Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "The Jimmy Dore Show"
channel.
-
109
-
108
-
88
-
77
-
76
-
70
-
68
-
65
-
61
-
59
-
50
-
49
-
38
-
36
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
23
-
22
-
The aggression was of the illegal coup regime against the parts of Ukraine not willing to follow the coup (for good reasons and it's their free choice, a coup regime got not right to decide over a nation like an elected government and even such an government is limited and not allowed to just exploit the citizens).
The coup regime, financed and armed by NATO (who did this to force Russia to act) then used military violence (what is utterly insane and in every possible way unacceptable) to force those people to accept their regime (well or flee or die) what Russia watched for EIGHT YEARS trying to solve this with talking.
When it was clear, the NATO is still NATO = an alliance of fascists and this would never stop, Russia accepted the call of the peopel in Donbass for not being part of Ukraine and came to help agains the aggressor.
At first this show of force should have been enough to just stop this insanity. But as disgusting and without any care for human life NATO is and as stupid as their puppet regime in Ukraine, they just escalated further, leading to the utter destruction of Ukraine - not even by bombs, which mainly caused all that damage in the Donbass and Russia will repair that and already does, but by utterly ohbliterating west- and middle Ukraine with debt, which it will never be able to repay, especially not after losing Donbass and Crimea for good and millions of people (this includes those who joined Russia, who fled and will never return if they can and of course the dead).
21
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@mikaseppanen1632 People don't seem to get that nukes are decastating, but not 300km devastating...
Always ridiculous. Most seem to think nukes are just bigger bombs, you can for example use to destroy a bridge (and if you use a nuke on that area, the bridge got the biggest chance to survive it if not hit directly.
Meanwhile the others think a single nuke could obliterate whole englang for example.
It would of course have a desasterous effect one everyone in england if you would wipe out London for example - what a single nuke indeed can easily do, even several cities. But it won't destroy the whole country with its heat, pressure or even radiation (radiation actually plays a lesser role the bigger the nuke is, because most of the radioactive material will simply be shot high up the atmosphere (not coming down before decayed or spread so much you won't have an effect) and even space.
Nuking Helsinki would have absolute zero effect on St. Petersburg from the explosion (the curvature of earth alone would likel not even let you see it). Longest sightline on earth is around 450km from a very high starting point to a very high objet in the distance, both mountains with nothing in between. So you have to be on a very high level and have something very high.
If you want to destroy a city, you will likely detonate the nuke in a few 100m height for optimal destruction (we speak cold analytics here, it's not about the moral aspect).
Unlikely enough to be seen from 300km away, though parts of the mushroom cloud might.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@yukiko6137 There are severaml main issues.
1. Ukraine's own media and even western media CHEERED for Ukraine bombarding Bucha when the Russian where there. As ususual for western fascism, all the civilians of course killed by that are just 'necessary collateral damage' and in case of Ukraine just ignored completely.
2. Days long several different officials of the coup regime cheered for defeating the 'orcs' and 'freeding Bucha' with ZERO talk any kind of slaughter, while it would of course be the very first thing you would talk about.
3. Ukraine's media and officials openly talked about 'cleansing Bucha from 'RUssian Collaborateurs' = witch hunt = killing whoever you want or someone points a finger at without any fear to be judged for it. Better hope to never come in a situation, where other peopel are allowed to take anything they want from you, including your life. Humankind as it is, especially in the west, is a gigantic, rotting pile of shit and moral wouldn't survive a day without laws to fear by all the psychopaths around.
4. The 'evidence' of the slaughter doesn't fit with basic biologiy. Means: look up, what happens to a dead human body, especially when not conserved by medical means and alike. It rotts. Very, very quickly, and gets eaten by pretty much everthing around. Those corpese presented are fresh and as usual western media is just stupid enough to push against their own lies. Oh, sure, of course idiots will believe it anyway, because, duh, they are idiots. But anyone with at least half a brain instantly questions a story, that makes up a lie like "we saw those fresh corpses lying there since weeks!"
Why should you make up that lie, if you got actual proof, eh?
When it comes to the people who talk about it, their stories are stupid. By those the Russians come in, play the boogeyman "WE GONNA KILL YOU ALL! BOOGABOOGABOOGA!"; then just leave again and sometimes shoot a random person outside.
