike. There is only one situation when something like that leads to a new government: when the people think that the current government is too weak to response to it. So you wouldn't get people vote for a pro west government, but an extremely anti west government. Thankfully Russian people are was smarter than our western ones...
    13
  45. Or what about the over 4000 prisoners which die every year in US prisons. That's around one every 2 hours.
    13
  46. It's NATO money, NATO intel, NATO orders, NATO weapons (even most of the soviet stuff is from ex soviet NATO countries) - and Ukrainian 'meat' and future sacrificed...
    13
  47.  @itsallminor6133  Mach 20+ are ICBMs child and not what is meant when talking about hypersonic missiles.
    13
  48. That's not how it works. Attacker losing more than defend is, when you got the same equipment on both sides, but one side got the advantage of a build up defense. Defending meanwhile plays zero role when it comes to bomardement, in contrary, bombardement mostly means that the defender got problems, since the point of a defense is to be quite unmoving - what makes it easier to bombard. Range (and quantity of range weaponry of course) played always a quite crucial role in warfar, going up from melee where a spear is better than a sword, especially when it comes to mass combat, then of course bows able to rain havoc upon an enemy and today it's even worse, with weapon systems firing on you from beyond the horizon. While NATO (and it's NATO, not Ukraine) can fire some ATACMS and cruise missiles here and there with equal range as Russian systems, there is an obvious lack of mass, while Russia got many times more, plus of course the overwhelming mass of FAB bombarding, what is more brutal than any ATACM or cruise missile and with 100 times the quantity plus there is near to no chance to intercept glide bombs, so while 90% of NATO missiles get destroyed before hitting something, 100% of those FABs get through. And those are a pillar on their own. Russiad also got way more missiles AND drones.
    13
  49. They attack landing ships because those are barely if at all armed. They simply are unable to hit actual war ships.
    13
  50. When fantasizing about the enemy during your planing, you should fantasize about them being stronger than you think, not weaker. The idea to go into a war with the utter delusion that the enemy will just be stupid, incompetent, corrupt and only fighting with crap simply means that you got no plan at all, leading to catastrophic losses.
    13
  51. Overall doesn't really matter, such scenarions are more about luck than anything else. When its hits you, you are dead, when not, you were lucky and live.
    13
  52.  @dean3280  Which not would be the better question.
    13
  53. A ridiculous idea, but fitting for the insanity of fascists. This DESTROYS any negoation position they might have.
    13
  54.  @seanniemeyer5437  You do get that most civilians were killed by Azov in Mariupol? Who also used them as meatshield. Meanwhile Hamas does not even have any choice, they are imprisoned in Gaza(by Israel!) and don't have hundredthousand of sqkm to fight elsewhere.
    13
  55.  @MarvinWestmaas  I mean, at least you are honest about being a Nazi.
    12
  56. Can the USA train more pilots? You do get that those are extra, they will not stop to train own pilots for that. So how much extra capacity does the US military have? US militarys seems big, but when you look at those 800 military bases around the globe, a lot of what they got is spread over the whole planet and by that very thin.
    12
  57. Real joke is that the whole Winter War was all about Finland wanting to work with the Nazis, not agains them...
    12
  58. Never saw any of these tanks do anything in Ukraine than burning or being abandoned. It's not even about them being destroyed, it's about that they never managed to do anything before getting destroyed.
    11
  59. Per se even worse: A FOAB only weights 7t - but detonates with the TNT equivalent of 44t (that's by the way a MOABx4) Certain death zone has a 300m radius...
    11
  60. Also a lot to secure the Donbass, de-mine it and alike.
    11
  61.  @banta-pd8zj  Ukraine lost 2014 when it sold itself out to NATO. Then ist lost the civil war, unable to force those against the coup back in line. Then it just died by fully becoming nothing but sacrifice for NATO, drowning in debt they will never be able to pay pack, losing hundredsthousands of men and forever losing not only the Crimea (what came with the 2014 loss), but now also the Donbass and if this goes on even more. There is simply nothing where they didn't catastrophically lose.
    11
  62.  @Ray-555  Funny enough, since he's at least asking questions, the "Slava Ukraini" crazies call him a Russian propagandist.
    10
  63. Most fascinating part is, how frozen assets can even generate interest.
    10
  64.  @banta-pd8zj  Russia got a massiv focus on avoiding civil losses, else you would have the typical NATO war casuality rate, where often morie civilians die than soldiers. In Ukraine war, even with the coup regime army loving to hide in towns and cities, you got a civilian casualty rate of <5%.
    10
  65.  @Trollthunder101  Well, they got no army to begin with. They are prisoners in Israels fascistic concentration camp.
    10
  66. 1940 USA traded well with the Nazis, as they did before. Without US oligarchs and their trade with german fascists, the war of Hitler wouldn't have been possible. Main reason the USA joined in was less about defeating the Nazis - that's what the Soviets did at that point anyway, but to ensure that the Nazis are not utterly destroyed and Europe not just completely liberated by the Soviet, with the USA getting no stand in there at all. The USA cared about as much to defeat the Nazis as they care today to defeat ISIS. And nothing makes it more obvious when you look at how the majority of Nazis stayed in power after 2.WW in the west - and were very quickly integrated into NATO - to continue 2.WW under a new name and Führer, but with the same goal: to conquer the Soviet Union. The only reason this didn't work out was that the Soviets also got nukes - and pointed those at the USA, so repeating 2.WW with a burning Europe while the USA watched all that from oversea wasn't possible anymore. But they still would love to do that - in the end: the whole Ukraine scenario is just that, just on a scale just small enough that Russia wouldn't ruin the world over it by nuking the USA. But don't get this wrong: they WILL do that if the NATO emperor is pushing that further and further. At some point it will be 3.WW and Russia will go for the head of NATO, instantly. No holding back, no further warning, just annihilation. Sad enough, this apocalyptic threat is the only thing that keeps US fascists from escalating it further - barely.
    10
  67.  @szalaypeter3810  Well, was around 20%. In 2.WW many Crim Tartars worked with the Nazis and had an own SS unit, though others also worked with the Red Army. Stalin's "cleansing" you mentioned was in 1944 - during 2.WW, but as usual when it comes to western propaganda, there are no Nazis at all, only bad soviets who for no reason go against innocent (Nazis).
    10
  68.  @Lammy2023  It does not look like a Russian cruise missile at all, it's way too thin for that. The damage does not fit either.
    10
  69.  @MS-ii1sv  Interestingly, most of the veteran mercenaries who were there seem to have left Ukraine quickly, since the love to murder for money, what was easy enough when you hunt down goat herders and alike in a carpet bombed country, but being the target of an actual military and just dying from some missiles that was fired from 500km away, so an actual war, they don't like that.
    9
  70.  @islandwills2778  What does pro Ukrainian even mean? Especially when you see Ukraine as one country, the people in Donbass as much Ukrainian as those Azov Nazis in the west, but they are enemies.
    9
  71. What? There is no chance to win, kid. And for you to know: Ukraine is brutally losing, even with all the NATO billions and throwing away its future as a country, ruined by that, not even Russian bombs.
    9
  72.  @drkucalo1  USSR SAVED Poland by getting in. Else the germans would have just marched through. WAY more polish people would be dead today, if Poland would even exist anymore. Without the Soviets and their gigantic sacrifice, none of the European nations would exist tody. At best servant states, "arish" enough to keep them. But eastern europe? Utterly gone.
    9
  73. Russia is constantly in "offensive", people just don't get that this is not like in a videogame, where you do a tank rush to the enemy base. Russia is using an offensive defense: it's constantly bombarding the enemy from fortified lines and dose not have to move for that at all. The clashes you see on the internet a scout units, who are send there for examle to steet up the enemy or in cases of flanking/encirclement, to put pressure on the enemy's logistics, but the actual frontline still stays where it is.
    9
  74.  @hotshot2101  Always love people like you. You go this absurd idea, that adding "I live there" or "I was there" and alike adds anything to your lie. Most people got ZERO clue what's even happenign in their own city, even less their country. Anyone who thinks, that "I was there" is an argument, just shows that he didn't even care to think about the who le lie story in the first place.
    9
  75. Just need to get an army of a million peopel from somewhere plus two extra new armies in equipment, then there would maybe be the chance to at least get TO crimea, so still wouldn't be sure of that. People don't see to get, that Russia got way more and way bigger weapons they could use, an no, not talking about nukes.
    8
  76.  @ea2631  It never is, especially not for the burned down shithole the coup regime made out of Ukraine. The only reason to fight to the very last is when you are in a situation like the Soviet Union in 2.WW. The Nazis wanted to genocide them. So... yeah, there isn't really a choice. Russia meanwhile hates to do this. They didn't like the coup, which already ruined Ukraine, thea hated the civil war the coup regime started, trying to ethnically cleanse the country, but even then went for a peaceful solution. But, well, when the other side WANTS war and death, it will and can't not watch and had to intervene. What by the way was the plan of NATO from the start to force Russia to this. NATO does not care for Ukraine at all. If none Ukrainian is left, just the better. Free land and resources for the west. I think many people still don't understand, who freaking evil we, the west, are, at least our leaders.
    8
  77. Not even starting to talk how one country focusses on defense like anti air and ECM, while the other sides emperor focusses on air craft carrier fleets and air power - what you mainly need to attack others around the world, nothing else. Carriers are an utter waste as defense, they are for attacking other countries.
    8
  78. They went there for a quick end if the regime would have been smart enough to give up. But when you actually have to fight, such a frontline all over the place would be a nightmare. The oh so glorious pushback of the NATO and its puppet regime was nothing more than Russia shortening the frontline, what is one of the most basic things in warfare.
    8
  79. Uh, no, they give a giant F about it, they simply reached the limit of reality fo their lies and exploitation.
    8
  80. They got no strategy, simply because they got no room to do anything beyond a few things and that's what they are doing. They literally can't do anything else besied being smart enough to give up.
    8
  81.  @Airborne-80  That fascists waste human lives like that? Of course.
    8
  82.  @nemiw4429  Well, it's easy to be accurate, if you simply say that whoever you hit was a terrorist.
    8
  83. Hell, that guy is still so delusional. "Ukraine did not let it happen." Child - Russia COULD flatten Ukraine. Easily. They don't want to, because they are the ones who wants to preserve Ukraine as a working state (in contrast to NATO and its coup regime puppets - and people like you, who clearly do not care at all about Ukraine and its people), what includes not mass murdering civilians and its peopel in general. Russia could crush Ukraine. What would cause so much more death and destruction. You think they could't just cut of electricity completely in an instant for examlpe? Since day 1? How are you still so delusional.
    8
  84. Why call it liberal? It's right wing extremist capitalism. "Liberal" is the completly work word for that. If anything than "neoliberal", but that too is a PR word for pretty much work slavery.
    8
  85.  @Zyzyx442  Ukraine is heavily losing since 10 years, so...
    8
  86. Those gains were just Russia shortening the frontline, what is a logical step when you switch to a war of attrition, since you want a straight frontline for that and at best some bulges here and there for manveures like encirclement - but even those will have a straight fortification behind it. Russia would have held Kherson city to keep the city intact and let the peopel live there even at that disadvantage of a wide river in their back, but with the bombardement of the dam by NATO/Banderites, this risk was too high and an absolute correct assassement as it was shown later when the dam was indeed destroyed.
    8
  87. Always love when such peopel come up with that this is a war you havent't seen before, utterly ignoring how western fascism carpet bombed country after country over the last decades 100 times worse and against peopel who got nothing to really fight back with. But those don't count, right? Weren't white enough or whatever.
    7
  88. What is simply just the typical fascistic thinking of uber- vs subhumans.
    7
  89.  @schijtaccount1  Yeah, it's always fascinating when people come up with "that guy said that", while there is zero reason for 'that guy' having any special insight. Even when you are right at the front - well, you can talk about your own position there. That's it. You don't magically got any clue about everything else.
    7
  90.  @adeveo9067  You mean if you don't drop something in there from for example a drone or with a missile, eh? "Cooling towers may contain a variety of combustible material, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC) fill, fiberglass reinforced polyester (FRP) casing, fan stacks, fan decks, fan blades, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polypropylene nozzles, as well as wood and fiberglass structural components."
    7
  91. That peopel still eat these ridiculous lies after 2 years of constant BS stories...
    7
  92.  @dimbulb6443  Ad hominem is another sign of propaganda.
    7
  93.  @odinymir4274  Those boat drones ARE expensive, because they need a hell lot of technology to work. It's not some rowing boat full with TNT. It needs all the means to be controlled over that distance and a whole lot of countermeassure against ECM and alike. Those marine drones aren't cheap at all.
    7
  94. It's no videogame. It's not like you just got credits and then place your factories and produce an army with endless ammunition and self repair you just send to the 100m away front, undisturbed. A transportation of masses of equipment is easily discovered and attacked, leading to a majority of it being destroyed before even reaching the frontline. If you spread it up, this means that only drops will get in, what then will not be able to make much impact at all before being destroyed again. This package is still smaller than everything sent before. NATO already sent thousands of vehicles and millions of ammunition - near to all of it destroyed, no level of propaganda will change that.
    7
  95. A-10 is a sitting duck against pretty much anything with an air defense.
    7
  96.  @andrewsek7485  Because that's not the real number, obviously.
    7
  97. The regime is pulling the fight into the cities for a purpose - and that IS the Russian double checking regarding possible civilian casualties. If they evacuate the city, it would just be 100% warzone for Russia when the regime is using it as their base, no reason to hold back, you can just rebuild buildings afterwards (as they already do in the regions behind the fronlines).
    7
  98.  @Whoami4967-p5r  What operations in the black sea? Have you seen any Ukrainian ships which would have to be hunted down by Russian ships? For wha they don't even need a ship, because the flag ship of the Black Sea fleet is: Crimea.
    7
  99.  @thecap5222  The capital wasn't encircled. A few thousand Russian soldiers did a pinning operation there for the majority of troops liberating the Donbass area up to the strongholds the Banderites build. Or more clear term: a distraction. You can't encircle a 3 million city with a few thousans soldiers, even less conquer it.
    7
  100. Moskva wasn't an embarassement. It's n over 4 decades old ship borderline ot of commision and not even part of the SMO. If that was an attack, it was absolutely stupid. If it was a fire, happens. Flag ship? Sorry, this is not a video game where flag ship is something important, the Moskva was simply the oldest ship around, that's it, the actual dangerous and active battle ships are much newer and ofter smaller, since Russia swapped quite a whole ago to smaller, but more dangerous ships. Moskva is mainly a sentimental loss, since it could have made quite a nice museum with its history deep into Cold War times. The military loss is pretty much zero. People also act, as if military accidents are somethign new or not know in the west, cleartly having no clue. US Navy for example lost a massive and pretty new ship just some years ago and that in its homeport to soe fire, still couldn't save it. Was double the size and half the age of the Moskva. Embarrasement? Simlpy somethinv that happens and with zero impact on the SMO. Again: if that was an attack, it was absolute stupid to waste that one shot they got on an absolute unimportant target.
    7
  101.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Russia never cared to hold Kharkiv, that's why you got zero defense build up there and they didn't try to even hold it for a second. They had that territory because there was zero resistance at start, then used that weakness of no defense as a trap when they shortened/straightened the frontline. Kherson City was different, they wanted to defend the city an keep the Nazis away, that's why they even accepted such a giant disadvantage with that river in their back, but when the Nazis/NATO started to bombard the dam, the risk was too hight and they evacuated the city and after that got no reason to not change the disadvantage into an advantage. Was overall very bad for the Nazis, because they had ugly losses even with the Russians willingly fighting at an disadvantage, just to keep a city save. And of course it was shown how right Russia was, since the Nazis DID destroy the dam later.
    7
  102.  @thechrisandphaedrusshow  Since Ukraine had many, many hundreds of 'Russian' tanks themselves plus many hundreds more from NATO, well, of course there will be a hell lot of destroyed "Russian" tanks. And the failur of western tanks is not even that they were destroyed, the failure is that you never see them do anything at all before being destroyed. Overall tanks solely exists today to send in as assault unit to force the enemy into action. Beside this they are borderline worthless with their extremely limited firing range alone. They are the most heavily armored unit and exist to take some hits before failing, that's it.
    7
  103.  @stevesimmons223  Uh, no, actually one of the big reasons the US Nazis droppped nukes in Japan was the fear that Japan would bow down to the soviets instead. Overall the USA did very little in both theaters, they mainly went in late for the looting. Both armies, that of germany and that of japan was mainly defeated by others.
    6
  104. I'm not surprised that 'we' are thieves, that we are since centuries. It's more fascinating, how frozen assets even generate interest...
    6
  105.  @jamesn0va  Still theft.
    6
  106.  @andreahighsides7756  Because they never tried to take it. Kiev is around 60 times the size of Avdiivka. You think Russia would try to take it with less soldiers than they got at Avdiivka? It was a pinning operation, attacking something important of the keep the enemy occupied while you take what you actually want.
    6
  107.  @ali-haider5788  No, it didn't. Russia brought some few thousands soldiers there. It's absolutely impossible to take a 3 million city with such small amount, even with 10 times as much. This alone makes 100% clear that Russia never went for Kiev.
    6
  108. Friends and benefactors? I hope you don't talk about NATO, because they are the exact opposite of that.
    6
  109. That airbase footage looks odd at best. When you look at the destroyed planes, they are pretty much copy paste. Since one destroyed plane is actually confirmed, they very likely just copied one, painted some black over it and sold this as proof. Since those attack are done by NATO with NATO planes surveillance and alike, they could easily show better proof than that, if it would really look like it. In modern day where you can fake whole HQ videos, you should try better. But in the end, it's not like anything will change reality, and the guillible will fall for anything anyway.
    6
  110. @NJ-wb1cz Uh, no. There is even less reason to speed it up. There will no discussion about Kursk nor will it be involved in any trade. They will just have to leave, that's it. They are in no position at all for any kind of trade. They don't even control that area - they are just there.
    6
  111.  @sporkconsumingsoup  What you mean? How your Nazis bombarde them? There is no need to force any of the few remaining people there into anything. Majority fled, many fight since years and that since start out of free will to defend themselves and their families and others.
    6
  112. ROFL NAFO was NEVER about countering disinformation. Not a single second.
    6
  113.  @frenzalrhomb6919  Well, western propaganda its full 1984, so victory = defeat?
