Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "POKROVSKE & SEMYHIRIA HAVE FALLEN" video.

@asntsoldier9921 This 3:1 nonsense doesn't work in modern days anymore. If you would have some guys with swords and bow or rifles and launchers, that would be one thing. But we talk about the times of multi layered high tech warfare - and on the other side in which strikes from very few people with devastating weaposn can still hurt superior enemy by surprise. This makes it all far more complex than just a numbers game - and in general it's not like a video game, where every side got their strength and weakness. Throwing high numbers of (more and more badly trained) soldiers into the fire is not a strength in number on the coup regime/NATO side, but the biggest and very disgusting weakness, because it costs so many lives and all for nothing.
5
@Paul-wo3qh Nah, there are still many civil structtures left to destroy and brag about that it was a military target. Of course not many of them will blow up like a fertilizer factory. But then just call it a Russian HQ, also works.
1
@seeleagent You for sure also believe that Ukraine got more tanks than ever, hm?
1
@QuizmasterLaw Russia gives close to no infos at all about any build ups or planed assaults. Only idiots do that anyway.
1
@giovanni-ed7zq Child, what are you talking about? If anyone needs high oil and gas prices, it's the USA, since they try to milk the rest out of their fading reserves and where do you think is all their money coming they need for their world wide warmongering includin in Ukraine? Russia got close to no debt in comparison to every western country and their military spending isn't big at all for the biggest country on the planet that is constantly threatened by bloodthirsty robbers like NATO.
1
@MrZlocktar Not really extreme when you got a country that is doing a fanatic "Volkssturm" and just wastes the lives of their citizens and coup regime Ukraine is doing. That whole defender/attacker thing is something out of contact warfare anyway. Modern warfare - and this is just geting worse - is all about range, about attacking without being counterattacked. Even in medieval ages, when you could just bombard a castle or surround it and wait it out wasn't easier for the defenders at all. It was If you got a storm the castle situation, of course the attackers are in a big disadvantage. And while a city is no castle, if the 'defender' don't care to defend the city or citizens at all and just play terrorists, it's of course a terrible situation - especially for the citizens. That's more about the whole "caring about civilians or not". Russia could easily crush Ukraine if it wouldn't hold back to keep harm away from civilians. Disgusting enough, coup regime and their NATO master does not think like that at all and don't give a single fuck how brutally ruined Ukraine will get and how many Ukrainians gonna die.
1