Sorry, that's not a believeable story. They either are like that, then there is no freaking reason that these eye wittneses are still alive. Or, since these people are neither dead nor even hurt, they just tell bullshit - and may even be forced to it.
Imagine you just survived a cleansing of your town by Nazi troops and those are still around and now sell those they killed victims of the enemy and control everything, including your life. Would you talk up = just also get killed like the others? Or would you play along with them and stay alive? This if they aren't just also Nazis. Coup regime Ukraine literally whitewashes SS soldiers as heroes. This means that it really sees racistic slaughter as heroism.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Communism is a social evolution of a socialiastic society.
Socialism means, that the economy serves the people, ALL people, not just the oligarchs as in capitalism. From this economical equality the society may rise into a state where the idea of all humans are equal of worth becomes part of them, where they get, that fighting each other isn't worth it and a waste of energy, resources, lives and live together as equals instead, working together (you know, as a 'community') not against each other. This Utopia (because indeed, we are FAR away from that) would be communism, though you could call the goal to reach it also already communistic.
Overall the thing communism must have is NO hierarchy of power at least. That's the minimum.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@firstandforemost87 Indeed, capitalists love that free market nonsense, but you always got a market when people trade with each other, that's nothing special.
Socialism also got a market. Socialism also got supply and demand.
What capitalists mean with free market is, a market in which they can freely dominate everything with their wealth and power without hinderance.
And what capitalists mean with supply and demand is, that both gonna serve them, that they control the supply and abuse the demand go get very rich.
Socialism also got supply and demand, but since socialism is about that the economy has to serve the society, the focus in it would have to be to satisfy the demand by creating a big enough supply or at least by equally spreading the supplys, every demand is at least partly satisfied.
Capitalism wouldn't do that. That's where the whole "low supply, high demand = high prices", because capitalism just abuses that situation.
If you got 10 people and 20l water, you got enough water for everyone. If you suddenly only got 10l water, socialism would give every of these 10 people just 1l, what wouldn't be good, but good enough for people to survive. Capitalism would tell the 10 people, that only those who can pay a high price will get their 2l of water - and the five left, well, bad luck. (a bit simplified of course).
Even worse, as capitalism is, it would take even those 20l water, the first, richest guy would have total controll over that and take 10l for himself, then sell the other 10 to the reaming 9 people and 5 of them will only get half a liter - even WHILE there would be enough water for all.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chesswithivan8346 Germany is still very close to Nazis. We simply miss the strength to mass murder other people and overall it's just too expensive to have concentration camps, but we are also part of the world wide mass murder and robbing against other countries, we love to see our weaspons kill, we love to ruin other countries with sanctions, which always and only target civilians and many of our policians would love to start another world war it seems, in their insanity.
Germany today is simply just a vassal state of the super fascist USA, that's the main difference. Their new Führer sits in oversea. And it simply lacks the strength to do anything. Better not give germans the possibility to go full Nazis again, the people here are clearly dumb enough to follow again and our corrupt people at the top are evil enough to try, if they see a chance for more profit.
Russia? Nothing in Russia looks like even going in that direction. Sure, if you follow our Nazi media, everyone else is that evil as we actually are.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
How?
The whole point of the terms left and right is that they are opposites.
Left = equality Right = elitism
You CAN'T unite it.
What you people mean is, if you can unite people who THINK that they are left or right. But you can only unite them inside the left or the right. You can unite them inside the idea of human rights OR despotism.
What shall MAGAcommunism be? MAGA stands for... yeah, what? "Make america great again" - that can stand for everything and nothing. You can (try to) make america great again with total nuclear war - or with abolishing the military completely. You can try to make america great again by making it a slaveholder country again - or by abolishing all (power) hierachy (= communism).
Anyway, if you follow the idea of communism = no power hierarchy, all people are of equal worth an no one rules over the others, you ARE a leftist, a pretty radical one, too.
Radical come from the greek radix = root, so radicla doesn't mean violent - that would be militant - just 'from the root'. A radical solution isn't a violent one, you simply rebuild something from the start, from the root. If you for example not just fiddle around with the current US system, but make a new one, that's radical.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Peopel should never forget:
There will always be greed, evil people.
And these greedy, evil people will abuse ANYTHING and EVERTHING they can, no matter what.
This means: you CAN'T create a system that is save from that.