    6
  114. No, it was not. If you would have many weapons on board, you would have a lot of secondary explosions, not one big fire cloud. A big fire cloud is more like the explosion of fuel or alike. That and all other logic makes clear, that this ship was a zero point target, that's the reason they attacked and hit it in the first place. The air defense was focussed on all wortwhile targets, the actual warships. And before being shot down they let the missile drop and just hit something random and selling that as success. If they could really hit what they want with their oh so good missiles, why shouldn't they destroy the missiles cruisers? While always hit zero threat targets, hm?
    5
  115.  @ketelin4285  Russia's plan A was Minsk 2, while NATO and Nazis just abused that, as they openly admitted that. When the Nazis tried to finish the genocide, armed by NATO (who planed to use this to lure Russia in and push it into chaos, as you partly described), Russsia had to step in, since waiting till they go crazy enough to attack Crimea would have simply force them to burn Ukraine down to the ground without holding back as they do now and that after the slaughter in Donbass, so we speak of hundredthousansd dead people (for NATO a joke of course, they mass murder over 30 billions in the last decades when you count all the direct and indirect killing and the less Ukrainians remain the better, easier to rob them dry and Ukraine got quite some resources - of course not even close to the gigantic wealth of Russia, which lead the world ranking by great distance). Plan B after Minks failed was a quick shock and hoping for that at least a glimpse of sanity is left in the coup regime somewhere. What might even had workerd, but of course NATO made quickly clear, that this is not acceptable. Ukraine MUST burn. So we got this now - that Ukraine burns. For nothing. Well... for NATO....
    5
  116.  @terryharris1291  Sure, an Russia shot down 1000 planes in one hour. See, it's easy to just write stuff.
    5
  117.  @artempopov3913  You would at best needs less guards on a plane. What shall these guys do on a plane? You could pretty go with zero guards on the plane.
    5
  118.  @richardkey1678  Funny, since Russian media shows everything the western media show, too - plus the rest of the story. Why shouldn't they? The best PR for Russia is to just quote our fascists and their insanity. No need to make something up, just show the truth.
    5
  119.  @FlyingMonkeyDevil  It's simply logical reality. The war 2014 started was a civil war inside Ukraine, the coup regime against those who didn't accept the coup, which mainly lived in the east and south. It's overall Russia that intervened 2022 and joined those militias/soldiers of Donbass. And why should those stop fighting?
    5
  120. Stealth mainly works against countries where you don't need it in the first place...
    5
  121. Afghanistan became both times victim of US fascism. Soviets went in to stop meddling of the CIA with the country (in the usual way), what the USA exploited by not even arming and training Afghan extremists, but foreign ones. The Afghan people, even those who wanted to fight (by the way against Afghanistan getting more secular and allowing schools for girls and alike for example...) were seen as too moderate, all too often talking with the soviets, so US fascism created a network out of extremely aggressive foreigners, transported those to Pakistan where the futher indoctrinated (this includes children by the way), trained and armed them to send them to Afghanistan, which paid a heavy price for that - also as usual with all the countries US fascism did such things.
    5
  122. Kherch bridge isn't needed for the miltary at all. This said: NATO is known for brutally destroying pretty much all infrastructue without any care about how this is of military worth and since they are the actual master behind Ukraine, it of course makes sense that they go for th Kherch bridge (and fail at that...).
    5
  123. What exactly shoukd Russia and China want from India?
    5
  124.  @DarrelX-im2hb  Actually Georgia bombarded civilians and also killed Russian peace maker troops there. It wasn't just some attack on a military base.
    5
  125.  @a.N.....  The only thing you saw from our western tanks was them burning instantly, without doing anything. And what you see from the Bradleys is the same beside some PR videos where they fire their gun at something. Beside this also just burning.
    5
  126.  @dieselphiend  Russia produces ALL their military hardware itself, child. You think they would put anything from NATO fascists into their weaponry?
    5
  127. Pretty pointless to put extermely expensive anti air missiles on kamikaze drones. For them to work you need even more electronic, so instead of 250k your kamikaze boat now costs 1M. And since not even the old ones ever magaged to hit an actual worthwhile target but at best a patroal boat or landing ships, what's the point to wast even more? Ah, forgot, the are burning the money of others anyway, so why should they care.
    5
  128. You do get that as soon as you make civilians take part in warfare, they are not civilians anymore?
    5
  129. Depens on who you ask. You don't ask those in Donbass, Crimea and the south. You don't ask all who fled. You don't ask all the "traitor". You don't ask the soldier you just dragged out of their cars. And then you can quickly reach quite high humbers.
    5
  130. @dorseyjack3206 Russia got close to no debt, gigantic resource reserves an economy that is not based on absurd growth of money and can easily live all on itself without any problem - and is strong enough to feed another half a billion people with ease.
    5
  131. Democratic is only when you care for ALL. Even a majority is still tyranny if you don't make politics that serves all. This is about what everysone needs to live - not what everyone wants, obviously.
    5
  132.  @danielbwest  Those aren't game changer either. Russia just started to hit a bit harder. They overall hold back a lot and still do. They could do MUCH worse, with MUCH more destruction and casualties, but that's not what they want.
    5
  133. Plus all in the same radius around.
    5
  134.  @edc1569  Only thing special about HIMARS is, that the Banderites to everything that they are not discovered and hit, so they stay far behind the frontlines and are very rarely used. Not that they got much ammunition for them in the first place.
    5
  135. Maps will never able to show the reality, a single line is simply unable to do this. What is showing the reality most is the constant begging of the coup regime for another whole new army and conscription after conscription round.
    5
  136.  @cguerrilla7315  The numbers are clear, there is zero doubt. Russia never went for Kiev. It's like saying that someone who throws a stone against a window tried to destroy the whole building with it. Obviously not. It's simply impossible.
    5
  137.  @jaywulf  You literally would have to pay Russia money for them to take any of our European garbage.
    5
  138.  @ruhtraeregel  It's a patrol boat. Have you ever looked at what they attack with these NATO drones? (those attackse are 100% NATO work) Landing ships. ships in repair and now a patrol boat. Never one of the actual big warships. You would guess that if those drones would be so awesome, they would go after the targets which destroy billions of dollars of NATO equipment first. And not stuff with pretty much zero impact on the war. While the patrol boat CAN fire missiles, that's nothing special. Those missiles can be fired from a container.
    5
  139.  @Aimercesttous  Peopel don't get that in modern warfare you don't have to move so much to hit the enemy. When people used spears you had to get into 1-2m range, make it 50m at best when you trow something. When you got longbows, catapulst, the first cannons and rifles, that became a few 100m. Then you got artillery and this climbed up to many kms. And today you got missiles system and can hit enemy 100s of km away with modern surveillance able to look far beyond the frontlines.
    5
  140. Yeah, sure, of course Russian will turn against Putin when they are attacked by the people Putin fights. Typical N@zi logic.
    5
  141. Just basic fascism. It's easy to explain: fascists often got high values, regarding those they see worthy of it. But the 'subhumans' are not part of that group - they got no rights or value at all in the mind of a fascist.
    5
  142. Wouldn't be out of question and for a little patrol boat it died quite the heroic death for that. It seems overall clear that those navy drones got no chance against actual warships. Such patrol boats are more cost guard level than navy. They got weapons, but overall in comparison to the real warships, they are far weaker in every regard, because it's simpy not their job. If those drones would be good enough, they would have tried to sink one of the big warships already, since those were the ones which destroyed billions of dollars in NATO equipment already. Not that this would change much, because the missiles they fire can also be shot from ground and air.
    5
  143. No, when you fight a stronger enemy and it isn't survival (so you got nothing to lose), you better give up or find other solutions. Attacking a stronger enemies weakpoint will just make you suffer even more in the end.
    5
  144. It's not even that, overall Russia never used that to their advantage and had most of the time less soldiers in Ukraine than the regime and of course also couldn't even go all out, because Ukraine is just a puppet of NATO, the main enemy, which created that proxy war for exactly that region, to damage Russia without wasting their own soldiers. The biggest problem is, that the regime mainly seems to have insane people left or at least only following those orders. When you see a Russian offensive, it encircles the enemy. When you see a regime offensive - it lets itself get encircled. And that happens over and over again and since 2022 they don't even pull bag but keep pumping in forces into this death zone. Beside the clear different in weaponry, that's one of the main reasons for the horrible losses on the regime side.
    4
  145. It's obvious, that the do. Their goal clearly is to destroy the military equipment and get rid of Azov, C14, Right Sector and alike. That's why most battle take place where the HQ of those guys are (Mariupol for example) and not in Kiev. Goal clearly is to do as little damags as possible to anything else.
    4
  146. USA is protecting nothing but the interests of their oligarchs to pillage the world. The thing that the USA protected in 2.WW were the Europen fascists. They SAVED those. That was the whole plan and it led to NATO, a bunch of fascists becoming the cannonfodder for US imperialism in Europe, because that's what NATO is about. Never was anything else. No one on this plane gives a single F to conquer Europe, starting with the F that it is an absolute worthless goal, because Europe is batshit poor. You can't conquer money, it will just collapse when you do that. You don't conquer an econmy via military means, because the majority of it will also collaps, instead you just copy the knowledge and built it yourself and that's not something you can prevent with a military. You conquer a nation to either get a) slaves, b) land or c) resources and A and B have lost a lot of meaning with the industrial revolution, when machine work became so powerful and the main source for productivity. But this made C even more important and that's it in the end: all wars are about C: resources. Either directly or indirectly. All attacks on Russia are all about to pillage the richest country on this planet. Nothing else.
    4
  147.  @ketelin4285  Overall the fault of Russia keepign the eastern euorpean states was NATO fascism. Even Stalin(!) wanted a peace treaty what as usually would involve any foreign army retreating to their home country. The answer of NATO fascism/US emperor was to station nukes in Europe, creating NATO and even taking in germany, where the USA had kept most of the Nazis in power and even gave them a career in NATO positions - for exactly the reasons that they are Nazis = perfect for NATO, which was created for the same goal that Hitler had. So Russia could not retreat. It was forced to keep those countries it really did not want to have, since after the genocide of the Nazis with 27 million dead, they had many, many other problems than this whole Cold War shit show and keeping a bunch of angry people as blocker against US nukes. But, well, nothing you could do about it. And NATO just showed them how right they were, since we now got NATO at Russia's border. Modern weponry just took quite a lot of meaning out of this. 60-70 years ago? No chance to allow that.
    4
  148. West needs resources. Russia is nice enough to sell those. But what should Russia do with those coupons (=money) they get for it? Just keep the coupons? No, of course trade the coupons for something they want. Since they buy those things with the coupons, they had no reason produce those themselves.
    4
  149. Good news for Ukraine? Why should it be good news for Ukraine, if their fascist regime gets more money from the western Nazis to keep burning down their country?
    4
  150.  @timothypeterson1903  In that case they wouldn't hunt down peopel on the street, because they would have no need for any replacement.
    4
  151. Lol, Moskva. Moskva was a museum and almost half a century old ship that was per se already out of commission (and never took part in the SMO). And those little boats are not military target at all. Maybe for Russia, because the Banderites use small boats for the insane meat waves, so when they do that, sure. But that thing just being in a random harbour? Just a boat as any other - and way less expensive than those drones with all the tech on board they need to function and deflect ECM.
    4
  152.  @dimasterin7439  Not how it works, fascist.
    4
  153. Propaganda on the social media is withotu meaning. The real difference is when you look at the official channels and the governments. Russian government itself doesn't say much at all. Meanwhile the most ridiculous propaganda in this war since start comes from Zelensky himself.
    4
  154. No, it will not. In modern warfare the losses on the side with less and worse weapons are much higher. When you got less artillery, less drones, less tanks, less everything, no aviation and so on, you just get bombed into oblivion. Russia isn't even on the offensive, because it does not have to. What you see on social media are scout- and small assault units to steer up the enemy, but that's not the main frontline. If we take all together we talk about way over a million soldiers - and anything you see on the internet never shows more than 50 in one place, the scout units often even much smaller. And yes, while you don't fight a war against an enemy that does not care for its country and people and all and all that fueled by hundreds of billions of NATO money with zero losses, the idea that Russia has even equal losses is just absurd. NOTHING shows this.
    4
  155.  @brownie43212  See: if you are pro Nazi, at least put some effort in, not just take reality and turn it around 180°.
    4
  156. Since reality is a "russian bot", 'they' are always here, you can't escape reality.
    4
  157. The "Afghanes" didn't win the war against the Soviets. The Soviets were on the side of the Afghanes - fighting mainly mercenaries brought in from the outside by he USA over Pakistan. The Soviets went out of Afghanistan because Gorbatchev wanted to end the Cold War (was of course naive, our western fascists will never stop to try dominating and pillaging the world). Afghanistan itself was ruined by all this, with the build up terror groups still bringing havoc to the whole region - not Afghanstan alone. Could be "fun" for Europe, when the next terror group is heavily build up Nazi hordes - bringing havoc to the European region...
    4
  158.  @johnjennings9043  It's overall insane what NATO pumped into this when you see the numbers from all the NATO countries.
    4
  159. Hu? Why not? We are fascists. We want to see profit while humand lives (beside our very own of course) does not matter, especially not those "subhumans". Ukraine got some nice resource reserves. And Russia got by wide distance the biggest reousces reserves on this planet. Why shouldn't we sacrifice any 'subhuman' we can for getting these resources? And the less of them remain, the better, they are just in the way. I don't get the question. Seems you don't understand how fascism works. What the 'subhumans' want does not matter. They exist to serve us at best - or shouldn't exist at all. That's the core of western ideology. Since centuries. All our brutal mass murder around the globe comes from this.
    4
  160.  @kasperiization  Child, those UN votes mean very little. Most did not like the escalation, but you don't get that they mainly did not like that it had come so far - all pushed by the usul culprits.
    4
  161.  @terryt2728  No, they didn't try at all. That was distraction. You don't take the 3 million people capitol of a country with a few thounsand soldiers. The number alone makes clear, that Russia never tried to take Kiev.
    4
  162.  @raysstlyn6346  Reality tells the opposite. The Banderas regime sacrifices the soldiers in insane amounts for absolutely nothing but a headline in the newspapers, while Russia doesn't care for such empty things and got zero problem to give up huge areas if that means a better situation for the soldiers.
    4
  163. He just forgot the "per month" part.
    4
  164.  @RogueAK47  You are delusional if you think that a defender will have lesser losses. Defense is easier when everything else is on par. Else you are just sitting there are and get bombarded the crap out of you.
    4
  165.  @Mountainclimber-zv4u1  Banderites Ukraine is bombing Donbass since 10 years, not Russia. Russia intervenes there against that since 2 years.
    4
  166. Area gains don't matter. Ukraine meanwhile lost three armies and NATO is running out of material to give and the regime out of soldiers it can sacrifice. The idea, that this is a stalemate is on the level of a videogame, where both sides just reached the limit of their tech tree and build up and now just keep on producing units. In reality, Ukraine got nothing left and this will only get worse.
    4
  167. Explanation is simple: the numbers are horribly wrong.
    4
  168.  @4lyfMotorhead  Money is worthless, productive work is not. Make a little test in your head. Delete all money and delte all workforce. What will have actual impact? Money is doing nothing. Without workforce it's worthless numbers and overall what inflation means, when there is MORE money than actual worth (so of course a lot of often criminal manipulation plays into that as well). Meanwhile workforce without money would simply make trading more annoying.
    4
  169.  @christianwilliams1982  Not at all, since they got vast superiority in every single sector but number of soldiers. They got more and better drones. They got more and better artillery and missiles. They got more and better aviation. They got better surveillance and better logistics. The only reality in which it would make sense that Russia got higher losses would be where the Banderites are superhumans.
    4
  170.  @Nave4x4  They come up with the absurd excuse that it was for Russia to steal out of the contracts. This also makes no sense by the fact alone, that Europe already stole Russia's money at that point, what was MAINLY from payment for Russian resources it already had delivered. So this alone not only canceled any contract by one side not only not delivering what they promised, but actively stealing it back.
    4
  171. Same they already got, you know, fired by all the hundreds of other jets already destroyed (this includes soviet jets sent by NATO countries). They need the F 16 since they run out of the last jets able to fire those cruise missiles and alike.
    4
  172.  @tallshort1849  It's simply the truth, kid.
    4
  173. Is there actual proof for this meanwhile? Because the footage looks very much like the last time the lied about sinking a ship and it showed up withotu any damage. The awful quality makes it very easy to fake such things, as the first one already showed. Quite odd overrall anyway, why Russia should have a lone warship there. They don't need those to fire missiles, they can easily do this via air or ground. Also odd that all this took too muh time between the attacks, what makes it way less likely to succeed. Anyway: let's just pretend it's real, congrats for sinking an actual warship this time, even if its an incredible small one they are so little about that they put it right there (almost feels like bait: "Come, take this one, it's an easy target").
    4
  174. That Star Wars example is typical for people who live in Hollywood and game fantasy world. Starting with that those drones aren't small ships, but navy warheads, slow over water torpedos, not fighting boats. They also only attack easy targets, like landing ships or patrol boats, nevern an actual warship. And in space this wouldn't work even less, since what makes these suicide navy drones a little bit effective against weak targets is, that they are hard to sea on the sea. In space you got nothing to hide behind. Overall those Navy drones do shit and in the end mainly work because NATO is guiding them and hiding behind Russia's good will to not escalate that into 3.WW by just shooting down all the NATO stuff around them.
    3
  175.  @Revolutionisnear1110  With that logic India must be a super economy dwarfing eveything else. Buying power? Many peopel is somethign you must care for, it's not a plus but a burden. People constantly consume things to stay alive and you must create that. A big plus is, how many resource reserves you got - and of course how you are able to use them. Europe got close to zero resource reserves - Russia has by far the most in the world. What is also the reason why Russia gives a fuck about conquering Europe - it's the other way around. USA got more reserves - but most are timber and coal and its gignatic hunger burned through all its oil and gas reserves and will make its system collaps when the rest is gone. Money is nothing. You need resources. Why do you think the USA creates these gigantic trilllion after trillion debt mountains? Because money is worth shit.
    3
  176.  @mentordamontanhafumegante5391  Yeah, per month.
    3
  177. Let's say it is general much easier when you can drive all your stuff a few km away from the enemy without any care, since they mainly got rifles and some mortars and RPG and not really anything to hit you beyond that. They don't get the difference, when even your 500+km away carrier fleet is an easy target...
    3
  178. Wouldn't even call it 'gains' when you just run into the kill zone of a layered defense and are not even able to overcome the first layer, which solely exist to slow down. That's like trying to ram down a door, but then fall over your own feet before you even reach it. Just pushing into the kill zone of a defense is even worse than just not attacking at all.
