Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "UA Confirms Rus Advance In Several Directions, ATACMS Cause CHAOS - Ukraine Map Analysis u0026 News" video.

  1. That's not how it works. Attacker losing more than defend is, when you got the same equipment on both sides, but one side got the advantage of a build up defense. Defending meanwhile plays zero role when it comes to bomardement, in contrary, bombardement mostly means that the defender got problems, since the point of a defense is to be quite unmoving - what makes it easier to bombard. Range (and quantity of range weaponry of course) played always a quite crucial role in warfar, going up from melee where a spear is better than a sword, especially when it comes to mass combat, then of course bows able to rain havoc upon an enemy and today it's even worse, with weapon systems firing on you from beyond the horizon. While NATO (and it's NATO, not Ukraine) can fire some ATACMS and cruise missiles here and there with equal range as Russian systems, there is an obvious lack of mass, while Russia got many times more, plus of course the overwhelming mass of FAB bombarding, what is more brutal than any ATACM or cruise missile and with 100 times the quantity plus there is near to no chance to intercept glide bombs, so while 90% of NATO missiles get destroyed before hitting something, 100% of those FABs get through. And those are a pillar on their own. Russiad also got way more missiles AND drones.
    13