You will ALWAYS guard it against these people and their abuse - not only the system itself, but you, too.
Yes, the normal soldier of course will think to fight for the right thing - because that's what the evil people will tell you.
Even the Nazis, while on a mission of GENOCIDE of MILLIONS of people, they told the story that they are the good guys vs the bad guys.
Evil people know no limits, no moral, no remorse, nothing. Just themselves and how to satisfy their endless hunger for more.
And they waste YOUR life for that just as easily as that of anyone else.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
People will never get, that the difference between socialism and capitalism is not if you can sell something, it's about who controls what is needed to produce things in the first place, what is needed to work, what is needed to survive.
Socialism would not take your right away to "sell books", but printing books and alike would not be in the hands of oligarchs, but the SOCiety as a whole.
Of course printing books is the least problem. It's more about controlling food, water, medicine, education, news media and so on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You realize that you are transsexual, when the whole puberty thing starts, so when you realize the difference between women and men, because the program starts to change you.
That's around 10+ (of course varying as puberty itself).
The big problem with the "be a grown up first" in that case is, that a hell lot of unrepairable damage (at our current state) will be done by just that "grown up" part, especially everything regarding your bone structure.
So it's more than understandable, that a transsexual person wants to avoid that IF they got with transistion.
Many don't. Not, because they don't want to, but because as things are, it's still patch work, you will be infertile and it's a stress for your body.
But imagine how brutal such an existence is to be willing to still accept all that.
And there is nothing you can do about it. You are literally born that way. Maybe that's how god makes jokes - or it's the other guy, messing with people or just nature failing as it does so oftn (you even got some million genetical males who STILL develope a female body with labia, vagina, uterus).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And then you wonder why it is easy for media to call you a right wing conspiracists.
Beause every now and then you just come up with stuff you got no clue of, fart into the internet, perfectly serving the right wing system with it by spreading their tales. And it laughs about you and abuses you further.
You got ZERO clue about this topic, this is more than clear, so why not be smart enough to keep your mouth shut at the bare minimum instead of ruining your channel with it?
It's always so annoying, when per se not dumb people think they should just run around talking shit for what reason ever, making it so easy for the evil people to succeed.
And it's not only that. For example that you constantly repeat the bullshit lie about "the left" when it comes to your media, the dems, 'wokeness' and alike - it makes anys sane person think that you are either too dumb to get it or that you are just another tool of the system, only playing this role as another trick.
Just look at your fans. None of them is any wiser. You make them even more confused, more stupid, even easier to manipulate.
Because you mix bullshit with facts.
Even the original Nazis knew, that this is they way you do it. You mix truth with shit. And it doesn't matter if you do that on purpose or out of stupidity - it ends with the same effect and you become anyother servant of the propaganda.
Congrats if that's what you want to be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@estherruth4692 How many peopel do even eat like that to make a study about it?
Those food studies are often a joke anyway. They simlpy take ill people and ask them what they ate - starting with the problem, if that is even true, if the peopel remember right or really want to tell and of course what these people also have done and may be ashamed off.
Overall cancer means that something in your body went horribly wrong plus your immune system being unable to handle it. The body got row after row to kill off cancer cells, but something all of them fail.
A big reason why we got more cancer might simply be Vitamin D deficiency. You need UVB radiation to produce Vitamin D (and the body can produce a LOT of it, easily 25k units per day).
But we meanwhile mainly sit inside and for good reasons we want to protect our skin from sunburns, what means we reduce UVB what means we reduce Vitamin D, the fuel for our immune system.
That's not even the big problem, since Vitamin D is easy and cheap to produce as supplement. But for some reason (probably the "cheap" part) we don't talk about that.
We in general don't really talk about the real elements, the Vitamins and minerals. Many people have deficiencies - and you could easily get rid of that.
You don't have to start to talk about the toxins you take, when the general supply of what you need for healthy living is already bad.
And that's not something about processed or "real" food. You can easily produce processed food that IS healthy, even healthier than real food. They just don't want to. Bigger profit to put shit into it and hell, the more peopel die the better, too many anyway, no? If you want to get rid of people, just make them eat shit.
1
-
@kylea1436 Early humans simply did not even know what cancer is, the just died for no known reason.
But that's not the point anyway.
