Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "How Ukraine Plans to DESTROY the Russian Fleet in Crimea" video.

When you make a hole in the street part of the bridge, that is easiyl repaired. If you want to put a bridge out of order, you have to do way more than that, at best destroy the pillars, that can't be fixed easily or at least make it collapse. A hole is nothing.
16
@ceejay1476 Also ECM and artillery.
3
No one said those were hit. They were damage. Since they were in dry dock, that's done alone if you hit anything in the drydock and get shrapbell damage from that. This whole attack is typical for "we know the harbour is there, we just blindly fire at it." If you would do a real attack, you wouldn't go for out or order ships which aren't worth it anyway, especially not landing ships, what's the point? You waste 10 expensive and limited cruise missiles on somethign with zero impact on the enemy.
2
@patwilson2546 100k missiles don't destroy warships, kid. Harpoon missile for example costs 1,5M per shot.
2
@robertbradbury7921 There is simple no need for ultra small chips, that's all, you don't need them for anything.
2
@ilayohana3150 Russia produces their military stuff themselves. The idea alone that Russia would ever trust NATO fascism with that...
2
@pilotmanpaul 1. It's not even clear if there is any wortwhile damage and to what. 2. Even if that stuff is destroyed, it's utterly meaningless, none of those two was of any importance for that SMO, so if that was an attack on purpose, it was an absolute stupid target to choose.
2
@danielbwest Russia is the richest country on this planet child. They can build giant fleets, they don't do, because for what? In contrary to NATO fascism, Russia does not care to wager war around the globe.
2
@nommchompsky Hell, you Nazis and your delusions, it's not even funny.
1
@JohnDorian-j7x True, it's likely 100%, but those 30% still came down and damage some stuff.
1
@danielbwest Russia has won a year ago. What you got now is NATO and its's Nazi proxy regime raping Ukraine to death for no reason.
1
@exotikz7905 It's funny how western Nazis still got the idea, that they are super humans with high intellect and all the subhuman monkeys can't do what they do. Never made sense, nevert will.
1
@koscy6897 "National Socialism" is merely the label the german Nazis have chosen. They themselves killed socialists, communists and everything left wing and were brutally capitalistic. Many german companies which still exists today and the families who own them made massive profit in the 3. Reich of the Nazis with slavery, what is all the absolute opposite of what socialism means (as the word itself says, it's about the economy serving the 'societas' = the people, not just some oligarchs/capitalists as in capitalism, which is mainly just a new form of feudalism). The ideological core of Nazism is it's racism - which it copied from the USA. You got white uberhumans, though there also not all whites and of course you could be a traitor of your race and so on, and the rest are 'subhumans'. Banderas Ukraine was and is following the same priciple - as is the west (and that since many, many centuries), just less obvious, but just look at their talking about the western garden and the rest is jungle or how a war in Europe is so different to all the other wars, because now we got white people dying. Of course Russian's are not white, as said: Nazism is very specific in that case - and still absolut arbitrary. The reason for that is simple: all this is just cover. It's the old thing of greed for power and wealth. And when it comes to Russia: it's the center focus of all greed because it is by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaar the richest country on this planet. The reason why the Banderas Nazism in Ukraine was supported and build up, was solely to force Russia to intervene with the idea that this could be used to ruin it without starting 3.WW (US fascism would LOVE to repeat 2.WW with its NATO cannonfodder sacrificed to ruin Russia and it getting in again at the end, like in 2.WW to secure all the loot, while Europe and Asia is burned down again - problem is, Russia and China would burn the USA to the ground if they would try to do that).
1
@lastword8783 Because Russia isn't US fascism. They could burn down Ukraine without any problem. They don't want to, because they aren't Nazis like NATO and its proxies.
1
@Mikhail_Zaitsev You clearly got no clue what you are talking about, child.
1
Of course it's NATO. It's NATO weapons using NATO surveillance and NATO satellites and probably even NATO pilots.
1
@lq7777 It's not unlikely that they even knocked out 100%, but this can still lead to stuff dropping and hitting other things. Overall: since it's 100% clear that this attack was orchestrated by NATO, it's very unlikely, that they went for those repair docks. That's really not a worthwhile target.
1
@werewolverine4906 The alternative is brutal mass murder which will kill hundredthousands of civilians as collateral damage. That's acceptable for NATO fascism, but not for Russia. Some damage to replaceable things isn't somethign they care for.
1
@mabhodlelajj1195 You do get that when NATO joins directly without hiding behind their proxy meat shield, that Russia can just freely attack anything it wants? What by the way includes destroying the internet (yes, they can EASILY do that and it would be desastrous for pretty much everything in the west).
1
@gitfoad8032 Turkey has to let through any ship that has its homeport there.
1
@thatgenericdixienormouspicguy Those fire cracker cruise missiles don't just obliterate a submarine. They may damage the hull, but that's it. You got the picture when they hit a bridge with it. Just punched little hole into it. You think that just turns a military submarine into dust? It's unlikely that it even directly hit it.
1
@sk-sm9sh The only thing we saw was, that NATO anti air completely sucks against everything, even little drones.
1
@beastmode6225 It's funny how you guys still believe the lies of the Nazis. They tell such stories day in and out, 90% of them are utterly false, but you just keep going. And that submarine is a little one, even if it would be destroyed, you talk about it, as if it was one of the many big nuclear submarines Russia got in its fleet, not just that little dwarf version. Regarding the conflict, even the complete destruction would be comlete meaningless. It was in dry dock anyway, so out of order.
1
@messier8379 Ukraine found nothing, those attacks are pure NATO attacks. Ukraine could do shit, the neither got the weapons nor the intel to do that. Everything from NATO and even then they only manage to hit such pointless targets.
1