    3
  179.  @philippe-f1s  NATO was never about defense. Defense from what? Europe is batshit poor, there is nothing worth to conquer.
    3
  180. Deception is the very core of warfare. You can use brute force against a vastly inferior enemy, but even then it will be much more costly than it would be if combined with deception.
    3
  181. I mean, since rifles play a very little role - of course.
    3
  182. What about it? Bad for the buyers of oil and gas. Such strikes raise the price, so in the end Russia can sell around 0,1% less oil and gas, because destroyed there, but those remaining 99,9% for a higher price, while the buyers simply have to pay more for less. For Russia's energy consumption, these strikes do nothing. You would have to do 100s of such strikes to make an impact. In case you don't get it: Russia produces over 580 BILLION cubicmeters in gas alone every year. Such gas tanks hold a few thousand cubicmeter, let's say they are on the bigger side with 10.000 per, 10 destroyed, 100.000 cubicmeter. 580.000.000.000- 000.000.100.000= 579.999.900.000 See the problem?
    3
  183. I mean, taking whatever you want to call Ukraine is at this point into the EU is a good way to destroy it (the EU - well AND Ukraine) further and it's not in a good state already.
    3
  184. That would mainly limit their speed and range a lot. Overall those drones aren't as good as people make them look like. They are expensive and you need a very certain setup up that mainly build up on Russia's good will to not start 3.WW by just destroying all NATO shit that is hovering around there and is used for that. Ukraine couldn't do these suicide bomber attacks. They neither got the drones and even less the surveillance and control needed for that. The drones msut also have a lot of high tech inside for this to work and counter meassure. People think those are just some cheap boats with explosives on board. Doesn't work that way, those would get lose quickly. And even those expensive high tech navy drones are only good enough to hit weak armed targets like landing and civil ships or patrol boats. If those navy drones would be any good, they would go for the actual warships, not the small fries. There is zero reason to no not use them that way if they could.
    3
  185. By the way: when attacking infrastructure is a war crime, than NATO is THE war crime alliance of all centuries. It's what they START! EVERY! SINGLE! OF THEIR ENDLESS WARS WITH! And that against mostly innocent countries, which did absolutely nothing wrong, especially not against NATO (well, beside not being a NATO puppet and selling out their people...).
    3
  186. There is literally ZERO reason to attack Odessa from sea. The idea alone is just stupid.
    3
  187.  @cefb8923  Russia didn't even have a full mobilisation, far away from conscription. Overall Russia does not WANT Kiev, nor the whole center and west of Ukraine in general. Question is, if in the end it won't be forced to take it, simply to end it, else NATO won't stop burning it down.
    3
  188.  @glennllewellyn7369  USSR wasn't expansionistic either. They wanted to get out of eastern europe, they simply couldn't, because NATO was created and Europe full with US nukes, so retreating one-sided would have been a suicidal mistake. USSR tried for a full decade to get a peace treaty - and created the Warsaw Pact when it got US nukes in Europe instead, many years after creation of NATO.
    3
  189. I mean, overall Russia's losses are not small, but of course that's no surprise when it goes against an insane regime that is sacrifing a good million of men and all fueled by endless NATO (which cowardly hides behind its meatshield) billions in equipment. You can't fight that with zero losses, obviously. Imagine the massacre of US troops you would have seen in Vietnam if North Vietnam would have been fueled with weaponry the same way as coup regime now (where they by the way also loved to use South Vietnam troops as meat shield, as you can see by the massive losses - not even starting to talk how many civilians the USA had slaughtered there, not holding back at all, like in all their wars). If Russia would act like NATO in its wars, you would already have hundredthousands of dead civilians in Ukraine.
    3
  190. Russia produces way more food than it needs itself.
    3
  191.  @mrityunjaytripathi5588  Russia can also produce most chips themselves without any problem. And if needed they could also develop even higher ones. The thing is, that doing everything yourself isn't very effecient. Of course a fisherman can also produce the fishing equipment, can build his own cabin, grow his own food and so on. But it's much more efficient if people share such task, everyone focussing on their part and then trading with each other. If Russia would just build everything itself, they would have no reason to trade with anyone else, since the others would have nothing worth to trade with. Sure, the could give 'money' but money is worthless. Money is a coupon. Russia would end up with a mountain of worthless coupons.
    3
  192. Russia's fortification worked because of layered combined arms warfare. When you don't have the tools to do that... well...
    3
  193. They hold fields and maybe a few villages. What's the point? It got zero military value but insane costs.
    3
  194. First ridiculous mistake is to think, that Russia storms in like in a medieval charge. People don't get it: what you see on those videos at the front are MAINLY scout units. The vast amount of heavily armed forced stays far behind that. When you got some tanks charge in, that is for forcing the enemy to react, what will be observed and than those heavily armed units behind all that take that under fire. Infantery units can also try to take some area, but this again is mainly to steer the enemy.
    3
  195. Question for NATO was: a) All nukes go to Russia and nothing much changes beside the wonderful opportunity to march east through all the ex USSR countries and use the corrupt governments to chain them to NATO. b) Let all the ex soviet states keep the nukes with no chance at all to march east but massive risks instead for NATO.
    3
  196. Should be easy to show them. Of course that's harder then to just type in a random number.
    3
  197. I mean, it's still interesting to hear their delusion, I guess?
    3
  198.  @fredo1070  To be fair: this comes from a medic, so he's talking about the peopel who weren't just shredded. When an artillery shell, missile, TOS or FAB hits you, you are likely just dead, so no medic involved.
    3
  199. EU membership would be a desaster for Ukrainian citizens. Not that there is much left to lose for middle and west after the Nazis and NATO have just burned down the country (pretty much the thing of NATO to ruin countries like that). EU isn't known to help peopl eat all. If you are on the floor, it will just abuse this and suck you dry even further.
    3
  200.  @constantinescuadrian2758  If Russia would invade my country after a Nazi coup in it, I would be thankful for them to care about us and stop the fascists. Well, already happened. And even though my country killed over 27 million soviets, 2/3 of that civilians, they forgave us. Borderline angelic to do that.
    3
  201. What do you want from a liar? He has to do that. Shall he tell the truth or what? That's not his job...
    3
  202. If this even happened (had the exact same kind of footage some months ago and it was all fake, the ship showed up without any damage at all): to have a lone, small ship up there is extremely odd any makes little sense. Feels like bait.
    3
  203.  @toti550  Russia wasn't monopolizing anything. It's simply the country with by far the most resourecs on this planet, especially gas. That's just reality.
    3
  204. That's no large group. And the Banderas Nazis are all about to sell (often enough the same and very old footage) over and over again to multiply thei 'success' (with no military impact), while utterly ignoring they they got ten times such losses at the same time. When you got way over a million soldiers fighting each other, you will have losses on both sides of course. That the sides that is fed over 200% of its GDP meanwhile in weaponry is still losing so horribly is pretty insane.
    3
  205.  @benteasdale5809  Yes, they attacked the Donbass since 2014 and one weak before Russia intervened, they started to bombard the Donbass again with over 1000 attacks per day, armed up by NATO.
    3
  206.  @oggaBugga  Most people don't even know that most of Japan's army was defeatd by other Asian countries. Just like in Europe, the USA went in at the end and did close to nothing, more mass murdering civilians than anything else.
    3
  207.  @JamesChurchich  No one was in Kiev. That was propagand about Russian soldiers killing civilians, while it was Banderites who killed civilians and their anti air missiles flying into buildings. I don't want to know how many people were shot in the first day alone by the insanity of "everyone is a Russian", especially because Zelensky instantly went full Volkssturm and let people out of prison and gave anyone a rifle without care. Remember the news about civilians, even children, crafting molotov cocktails? Zelensky was full "the people are cannonfodder" from the start.
    3
  208.  @patrickmayes6071  Nope, what they did their worked out perfectly. You only can come to the idea tha Russia lost there, if you are so stupid to think that they tried to take the 3 million people city Kiev with a few tousand soldiers.
    3
  209.  @horoshkoaleksandr273  You do get that Robotyne was a village with ~500 people?
    3
  210.  @demivik5812  Kid, Russia didn't even had an actual full mobilisation of its reserves, while your beloved Nazis hunt down civilians in the streets to force them into uniform. You Nazis can lie all you want - reality doesn't care, no matter how many idiots you find believing you.
    3
  211.  @Kofferr  I mean, have fun to believe that nonsense. It's bad for your to fall for your own lies.
    3
  212.  @terjeoseberg990  You really don' get that reality just ignores your insanity, do you?
    3
  213. With one side using (pointless) propaganda as their 'strongest' weapon and even having giant studios going on to produce that propaganda, the shown war crimes are more likely MORE than the real ones at least regarding this side. Since we got a literal Nazi regime on one side, proudly wearing the emblems of the Waffen SS, it wouldn't even surprise me if they kill people on purpose to film it for their PR. We talk about a regime that wanted to displace or murder some million people and who are now fighting for their power and lives, just like the german regime did...
    3
  214.  @The-ghost-of-Moskva  Yes, it was wiped out. That's why you got full mobilisation and 10+ conscribtion round and now demanding for another half a million.
    3
  215.  @komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257  You can easily look up where majority of the German and Japanese armies were defeated. In both cases it was not by the western allies, not even close.
    3
  216. What isn't anything new. It's a problem since hundred of years, when you got less soldiers and equipment than the enemy. You CAN compensate some of that, but even then it still would be better if you had the bigger army, not the enemy. And of course quantity has its own quality also means, that you must care to keep that quantity. But peope love to turn that around for their delusion. Someone who doesn't see quantity as a quality is far more willing to just sacriced soldiers as he likes.
    3
  217. Russis does not need to sell resources at all. They can just keep them. In contrary to worthless money, resources got a real value.
    3
  218. Responsible for the intervention of Russia is 100% the Nazi regime and its try to finish its genocide in Donbass by force, what all western and Ukrainians signers of Minsk 2 meanwhile admitted. They never cared for peace, it was only to buy time to gear up after the coup regime had lost so many soldiers not willing to follow their fascism, so they only got sick Nazis willing to murder, but being incredible bad at warfare. So the regime needed those years to build up their forces, while NATO of course KNEW that this would force Russia to intervene with the absurd idea that some sanctions and that SWIFT action would then just ruin Russia, regime change and after the slaughter of Donbass there would be a lot of sweet and cheap resources for the western fascists. THAT'S what wars are about. Russia never wanted this war in every way. If Putin would have wanted Ukraien, HE would have created a coup in Ukraine against the west or at the least have stopped the coup the west had pushed, not only followed by brutal violence against all those against it, but also the instance sell out of Ukraine to the west, what was simply a complete desaster of Ukraine, even without the war. An insane warmonger country would not just look at it and try fo almost a decade to solve it with talking - only steppign in when that regime indeed tried to finish it, there is no doubt. Over 1000 attacks per day against the Donbass for a full week before Russia stopped it. Even then the regime could have ended it and get away wirth a blue eye. But of course it's just a NATO puppet and both don't care to just burn down Ukraine's future. There is nothing left now. And it's not Russian bombs, but the brutal corruption, dept and the fascism, that ruined the future of western and middle Ukraine.
    3
  219. Borders of Ukraine were redrawn by an illegal, militant coup with those not willing to follow the coup brutally attacked by the coup regime unless able to prevent that by joining Russia for protection (Crimea) - or later saved from the oppression by Russia's intervention against the genocide (Donbass).
    3
  220.  @FishandHunt  You do get that this is a Nazi cheer, right? It's like yelling "Sieg Heil!".
    3
  221. All the active warships are undamaged.
    3
  222. Wasn't 10:1, not even when you include the millions of civilians the Nazis slaughtered. Ratio of dead soldiers and civilians in the soviet union was around 1:2. For every soldier 2+ civilians died. Soviets on the other side did not do the same to the germans. There most civlians were killed by the fire bombing of the western allies, who did very little damage to the german army, which was mainly defeated by the soviets to over 80%.
    3
  223. The grind is going since monthes. What we see now is the breaking down of all the defense the coup regime and NATO had build up over years.
    3
  224. Actual impact od the drones is simply not good enough in general. You need millions of drones and even then they are not the dominating factor in warfare (at least not the fighting ones, the surveillance drones are a whole different thing). The thing is that every drone will ALWAYS create a video and by that they can look dominant when of those ~1% you see of this war on the internet, over 50% is from drone attacks.
    3
  225. New to fascism and its insane world view?
    3
  226. The reason why renewable energy doesn't work well in Europe is the right wing oligarch governments giving a giant F about it and only exploit the topic for their own gains, nothing else, as usual. Renewable energy is the ONLY solution for mankind by the simple fact that ths sun will shin as long as this planet exists, while we will sooner or later run out of EVERY not reneable resource, especially when we just burn it, what in general is a giant waste anyway, because many of them are needed otherwise, it's on the same level as using food to fuel a campfire if not worse. Germany is still coal mining - at INSANE costs - and they already talk about going back. US empire mainly got lumber and coal left, so they likely will switch back to that too, when there fascistic dreams of world domination will hit the wall.
    2
  227. While the Nazis need NATO money meanwhile to even pay the wages.
    2
  228. To be fair, only 30.000 Georgians sided with Hitler, 700.000 fought against the Nazis.
    2
  229. What is even the goal? There is none, even less a reachable one.
    2
  230. Called "meatshield". It's the same reason why the Banderas Regime drags the fight into the cities instead of trying to keep those away from them.
    2
  231. Of course the USA could stop the war - THEY started it. It's THEIR war. Ukraine is just a puppet. One of many...
    2
  232. Then you don't know what of the basic rules of fascists: if you are not with them, you are against them.
    2
  233. How is damaging or even destroying an old, out of order ship that played zero role in those 2 years any kind of shaping operation? You know what shaping operation is? Surrounding the fortress of the enemy. If your Nazis would be even 10% as good as you want them to be, they would at the very least not allow that to happen. Not even doing it themselves, but at least not let it happen to them. And if they would have any gut super duper strike missiles to sink ships, if they would even have a single brain cells left, they would destroy an actual warship with it. Those which detonate billions of NATO equipment month by month. That landing ship is doing literally nothing, nor was it full of ammunition of any kind, obviously, because that's not at all an explosion of that kind.
    2
  234. Better ask Russia if you can help out in East Ukraine. Wouldn't go to middle/west Ukraine, they more and more drag men from the street to send them to the frontlines, running out of cannonfodder. You can quickly end up with a weapon in your hand instead of fighting fires.
    2
  235. Nah, it's just so corrupt, that the stuff explodes by itself.
    2
  236. Anything you give to the most poor will instantly be right back in the economy, since people need that money to survive. Not compareable with pumping money into a completel diffrent country or to some warmongers.
    2
  237. Not the point. Look at Nazi germany and what it did to Europe or what fascistic Japan did to China at the same time, while having way less people.
    2
  238. "If Russia would have no nukes, we would go in" = "If there would be no nukes, we would have already tried another time to genocide Russia and steal it's resources." Yeah, everyone with a glimpse of education and intelligence knows that...
    2
  239. It's absurd indeed. NATO destroys 3-4 of Russia's 2000(!) S-300 launcher (and that's just the S-300 and the don't even keep all of them active, they just keep half of themthem on reserve, to replace losses): the tides turn! Russia destroyed 9-10 of Ukraines last (mabye) 30-40 air defense units: silence
    2
  240. Why? The actual warships seem to have no problem. If those naval drones would be so awesome, they would be sent directly against the high threat missile cruisers and alike, not against pointless, ages old landing ships.
    2
  241.  @Fenris77  Funny that you Nazi can only come up with calling other peopel trolls, while your whole propaganda is taking reality and just turn it around 180°.
    2
  242.  @NTraveller  Beause going over a single bridge in an offense against an army with artillery, missile, air and drone superiority is the thing you want...
    2
  243.  @tompoynton  That was because of the Nazis and their NATO masters threatening to destroy the dam. Too high risk to not evacuate the civilians from the city and after that, what is the point to hold a position with a great disadvantage, when you can easily transform it into an advantage?
    2
  244.  @TimD-ny6ks  You do get that you only yell "I'm re** Nazi!" by using the word "orc"?
    2
  245. I guess those "mass civlian casualties" comes from all the people who take swims in the harbour?
    2
  246.  @mirandela777  Russian company Mikron produces literally BILLIONS of chips.
    2
  247.  @paulzoom489  No, the side that is bombed the shit out of has the majority of losses. Have you seen giant tank armies which drive into Bakhmut? No, of course not. Because Russia never entered Bakhmut. Their army - even know - stayed east of it. You got scout- and other small units entering it, but that's infantery. There are losses, sure, but not compareable at all with the side that lacks in everything. See: A castle is obviously a tremendous defensive position. But if the enemy can use cannons to bombard you, while staying out of range, that doesn't help you much.
    2
  248. I mean, NATO exists to conquer Russia (and the rest of the world) for the USA, so... yeah, it's not even lying, just the reason is the exact opposite, NATO will keep attacking.
    2
  249. Crimea is impossible to lay siege on by Ukraine by the fact alone, that it got whole Russia at its flank when it does that. Would end in a massacre. Imagine you try to besiege a castle, while the whole country and its giant army thatt owns this castle is in your flank. No sane person would ever do that.
    2
  250.  @valiantone395  Russia wouldn't take Estonia even if you would pay them for it.
    2
  251. Utterly insane to just cross a river with absolutel no space to maneuvre. It's a 100% trap and absurd to fall for it, since there is absolutely nothing to gain. Everything you can from that certain death posion with the river in your back, you could just do from the other side of the river. What the coup regime is doing there is what comes closest to "meat wave tactics". They just keep sending over soldiers without any heavy gear, to... do whatever, until they die. It does not even serve any purpose beside making it some kind of ridiculous PR victory to be there. Like storming toward a castle wall an celebrate that you reached it, while the archers and so on slaughter you from above.
    2
  252.  @septuleptum  Even if true, this would mean nothing. I see all the peopel who live in the same countra as I am and most got zero clue of anything, not even the town they are living in.
    2
  253. Not really and they lost not a single one of the actual battle ships. If those NATO drone would be that awesome, they would go for those, not for transportships and patrol boats.
    2
  254. Probably about the quality. It's shit in all of these countries.
    2
  255. Destroying a bridge in general is hard enough if you are not on the ground to set the explosives or got really big weaponry. When it comes to massive bridges like the Crimean one, which withstands the sea including ice on it, it's even harder. The only way to really destroy a bridge is to destroy the pillars. What we have seen until now didn't even made a dent in any of these.
