Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Truth About Attritional War - Ukraine's New Strategy, Russia's New Offensive - UA Map u0026 News" video.

@S7UAEU No, that's just wrong and makes no sense. If anythign than the one being attacked takes more casualities, because, duh, they are getting attacked. This isn't a sword fight with two guys with swords stand in front of each other and the more careful fighter make have an advantage by not jumping right into to other ones blade. This is one side bombing the shit out of the other side. And overall: without NATO there would be no Ukraine left. Take NATO money and weapons away and you got people without arms and wages. Ukraine has lost over four full armies meanwhile.
16
@komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257 You can easily look up where majority of the German and Japanese armies were defeated. In both cases it was not by the western allies, not even close.
3
@colincampbell4261 The Yanks mainly carpet bombed civilians as usual and did close to no fighting (in comparison) against actual soldiers who were mainly defeated by the soviets in Europe and by other asian countries in the Pacific. The sole reason US fascism went in at the end of 2.WW was for the looting.
2
The whole point of existence of NATO is to control the world by any means for its emperor USA.
1
Germans went for genocide and killed more civilians than soldiers. Completely differente war. Russia could easily raze Ukraine to the ground, but they are not genocidal maniacs. The clear goal is to liberate Ukraine from fascism, not war against Ukraine itself. The Russians even forgave them germans and that pretty quickly.
1
Pretty much 2014 when they let a NATO led fascistic coup happen. Country was done for in that moment - and that was the main reason why the smart people in east and south instantly went against it.
1