Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "'Human Shields' Ukrainian Foreign Fighter: FULL, UNFILTERED" video.

  1.  @MS-ii1sv  Interestingly, most of the veteran mercenaries who were there seem to have left Ukraine quickly, since the love to murder for money, what was easy enough when you hunt down goat herders and alike in a carpet bombed country, but being the target of an actual military and just dying from some missiles that was fired from 500km away, so an actual war, they don't like that.
    9
  2. What? There is no chance to win, kid. And for you to know: Ukraine is brutally losing, even with all the NATO billions and throwing away its future as a country, ruined by that, not even Russian bombs.
    9
  3.  @ketelin4285  Russia's plan A was Minsk 2, while NATO and Nazis just abused that, as they openly admitted that. When the Nazis tried to finish the genocide, armed by NATO (who planed to use this to lure Russia in and push it into chaos, as you partly described), Russsia had to step in, since waiting till they go crazy enough to attack Crimea would have simply force them to burn Ukraine down to the ground without holding back as they do now and that after the slaughter in Donbass, so we speak of hundredthousansd dead people (for NATO a joke of course, they mass murder over 30 billions in the last decades when you count all the direct and indirect killing and the less Ukrainians remain the better, easier to rob them dry and Ukraine got quite some resources - of course not even close to the gigantic wealth of Russia, which lead the world ranking by great distance). Plan B after Minks failed was a quick shock and hoping for that at least a glimpse of sanity is left in the coup regime somewhere. What might even had workerd, but of course NATO made quickly clear, that this is not acceptable. Ukraine MUST burn. So we got this now - that Ukraine burns. For nothing. Well... for NATO....
    5
  4.  @ketelin4285  Overall the fault of Russia keepign the eastern euorpean states was NATO fascism. Even Stalin(!) wanted a peace treaty what as usually would involve any foreign army retreating to their home country. The answer of NATO fascism/US emperor was to station nukes in Europe, creating NATO and even taking in germany, where the USA had kept most of the Nazis in power and even gave them a career in NATO positions - for exactly the reasons that they are Nazis = perfect for NATO, which was created for the same goal that Hitler had. So Russia could not retreat. It was forced to keep those countries it really did not want to have, since after the genocide of the Nazis with 27 million dead, they had many, many other problems than this whole Cold War shit show and keeping a bunch of angry people as blocker against US nukes. But, well, nothing you could do about it. And NATO just showed them how right they were, since we now got NATO at Russia's border. Modern weponry just took quite a lot of meaning out of this. 60-70 years ago? No chance to allow that.
    4
  5.  @FishandHunt  You do get that this is a Nazi cheer, right? It's like yelling "Sieg Heil!".
    3
  6. Better ask Russia if you can help out in East Ukraine. Wouldn't go to middle/west Ukraine, they more and more drag men from the street to send them to the frontlines, running out of cannonfodder. You can quickly end up with a weapon in your hand instead of fighting fires.
    2
  7. What you want to know? Russia went out of it, since they don't care to throw away lives of their soldiers to hold onto some open fields with no current worth. Coup regime went in and paid for that with many thousands losses. Well, at least they could make some worthless PR out of it and Nazis don't care for their cannonfodder.
    1
  8.  @elektrotehnik94  Most tactic and strategy in general is simply to use your brain. The rest are details only very few have, for sure not peopel in social media and for sure also not some mercenary guys. Ukrainian tactics is clearly just to waste a hell lot of men for pushing or holding somewhere with any plan beyond that. What is the reason they lose, even against a fraction of the Russian military still holding back and the dozens of billions from NATO.
    1
  9.  @jacobjorgenson9285  Kherson city had a lot to do with the dam. They could have hold it and did quite well, but the dam was a too high risk with NATO insanity involved (we remmeber NS1/2 here for example), so they had to get the civilians out of there anyway and after that there was no point to hold a disadvantaged position, when you could easily make an advantage out of it. That's a VERY big river and having it in your back sucks. And they still dominated. Imagine the situation now. Now wonder you don't hear anything about it anymore from our media (so I liked the images the first day, especially those Ukrainian Insurgent Army flags = Nazis and the soldiers wearing the Dirlewanger and Galicia emblems, both infamous SS units).
    1
  10. Service of his Homeland? You mean a NATO country? NATO does not serve its own countries. It serves rich, fascistic oligarchs and ruins even its own members for it - and even more proxy countries like Ukraine it completely burns down for that.
    1
  11.  @333Columbia  Attacking Crimea is invading Russia and Russia will also not watch the mass murder or deportion of over 8 million Russian Ukrainians. That's why we got this intervention.
    1
  12. People like you also cheere for the original Nazis. Read a Nazi diary from their genocide through east europe. Oh, they were all heroes and the one fighting against them to stop their racist genocide were the monsters in their stories. You side with literal Nazis, who praise just these people as heroes and share the exact same murderous rascism.
    1
  13.  @bagman534  Well, the Nazi regime he plays the mercenary for is slaughtering civilians since eight years and has pushed millions out of their homes. They also abuse them as human shields, there are thousands of testimonies for that. They also still shoot at the civilians in Donzek and Luhanks, even with cluster mines, mining the cities and it will take years to get rid of them all. Of course peopel like you don't care about that and instead even cheer for such monsters and believ any dumb lie they tell you, no matter how often it is revealed as fake. Even a high official had to leave her position, since she simply made up rape stories for propaganda. Bucha? Clearly a massacred committed by the Nazis even with telling the people on Ukrainian media, that they gonna clear the town form "Russian collaborateurs", so what the Nazis always loved to do, slaughtering civilians they accuse of being traitors or just for the fun of it. Plus of course the bombarding of the town with artillery, what of course mainly kills civilians. Western media, as usual, tried to spin it as Russian artillery shrapnells, but how shall Russian artillery shoot at itself? Meanwhile the Ukrainian artillery shelling of Buch was even sold in western media as heroic deed. And so on and so on.
    1
  14. Psychopath.
    1
  15.  @jimdr63  Well, he goes to a country to ruin it by serving Nazis. Good luck in hell with that...
    1
  16. He fights for genocidal money and a lot of blood money he gets for it. He's the opposite of a hero, he's a monster and the enemy of freedom and life.
    1