    2
  256. You can easily make even high quality video fakes these days. Faking potato quality photos is nothing. The only real number in this war from NATO/muppet side is the one where it comes to replacing the losses. Since you can't lie about that. When you run out of soldiers and equipment, you have to replace both or you are finished.
    2
  257. Still saw zero proof for any shot down A 50. And since our western sources are known for being pathological liars and disgustingly evil manipulators, I will never believe any of what they say without proof.
    2
  258.  @shooster5884  Ten times average salary to a POOR man? That would what in the west? 5000€ or dollar? When you take the average of the poor in the west, that's on the level of people who barely survive and need food stamps, live on the street or in their car. The poor are HIGHLY in debt in the west.
    2
  259.  @demivik5812  You don't know what trade means. Overall someone might not need it at all, but if they trade with others, because they got what those people want, they of course want something in return - else it wouldn't be trade, but just a gift. Of course you then take something what you might not produce at all or you then just not produce yourself, because you already got it via that trade. Got nothing to do with being self reliant or not.
    2
  260. To be fair, that he's boring is the least of the problem here.
    2
  261. Child, you got no clue what political left and right even means. The 'free west' is far right in its very core. Rightism = elitism. The "uberhuman" ruling over the "subhumans" Leftism = egalitarian. All humans are equal in worth and rights. That's the definition of these words. There is no other.
    2
  262.  @tjallingdalheuvel126  Problem is, for effective guerillia warfare you need the support of the people and the peopel in Donbass HATE the Banderas regime. People don't get, that Kiev is the invader - into Donbass. They are not fighting on home turf.
    2
  263. Whole Black Sea Fleet is doing fine. If NATO would have any good weapons, they wouldn't have attacked transport vessels and small boats but the actual warships. Only warship that sunk was a borderline half a century old that was pretty much out of comission since years and never took part in anything of this. So overall again a lot of PR, but nothing worthwhile. The strikes just got worse after the started that shitshow and will get more brutal even more the more lines they crose, until simply no energy infrastructure at all will remain.
    2
  264. Actually it does not look like it got ammunition on board at all, since you got zero secondary explosions, what is absolutely unlikely (if not just impossible), if you would have a big transportship full of ammunition. The big flame cloud looks more like a fuel explosion.
    2
  265. Ukraine would pretty much turn to dust in this point if you take NATO money out of it. NATO spend more than two times the pre war GDP in there. And don't come with those ridiculous numbers for 2022, 2023 and 20024, where it constantly rose - likely be just taking the pre war numbers and adding the NATO money on top of that as if this wasn't just debt.
    2
  266. ? They aren't under occupation, they said no to the coup, left Ukraine and joined Russia instead to not be bombed by the Banderites like the Donbass.
    2
  267. Strike against Nuke warning system just massively increases the risk of a nuclear strike. It's a warnin radar. It literally just exists to give early warning and by that time to react. Less time to react = exponential higher risk for retalation.
    2
  268.  @559farms4  The discussion is about a patrol boat, not even a ship. And Russian missiles can be fired from pretty much anything. Don't forget that these are NATO attacks. Ukraine's coup regime neither got the miltiary and even less the surveillance means for such attacks.
    2
  269.  @Bengastar  You forgot the "n" after "demo".
    2
  270.  @Kofferr  They didn't lose them, they let them go in the sheer naivety that NATO fascism wouldn't exploit this.
    2
  271. Putting a ridiculous expensive anti air system as main defense at the front is just an absolute waste and insane. Such a system ist not made for operating alone, because it is defenseless against most of the weaponry. It will be just cannonfodder. Something like patriot is made for a small amount of very few high value air targets and must be defened by other anti air and others systems, which take care of the rest, especially everything that will go after the patriot.
    2
  272. War is deception. Of course it works with lies. There are of course massive differences if you lie to trick the enemy or if you lie to trick yourself. Typical example for lying to yourself is, when your whole strategy is based on how stupid, bad and incompetent the enemy is.
    2
  273. Already dead, what you see now is NATO fascism using the corpse as a sockpuppet. It's disgusting.
    2
  274.  @para-tanker  You mean US fascism? And not other countries, the whole world.
    2
  275. Lol, which wars has Russia actually started? Close to none, especially in comparison with US fascism, which is consstantly at war around the globe since it was build upon genocide and slavery. And if anything Russia winning will mark the end of just that imperialism of the west, that never stopped.
    2
  276. Kursk IS already the regime putting reserves there to open a frontine, while they can't even hold any of the others.
    2
  277. Damaging ICBM warning syste only makes it way MORE likely for Russia to use nukes and their usage of nukes is not limited by that at all. It's a warning system, nothing else. And it's not like they wouldn't see nukles incoming without it. It would simply by less time = less time to think about if if and how to retaliate plus already treatened by that attack against the warning systems = the chance they decide that NATO went nuts and it's time to annihilate it simply becomes bigger and bigger and bigger. Russian nukes don't need those raders.
    2
  278. Russia false flag makes no sense at all, for what? Ukraine's regime already did an endless row of horrible things including terrror attacks and the west either ignores it or blames in on Russia. Ukraine is a sock uppet of the west and will just rewrite everything for the publis as it pleases. By that alone a false flag can't even work.
    2
  279. After 2.WW majority of germans said, they had no clue that the Holocaust happened. Because they were the same stupid assholes as the people are today. What was actually the case: "We COULD have known, easily, but we just ate anything the government media told us and everyone going against it was clearly a traitor." What was by the way like that even after the war. They didn't hunt down the Nazis - but the socialists and communists. The Nazis stayed in power or even got whole new carreers - for example in NATO. Of course with new clothing and emblems.
    2
  280. AfD is a fake oppositon party. It's their job to be "against" all of things to lure back the stupid voters to the system parties, which fear to lose too much power after the financial and other crisises they have caused.
    2
  281. I love that "Orc" word, you instantly know when someone is not only a Nazi but a stupid Nazi on top, using that word. And Russia got good 30 of them in their hand they don't use plus those are old ones and are replaced anyway. Not to mention that ther is zero evidence that it was shot down in the first place.
    2
  282. EU was never democratic. It's an economical "Union" ruled by plutocrats...
    2
  283. East doesn't even need propaganda. They can just point at reality and quote our western leaders. Can't make up any lie that surpasses that ugly truth.
    2
  284.  @dieselphiend  Look up Micron (Russia). For a drone a 90nm processor is more than enough - they produce literal BILLIONS of those. For military hardware the main thing you want to have is to not be too fragile - and in case of one way weapons, to also be cheap. Russia is not the west, where corrupt governments throw billions at corrupt companies for absurdly expensive garbage.
    2
  285. HELL! KIDS! Stop that stupid nuclear weapon bullshit! Russia will never us nukes against Ukraine, for what? If Russia will ever uses nukes, it will burn down USA with it and likely everything around NATO militaryy in Europe and the rest of the world, for sure not an already burned down shithole like Ukraine, which overall Russia wants to SAVE from these Nazis and their NATO masters. If Russia would want to ruin Ukraine, you would see that...
    2
  286.  @dieselphiend  You Nazis will never learn that reality doesn't care about your delusion.
    2
  287.  @dieselphiend  No, western fascists got a long history about making up bullshit about the countries they attack. Russia saved WHOLE Europe. It was Russia who defeated the germans, 90% of the german army fought and was defeated in the east. western allies did borderline nothing - their main thing was fire bombing civilians.
    2
  288. Funny how every little whit is always an "emberassement", especially coming from westerners, who can't even build normal infrastructure anymore.
    2
  289.  @yyy-875  You brutally mispelled NATO.
    2
  290. Europe is ultra bankrupt, the whole 'free west' is. Money is worth nothing anyway - that's the reason why the west just tends to print it, because it doesn't matter as long as people are stupid enough to eat that lie.
    2
  291.  @leviathan-tk7rz  Not compareable at all, though.
    2
  292.  @web30web  Don't use that Nazi cheer like that.
    2
  293. Propaganda CAN be halftruth (does not have to be), that's still a lie though, actually an even worse one. Halftruths are way more dangeroues than lies and way more distorting, because it corrupts the truths, where a lie just stands and falls on its own.
    2
  294.  @matthansberry5795  Politicial left = egalitarian = general human rights as the basis of everything. Political right= Pov of monarchists, population divided in classes, a king, aristocrats, oligarchs and the majority just servants. That what left and right means, nothing else. And yes it's used wrong in absolute every day all the time - on purpose, because the slaveholders of course want the slaves to cry for more chains around their necks, not the abolishment of slavery.
    2
  295.  @colincampbell4261  The Yanks mainly carpet bombed civilians as usual and did close to no fighting (in comparison) against actual soldiers who were mainly defeated by the soviets in Europe and by other asian countries in the Pacific. The sole reason US fascism went in at the end of 2.WW was for the looting.
    2
  296. No one told him, that his evil government started the war, eh? And that the president of that time is now in prison in Georgia, because after becoming best bud with Zelensky and had an astonishing career in Banderas Ukraine, he was so stupid to come back to Georgia.
    2
  297. There is no woke imperialism. It's just imperialism using the same method of stupid lies as usual. NOTHING changed. The sole reason imperialism today is not brutally warmongering as 100 years ago is the problem that the main targets of this imperialism would obliterate us. But even back then you had the same lies. Do you think the german in 1940 said "Uh, we are so evil, we just kill all the people and steal their stuff." No, they said "We are so good, we are the civilized world, the garden, the better people, the perfect people and got the right, the duty to fight against evil, the jungle, the savages." They literally told the same lies! And the people back then ate them the same way as they are eating them now.
    2
  298.  @gravkocher5677  Child: warfare is about destoying the enemies army, if there is no armys left, you can take anything you want. When it comes to weapons and money Ukraine got no army left since way over a year, it's all NATO. When it comes to 'meat', they also are at the point, where the have to hunt down people on the street = the last breath.
    2
  299. There is quite some, we in the west are not shown for obvious reasons, since it goes completely against all propaganda.
    2
  300. 'Funny', how neither west nor great Führer Zelensky ever talks about the people in Donbass and on Crimea. It'a always about Russia and that the regime want to take control over Donbass and Crimea, not if the people there want that (they don't - that's why Crimea seperated from Ukraine after the coup and the Donbass fought to the teeth against the regime and its tries to oppress them.
    2
  301.  @illomens2766  Not really. Overall just another social media clown and they are randomy correct via the same methods that a blind chicken may find a seed.
    2
  302. It's obviously 4: Russia attacks at all fronts because it can, what then creates even more chaos and attrition withing the Banderas forces, who don't have enough forces at all fronts.
    2
  303. "Putin will do everything to drag Belarus into the war" - coming from a man who tries everything to drag whole NATO into the war and end humanity.
    2
  304. The theory about that "ammuniton depot" is to have been FABs, but even a single FAB creates quite a crater. You see nothing fo that kind here. Ovearll more looks like some lightweight construction, nothing where you would find heavy explosives.
    2
  305. Ukraine collapsed several times. That's why the keep forcing hundredthousands of civilians into uniform and NATO keeps pumping more billions into the burned down country than it's whole GDP, what is absolutely insane and has ruined Ukraine forever. In contrary to our corrupt west, it can't just print money and will be brutally exploited, especially the people.
    2
  306. Love how people come up with the "flagship of the Black Sea Fleet" as if this got any meaning. Moskva was an over 40 years old museum - that wasn't even active. They push "flaghship", because the movie-brainwashed stupids then think of some fancy super unit that is carrying the whole fleet. Moskva was a zero-worth military target. If it was sunk by an attack, it only shows how retarded NATO is, wasting that one shot they got on an absolute worthless target.
    2
  307. No one calls "the Ukrainians" Nazis. They call Ukaininan Nazis Nazis, because they are Nazis. Russia is fighting and dying FOR millions of Ukrainians who also fight and die against these Nazis since 2014. And if Russia would think that all remaning Ukrainains in the middle and west are Nazis - they would just burn the country to the ground. What they can do. Easily. Russia KNOWS that the Nazis are a minority, but a minority in power, just like in 2.WW germany. That's why it is an SMO and not war. War = Ukraine itself is the enemy. And then you would see something that looks way more like Gaza for example = obliteration.
    2
  308. "It can't >apply when it suits you when it doesn't suits you<" - You do get that this actually describes the core of the western ideology, right?
    2
  309. Well, by the liars, not in general.
    2
  310. Have found zeo proof about the A-50, while the other plane landed. So overall a big nothing burger while it was 100% not Ukraine, there is no system that could have done that, not even via Patriot or a Jet with a Meteor missiles directly at/over the frontline.
    2
  311. Military Summary is just taking social media pictures and videos and often enough commention it in a very arbitrary way to get clicks. They are no real info source at all.
    2
  312. You side with a Nazi regime, used as cannonfodder by NATO fascism. You are as far from freedom and justice as possible.
    2
  313. That's a bad video. All it's (stupid) symbolism is clearly more targeted at smarter people, but those won't fall for such ridiculous bullshitting. Those who are dumb enough to fall for it won't the odd way it is done.
    2
  314. Still saw zero evidende for any downed A-50.
    2
  315.  @factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204  What is kind of funny, since overall they mostly link 'facts' to 'Russia' that way, as if Putin is some kind of god of truth. XD
    2
  316.  @janlolwitz951  Banderite Ukraine can't even pay wages anymore without NATO money. That's not a nation, that's a falling apart puppet.
    1
  317.  @scroopynooperz9051  Problem is that money in general is worthless and if you think and act otherwise, you just dig the grave for the fake system you create with that.
    1
  318. Russia build its spaceprogram with shovel throwers and ruling by the thumb.
    1
  319. Reality doesn't care for your social media delusion.
    1
  320. NATO exists as cannonfodder for the USA. The USA will NEVER help any NATO country if they don't see it as being used as just that cannonfodder. What they are doing now with Ukraine, that's what NATO is for, to die for the USA. The USA simply can't do that with NATO as they want to, because Russia and China made clear, that they will ALWAYS burn the USA to the ground if it is trying to do that. That's why it goes for these proxy wars, to push as far as possible into that direction it wants without doing that step where Russia/China say: yeah, that's it, you are dead now.
    1
  321. What you want to know? Russia went out of it, since they don't care to throw away lives of their soldiers to hold onto some open fields with no current worth. Coup regime went in and paid for that with many thousands losses. Well, at least they could make some worthless PR out of it and Nazis don't care for their cannonfodder.
    1
  322.  @elektrotehnik94  Most tactic and strategy in general is simply to use your brain. The rest are details only very few have, for sure not peopel in social media and for sure also not some mercenary guys. Ukrainian tactics is clearly just to waste a hell lot of men for pushing or holding somewhere with any plan beyond that. What is the reason they lose, even against a fraction of the Russian military still holding back and the dozens of billions from NATO.
    1
  323.  @jacobjorgenson9285  Kherson city had a lot to do with the dam. They could have hold it and did quite well, but the dam was a too high risk with NATO insanity involved (we remmeber NS1/2 here for example), so they had to get the civilians out of there anyway and after that there was no point to hold a disadvantaged position, when you could easily make an advantage out of it. That's a VERY big river and having it in your back sucks. And they still dominated. Imagine the situation now. Now wonder you don't hear anything about it anymore from our media (so I liked the images the first day, especially those Ukrainian Insurgent Army flags = Nazis and the soldiers wearing the Dirlewanger and Galicia emblems, both infamous SS units).
    1
  324. Cease fire is worthless, especially with the west and its proxies. They never follow those. Not a single time. Only time they stop trying to ruin something is after they have lost and it just isn't going anywhere anymore.
    1
  325. What betrayal? That stupid dicator kept sending in units to fly them out. There was simply nothing that could be done. Overall it's more Azov that will have to flee. Maybe they manage to kill Zelensky someone in years, but as it is not, he's their Santa that brings in all the weapons and money from NATO.
    1
  326. NATO got no tactics beside carpet bombing third world countries and still losing on the ground.
    1
  327.  @RomanVarl  Easy when ou got the crazy PoV of a fascists. Subhumans are simply not good, strong and smart enough, so they die like flies. When you got this picture in your mind, everything makes sense, at least in your little f uped fantasy world.
    1
  328.  @Germ4ch  Of course it's not even a 1:1 ratio. They got more from absolut everything. Artillery, planes, drones, anti air, ECM, support, energy, just everything. The sole idea that Russia got giant losses is based on them being stupid animals who just rampage through the fields, so just typical fascistic racism.
    1
  329.  @Br1cht  People don't get that they don't even see 5% of this war on social media, no matter how much they hang around. Take artillery: thousands of shots per day. How many videos of that do you get? Less than 1%. MILLIONS of drones are used. How many videos do you get of these? Again, even with them filming all the time, at best a few %. Majority of this war is still staying in the dark and Russia does not really care much for pointless victories on the internet.
    1
  330. Funny when western peopel call pretty much everyone else "authoritarian" and how this "makes it easier to implement changes" for them, while western governments constantlys make horrible changes against the people all the time, the more horrible the faster.
    1
  331. Absolutely unlikely that Zelensky's assassination would make those who didn't already join his army change their mind, in contrary, many would (silently) cheer for it, even many soldiers, who saw the insanity of this man meanwhile. If anything then NATO warmongers would use that for escalation and try to send in NATO troops. For Russia, Zelensky is without any meaning. Like the whole coup regime, he's a NATO muppet and absolutely replaceable as such.
    1
  332. I mean, it's a regime that sells out their whole country for whatever they got from NATO for that. So they clearly do not care about human lives at all.
    1
  333. New the our western Nazi PR? It's ALWAYS like that. Listen to all our western 'leaders' and NATO guys: they tell the same shit. Russia = incompetent drunks and idiots who get crushed by Ukraine - but if we don't send more weapons and money to Ukraine, those incompetent drunks will overrun Europe. And everything they tell is like that. Because they are liars. 100%.
    1
  334. The murder journalista, politicians and co since the coup en mass. It's not really anything new.
    1
  335. Also US fascism didn't support Afghan people, but create international "islamistic" terrorism, by collecting the worst kind of people from everywhere, send them to Pakistan for training (and indoctriation - US fascists even created books for children to sow hate against Russians from young child age on), arm them up then send them into Afghanistan, of couse without any care what this would do to the country or in general. As usual.
