Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "7 Lessons NATO should learn from Ukraine war" video.

  1.  @donaldhysa4836  His whole list is a joke. He got no clue, he just wants more stuff and absurd amounts of it. 500 tanks for example. That's more than UK, france and germany together have. 1000 artillery? Not even USA got that many in service. He simply wants mountains of everything. Funny enough how little air defense is in his list... Or fuel. You know, to actually make all that stuff move and not just lie there. He likey just got high on drugs and then wrote some numbers on a piece of paper.
    12
  2.  @Mooshimoca  Problem of cheap drones it, that you can jam them even easier. Drones can't get close to actual Russian frontline, because they get jammed. That's why Ukraine is firing blindly and that mainly at civilians, far away from Russian positions. Likely think: yeah, we take cover in civilians and hospitals and schools, so they will, too.
    9
  3. As usual and who would have guessed: a working army is about everything working together. That's why all the tank about some single wonder weapon is always ridiculous. It's not a game, where you build one super unit and that can trash everything. There is nothing even close to that in RL - if you don't just slaughter an anyway helpless enemy like NATO loves to do, but then pretty much anthing is a "wonder weapon".
    8
  4.  @ajc5479  Tell your CIA officer to give you better training, you all tell the same stupid line and it's boring.
    6
  5.  @donaldhysa4836  Because they hold back and take their time. They could just obliterate everything, but they don't want to do that, that's all. That's more risky for their own soldiers, but to destroy as little as possible and make sure to keep collateral damage very low is more important than that for them.
    5
  6.  @donaldhysa4836  Well, sure 1000 drones when sacrificed will for sure also destroy something. You do get, how absurd that number is when you talk about full grown war drones, right?
    3
  7.  @deadeyecpt.7765  Well you sometimes got superunits and overall games are often designed, that units got health bars and then you can repair them or they reg themselves and of course everything is all nice on a small map, you just got the enemy and the enemy is super dumb and all that. In reality, you see shit, you know shit, 99+% of the shots miss the target (and hit something else) and even when you got a firefight, you will barely see whom you are actually shooting at, not even talking about artillery and so on. When you hear the western media and co talk about the magical artillery units we send them for example: well, fine when you can shoot so far (and what they got - and was destroyed - could do that, too), but withotu surveillance, this doens't help you much. From journalists at the frontline came the info, that they simply can't look the far and drones get jamed and so on. Satellite images are mainly good for stationary targets, stuff that can't move, like buildings. So what we got (well, not from our MSM) are shots of our wonderful western wonder weapons against villages, schools, hospitals and alike, no soldiers even near it, but, well, they know those buildings are there, those can't move away, they don't know who's inside, so they just shoot at them. Same for the great idea to just open prisons and in general just give military weapons to anyone who wants them. What persons will take such an offer? The smart ones? The thoughtful ones? Or the ones who are aggressive, dumb or think it's all a videogame? They sit there with others like them, their new weapons with overall not enough ammuntion to reach anything at all beside being a lethal risk, and, well, no enemy in 50km radius. But they don't know that. They were told, there are enemies everywhere. Saboteurs. People in civil (like them). Danegerous, likely armed people (like them). I don't want to know, how many people died from that alone. Friendly fire is a big problem even in trained armies, it's still a big danger. When you just arm civilians (and criminals), it's not only a risk anymore, it's the main threat. It's something you rarely got in video games.
    2
  8.  @jonshive5482  I guess you mean the invasion of Ukraine Nazi regime into Donbass then, eh?
    1
  9.  @deathtrooper199  Oh it GOT a lot of attention of NATO. They are the puppet masters behind it and trained and armed the coup regime in all these years.
    1
  10.  @AllisterCaine  They hold back to no just obliterate everything. If Ukraine wouldn't be run by Nazis pushed by western fascists, they would have given up already and move on. Instead NATO fascism keeps sending Ukraine into death and destruction. Russia's slow path gave and still gives Ukraine endless chances to stop it. You know how NATO acts? They just destroy everything and - just as in Ukraine - gives a single fuck how many of the country and its civilians survive. If Russia would act like NATO, you would have a burned down Kiev already and hundred thousands dead civilians already. Ukrainian army is hiding in cities, using their own population as meat shields. Hell, their own politicians admitted that. Literally said: "Russia is doing bad in city fights, so by hiding and attacking in cities, we can prolong the war and get out kills" (not exact quote word by word, but by meaning). What by the way just tells two things: 1. Ukraine uses the tactic of terrorist, because not even guerillia soldiers would burn down their own cities and abuse their own people as cover. Terrorist do that. 2. They just admitted with that, that Russia tries to keep civilians losses at a minimum, else their tactic with hiding behind them would not work at all. And they don't just hide, they shoot at them, too. With NATO weapons. Those attacks that hit the Donezk reason, including a running hospital with hundreds of patients inside and not a single soldier even near it, hit by western NATO ammunition shot form NATO artillery. They don't use that stuff to attack the Russian army, because the Russia army just obliterates them if not before they shoot, then after. They shoot at the people living in Donbass. They do, what they did since 2014 = trying to get rid of all people there to conquere the land.
    1
  11.  @cjeromet1971  Nuclear weapons are not wonder weapons. The whole point of war is to steal other peoples stuff or go against that - what is pretty stupid in general, because you still waste and destroy so much more, but some get out with some personal profit anyway and many others are stupid enough to fall for the lies of such few to follow along. Nuclear weaspons are just the ultimate escalation. There biggest value is, that they are so over the top, that they make wars more unlikely. And still: those few insane evil ones are still greedy enough to try it.
    1