Our digestive system is not made for plants. We don't use them well at all and without modern economy, only eating leaves, fruits and nuts when you might be able to get them, would be quite the mess and lead to an enormous deficit in many important vitamines.
Especially because early humans did not really know about them either. Even today many don't know what is in what food, especially when it comes to not being able to eat it fresh.
Vegetables and co lose their vitamines pretty quickly.
And the real fun starts in winter anyway. Meat and milk products made it much easier to survive.
If you eat everything from the animal, you can survive solely with meat even and that without help of a high civilisation and its economy.
Much harder with plants.
Vegan is luxury. Humankind didn't have that for a very long time. Overall we managed to overcome giant hunger catastrophes only in the last decades.
A much bigger problem than meat and co is, what we put into it - thanks to capitalism, it's all about profit, not about health.
Would be easy to make processed food healthy. Without any problem.
But look at the US health care system alone. A bigger GDP than most countries on the planet. Money, money, money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nuclearcatbaby1131 While I'm also no fan of going crazy and just blaming everything on it, I never understood why there is even the need to full around with our immune system like that, when the old ways of vaccination (so pretty much giving the dead body of a virus to our immune system so it can study it) had to be replaced like that.
The usual, egomanical "playing god" thing. While humankind has left evolution with all the changes via medicine, soviety and all (evolution works with murder, it simply kills the 'weak' and let the 'strong' take over, good enough for nature I guess, but it's bloody horrific, still), we indeed have to look how we replace it by the same means, so look at how we an get rid of our weaknesses (for example when it comes to developing cancer) with science and of course the focus on understanding DNA and what follows is one of the main roads there.
But we are still on the road and not in the situation to just fool around with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Must say what I undestand even less than the people who don't want to see the Nazis are people who DO the the Nazis and still say, the invasion is a war crime.
So, you DO know that this country is run by military armed Nazis hordes who mass murder people year by year with the goal of ethnical cleansing, but stopping them is a war crime?
Sorry, but that's even more fucked up than those people who simply think that there are no Nazis at all, their PoV makes at least sense. Sure, they are blind to reality, but they don't say: yeah, their are mass murdering fascist, but, you know, who cares, just let them do their thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dems ARE far right, child. That's the whole problem with them.
Hell, what you you think political right stands for? It's elitism. It's the idea that a few at the top can exploit the rest. That's what political right means. Feudalism, capitalism, monarchy, aristorcracy, plutocracy, tyranny, fascism or the 'free west' "Democracy" = elections about whom of the oligarchs should be the posterchild for the next four years to exploit you for all oligarchs anyway.
And they can do that, because you people don't even know what the words means they use for that. They play you like a fiddle. And you never learn.
Hell, you literaly cheer for ht same old Reps as the saviors as if the came down from heaven as angelic beings. They, together with the Dems, ruin you since ages. And they will not stop, why should they?
The only thing that is postive regarding Trumps is, that he's not an outright warmonger like the others. But he won't save your country. He couldn't, even if he wanted to. And he doesn't.
They fool you with the choice between shit and piss. It doesn't matter what you choose, you are in for an awful meal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Got such media reports in germany again, as usual, talking a lot about the brutal violence of the "communist regime", while the pictures showed what the 'students' did, for example binding a police officer to a bus and burning both.
Imagine something like that happening in the west.
When for example G20 in Hamburg people demonstrated againt war and alike, the police brutally started to go against them causing many heavy injuries and that for them wearing masks(!) (was beforce covid).
You got people sitting on the roof of 15+m high buildings, doing nothing and police shoot at them with their watergun truck. With the power of that thing, they could easily have killed people by making them fall, but they don't care.
And so on.
And none of these people killed any police officer or even tried.
Meanwhile when some unknown people raided a known left wing area in Hamburg, the police did nothing, while media blamed the left anti war demonstrants - to loot their own houses and supermarkets.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The parties in germany which come to power and are supported by the media are all known (well, by those who care) to be puppets of the USA and that partly since 2.WW. The Nazis were very happy in germany, that their new Führer USA got so much use for them to fight the old enemies, especially Russia and evrything left.
We got exactly ONE opposition part of worth in germany "Die Linke" (The Left), that is against war, warmongering, sending weapons evrywhere in the world, for social topics, an economy that serves the people, not the oligarchs, a non hierarchic healthcare system, that isn't more and more pillaged, to work and live together with other countries and not see them as enemies (especially Russia) and so on.