    1
  336. For sure thousands times more reliable than our western currencies which are 90% steam.
    1
  337. 2014 coup was 10 years ago. Russia tried for 8 eight years with talk, just to see that this was abused to arm up further. So this 10 year delay is simply just the same. They would use this to arm up their cannonfodder regime.
    1
  338. Because NATO's puppet regime is (no surprise) losing. So NATO emperor USA ordered its cannonfodder servants to send new meat for the meatshield NATO is hiding behind during its attack on Russia.
    1
  339. Quite pointless to take GDP anyway, when Russia is producing those weapons themselves and not paying some oligarchs for it... They also don't have to buy resources from other countries fot these weapons, so while it's of course still a waste of resource, like war in general, it's not compareable with the western spending. And you can recycle quite some part of these resources later, anyway when your wars are in the area of your own country and not on the other side of the planet.
    1
  340. Never heared anywhere, that those 4 hours are for both sides, what doesn't even make any sense. Questionable enough to belief it for Ukraine, but the other way around sounds like the typical Nazi PR, which just turns around things 180°, without any care, enough stupid idiots gonna believe it.
    1
  341. Service of his Homeland? You mean a NATO country? NATO does not serve its own countries. It serves rich, fascistic oligarchs and ruins even its own members for it - and even more proxy countries like Ukraine it completely burns down for that.
    1
  342. I mean, you COULD argue tha fascists don't want war, they would like it way more if their victims would just surrender and flee, die or be enslaved by them....
    1
  343. Putin clearly stated what the SMO is about. 1. Secure the Donbass so it can't be attacked anymore by the coup regime troops. 2. In support of that to destroy the army of the coup regime - and in that regard also what NATO sends in, that's why Russia burned through the coup regime's army meanwhile around three times and will continue to do that. 3. To get rid of the Nazis, what overall of course mainly means to get rid of their influence, sicne you clearly can't get rid of fascism, as it was shown in the west over and over again, where it holds up in every regard. You can only limit it.
    1
  344. I mean, all that will end with the US empire falling apart as it already does (and all that craziness now is a symptom of that). USA is running out of its gas and oil reserves for example, because they burned through it with high speed. That alone is already crushing. Thanks to the stupidity with trying to ruin Russia, the fall of the dollar in regard of power is now sped up 10 fold. The country itself is rotting away and the debt is crushing. The US system sucks in more money to the rich meanwhile via interest for debt alone than most countries on this planet got as actual real economy. Such ultra corrupt systems can't survive. And those who profit from it do not care. They will just leave the burning shithole behind when it collapses, so the plan.
    1
  345.  @m19961234  As usual US fascists ignore the hundredthousands of soldiers of South Korea the US Nazis sacrificed.
    1
  346. More like USA created international terrorism to abuse Afghanistan just like it abuses Ukraine now, to make it a failed state with the sole goal to use it as cannonfodder against Russia. Better look up what the USA did when Afghanistan wanted to become a secular state and the USSR went in to actually help it against the usual CIA meddling. USA then created an international interlinked "islamistic" terrororganisation, trained and indoctrinated (even children) them in Pakistan and armed them with billions of dollars in equipment. Same as NATO armed Saddam to wager war agaisnt Iran. This includes the chemial weapons. The 'free west' is the evil on this planet - since HUNDREDS of years.
    1
  347. Russian's know very well the fascism Donbass is dealing with since 2014.
    1
  348.  @pogo1140  Loitering drones are exactly what they are useless against, because those come from the side and avoid the cage.
    1
  349.  @jimmoynahan9910  Huge doesn't matter. Under Putin Russia focussed on smaller but much more lethal warships. If you think NATO is so good, why don't they at least try to sink or damage one of the actual warships, those which destroyed billions of US dollars in equipment and keep on doing it?
    1
  350.  @333Columbia  Attacking Crimea is invading Russia and Russia will also not watch the mass murder or deportion of over 8 million Russian Ukrainians. That's why we got this intervention.
    1
  351. Worst outcome for Ukrain was when their Nazi regime decided to sacrifice the country and population. Before that the coup itself was already a bad outcome, terrible, as the coup regime started a war against all those who didn't want to accept it.
    1
  352. When you count the death toll of Stalin like that (and fascists love to just multiply the numbers plus just take the numbers from deaths by Nazism and say it was Stalin's fault), capitalism would have killed several billions already. Stalin was the soviet leader in the times were western fascism tried to genocide all slavs and other 'subhumans', the slaughter of hundreds of millions people and the Soviet Union stopped them, the SU, not hte west, US fascism actually SUPPORTED(!) the Nazis until it was clear that they would lose so it joined the war for the looting. Look at the numbers. The western allies did pretty much nothing in comparison. And then some guy who fights along Nazis in modern daysw, who celebrate SS units of 2.WW as heroes,, comes up with such insults? Better look at yourself and and our mass murderous west.
    1
  353. Doesn't even matter. It's ridiculous alone how they try to make a big thing out of that. Russia got THOUSANSD of anti air system, it's the main focus of their military. To celebrate the destruction of 1-2 system per month is ridiculous, since Russia got a higher replace rate than that. You would have to do such strikes every single day to feel an impact. What they can't. Not even in the slightest. They now use all the missiles they got to destroy some targets here and there, but this is not even making a dent.
    1
  354. NATO only exists to serve US interets. Without its master NATO is just a bunch of master-less dogs.
    1
  355. EU is not democratic at all. It's a purely economical union ruled by oligarchs and the parties they bought.
    1
  356. The answer to these crossings were the continues destruction of west/mid Ukraines energy infrastructure. What do you want? Them just stomping Kiev?
    1
  357.  @JosephGibson  Lost a good year ago. What we got now is the usual NATO crime of raping a dead corpse, leaving another burned out country behind. Russia did close to nothing to west Ukraine, but the damage done by NATO, Nazis, corruption, warmongering and gigantic debt can't be repaired. Not unlikely, that rest Ukraine will just be swallowed - IF anyone even want it. As it is, likely most Ukrainians don't want to to back there as it is...
    1
  358.  @psmith7742  You mean that old crap system with missiles for 3-6 million dollars per shot? For them to be even able to hit the bombers, they would have to be right at the frontline = easy targets. No, the Nazi leaders will keep those patriots around themselves, far away from the frontline.
    1
  359.  @Archer89201  Kharkiv was a desaster for the Nazis, they lost aburd amounts of troops and equipment for nothing.
    1
  360. Uh, sorry, but you don't risk your life and flee your home and homeland, when your reason is "nah, we are winning too much, they don't need me." And of courses if you would win so hard, you wouldn't even need to push civilians by the hundredthousands into uniform (what overall was never a good idea, ask Adolf, his "Volkssturm" was a brutal failure).
    1
  361. It's not important, actually Ukraine NOT in NATO is the main selling point now, because that way the fascists can abuse it a meatshield as they do right now. Of course if Russia wouldn't have reacted at all, NATO would have absorbed it and create a massive military base on Crimea to control the Black Sea from there and that withotu any need of Turkey anymore. So either Russia would have let that happen - or NATO would get its war. Of course the idea with the war was, that it would make Russia collaps and than easy to pillage. Fascists and their "Endsieg" fantasies.
    1
  362. New to that our western propaganda never made any sense and constantly contradicts itself?
    1
  363. Patriot is absurdly(!) expensive garbage...
    1
  364. For what does Australia need an army? Maybe some Predator aliens would go there to hunt the local fauna, but who else?
    1
  365.  @FairladyS130  No, they went in to end it. What would have happened without western fascism pushing a stupid puppet regiem to sacrifice itself.
    1
  366.  @p51mustang24  Just for comparison: 1981 = 1500nm chips.
    1
  367.  @appalachia3276  There were never good intentions from the west. It's all about profit, all about greed.
    1
  368.  @MrRoyalbeers  Since Ukraine mainly got soviet tanks and was sent many hundreds more, with Russia destroying them left and right, of course you got a giant amount of crushed soviet tanks. Got the problem now, that with NATO tanks, you can't sell those as Russian tanks anymore. Western media tried and enough idiots still fall for it, but it was way to easy to show that lie.
    1
  369.  @പരുന്ത്  Israel commits genocide. Ukraine wants to commits genocide. Both are NATO proxies. Main difference is, that Russia does not accept that you genocide ethnic Russians right at their border.
    1
  370.  @oanaivancea6775  Wellm, the first goal would be to murder or drive out all the crimean peoplen who hate coup regime Ukraine for obvious reasons, since they weren't fans before the coup, but after it, when this coup regime started to mass murder people, this obviously did not add to the opposite.
    1
  371. @somerandomdude Well, the coup ruined the country, which was prety poor before and the most profitable part they got was the trade with Russia - which the coup regime just cancled with their instant sell out to the west. And of course the insanity now with billions in debt on top... yeah, there is not really anything left to save. Crimea was lucky, Donbass will be rebuild, Russia is already starting with that, but I don#t see much future for middle and western Ukraine. Would not be any surprise if the west is jsut absorbed by Poland (got some nice resources there, not as much as in the Donbass, but still), what would only leave a super bankrupt rump Ukraine at best. Just cancel the country and create a new one, no chance to get out of that abyss..
    1
  372. You talk about that A-50 nonsense? That was fake. An Il-22 was damaged, that's all. Zero evidence regarding for anything happen to An A-50. That friendly fire bullshit came up by other social media clowns, because the Ukrain story made zero sense at all, that they shot down something that was much further away than any anti air they got.
    1
  373. Does indeed not look like it at all. I mean, you can easily look up how White Phosphor attacks look like.
    1
  374. Ugh, people should stop throwing around terms they got no clue off... Woke, globalist, left, right, authoritarian, hell even 'freedom'. Either they are part of the liars who use those terms wrong on purpose for distraction and manipulation or they are the idiots who fall for it...
    1
  375.  @chrissmith7669  Reality does not care about your delusion. If Putin wanted to absorb Ukraine, the coup 2014 would have no chance to happen at all, even less the slaughter of the coup regime against the Donbass.
    1
  376. People like you also cheere for the original Nazis. Read a Nazi diary from their genocide through east europe. Oh, they were all heroes and the one fighting against them to stop their racist genocide were the monsters in their stories. You side with literal Nazis, who praise just these people as heroes and share the exact same murderous rascism.
    1
  377.  @ryanwalters6184  Take NATO money and weapons out of this and what do you have left? The Banderites couldn't even pay the food of their soldiers since good two years, even less the weapons.
    1
  378. Majority of western crazies and warmongers are 'cisgender' and heterosexual. Doesn't make them anymore less insane. So why bring something in that clearly got nothing to do with it?
    1
  379.  @ДимитърЙосифов-т7ъ  Only reason for that are the Nazis and their NATO masters, unwilling to stop before there is nothing left of Ukraine. It's insane, but typical Nazis.
    1
  380. NATO attacks indeed, hiding behind their satanic sacrifice Ukraine and the fascistic lie that they aren't the main warmonger behind all this with the clear goal to destroy Ukraine as much as possible.
    1
  381. No, those attacks on some of THOUSANDS of oil/gas storages will have no effect on Russia's war efforts at all - if you don't count that every time they will go a step further to destroy what is left of Ukraine's energy sector. The attacks of NATO (and it IS NATO doing that) are not even making a dent in Russia's massive energy industry.
    1
  382. Most obvious part of this attack is, that this was done by NATO and NATO alone, since Ukraine got absolutely nothing from attacking that thing (nor could they do it). The whole war is NATO using west/middle Ukraine as a meat shield.
    1
  383. More like the hundredth. It's kind of fascinating to see, how the Ukrainian regime never learns anything out of their horrendous mistakes.
    1
  384.  @FairladyS130  Take NATO equipment and money out of Ukraine and you pretty much got no Ukraine left at this point...
    1
  385.  @russianbotstein1422  What shall they do? Let the truth prevail? Google as a leading company in western fascism can't tolerate that.
    1
  386.  @spicesmuggler2452  Uh, all our governments in Europe are full with Nazis, so... no.
    1
  387. I mean, not avoided, just be far less bloody. It's just absurd insanity to allow the enemy to encircle you like that, but in case of Ukraine it's even worse, because they even GO into encirclements. Whenever they attack, they end up in encirclement, the worst situation you can be in since thousands of years and in modern warfare it's even worse. Also makes the propaganda even more stupid, how it causes heavy losses to Russia. When you are encircled it's a miracle (or good will of the enemy) if you are not just getting slaughtered. Falling back isn't hard - when you do it BEFORE that happens. When you hold a defensive position, this include your sourrounding land. If any of that breaks, you either must get this back - or you must give up your defense position and fall back. It's like a ship. If one sections starts to run full of water, you either are able to stable it, or you must evacuate. If you stay on the ship until it's already sinking, yeah, you are just fucked.
    1
  388. That's the reason why you never must let Nazis come to power. They even kill their own people. It's an ideology of insanity and death.
    1
  389.  @LeadLeftLeon  Whole reason for US/NATO wars is the fact that the USA (and Europe ) NEED resources.
    1
  390. I mean, Ukraine per se could have the capabilities. But that region is NATO territory and on top of that they would never dare to attack per se the infrastructure of NATO country (this pipeline is overall very important for germany to get gas and was a big investment) without NATO or at least NATO emperor USA giving an okay - if not order. Imagine if NATO would see that indeed as a terror attack against its infrastructure (what it is...).
    1
  391.  @tilenjeraj2684  You mean beside detonated prices which are a problem for millions, make the debt explode and bleed our the economy?
    1
  392.  @tilenjeraj2684  That's everywhere the case and at every time. Why should rich people risk their lives in the army? You may have some, but the majority will do other things. Most countries also don't want the most educated to join the armys but do what they studied instead. You overall still have to continue to run the country in war. You think the well educated and wealthy join the army in any western country? Some, but in general, nope.
    1
  393.  @tilenjeraj2684  The reason Russia does not end the war in days is that this would burn Ukraine to the ground with hundredtousands of not millions of dead civilians. They COULD do that. They don't want to. Because this is no war. It's an SMO. They don't see Ukraine as the enemy, they see the Banderites regime as the enemy and that Ukraine has to be freed from it. You don't want to see how a war would look like.
    1
  394.  @tilenjeraj2684  Well likely more than 25% of Americans are stupid, sooo it's no surprise that you get 25% believe such absurd nonsense. You clearly got no clue of warfare nor about the situation in Ukraine.
    1
  395. Well, he's a fascist, what shall he say? He's simply honest about his disgusting insanity.
    1
  396. All active warships are undamaged.
    1
  397. Russia got state of the art ECM, what is a pretty good counter to drones, too. They don't shoot down all drones, manny are just jammed or otherwise disable or hacked into.
    1
  398. Alays fascinating, their targets for those expensiv suicide bomber boats. Don't forget: this is not the same as putting some cheap explosives into a cheap car and blow it up. Those boats need a hell lot of electronics on boar to control them in the first place on that range and of course to shield them against ECM. That's without the satellite system of cowardish NATO, hiding behind their meat shield, that they most likely use.
    1
  399. Zelensky is a NATO puppet. His death would change nothing.
    1
  400.  @UJLite  You mean east Ukraine, those who are now supported by the Russians, as the defend their homes and people against fascistic invaders from west Ukraine?
    1
  401. The destruction is the least problem. Major destruction is in the east and south so Russian territory and they will just rebuild, better than before anyway. Middle/West Ukraien got very little destruction and it would be even less if the wouldn't push for such heavy losses by continuing this insanity. But of course all the NATO "help" was no help at all and absolutely ruined the country in every way.
    1
  402. When you got a hit that makes the ammunition detonate, that's also a hit that 95% likely will kill the crew. The ammunition is more durable than a human.
    1
  403. Don't see any reason for Belarus to join in in any way - if Ukraine doesn't try to indeed start a war with it, what...makes no sense. If anything, the Bandera regime needs something like Georgia or Moldova starting a second front, but for sure doesn't need a second front against it. - Not that this would change much anymore, it's all a desaster.
    1
  404. Youtube bombards me with western propaganda for obvious reasons. The reason why this does not work starts with that our propaganda contradicts itself all the time and in general makes no sense by any reason and logic. It would need factual proof for such insanity to make me consider it (it's not impossible that insane things happen, especially when humans are involved, but it's still not the first thing to think off, even less when the insanity goes along so well with that wishful thinking of our fascists...).
    1
  405. It's not even the actual warships. It's landing ships and patrol boats, because they are much easier but borderline worthless targets. The only real warship loss was the Moskva - but that thing was mainly a loss as a museum with its age (and also didn't take part in the whole SMO = zero military impact). If their missile and drones would be any good, thye would go for the high value targets.
    1
  406.  @jamiam23  The only thing you must know regarding fighting with them is not fight with them at all against a real army...
    1
  407. NATO doktrin is to slaughter defenseless people often while hiding behind proxies and that on the other side of the planet.
    1
  408.  @Bluest_of_Blue_Waffles  Buch was done by the Nazi regime, child. That's absolute obvious. That our media lies about that, ignoring all the facts - well, obviously. What shall they do? Stay with the facts? The facts are the worst enemy of fascists.
    1
  409.  @Bluest_of_Blue_Waffles  Billiions of dollars into our western Nazi PR and all it can up with is calling reality a Russian bot.
    1
  410.  @Spaceman719  Overall all the "warcrimes" from Russian sides are obviously not existing by the fact alone that the sole thing they brought up on the ICC was.... saving children. They did not have anything else.
    1
  411. That would be a patrol boat, not even a ship.
    1
  412.  @Cyberdemon1542  True, Navalany was random racist and crimimal, who became a CIA assets for propaganda, that's why you heared so much about him in the west.
    1
  413. Of course you got Russians who are anti Russia. Just like you got millions of Ukrainians who are anti that coup regime and partly even armed themselves to defend their lives and homeland against it. You can find anti government militants in every country in general.
    1
  414.  @robmckrill3134  They could just obliterate Kiev and be done with it, but then you got a failed state with a lot of crazy Nazis running around. As it is now, you got those Nazis (and sadly many forced people) being used as cannonfodder for US fascism and NATO wasting a hell lot of money, weapons and its economy on a fight it can't win at all.
    1
  415. Coup regime Ukraine is not needed in these talks, because the coup regime is a sock puppet on the claws of US imperialism. Take money and weapons from the USA out of Ukraine and in the west there is not even a state left at this point...
    1
  416.  @teddypicker6969  Storm Shadow and Glide Bombs are completely different things, kid. And what you see on the internet doesn't matter. Internet is full of shit.
