Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "What is “gravitic propulsion” and could the US government hide it?" video.

@c6jones720 That's all just not anti-gravity. That's simply using another force to counter gravity force. Anti gravity would overall just block the effect of gravity. The thing is, that we don't even know what gravity is. We know what it does. And that it for some reason got to do with mass. But why? Zero clue.
3
Isn't Math not manly just a language for humans to describe, understand and work with natural laws and alike? So fooling around with math would not do anything anyway. That's like the idea to change the word "table" to "plane" with the idea that could fly away on tables afterwards.
2
Anti Gravity would have to block gravity, that would be 'enough'. Of course we don't even know what gravity is. We know what it does. And that it somehow got to do with mass. But why mass 'creates', 'got' or 'whatever' gravity? shrug... We are not really much better than the people who saw lighting and say "well, that's Zeus". We have it a name, we did our best to put it into formulars, but WHY it exists, we got as much clue as the people who believed in gods. We simply don't say it's the god gravity, but just gravity.
1
I'm not on the side of these snake oil salesmen and their ridiculous promises - but we also shouldn't just say "if it's there, we would already have found it", because that's a mistake you see during all human history every single century. They were always certan that they had found everything possible - what even might be true - from their PoV at that time. They WERE able to see more than 100 years before every century, but that was the case every single century. And when you look at very earthly things or even just the human body and how we are still not really understand it all too well, the idea that we could understand the universe already is a bit laughable.
1