They are smeared by the media since forever, called Putin puppets and alike and worse.
It's the only party (over 5% - and partyl not even making this anymore, thanks to the smearing and idiocy of the people to fall for it) that is in the left spectrum in germany and that moderatly, all other parties are right wing, though we also got parties like your Dems who sell themselves as left - and simply aren't, like Olaf Schol's SPD or "The Greens" who are in power in the moment, together with the neoliberal FDP and just going for more war.
Especailyl the greens, who started as peace-loving party some decades ago are meanwhile the worst warmongers. One of the highter up "Marieluise Beck" just went to Kiev and were in the prime news in germany, calling out for more violence and war and weapons and a no fly zone, to stop Putin, constantly lying about everything.
Our media in germany is actually even worse than what you got in UK and USA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Disgusting to spread such nonsense.
Cancer cells are body cells. The dangerous cancer that multiplies quickly is fast growing and by that much eatin cells, which even steal from other cells, by that they need a lot of energy what is used in chemotherapy, because then the cancer will also take in more of the poison and hopefully die faster.
A metabolici support for this is to give insulin before the treatment to push the cells even more in to hunger mode, but this does not mean at all, that you can kill cancer via hunger. It eats the same as the other body cells and as said: it even steals for that rom other cells, what is a problem in general, bust just gets worse, when you try fo enforce it.
People who tell you, that you can just east something special and won't get cancer LIE to you! Same for peopel who tell you that you just need some single pills or alike.
Cancer is complicated and no, not everys place on earth is as shit as your right wing extremist oligach system of greed in the USA. If you could simply feed meat to patients to cure them, there would be enough places on earth to do that. It's simply not true.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason is simple: fascism. Fascism stomps any resistance and the first target is always media.
In germany, a professor describe the difference between propaganda and agitation. That agitation will lead to more political educated population and that in Russia you can have a political discurse with your cleaner, who will tell you all of the backgrounds about the topic, because it's simply an atmoshere where a lot of pros and cons and so one are discussed (what of course got its limits when you are an US sponsored puppet who talks about how to violently throw over the government).
Propaganda meanwhile destroys all politicial education. Everything has follow the line and lies of it, everything against it will be ignored or forbidden. That's why, as the professor said, most talk to someone in our west will end after thirty seconds, since the only thing you gonna hear from them is what they just read in the newspaper, they don't know backgrounds, they don't know how things are intertwined, they 'know' , what they are allowed to know, what mostly got its limits at 'us = good, they = bad'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ugh, hell, why are you guys doing that over and over again, speaking about stuff you clearly got no clue about?
Yeah, it's nothing new, that the body needs a certain amount of sunglight for example to produce Vitamin D (though of course you can just supplement it).
Of course for that you aren't allowed to use anything that blocks the radiation like sunscreen or sitting behind filtering windows, because then you will also not produce Vitamin D and in winter or when you simple live in a region with less overall sunlight per year, you might get problems anyway, so supplementing vitamin D is necessary anyway.
When it comes to the serotonine production it's fine enough to be outside in the shadow or later the day, because in contrast to Vitamin D it doesn't need the UV B radiation.
This said: nothing of this is new nor does this mean that sunlight is good and you should just toast yourself.
You only need a few minutes outside for enough Vitamin D production and the warning from sunlight regarding cancer is about people who sit there for much, much longer and that constantly.
Overall as long as you avoid getting sunburns = obviously damaging your skin, there is no need for fear.
This said: getting a tan is alraedy the reaction of the body to per se too much sunlights. It detects damage and adjusts to it. That's the whole point of a tan.
1
-
@tatjanaflugel396 Oh, sure, just do. I mean, most of you don't use them right anyway and now guess why the corrupt, right wing system loves using these words you are not using right, hm?
Instead of leftism you can just say general human rights.
Instead of rightism you can just say: despotism, slavery, exploitation.
That's what the two opposites stand for. One for the idea that all humans are equal in righst and worth. And the other one that the thousands of years of oligarchs exploiting the masses is the only right way to go.
Left was called the try to get these rights. Right was called what was against it, keep the king, the aristocracts, the rich and and the slaveholders.