    1
  417. Only saw these photos which don't prove anything anyway - especially not current days, where even random people on the internet can produce all kind of realistic lookin HQ videos, while Ukraine (and NATO) run whole companies for propaganda. Than you get this potato quality footage with... some stains, that don't look like anything. I mean, there are (darker!) stains like that in the "before" picture, no? And much closer to the aircraft.
    1
  418. Would be reasonable, the problem is, that Nazis are insane and NATO LOVES to see Ukraine die. Easier to pillage it. Russia can't do much. As long as the regime is fighting it will continue to destroy it, trying its best to keep civilian casualities at a minimum. If Russia would fight like NATO we would already see half a million civilians dead if not more...
    1
  419. NATO was created to repeat 2.WW: USA watching from oversea while Europe and Asia burns, then gets in at the end for the looting. Problem was soviet and later chinese nukes and both making very clear, that they will nuke the USA first whenever NATO starts a war against them. That's why they switched to proxy wars instead - like Ukraine.
    1
  420. You do get that NATO is "Hitler"? You do get that NATO took in all the Nazis of 2.WW? You do get that the USA whitewashed all the Nazi mass murderes of 2.WW to use them to continue 2.WW under their leaderships and new name: Cold War. With the same goal. And you do get that no one in the USA and most of the west has any chance to survive a nuclear war?
    1
  421.  @Lado93  It got not war economy, kid.
    1
  422.  @ThoreVeldur  Orxy is a farce. They mark destroyed equipment wrong, double count it and so on. If you want to get a feeling for reality, look at the replenishment, since you can't lie there.. Ukraine had a massive army at start with hundred thousands of soldiers. If Orxy numbers would be true and that army would have almost no losses (since they also conquer so much Russian stuff), while Russia's army is totally destroyed by that starting army - there would be ZERO need for NATO to spend a single cent on this. Instead they pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into this and send several full armies to Ukraine - with another one now. By that it's more then clear who got gigantic losses. Same for human casualties. They can lie all they want about the losses, the fact that they are scrapping the floor of the bottle meanwhile regarding their forced consciption with the demand to send back refugees tells EVERYTHING about the real losses.
    1
  423. Western countries are overall pretty bankrupt and got close to zero resources to waste on that shit. Even the peace time production of war stuff was a massive waste.
    1
  424. It's not unlikely that those are Russians but what would be the point? You got millions of Ukrainians who are and partly even fight against that Ukrainian coup regime.
    1
  425. Russia does not need an excuse to not negotiate. Overall it's clear since centuries, that you can't thrust our westen fascists. They will always lie and will never care fo promises made, not even for written law or contracts.
    1
  426. Oh, people know very well that there was a slaughter committed by Nazis against "collaborateurs" in Bucha. Only brainwashed idiots don't know this, since the evidence is very clear.
    1
  427. It's just the usual PR BS of the west, throwing around with words with fake or utterly different meaning to sooth the stupid masses. Rule based order does not even mean anything. What rules? Rules can be everything, same for laws. In 2.WW germany mass murdering peopel was "legal" and the "rule based order". Same when the talk about freedom. What 'freedom'? Freedom from what? Freedom can be absolute terrible. One of the worst punishments in middle ages was pretty much called "free like a bird" = you got as many rights as a bird = none. Freedom means little when you are fighting for survival - what overall is then again just another chain around your neck. The very first thin people have to learn when it comes to our western right wing extremist system is: they lie. Always. And in every way possible. Not just one lie. Millions of lies. In many layers, because the plan is to just drown the truth in this ocean of lies. And it works.
    1
  428. Don't be ridiculous to compare teargas grenades with chemical warfare and even more call it a war crime. In that case European and US fascism constantly commits warcrimes against its own citizens, since they love to use tear gas against demonstrants.
    1
  429. Whole idea is to ruin Ukraine as much as possible. That's a thing of us westerners, well, at least of our leaders. They just love to ruin countries. Makes it easy to pillage them.
    1
  430. Lot of nonsense. Ukraine was fighting FAR worse then imagined, going full 1945 insanity with destroying their own country and population and that not even for themselves, but a foreign master. Take NATO money and equipment out of it and this would be over since two years, actually never even have started. There is nothing to cheer for when it comes to an insane mind with no regard for human lives.
    1
  431. Thanks for openly using Nazi speech to show people what scum you are.
    1
  432.  @rodneyagesa1851  And that while not even fighting Russians. They could advance there because Russia let them - what is typical for warfare and only an idiots runs right into such maneuvre warfare, what of course causes massive losses. That's nothing new.
    1
  433.  @Stephen-4722  Not your decision, Nazi.
    1
  434. Funny how we have to send billions of money in military equipment then, hu? As always, our propaganda contradicts itself.
    1
  435.  @markaxworthy2508  Ukraine DID collapse - then NATO came to slaughter Ukraien via its usual methods. It's not like the collapse even changed, it's a corpse used as a sock puppet.
    1
  436.  @Imperius12  Kieve was a - very succesful - distraction, what let Russia easily secure all the territory up to the fortified positions without much resistance.
    1
  437. Russia does not need "snakes in the grass". It can SEE what you are doing there on the battlefield and the whole country and it also got military intelligence which even listens to NATO. Not even talking about how the Nazis bragged about doing all that long before it started, so if anything the leaders of the regime and NATO are the "snakes".
    1
  438. Russia will not fool around with soldiers. After 2.WW soldiar is pretty much a holy job in Russia, in memory of the millions of soldiers who gave their lives to stop the fascistic genocide of he west against it, directly followed by NATO agression again tryin to do the same thing. It's simply not something Russia lies about.
    1
  439.  @bendoubleu7516  More like all the typical N@z1 talk from western politicians and militairs. You don't need any propaganda, when the enemy goes full out in bloodthirsty warpropaganda.
    1
  440.  @demivik5812  No, they don't.
    1
  441.  @demivik5812  Russia needs nothing of this. Just because they got some stuff from western countries to get rid of the worthless money they got from those, doesn't mean that they couldn't just build it themselves.
    1
  442. World wide air defense shortage? Maybe in NATO, for sure neither in Russia, nor china nor many other not NATO- friendly countries, who simply don't give their stuff away to some fascistic NATO proxy regimeS.
    1
  443. It's also high symbolic to burn a straw puppet. PR victory? The word alone tells how worthless such a "victory" is. PR is made up nonsense to trick fools.
    1
  444. sigh People should stop talking about parties and countries the got no clue about. AfD is a cheap CDU clone (that's the party of von der Leyen) and is a fake opposition party. If you don't get it, just look at Meloni, it's pretty much the same BS. Meloni also went into the electiosn with being against Ukraine war, arm deliviers and so on - it was all lies. Germany plays no role at all anyway, it's bankrupt and can't just print money as the USA does, nor does it have the resources or industry to feed Ukraine.
    1
  445. Memorandum (what is nothing but some words anyway) was for the legitimate government of Ukraine - not a coup regime, which was actually going against the Memorandum in the first place.
    1
  446. Sorry, but NATO was never created to conter anything, but to continue 2.WW with the USA as the new Führer, giving it all a new name (Cold War), but keep the goal: conquer the Soviet Union and and rob its massive resources. Nukes just made it impossible.
    1
  447. Wonder why the Ukrainiana need a 10:1 advantage, afterall the story is that they easily defeat 10 times as mans Russians, no? That's the most 'funny' part about western propaganda, that it constantly contradicts itself.
    1
  448.  @Marvin-dg8vj  laugh You mean the corrupt money laundring in the west.
    1
  449.  @seljakizgruda  Prettty much no one. You simply eat up western propaganda telling you endless lies, while actually trying to regime change Russia, China and co constantly. It's insane how many western "NGOs" have swarmed these countries and they aren't NG at all. See: Russians got all the reasons in the world to re-elect Putin over an over again. Meanwhile pretty much not a single western election bringts people to power who are not utterly corrupt and continue to ruin their own country and people, the alliances their countries are part of and the whole world. In germany for example the leading party of the right wing block that is constantly in power, while the only opposition party got ZERO chance to change that, is known for its corruption since the 1950th and it never stopped. It still got back in power, even though corruption is of course always anti democratic and it even openly stands for further corruption to increase the bleeding out. And the other right wing block parties support this and deliver a fake show, just like Dems/Reps in the USA, which have no choice at all and any actual opposition has ZERO CHANCE to ever come to power and actually change anything. Even now people praise Trump, but Trump doesn't change the system. The core problem is rich vs poor - that is the real war and the mother of all other wars.
    1
  450.  @florinszasz5506  Kraken are simply Azov guys, so just the psychopathic Banderas extremists. They aren't good, they simply lack any morals and are by that perfect choice to bombard civilians. Our media then can sell that as another Russian HQ with 20 generals destroyed, who hid all in that random house right at the frontline or whatever.
    1
  451. Russian company Micron produces billions(!) of 90nm chips and can easily produce better, too.
    1
  452.  @mikropower01  Good luck building anything in Taiwan without the resource from for example China. Taiwan simply couldn't work, not even survive without the motherland.
    1
  453.  @harleyquinn8202  Jus because you can produce 3nm chips doesn't mean that it is the norm. You in generall don't want to go into extremes for no reason.
    1
  454.  @mikropower01  Hell, you don't even need these extremes. Who cares about 3nm chips?
    1
  455. All their active warships are undamaged. So, no.
    1
  456. I mean, why do you need an army at all? At best to not get occupied by Spain I guess, but for sure not against anyone else. Same for most of Europe, the only enemy it may have are other NATO countries, no one else gives a fuck about conquering and part of Europe. For what? There is nothing worth go get from it.
    1
  457. Russia can just wait until (already ultry bankrupt) NATO runs out of money to spend, what will lead to instant collaps of Ukraine. Other collaps would come from lack of cannonfodder, what we can already see, including rising resistance against the murder regime and its hordes of man-hunters. After that they can take whatever they want anyway, that's why you don't see the move much at all.
    1
  458. Uh, NATO is cannonfodder for US imperialism.
    1
  459. Russia could have done the usual "Just burn it down" tactic of NATO, but in contrary to NATO Russia thinks of the future of a country and never wanted to ruin Ukraine. Even now it still holds back. NATO would have brutally ruined all infrastructure rom day 1 one - then still fails and just leaves a ruined country behind.
    1
  460. EU is a joke, though. Brutally in debt, no resources, massively lacking in top tier technology meanwhile, countries rotting away (like the USA, but the USA would have less problem to pull that around, if they actuaolly tried and the division comes from Euroep staying with the stubborn warmongering and dreams of the times of their 'glorious' empires). When they come up with "we need a new leader of the 'free world'" (ignore how ridiculous it is is to call the west the 'free world' or anythign other positve), they live in the delusion, that any European country would take that place. They can maybe ask China for some nice advices, though it won't really go for the mess to actually rule over them.
    1
  461.  @strawdemindset  Child, Ukraine was neutral before 2014 and traded well with Russia and the west alike. It was the west who destroyed that, pushed an illegal coup, instantly followed by an just as illegal sell out of Ukraine and its people to the west, what was a catastrophy and one of the main reasons why so many especially in the economical strong east were against it. Then NATO ordered its proxy to just crush this with military force - funny, after it said that the coup is fine, since the democractically elected government dared to have police forcers on the street, where 'demonstrants' threw molotoves at them. But the new regime bombarding cities with cluster ammunition and alike, that was fine. Hell, you can't make this up.
    1
  462. That's not what happened in Bakhmut, though. In contrary.
    1
  463. Starlink = Musk = now part of the coming government, so it's not unliikely that Musk hast to get Starlink out of Ukraine for that alone.
    1
  464. Oh, they WANT to repeat that since 1945. They can't. Nukes don't allow that.
    1
  465.  @Kayzef2003  What Ukraine isn't doing at all, but the opposite.
    1
  466. They are fascists. I wish that would be the worst they are doing - but it's not even close.
    1
  467.  @MartinLundström-l4v  Oh, Russia hates war, but it is constantly forced into them by the west - since CENTURIES.
    1
  468.  @dorrisday1518  You do get that Russia sides with many Ukrainians who defend themselves against a fascistic regimce since 10 years meanwhile? So if you say that Ukrainians don't give up...
    1
  469. I don't even see anything remarkly looking like explosive damage or soorth on those pictures. You got dark stains in the 'before' picture - and those are closer to the aircraft. What you got afterwards is further away, partly lighter (what makes little sense, since sooth is... well, sooth black) and does not really look much like coming from a drone explosion and it can't come from burnign fuel, because it's too far away from the plane for that with no connection to it. The typical bad quality doesn't add up well either.
    1
  470. Thos press freedom index and others are done by western think tanks. Those listes themselves are pure propaganda and the methods alons who they are created are just ridiculous.
    1
  471.  @Bluest_of_Blue_Waffles  You Nazis always had a problem with accepting reality, nothing new.
    1
  472. Hell, he's partly talking so much out of his ass, it's ridiculous. USA got no allies. USA got servants. And that's the NATO countries. Countries like Iraq, Ukraine and so on aren't even servants, they are cannonfodder and victims of US imperialism. And no, there was no way around Ukraine war, because for that NATO would have had to stop their plans and what people don't seem go get, not even after 1000 times is, that fascists don't care for anything but their OWN greed and well-being, nothing else matters, not even millions of dead and billions suffering.
    1
  473. Ukraine has no own arms and legs. It's a puppet used by NATO who does not care if there will be anything left of it.
    1
  474. NATO is all about everyone else dying for the emperor USA.
    1
  475. Such first layer of a defense line, which exists to slow down an attacking enemy, is pretty pointless anyway when you lack the major defenseline with all the artillery, missiles system, aviation and so on.
    1
  476. Never try to think about the logic behind a fascist's mind. There is none.
    1
  477.  @zaynevanday142  Child, the schools and women rights was something Afghanistan got when US fascism started to arm terrorist to ruin it.
    1
  478. Russia will jsut continue the attrition until the Banderas regime collapses. That's the obvious main focus that also makes most sense. Fighting over Odessa would mainly mean that the city will be destroyed with the Banderites being known for using civilians and civil structures as shields as they died in Mariupol. Same likely for Kharkiv City. Russia will most likely only go for liberating these cities by force if there is no other way.
    1
  479. Money in general is worthless anyway. It's a useful trade medium, only idiots see more in it than that. You can do literal shit with money on its own, most of it you can't even burn, because it's just a number on a computer.
    1
  480. Nothing new that people use to hide their identity when trying to flee. Got absolutely nothing to do with transsexuality - not that idiots would even try to look up what the words means they use and overall get smarter, so they stop falling for any stupid propaganda thrown at them...
    1
  481. Was more than obvious from the start that Krynky was a trap - and the coup regime soldiers they let go there were the bait. Starting with, that there is literally nothing those could do ther what couldn't be done the same way from the other side of the river. Absolute pointless. And no, Krynky was absolute unimportant beyond PR nonsense.
    1
  482. The fascists who run the EU don't care for what is left of Ukraine, this is all politics and warmongering and the further try to somehow manage to destabilize Russia to get their bloody claws on Russia's mountains of resources. And of course Ukraine shall be pillaged, too - but the most worth here you can find in the southern and eastern regions, so the EU fascists hope for pumping enough worthless money into Ukraine so they can get these back in. And of course Ukraine will then have to pay back with all this.
    1
  483.  @ЕвгенийПершин-е1ь  Nonsense, Russia is doing this SMO to save millions of Ukrainians from that Nazi regime, risking the lives of Russian people. If Russia would see Ukrainians as worthless, they would wager war like NATO does, killing way more civilans than militias. Instead Russia does everything to avoid this, even though it means more risk for its soldier.
    1
  484. Actually, when it comes to Russian casualities, while they only mention them a few times and not daily or weekly, when you follow Meduza/BBC and what number they come up with they can prove, it's pretty much the number Russia gives. Of coures Meduza/BBC as the western outlets they are add to this, that there will be FAR more on top of that, but that's just an assumption withou prove. People don't get, that being a soldier is kind of a sacred job in Russia after 2.WW. You don't go to a Russian mother and lie to her, that her son just got lost somewhere, when he was killed during his duty as a soldier.
    1
  485.  @ЕвгенийПершин-е1ь  Especially those are old crap F-16 our corrupt warmongers simply want to make big bucks with. It's more money laundring than anything else.
    1
  486.  @danielbwest  Eastern European NATO countries.
    1
  487.  @andrewsek7485  Well, when you got way over a million soldier in total on the field and an insane Nazi alliance like NATO pumping in gigantic amounts of weapons, the idea that one side could fight to zero is absurd. NATO fascism didn't even manage that against goat herders with brutal carpet bombing of the countries and hundredthousand dead civilians.
    1
  488.  @ChristianHarten1911  Zumindest im kranken Fantasiereich von Faschisten.
    1
  489. Nothing is easy about that. 1. Those attackes are 100% NATO and include satellites, drones, AWACS and billions dollar programs. 2. Even then they only manage to damage patrol boats or transportships, not any of the high value targets.
    1
  490. 50MT would be the Zar bomb, the biggest nuke ever detonated. Sarmat can carry one big warhead, or 10-16 smaller ones or several glide vehicles. The MIRV warheads are something around 600-1000kT - what is obviously still enough for a medium sized city and while not completely destroying a big city, it would still destroy big parts of it and be devastating for the remaining parts. And that up 10-16 times per single Sarmat...
    1
  491. Uh, does he really call a cauldron bad for those who created it, because it's "a longer frontline"? So the make the people inside the cauldron the winner, because, well, their frontline is pretty much just their position, right?
    1
  492. It's exactly like Hitler, yes. Hell, he started last year with "Volkssturm", that everyone shall take up arms and die for him. Look up Volkssturm if you want to know what an absolute hellish idea that is...
    1
  493. Europe's core security principle is, that the whole world has to listen to the fascistic dictate of NATO, everything else is 'risking the security" of their plan for world domination. Of course with the USA as the emperor of it.
    1
  494. NATO abuses Ukraine as cannonfodder. The same reason they don't want Ukraine in NATO as the won't allow them nuke. Even more because it's quite clear that the facistic coup regimer brought to power by NATO won't hold forever and could easily be replaced after that with a very anti NATO government. And of course Russia would simply destroy any nukes when they would try to install them.
    1
  495. Ukraine is getting slaughtered by the gigantic debt alone that all the NATO weapons created. You really don't think that our western fascists give away anything for free?
    1
  496.  @EL20078  Still proudly presenting the Nazi emblems, including that of the Waffen SS Galizien.
    1
  497.  @kindlingking  Holodomor ia a Nazi lie. There was famine, but that was all aroudn the globe and in the whole Soviet Union - which still sent food to Ukraine in that time.
