Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Complete Imminent Collapse Of The Frontlines - The Hard Truth - Ukraine War Map Analysis u0026 News" video.

@banta-pd8zj Ukraine lost 2014 when it sold itself out to NATO. Then ist lost the civil war, unable to force those against the coup back in line. Then it just died by fully becoming nothing but sacrifice for NATO, drowning in debt they will never be able to pay pack, losing hundredsthousands of men and forever losing not only the Crimea (what came with the 2014 loss), but now also the Donbass and if this goes on even more. There is simply nothing where they didn't catastrophically lose.
11
Not even starting to talk how one country focusses on defense like anti air and ECM, while the other sides emperor focusses on air craft carrier fleets and air power - what you mainly need to attack others around the world, nothing else. Carriers are an utter waste as defense, they are for attacking other countries.
8
@andrewsek7485 Because that's not the real number, obviously.
7
@Whoami4967-p5r What operations in the black sea? Have you seen any Ukrainian ships which would have to be hunted down by Russian ships? For wha they don't even need a ship, because the flag ship of the Black Sea fleet is: Crimea.
7
@thecap5222 The capital wasn't encircled. A few thousand Russian soldiers did a pinning operation there for the majority of troops liberating the Donbass area up to the strongholds the Banderites build. Or more clear term: a distraction. You can't encircle a 3 million city with a few thousans soldiers, even less conquer it.
7
@a.N..... The only thing you saw from our western tanks was them burning instantly, without doing anything. And what you see from the Bradleys is the same beside some PR videos where they fire their gun at something. Beside this also just burning.
5
@danielbwest Those aren't game changer either. Russia just started to hit a bit harder. They overall hold back a lot and still do. They could do MUCH worse, with MUCH more destruction and casualties, but that's not what they want.
5
@johnjennings9043 It's overall insane what NATO pumped into this when you see the numbers from all the NATO countries.
4
Ukraine collapsed several times. That's why the keep forcing hundredthousands of civilians into uniform and NATO keeps pumping more billions into the burned down country than it's whole GDP, what is absolutely insane and has ruined Ukraine forever. In contrary to our corrupt west, it can't just print money and will be brutally exploited, especially the people.
2
@ЕвгенийПершин-е1ь Especially those are old crap F-16 our corrupt warmongers simply want to make big bucks with. It's more money laundring than anything else.
1
@danielbwest Eastern European NATO countries.
1
@andrewsek7485 Well, when you got way over a million soldier in total on the field and an insane Nazi alliance like NATO pumping in gigantic amounts of weapons, the idea that one side could fight to zero is absurd. NATO fascism didn't even manage that against goat herders with brutal carpet bombing of the countries and hundredthousand dead civilians.
1
@Whoami4967-p5r HIMARS did shit overall beside propaganda. Every videos with a bigger explosion than a grenade was called "HIMARS", no matter if that even happened and if it was actually HIMARS. That's why the Banderites focussed so hard on keeping those few systems they got alive, what overall limited them even more and of course wasn't enought in the end. How many did NATO send? A few dozen, right? What do you see of them? If those would be big game changer, you would see hundreds of HIMARS strikes every day. Not half a dozen in a week. Do you get how much ammunition is fired in this war? Millions. Himars is a mere fraction and the best you see of it is some explosion and a story told to that, that this little cabin was another Russian HQ with 20 generals inside. Coming from a side that is knowing for ridiculous lies since start, it's absurd how anyone can be so stupid to buy it. Russia got hundreds of HIMARS like system running plus massive aviation what includes drones which can do more than drop a grenade, hunting down whatever they want dozens of kms behind the frontline, not even starting with their thousands of missiles with even more range. If HIMARS is so special, what is all that?
1
@jdg9999 Not a single one of the actual warships which destroyed billions of dollars in NATO equipment with their strikes.
1