But you people think it stands for... whatever. Strong state vs weak state? As if that even makes sense, since of course despotic states (= right wing) got a very powerful state. Right wingers are against a strong state when this state is suppposed to stand for the right of the masses. Then, yes, they want a weak state = weak rights = weak people, so they can easily exploit them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Always funny when they say, it's about dinsformation, because in that case, they would have to censor all our western media for sure.
I don't hear much disinformation from RT or Sputnik, actually. But even when these guys just question our 100% fake news narrative, it's already called disinformation.
What these tech companies actually do, is to protect disinformation by trying to make it the only source.
They simply try to bring us back to the days, where there was only TV and radio and newspaper as only source of information.
Of course, no matter what they try, this will still not work - and especially not change reality, no matter how many dumb people they may trick with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ugh.
Russia had a revolution from the left going against the right wing extreme of a monarchy and all this comes with, but of course things never end as they are planed, especially not because you will always have the violence and counter revolution of the former system intervening and of course new right wing elements trying to take over and seize power. (right = elitisms = few rule over the many, left = egalitarian = all people are equal in worth).
It's of course not that simpole as Lenin vs Stalin. Not even as simple as just taking the Soviet Union, because one of he main factors for the bad development was the constant and often up to existencial threat from the outside, with the new Soviet Union being attacked from the start - and pretty much up to today.
Lenin himself said, that they merely reached State Capitalism, what was fine with him as a step toward socialism, but it's not just Stalin being against that, it was simply not possible. Socialism and Communism are no systems of war. When you are threatened by fascism in every way possible form the outside, there is no way to develope such systems.
That's why they got social elements here and there, but when it came to power and economy, kept everything under the typical right wing control = a brutal power hierarchy.
Because they wanted it? Not even worth to ask, because they simply had to. There was no room for any othe decision when genocide is standing is running through your door.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Vaccines DO work, that's a fact, you just don't give them for fun to everone if they are not making you immune.
The western Covid vaccines were driven by corruption for a lot of reason:
1) They didn't make you immune at all, you still could get it, spread it and even this protection only lasted for ~3 monthes, what is ridiculous.
2) It was a new way to mess around with the body, not the usual, proven ways and to just test that on billions of people is just plain evil.
3) Forcing vaccine on everyone only makes sense with the immunity aspect to get rid of that virus for good, without that you only tell people who are endangered by an infection that a vaccine could help them, but even then it should be their choice.
4) It was insane how even some medical personal told people that it doesn't matter much how to give a vaccine in the correct way. It MUST go in the muscle. If it goes in the blood stream it can quickly end up elsewhere int he body including the heart, where it should'n't be. An inflamation of your arm mucles is one thing and annoying but not dangerous. An inflamation of your heart meanwhile...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Problem with this is, such parties are a one trick pony. They went and got elected in for that one thing, but of course you need much more than that.
It's the reason why a system like in China makes much more sense.
The elections aren't about the government, because overall: what's even the point of it? As if any country with elections would let some revolutionary party really get there to begin with.
Instead the elections aer all about respresentatives of the daily lives and problems, which than form that big congress that focusses on all these problems - instead of, you know, the success of their party.
Even when you got parties in the west which promiss to act like that, they a) just lie about it to get elected, than just don't do it or b) if they really are different, than the system will make sure, that only some minorities will vote for them and the other parties will keep them away from any possibility to make a change.
This BBB success will also lead nowhere, it can't the system doesn't work that way to begin with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If we speak about an US lab, that would be a very different thing than the lab leak theory, which was spread to put the blame on China.
If coming from an US lab, this was no leak - it was a warcrime commited with biological weapons.
In this case a virus will likely be 'engineered' to look normal and not in the usual way, too.
Would by the way fit well to the biolabs in Ukraine and all around the world.
Overall don't get how people think, that US fascism wouldn't do something like that. Of course it would. World wide mass murder, the only country that used not ONE, but TWO nuclear weapons and both directly on cities. Which used, directly and indirectly chemical weapons en mass even after 2.WW, also wide spread, not just against soldiers, which used Napalm en mass, also on cities by the way.
And many more...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nonsense.
1. Humans can't explain most things like how the universe even came into existence, same for life. The big bang and other theories don't solve the problem at all, it's still just a transformation of someting that was there and doesn't solve the problem how that something come into existence in the first place and what is before and beyond it. Same for life. Evolution doesn't explane at all how life was created, it only explains how life isn't something fix but adapts, changes.