    1
  498. Especially not when Ukraine got no legal government since 2014, since the coup got rid of the last legitimate government and after that you only got fake elections, starting with not allowing vote in whole Ukraine and by that no elected government would have any right to decide over all these regions and of course brutal oppression of media and political parties, making it no election in the first place.
    1
  499.  @shooster5884  The people there got the right what you Nazi lovers say doesn't matter at all. The people live there, it's their country, by that they are the only people who can decide how they want to live and that referendum was simply making that public, nothing else. The fascistic coup regime go zero right to oppose this, especailly not by it not even being a legal government of Ukraine to begin with, since they got to power by not asking these people at all = they are 100% unelected.
    1
  500.  GrEGGson  It was one ot thousands typical Nazi lies.
    1
  501. Oh, Leyen is elected, afterall the majority of shitheads in Europe vote for far right parties like hers and of course by that you get all the brutal corruption coming with it.
    1
  502.  @journeyintococo6996  You from UK? ROFL. You know why EU is such a shitshow? Because just like in UK the people in Europe constantly vote for the right wing, ultra corrupt parties, the neocons, neolibs and warmongers.
    1
  503. So NATO got overall no discipline and morale at all, because in all their wars they commit and endless row of warcrimes from the start?
    1
  504. Overall all "Russian warcrimes" accusations became a joke when the ICC condemned Russia for... saving children. Means they got literally nothing else but that.
    1
  505. Russia isn't even doing that. If Russia would think that all Ukrainians are Nazis, they would burn the country to the ground.
    1
  506.  @Jole30  Only difference is that they know also talk about it.
    1
  507. Russia has never shown the insanity to just keep sending in troops into a cauldron. Banderas Ukraine meanwhile has done this at least dozens of times. Banderas Ukraine is also the one telling absolute absurd lies since start, same for its master NATO (which is doing that sinc decades, leading to mass murder and destruction around the globe). The idea alone, that Russia would send in 100s of troops into such a small place, while of course the Banderite Supersoldier are just a handfull in that whole region - who stupid do you have to be to question who is lying? Russia's movement at the frontline is always small scout units. You simply don't SEE the vast majority of their army there.
    1
  508. Well, wenn outlet of the Biden regime tell us, that the Russian regime is doing something while the NATO regime is financing and arming a fascistic coup regime in Ukraine, that's for sure something you should take seriously. It's not like the US regime is lying all the time since decades over pretty much everything including all the NATO regimes under its paw.
    1
  509. Evertime Ukraine is doing such pointless attacks against oil storages (even if all of them would be succesful, that wouldn't make a dent into Russia's oil reserves), Russia cuts another 5% points away from the coup regimes remaining electricity. And that regime should say, thanks, oh thanks - for them not doing cutting of 100%. What of course is not about the coup regime but the innocent civilians.
    1
  510. It was US funding that mainly ruined Ukraine, because the part that is not Russian now is not ruined by Russian bombs but by endless debt to the west...
    1
  511. The whole point of existence of NATO is to control the world by any means for its emperor USA.
    1
  512. I don't see anything even close to a FAB - nor would those look like that after such explosions nor what they lie around like that.
    1
  513.  @ДенисВислогузов-в5ж  Nothing US fascism and its NATO can do when countries they no. They could of course do the usual and start to regime change or bombard them, but the more openly you talk about this, the less likely they can do - and also just talk with China and Russia about it, pretty much the best protection against NATO fascism, when you are under their umbrella. Worst you can do is to go along with NATO or try to stay neutral, then US fascism will just regime change you and install a puppet - see Ukraine as just the latest example for that.
    1
  514.  @Yankeepride03  Succesfully destroyed Ukraines army four times meanwhile, bleeding out NATO. Sad part is how NATO fascism uses Ukraine as meatshield and ruining it forever, but well, nothing you can do about that form Russia's side, that's Ukraine's choice.
    1
  515. Child, the west produces ABSOLUTELY NOTHING the rest of the world needs and couldn't produce itself.
    1
  516. Yeah, fight for replacing these grenades with real ones, so the guys die instead from shrapnell wounds. What a terrible person are you? Would be one thing to fight for thise war to stop, but going against pretty much the only weapon used that is NOT lethal is EXTREMELY weird at best.
    1
  517.  @bertieschoice216  Those attacks on low value tagets are done by NATO with UK drones. Overall it's worthless and doesn't help western fascism to prevail.
    1
  518.  @ugvadugvaw  What about not being fan of neo fasists who ruin the EU?
    1
  519. Those attacks on oil and gas in Russia is mainly an attack on the buyers, because this will simply increase the price and Russia will be able to sell a bit less oil and gas, because burned, but for more money. While the buyer will get less oil and gas - for more money = bad for the buyers. Of course the ideas of the NATO fascists is still, that this could someone end up with chaos and regime change in Russia, so they keep pushing.
    1
  520.  @swirvinbirds1971  Beore 2022? Nope. Was solely NATO fascism pumping billions into their puppet regime to mass murder the people against the coup - who also sat on the majority of the resources of Ukraine.
    1
  521. "Alleged war crimes" = zero proof for anything. There is a reason that the puppet court of ICC could only blame on Putin to save children, nothing else.
    1
  522. You do get that NATO is the tyrant who wants to control the world and espcially all resources. When it comes to anyone attacking NATO countries the first question that comes to mind: for freaking what? There is not worth to conquer.
    1
  523. Well, they believe the western lies. By that the whole Russian army is pretty much destroyed, nothing left, while Ukraine actually got a bigger army than they started with by conquering all that equipmenrt from the slaughtered Russians PLUS the thousands of vehicles they got from NATO (for what ever reason). They just beg for the lols for a third army now, they don'tg really need it, obviously.
    1
  524.  @juliantheapostate8295  While Nazis are by definition extremelys dumb, since their ideology simply can not work, it doesn't mean that they will always be dumb enough to throw their lives away in an hopeless situation. For that they got their indoctrinated cannonfodder. After 2.WW many Nazis surived and had wonderful careers in NATO and alike thanks to that. Will happen again, NATO never had any probs with fascism for the obviouss reason that it is a fascistic alliance, created to murder-rob the rest of the world, especially the 75 trillion dollars in raw resources giant Russia.
    1
  525.  @eternalwheel  Stupidity of course. Afterall, Banderites are caught lying since start and not some random social media clowns, but their whole leadership.
    1
  526. They are fascists, what should the do? Stop lying? Stop twisting everything into the accept opposite?
    1
  527. Russia got no war economy. War economy means, that you transform your normal economy, all the civil companies and alike into military companies, to produce war stuff. Russia doesn't do that. At all. Their military companies just produce a bit more stuff, that's all. And yes, Ukraine if out of ammo, that's why NATO sends absurd amount of equipment to it all the time. Russia simply does not care to make aereal gains. Those are a side effect now, because even with all the insanity of endless forced consciptions and all the NATO billions, the coup regime's army crumbles more and more.
    1
  528. Still just another social media clown who just repeats what he hears elsewhere. Overall you only see a vers little glimpse of what is happening. The most obvious picture is drawn by how many billions NATO has to pump in to keep it going and how the coup regime is clearly running out of people to catch from the street, while Russia is doing nothing of that.
    1
  529.  @Tobi-ln9xr  Just as today, the majority are just idiots who ate everything their propaganda served them.
    1
  530. Makes indeed no sense, he didn't have the insight and overall: if a journalist would have, that's the problem of the army to allow that. It's absurd enough to think that Russia would give a single fuck about social media when it comes to surveillance. They got satellites, planes and tenthousands of drones, while social media is full of garbage no sane person would trust.
    1
  531.  @arijao92  You elect these Nazis into power... you got your chances, over and over and over again, but you never learn.
    1
  532. Communism = 100% democracy without any powerhiearchy and following the general human rights to the point. Utopian, but for sure not something that people even should get up on trying to reach - in contrary to all the despotic system we still got running, mainly changing the names, never the actual core of it.
    1
  533.  @MrStasyan2013  Only when you play the retard and count't the pinning operation at Kiev as conquered territory including everything around it in a 50smile radius. Also at that point Ukraine hadn't lost much at all and even could have kept Donbass and Co. Today this is utterl out of question and Ukraine pretty much does not exist anymore. As soon as NATO stop the money flow you got a broken, ultra bankrupt state left with millions of citizens who will never come back.
    1
  534. Russia doesn't need arms. It's just the typical propagandy crying of NATO, likely not even targeted at Russia but China it afterall wants to ruin, too.
    1
  535.  @Sarefsx  Fine, then Ukraien will cease to exist, because Russia won't let the Nazis have their genocide, no chance.
    1
  536.  @zszempty  Overall Russia won several times meanwhile and that with a mere fraction of what they can do. There is a reason NATO countries keep shoveling one full army after the other. And the Banderas regime having to hunt down people on the street b the tenthousands meanwhile, so they can keep shoveling cannonfodder into this insanity.
    1
  537.  @manners7483  If you land an army somewhere in Siberie, the fricking wilderness will kill it before the reach anything. People don't understand how absolutely big Russia is and how brutal the wildnerness and just the weather is in the E-NE. And modern high tech does not change that, since most of our western high cost garbage wouldn't survive that, either.
    1
  538.  @moonlightfilms5279  US Nazis did the usual - being invaders on the other side of the planet to steal oil and push regime change and throw some bombs on soldiers of the legitime government who fought against the union of western- and islamistic fascits (NATO and ISIS).
    1
  539.  @bagman534  Well, the Nazi regime he plays the mercenary for is slaughtering civilians since eight years and has pushed millions out of their homes. They also abuse them as human shields, there are thousands of testimonies for that. They also still shoot at the civilians in Donzek and Luhanks, even with cluster mines, mining the cities and it will take years to get rid of them all. Of course peopel like you don't care about that and instead even cheer for such monsters and believ any dumb lie they tell you, no matter how often it is revealed as fake. Even a high official had to leave her position, since she simply made up rape stories for propaganda. Bucha? Clearly a massacred committed by the Nazis even with telling the people on Ukrainian media, that they gonna clear the town form "Russian collaborateurs", so what the Nazis always loved to do, slaughtering civilians they accuse of being traitors or just for the fun of it. Plus of course the bombarding of the town with artillery, what of course mainly kills civilians. Western media, as usual, tried to spin it as Russian artillery shrapnells, but how shall Russian artillery shoot at itself? Meanwhile the Ukrainian artillery shelling of Buch was even sold in western media as heroic deed. And so on and so on.
    1
  540.  @dieselphiend  Around one third of what Russia got. With the brutal lack of everything else Russia is using like hundreds of heavy bombs, millions of artillery shells, thousands of other drones, hundreds of heavy missiles and so on.
    1
  541. Even IF there would be Ukrainian's involved that was 100% a NATO attack. Hell, they even admitted to know about it, so funny how it was pushed at start that it was Russia, if they alwas knew that it was Ukraine. But it's all BS, just the usual, western fascism doing western fascism stuff.
    1
  542. It's almost funny, how this is all a well known timeline, when NATO followed their plan of escalation with Ukraine since 2014 up to the point where Russia was forced to intervene, instantly followed by that (ridiculous) try to push it into chaos with sanctions, including freezing the money for already delivered Russian resources (because that's the majority of those asses, payment for oil and gas and alike) and of course trying to ruin the Russian economy following the old idea, that it only exists because Russia is selling oil and gas to Europe with NS simply the crazy pinnacle of that. But then the western media say, that all this was actually Russia's doing and people are so retarded to eat this. But, well, I still know how all the crazies went mad, when I told them how ridiculous stupid the idea alone is, that Russia blew up their pipeline and that it's absolute clear that they did it. If you are that level of braindead, there is no lie you wouldn't believe...
    1
  543. The only thing likely is, that if this continues that there will be no west Ukraine left - while Russia will give a fuck about taking care of that ruined state. Not ruined by Russia, but NATO and its puppet regime.
    1
  544. There is no western "progressivness". That's a lie. They all as conservative as it can get, wanting to keep the old, prea-democrativ, prae-human-and-worker-rights world order, with them as the ruling elite and the masses as their serving slaves, dominating the world and stealing its resources as they please. Eversthing progessive and left wing promisses about freedom, peace and all the other left wing human rights, are just lies, propagadna, to whitewash this.
    1
  545. They overall are only sent to shoot western cruise missiles on some random, mostly low value targets for big PR victory. Maybe they even manage to damage the Crimea Bridge again, what's utterly pointless, but again can be sold as big PR victory. Of course PR is only useful to trick idiots - not to change reality.
    1
  546.  @dieselphiend  Oh, of course western fascism is like that since centuries. Whole USA was build on it, on genocidel, slavery and world wide warmongering - of course as usual all coated up with the usual lies.
    1
  547. Because you want to be known for helping Nazis to ruin their country...
    1
  548. Oh, that's easy, just lie for bigger liars, like NATO.
    1
  549.  @xXIcariaXx  It's not, not at all. Selling a hell lot of expensive crap doesn't make you a strong economy. Money is overall worthless. What goods of worth does the USA produce? And price is something negative. A valueable good with a low price got a much higher worth than a pile of shit that for some reason is sold for a billion.
    1
  550. Just to be clear: when you call tear gas a chemical weapon and using them a war crime, you automatically call EVER SINGLE western nation a fascistic state that is constantly commiting war crimes against its own population. So please follow up on that.
    1
  551.  @Wlof25  For the delusional every movement of some soldiers is a "meat wave", what is of course absurd. If anything than sending soldiers into a hopeless endevor with close to no support and chance of success beside the idea that you just overwhelm the enemy by your own corpses, that's what "meat wave" is. So what you see from Ukraine over and over again, like not retreating from a cauldron, instead sending in more cannonfodder.
    1
  552. USA only got power over the fascist regime in Ukraine, not even over Ukraine itself. If they stop sending money and weapons, the fascist regime will collapse. They got no power at all over Russia. Those sanctions do nothing.
    1
  553. Absolutely delusional to think that Russia would need or use company satellites for targeting and alike.
    1
  554. The real problem with the coup regime constantly hitting even civilians in their own cities is, that they hide their stuff in those cities and towns, including their air defense. Not only does that mean, that the towns become military targets by that, but when they shoot down stuff it will of course fall down onto these cities and when you got higher buildings, the anti air might even hit those, because reality is no movie, those missiles don't just magically dodge buildings or fly through them. That's why Ukraine made up that bullshit about Russia using S-300 for ground attacks, because they piled up so many incidents with anti air hitting buildings.
    1
  555.  @larrymac8538  Coming from a Nazi lover who cheers for his fascistic regime pulling civilians by the thousands from the street to make them nothing more but cannonfodder.
    1
  556. Feels almost like the try to reach what NATO was made for: see Europe burn while the USA laughs their ass off in oversea and waits for the looting. Of course this won't work. The goal of NATO fasicsm was always to steal Russia's resources and this would just lead to Europe stopping to exist if they go full out war. What they can't and would likely have massive riots if they try.
    1
  557. Big problem with propanda is, that reality gives a fuck about it.
    1
  558. Just saw a picture of an Azov guys yesterday, complete with their N@zi emblems, who burned a Trump book and other stuff.
    1
  559.  @Wowwhataswing  Good third of that is FIGHTING the regime and i wasn't 40 million in total to begin with plus all the millions who fled the regime. Half of what remains is women and majority of the other half are elderly or children.
    1
  560. Because the USA are a failing empire anyway.
    1
  561. Well, your whole system is pure corruption. Your stuff is so expensive not because it got higher value, but because you got that corruption bonus on top of that, that sucks in money from the middle and poor to our oligarchs. That's how you ended up with such a desastrous wealth distribution in the first place. And people don't even know that. If you ask an US american what they think the world distribution is, they come up with something that would be pretty much socialism - and when they tell you how it should be, they come up with communism (without even getting it and using these words). That the reality they are in is 100 times worse? Nope, no clue.
    1
  562.  @terjeoseberg990  You do get that those numbers from your Nazi buddies are utterly absurd and wrong?
    1
  563.  @patrickmayes6071  Quite the irony. Reality is pretty obvious. You got one side with zero problems and the other side keeps begging for another new army every few monthes and another half a million citizens it forces into uniform. So it's clear who got horrendous losses and who doesn't. You can lie all you want, when it comes to compensating the losses, you can't.
    1
  564.  @Kofferr  I remember well when you Nazis suddenly cheered for Wagner and its incredible fighting power when Prigozhin made his PR move. Suddenly Wagner wasn't destroyed anymore as you said before, but at full force. See: it's enough to listen to you Nazi propagandists, you contradict yourself all the time.
    1
  565. @kcdstest Wouldn't they be more 'clustered' at night, when they sleep in the barracks or alike? Overall unlikely that Russia is training soldiers there.
    1
  566.  @Whoami4967-p5r  HIMARS did shit overall beside propaganda. Every videos with a bigger explosion than a grenade was called "HIMARS", no matter if that even happened and if it was actually HIMARS. That's why the Banderites focussed so hard on keeping those few systems they got alive, what overall limited them even more and of course wasn't enought in the end. How many did NATO send? A few dozen, right? What do you see of them? If those would be big game changer, you would see hundreds of HIMARS strikes every day. Not half a dozen in a week. Do you get how much ammunition is fired in this war? Millions. Himars is a mere fraction and the best you see of it is some explosion and a story told to that, that this little cabin was another Russian HQ with 20 generals inside. Coming from a side that is knowing for ridiculous lies since start, it's absurd how anyone can be so stupid to buy it. Russia got hundreds of HIMARS like system running plus massive aviation what includes drones which can do more than drop a grenade, hunting down whatever they want dozens of kms behind the frontline, not even starting with their thousands of missiles with even more range. If HIMARS is so special, what is all that?
    1
  567.  @jdg9999  Not a single one of the actual warships which destroyed billions of dollars in NATO equipment with their strikes.
    1
  568. Friendly fire was made up by other social media trolls instead of just dismissing the usual BS stories of the Banderites. There was no shot down A-50 at all and even the Il-22 wasn't shot over Azov Sea, that's simple where it "vanished" form radar, what on itself means nothing at all but just that. There is at least evidence of a damaged Il-22 - if real. That one is a bomber though, means it will get close enough to the frontline that a longer range anti air might be able to fire at it - and clearly failed.
    1
  569. It's known since 2008, that NATO had this plan with a coup, civil war and then forcing Russia to intervene with this. The analysts may have written that as a warning, our NATO fascists saw it as plan.
