Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Blaming Russia for Zaporozhye. HIMARS ammo running low. Peski taken, closing in on Avdeevka Update 1" video.

@tobyknowles3531 Thermobaric is not really anything special, it's simply a fuel bomb, not anythign super high tech. First nation that fooled around with that idea had been germany. USA came later for the use in Vietnam...
6
The effective use of TOS-1 by the way also shows that HIMARS is making no difference. TOS-1 is devastating, but does not have a high range. If HIMARS would be effective, the couldn't bringt it in position like that.
3
@TNord. Fire itself is of caused used even longer as a weapon, sure (not THAT often as movies want to makes us believe, since it's pretty risky, specially in earliers times). It's not the same idea as a thermobaric bomb, pointing at the 'baric'. Such fire weaspons were really just working like that: with heat, not with pressure.
2
Always love the 'argument' of our propaganda: Ukraine is not doing it, because it would not make sense. Ukraine got no Nazis, because Zelensky is a jew. And so on. Meanwhile all the anti Russia PR is build upon: Russia is evil, brutal and stupid.
1
Regarding Bucha (and pretty much all other warcrime accusations against Russia): you don't hear much at all abotu any of those anymore, they just come up with new stuff, like the nuclear power plant, which will also be forgotten again, simply because they can't deliver any evidence against Russia, it instead clearly points in the opposite direction.
1
@JK-gw1yf Question is: do they even? When you look at the profit of the energy companies, those pretty much explode. If the energy PRODUCTION cost would rise, how could their profit? Feels more like we got the usual capitalism just of steroids. Energy is an oligopol since decades and they abuse this in every way possible and it seems now even more, while buying our corrupt politicians. There is no real reason for such brutal price explosion.
1