2. With that in mind, there is simply the constant thought in a human's mind, why they even exist and if there is life is just pointless reproduction, especially when it is a not too good life, leading nowhere, life just a meaningless existence in the first place that the universe doesn't need, what is a devastating thought for most humans, that nothing matters.
Without solving such problems, it's stupid to cry about religion, which is simply a very human try to find sense and overall the most basic step for moral behaviour, because if nothing matters and life is just what evolution does = constant slaughter of the weak so the remaning can reproduce and 'evolve', you can do very, very bad things without any problem.
What the germans did in 2.WW with their concentration camps was nothing else. It was artificial evolution. Breeding 'worthy' humans and killing of the 'unworthy' and without religion or quasi religious believes like the general human rights (which are just as made up as any faith), without the idea that life in general is sacred... well...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Child, what leftist? Western media is hardcore right wing as are all ruling parties.
Germany got ONE left wing party, all othes are right wing, using different lies to sell that exploitation to the idiots.
AfD is nothing but a bland copy of von der Leyen's CDU, you know, the crazy warmonger in the EU.
AfD constantly votes for cuting wages, cuting social welfare, cutting taxes for the rich what means nothing for the poor and middle class, but massively weakens the state which rotts away, what again hurts the poor and the middle class the most.
That's AfD, but of course they just blame the victims of the far right warmongering around the globe, so yeah, let's vote for them and more cutting down of everything.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thought about "chemtrails" this day, when I saw a plane and how little sense this conspiracy makes from the start, since in the height, the chemicals would be dispersed so much and land who know where.
Meanwhile people don't seem to care at all what all kind of shit they put into our food and drinks.
And by the way: while BURNED(!) meat to the point it goes charcoal black (just as any other food you do that to) is bad, we still don't talk much about smoking, do we?
But, well, there is a giant lot of money in smoking, isn't it. In something where you pretty much inhale pure poison.
Alcohol sin't good, too, but in comparison to the poison cocktail that is smoking, you could almost call it healthy...
Same for other drugs and there are some extremely nasty ones.
And yes, while the main cancers you get from smoking are in your lunges and the whole system around is you also increase the cancer chance for everything else.
So while we FOR SURE should start to put less shit into our food and whatever we drink, It's insane how propaganda and greed made something as deadly as smoking so accepted - with meat and alike getting for more pressure in general. What is kind of absurd. Humans eat meat since thousands of years, same for many other animal products (and yes, it's how nature is build, nature is absolutely murderous and does not care for survival of anything, you either make it by yourself or you just die horribly, THAT'S nature). If any of that stuff is suddenly bad, then solely because what we meanwhile put in there - again out of greed.
When I hear talk about alternatives for cow milk, that you could take plant milk and that you could but vitamins and minerals into that plant milk to make it as good as cow milk - so when you could put extra viamines and minerals into plant milk to make it more healthy, why not do the same to all the other food, instead of all the bad up to toxic shit?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Klaus No, child. Socialism describes an economy in the hand of the people, in which the machines work for the whole society - that's why it's called SOCIAlism.
Name me a country where this was the case and even more a bad thing.
You can't.
You don't get it: capitalists call other countries socialistic (those don't even do it themselves, they at best say they want to REACH socialism and got some social elements like education and health care for all, but not socialiastic economy) to scare you away.
Take North Korea. Everytime its in the news, it is called a "communistic regime". Meanwhile North Korea does not call itself communistic. It calls itself a democratic republic.
Funny that they never call it that, no? Well, because we also use the word democatic to fool the masses, so we don't want to smear the word, that's why.
Democracy can't even exist without socialism or something alike. Because the REAL power is ALWAYS in the economy. You can vote for whatever you want, if oligachs control the economy, this is without any meaning.
You don't need politics to survive, you need goods. And who ever controls the goods and their production controls the system.
That's why the right wing extremists (that includes parties which people like you see as left wing, but left = egalitarian, right = elitism, so any party that stands for a class system, that caters to the oligarchs and their power ARE right wingers, no matter what they call themselves, only those who give politicis for ALL people are leftists, that's the definition of the word) love to talk about democracy and elections, because those are meaningless, while they do everything possible to keep you away from changing the depotic economy.