    1
  570. It was never about Ukraine. Ukraine is just a meatshield an cannonfodder for NATO to go for Russia's resources and world domination again.
    1
  571. Only meatwaves you see are coming from Ukraine. Pumping hundreds and thousands of soldiers into a cauldron (= the worst situation you can be in on a battlefield) nor nothing more but PR show? Meatwave. Sending hundred after hundred of soldiers on the other side of a river with zero backup, zero chance to do anything there that couldn't be done the same way from your side of the river, again just for PR? Meatwave. Russia never did anything of that.
    1
  572.  @thomaslacornette1282  Yes, and? Why you think they keep shoveling civilians into uniform and demand form EU To send everyone back?
    1
  573.  @Prometheus7272  Oh, Ukraine obviously not, that's why our fascists see them as subhumans the can sacrifice as they please. What the do with Ukraine is of very strategic importans, because our fasists risk a lot to bring down Russia - and it doesn't work. At all.
    1
  574. Psychopath.
    1
  575.  @jimdr63  Well, he goes to a country to ruin it by serving Nazis. Good luck in hell with that...
    1
  576. Especially because the west is still the aggressor. Russia got no interest in Europe nor the USA, for what? It's the other way around, our greedy fascists still try to get their bloody claws on Russia's cast resources.
    1
  577. Russia only gave three goals, never a time line and three days would make no sense with these goals beside the regime giving up, what overall would be the only right decision they could have made.
    1
  578.  @robmckrill3134  Why are you asking Russia to hand over Ukrainian soldiers who shot down MH17 with Ukrainian BUKs and/or airplanes? Russia had nothing there in range to shoot it down, nor the resistance in Donbass. That's why the propaganda outlet Bellingcat has to made up a ridiculous story about eh odyssey of a Russian starter ramp without radar, driving through enemy lines - several times. Not even a braindead monkey would eat that absurdity.
    1
  579.  @robmckrill3134  Found guilty by NATO. That's like saying that the Holocaust was justified because Nazi courts found the victims guilty. Mh17 was downed by Ukraine, but it was impossible for NATO fascism to admit that, that would have ruined their whole (murderous stupid) plan.
    1
  580.  @mnk9073  That's what the elected government did - and that's why the west did coup them and replace it with a western puppet.
    1
  581. Anyone who reads the contract EU gave to sign knows exactly that this was a sheer sell out of Ukraine, nothing else. And Yanukovych offered new elections, it was the fascists which took over Ukraine and their NATO masters who went against that. Ther was no legal elections since then.
    1
  582.  @fabienherry6690  Don't forget, that this is 100% NATO, because when you take NATO money and weapons out of this, there is simply no "Ukrainian" army left, only some unpaid guys without even a single bullet.
    1
  583. There is nothing four dimensional about it. What you see in strategy and tactics the usual, the biggest hick-ups simply utter delusion about made up goals. Most surprising thing is, how the NATO side and their puppets are utterly unwilling or -able to learn and constantly repeat especially two devastating mistsakes: 1. To run in, just to get flanked. 2. To not retreat when necessary and instead get encircled. Both problems leading to the most horrific situations you can be in.
    1
  584. If they would be helpless, those NATO attacks would go for the real warships.
    1
  585. It's just win win. Russia isn't running out of weapons at all, it's more about how much it is willing to lower it stock piles, since the REAL enemy is of course NATO North Korea got a lot of weapons - since the USA army that almost genocided it seven decades ago is still waiting there wih quite an army in its proxy nation SK - but overall will likely not use them (even more because while China may not care super duper much about NK itself, it will never allow the USA to claim it. Means: they got a lot of stuff lying around, that will rott before used, so someone taking it from them and given them some nice trade goods in return is a good deal. On top of that it's good marketing, showing how their stuff indeed works.
    1
  586. Doesn't have the range, not even when you put it right at the front = losing it. There is overal zero proof for an A-50 shot down. The damaged IL-22 seems legit, but that's a bomber, so it could have flown an attack and then was shot at, being hit at the back. If that was a patriot, it massively failed at its job. That's a 5.000.000$ missile not able to take down an old age soviet bomber.
    1
  587.  @岩成-f4w  Well, you fascists call the Soviet Union communistic all the time = 100% democracy (that's what communism means). But yes, Donetsk and Luhaks pleaded Russia for years to help them against western fascists who bombarded them since 2014, killed thousands and forced millions to flee.
    1
  588.  @JJRM8  Russia never even tried to take Kiev. You don't take a 3 million city with some few thousand soldiers. It was distraction to force troops stay in and near Kiev, giving the actual assault the free room to take all the land up to the fortified lines.
    1
  589.  @JJRM8  Both were NATO dogs since decades. NATO actually lost with this, since they lost the possibilities to sell them as "not NATO". Finland and Sweden mainly won to pay billions of Euro for nothing, just to be marked for instant anniihilation when USA ever goes insane enough to start 3.WW. They will be destroyed the first minute, simply to minimize the risks. That's all they got from it.
    1
  590. The illegal coup regime can't give up anything, since it does not belong to them in the first place. A coup destroys a country, that's why it is a coup. The coup regime CAN hold things together of course by whatever means, but if it does not manage it, it will simply be the illegal regime of whatever it manages to make follow it.
    1
  591. It will obviously never be potected under article 5 as foreign troops in a no NATO country. Not that article 5 has any meaning anyway. NATO fascism is warmongering around the whole globe and it's never about defense. And US cult leader would do shit to help any of its NATO cannonfodder countries. They are part of NATO to die for US interests, not the other way around...
    1
  592.  @Tbone1492  Maximum delusion of your Nazis, the most suicidal one.
    1
  593. Same reason why some "rebels" in african or asian countries love to wave US flags.
    1
  594.  @Jatzki  That's was never their plan, child. Of course if the Banderas regim keeps fightin at one point Ukraine will simply collapse, but even then it's unlikely that Russia will care to pick up the rests.
    1
  595.  @MartinLundström-l4v  Russia didn't have those since CENTURIES. Meanwhile the west is warmongering around the planet for land and resources - especially Russia's...
    1
  596.  @Peroriperora  No, any western countries is winning that by far, because we are so freaking corrupt, we legalized corruption and made it the core of our systems. You can be corrupt than that.
    1
  597. The core value of NATO is imperialism. Democracy is just the propaganda they are selling with it to the stupid.
    1
  598. Better not look up the trading did with the Nazis - partly even during the war. Or how little they actually did to get rid of them and at least push them out of power in west germany.
    1
  599. Prigozhin said everything and the opposite, he's a PR guy and abused the focus he got from media to troll. His own men would likely have killed him if he would have actually revealed anything to the enemy via twitter or whatever, since that's treason that plays with their lives. Funny enough, all who went for "Wagne is dead!" in Bakhmut instantly treated Wagner as a giant army of super soldiers who can't be stopped when Prigozhin tried his PR stunt to keep Wagner from being disolved and taken out of his hands. Suddenly the same peopel talked about Wagner as if they hadn't lost a single mercenary.
    1
  600. We, the 'west' are the main evil - since CENTURIES.
    1
  601.  @shooster5884  I would hate the coup regime that started all this with a civil war agains the east and its sell out to NATO fascism.
    1
  602. No, it simply means nothing. Rules can be everything. 2.WW germany followed very clear rules. All fascism does. Rule does not say anything. Same for 'freedom'. Freedom from what? One of the worst punishments in medieval age was called "free like a bird" (vogelfrei), which simply meant that you were no seen as a person anymore, you got zero protection from any laws.
    1
  603. Don't stress yourself. Stress is pretty much a poison to the whole body.
    1
  604. Ugh, he's still going with that garbaeg of S- 300 rockets, because his beloved Ukrainian regime made it up to distract from the fact that they constantly hit their own cities with their own anti air missiles?
    1
  605. You google Nazid will never learn that you can't stop reality with your censorship, you can only dig your hole of lies deeper.
    1
  606. Pretty sure they sit in his ears in whisper into this brain from there.
    1
  607. Germans went for genocide and killed more civilians than soldiers. Completely differente war. Russia could easily raze Ukraine to the ground, but they are not genocidal maniacs. The clear goal is to liberate Ukraine from fascism, not war against Ukraine itself. The Russians even forgave them germans and that pretty quickly.
    1
  608. Anyone who really caresa about the Ukrainians want them to be free from the Nazis who ruins them and their country and NATO who abused those to burn down Ukraine in the try to regime change Russia.
    1
  609. Pretty much 2014 when they let a NATO led fascistic coup happen. Country was done for in that moment - and that was the main reason why the smart people in east and south instantly went against it.
    1
  610. Westen resources? The west got SHIT regarding resources, what do you think NATO is for? To rob other countries. And technology? What technology? We got NOTHING special. Leyen is a crazy right wing extremists - who FAILED in every single position she got in germany, that's why we send this piece of *** to th EU parliament, that's where corrupt politians went, when there is no way to hold them anymore in the country itself.
    1
  611. Can't be more stupid than germany. Majority of people there still vote for the neocon warmongers. Ukraine at least was always half/half - that's why you got the south and east fighting that shit. And the main warmongers in Ukraine are just sellout to western fascism and make good bucks with it, they simply don't care for the plebs.
    1
  612. Not really, he's overall without any importance. The whole coup regime is a NATO muppet show.
    1
  613. Nothing is new, the west empire just fell apart more and more, what now made it possible for the world to stand up against it without risking genocide as before.
    1
  614. What shall western media do? The truth is the worst enemy of what they have to sell.
    1
  615.  @airon89toyota  Child, when you are the defender of a castle, but the attacker bombards the shit out of you with cannone and alike, your castle does not help you at all, you are simply trapped there. And modern warfare is even worse than that.
    1
  616.  @Heretus  There is a mainly sheer endless row of terror attacks by NATO and its puppet regime, not even starting with the genocidal war against the peopel in Donbass. What has the west ever had as argument for their carpet bombing of countries on the other side of the planet? None.
    1
  617. The idea alone that you have to follow other countries culture, which often does not even have any, especially not a leading one. Western culture mainly is to abuse and pillage ther rest of the world which is seen as subhuman and only valueable as slaves. That's the so called "western culture" since centuries, even today.
    1
  618.  @1k20a  Russia got all the press from the west and its press also gives all the infos western press is giving PLUS the other half. Why should they even hold it back? The best PR for Russia is openly showing the insanity of our western despots by simply letting them talk.
    1
  619.  @nedkelly9688  Oh, you bombed bunch of people, and now you are proud of yourself and your fascistic army who almost manage to ruin another country, Syria, by making it an ISIS state - if Russa wouldn't have stopped you.
    1
  620. Sure, sure, the mass murdering colonialists must explain their victims, that the others are the evil ones. XD
    1
  621. There were never security guarantees from the USA for ANY country on this planet. That's like saying that a mafia guy gives security guarantees to his mobsters. No, they are tools to do his bidding. And Ukraine is by far not the first tool that was thrown away after it became useless and did not do what the godfather wanted.
    1
  622. Complete opposite is the case and your comment literally proofs that, how in western media and society the other side is not only ignored but demonized, what is by the way typical for fascism.
    1
  623. In case of Russia there are many people just willing to risks their lives defending those millions of civilians the Banderas regime tries to murder or deport.
    1
  624. "Peopel start to doubt other claims." Wow. Took them only two full years of obvious bland lying.
    1
  625.  @dannyj2197  Child, it's western fascism still trying to do the whole world domination colonialism - especially focusses on Russiak the biggest country on the planet with by far the most resources. Russia is doing NOTHING like that, for what even? Not even Stalin wanted those eastern European countries which had been saved from the same western fascism as now with a gigantic blood price by the Soviet Union. He was FORCED to hold onto them, because even after germany's defeat, western fascism didn't stop. What do you think the Cold War is? It's sheer continuation of 2.WW. Just a newm name and a new Führer: the USA. But the same goal. NATO does not exist for defense. The only thing NATO countries would have to defend themselves against are other NATO countries. Not a single non NATO country gives a single F to conquer any NATO country. For what? None of them got anything worth to conquer in the first place.
    1
  626. Retreating out of an encirclement is by far the worst you can do. It's a massacre. And it's not like it was ordered, there are many signs that it was simply impossible to stay, so they just fled and the 'order' came AFTER that, just to try to create the illusion that it was on purpose. If you got something like an encirclement happening, you must retreat at the START - not when you are encircled. You are fucked when this happend, no matter what. Only REAL chance then is to give up and hope for the best will of the other side.
    1
  627. The Banderites already forced millions of East Ukrainians to flee their home, what are 2,4 million Crimeans more...
    1
  628. What's the point? BoJo as all the others is a fascistic liar. He will just keep lying.
    1
  629. Those supposed S-400 pics look fake. A look at the grass around it alone, nothing burned what is extremly unlikely. Who even made these photos?
    1
  630. He fights for genocidal money and a lot of blood money he gets for it. He's the opposite of a hero, he's a monster and the enemy of freedom and life.
    1
  631. Russia tries since 2014 and before. If you look at the whole shit show that led to the illegal coup, it's alreads clear who is the sane side and whos it the brutal aggressor with ZERO regard for Ukrainians. Russia always made good offers to Ukraine, benefitting both sides, often enough Ukraine more than Russia, simply because it needed that help. Meanwhile the west demanded a sell out, that Ukraine cuts its ties to Russia, what alone is devastating for its economy and on top of that becoming a military tool for the west and of course squeezing its own population with austerity politics. It was pretty much the choice between normal police protection and selling out to the mafia for 'protection' - just way worse. That's why a violent, illegal coup was needed to get it, because of course the elected government in Ukraine wasn't stupid enough to do that. It's how it worked since decades around the globe. If you are smaller country, you either follow want our western fascists want - or you get regime changed, bombed or sanctioned to death. Your fault for not being 'smart' enough to go along with 'freedom'.
    1
  632.  @bram7703  Well, sure, the original Nazis wouldn't accept anything beyond the reign of the "Übermenschen" and destruction of all "Untermenschen". But only the most brainwashed and insane still clinged to that 1944+.
    1
  633.  @TheSamberg  They force hundredthousands of civilians into uniform to waste them as nothing more but cannonfodder. Are you really that stupid to think that this could work without threatening them? Russia didn't even have a full mobilisation, far, far away form the situation to throw civilians into a meat grinder.
    1
  634. His complete analysation is ridiculous. The one thing you can Russia blame for is to underestimate three things. a) the stupidity of NATO to really think that it could push Russia into chaos with sanctions and throwing hundreds of billions of dollars in money and weaponry into the fire. b) the demonic character of NATO to have no morals regarding sacrificing whole Ukraine for this goal. c) the insanity of the the coup regime in Ukraine to go along with b). That's what Russia had to adapt to.
    1
  635.  @vicjokoper8142  You do get that reality does not give a single F about your delusions, right?
    1
  636. It fits together perfectly. They steal the money from the people in UK because they hate them and they send them to a fascistic regime because they hate the people in Ukraine.
    1
  637.  @adocuric9154  Germany is a pretty small country?
    1
  638. Hell, child, they already DO hit inside Russia all the time. Whatever they openly talk about is already happening since weeks and months. Ukraine couldn't hold a singel line since 2 years without NATO. EVERYHING that happens there and now is 100% NATO plus Ukraine as cannonfodder for it. This includes all the attacks since many months on Russia.
    1
  639. Patriot systems are worth their weight? Only saw them getting destroyed for a horrendous amount of money they cost. Hell, Russia likely produces (not sells) their jets for less money than a single Patriot missile costs.
    1
  640. There is nothing to cheer for. Especially the Russians just HATE having to do this and even more that neither the regime and even less NATO is willing to stop and just continue to ruin the land and people. Russians even forgave Nazi germany, knowing that the majority of germans were still normal people. In case of Ukraine it's even worse. Russians see Ukrainian people like their own. It's as much a civl war for them as it is for Ukraine west vs east.
    1
  641. Ukraine lost 2014, when it let that takeover by the west happen to pillage and exploit it in every way possible.
    1
  642. Kurks is just 100% a reason for Russia for no talks at all. That was clear from the start.
    1
  643.  @tallshort1849  I mean they literally tried to go for peace eight years long even after a completely illegal and extremely anti Russian coup, that brought people to power, who instantly started to use military violence against anyone against the coup - and of course Russian (and there lived over 8 million Russians in Ukraine). Good luck doing something like that in Mexico or Canada just in general, even more when you install a racist coup regime that talks about cleansing those countries from US americans. USA will slaughter you for FAR less - overall, you don't even need to do that, just have resources they want and come up with the idea, that you want to use them yourself or for making life better for your people, a whole row of ocuntries were destroyed by our 'free west' for that alone...
    1
  644.  @hotshot2101  Child - just really got outside and try to get all the shit out your empty head, maybe then you brain got SOME chance to survive and recover to a halfway functioning level.
    1
  645.  @michaelfaraday8391  More likely that this ship got hit because by all means this target was so extremelys stupid that they thought the missile would fly further and try to actually go after an actul war ship, which would have shot it down. Instead it went down further and was wasted on a decade old broken ship, sold as massive strike against megatons of ammunition (what the explosion doesn't look like at all). If they would have any ability to powerful strikes - they would at least try to sink actual warships, which fire those missiles that blow up billion after billlion in NATO equipment.
    1
  646.  @linusp9316  Attrition means, that you use what you got most effectively and by that don't waste super expensive weapons with very limited supply to shoot at worthless targets, but you go for the most valueable targets. You don't sacrifice a knight for a pawn, you try to sacrifice a knight for a queen or alike.
    1
  647. It's not that many. Russia got so many resources. Ukraine got some and yes, majority of those are in the east and south, but it's not even close to 10s of trillions.
    1
  648.  @a.N.....  Well, just google "top 10 countries world resources" and you got a good outlook.
    1
  649. Never saw any proof for any A-50. Social media talk is worthless.
    1
  650. And that's just artillery and drones. It's even worse when it comes to missiles and all aviation. If Russia would go to war like NATO, Ukraine would be simply burned to the ground. But that's the difference, while NATO and its regime is doing everything to ruin Ukraine, it's not Russia's goal at all.
    1
  651. Sanctions on itself do nothing against a resource country. When it comes to the endless row of countries western fascism ruined, it was always WAY more than sanctions, but active meddling in the economy via regime change or buying corrupt oligarchs and worse.
    1
  652. Because those one millions super soldiers who slaughtered 95% of the Russian army want to take a little coffee break and so they send in some random civilians instead to take care of those remaning 10k Russian soldiers. Something like that.
    1