Because there is the actual power.
And if you say: but they make the laws, they can control the economy. No, they will tell you that they have to follow the "realpolitic" = they have to do what the oligarchs want.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SweetTooth8989 Child, you guys simply don't know what the word "political left" means.
That you com with "libertarian" alone is telling enough.
You do get, that those who talk about "freedom" and "libertarism" and alike ARE right winger who abuse the nice sounding word of freedom to talk about THEIR freedom - not yours.
The difference between left and right is not freedom, both like freedom, who doesn't? The difference is, that the left want the freedom for ALL and the right wants it for themselves alone. It's the difference between equality (= left) and hierarchy/elitism (= right).
And no: calling people or yourself left or right does not make you or them left or right. If you are left or right is solely defined by how you act.
Of course right wingers LOVE to call themselves leftists and even talk like them.
If someone tries to trick you, sell you a broken car as new for example, that person won't tell you the truth, that he's an assholes who wants to get your money and give you shit for it. He will lie. He will say the exact opposite, that he wants all your best, that he is the one losing money with this deal and and so on. Because the truth would ruin his plan. That's why right wingers love to lie. They want to rule over you, that's what being "political right" means. But when they need to full you for that, so you, out of your own will say: yes, that person sounds great, he indeed should rule!, he won't tell you that openly.
Meanwhile when it comes to leftism, it makes no sense for them to lie about it. "Yeah, well, overall many who got a lot will of course get less, since we tak care for everyone, but overall this will be better for everyone, we will have peace, we won't destroy things anymore by fighting each other, we work together, to make the best out of the world by seeing each other as equals, not working for some ruler or ruling class."
The right, the capitalists got exactly ONE argument against this: "This can't work, because people want to have more than others and will not accept such a system."
Funny, becausel, you see: for a poliicial right system to work, the big majority HAS to lose, so a slim minority gains more.
It's a limited system, this includes "freedom". If you want more, you have to take it away from someone else.
Right says: great idea, we want more, so we take it.
Left says: No, we have limited resources, we have to share these.
That's the difference, that's the meaning of these words and if you are right or left is defined which of those ways you follow.
In general, it does not need to be an extrem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
West germany NEVER felt any debt toward SU/Russia. The Nazis fled west, because they knew, that the USA are good friend with nazis. The USA had supported Hitler's rise and even a long tirm during the war. The USA kept our Nazis in power and made sure, that our government would still fight everything left.
Many years the west germans were still on the side of the Nazis and hated german socialists and communists, seeing them as traitors.
The party that took in most of the Nazis CDU/CSU, they whitewashed every warcriminal and even got them in highest positions. The 'Verfassungsschutz" (Federal Office of Protection of Constitution) was mainly build up by a known Nazi spy and the USA. CDU/CSU got the power in germany most of the time since 1945 - and managed to make most other parties (including SPD - 'social democrats, only by name, though) and Green party (only by name though, they are the worst warmongers germany got these days) follow them anyway. So while germany got more parties than USA, most behave just like your two parties, only difference by name and image, but standing for the same shit.
Von der Leyen is CDU poltician for example. Brutally failed in every politicial position she got and was just placed in the EU by the typical corruption we got in Europe. Europe is so corrupt, that we simply don't see corruption as corruption. We just legalize it. Voila - no corruption anymore. Of course it does not work that way.
That's make it so easy for us to work with other corrupt governments. That's simply our thing. We love corruption. Because we love profit. It's AAAAAAALL about profit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leslielearnorth Why should I look at these countries? They aren't socialistics. They got some socialistic elements and they were by far the best these countries had to offer.
Their problems? Typical capitalistic. In case of Soviet Union the main problem was the constant aggression from the west (up to today in the end), trying to destroy the country over and over and over again, so it's not even like they could have tried to reach socialism, which isn't a system made for war, which demands far more hierarchic control.
Venezuela? The majority of the economy is still in private hands, oftern oligarchs, and guess who made sure that the country would get such gigantic problems, to make it fail and take over again completely to get rid of the social elements, so they can exploit the masses again and not help them.
There is no socialistic country in history. There are countries with socialistic elemenst, like genaral healthcare, education, housing and alike. But it's only socialism, if the whole economy serves society, not just some elements.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1