Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Why Has Ukraine Not Yet Collapsed?" video.

@Kirillissimus Reading a manual isn't doing the trick. The more high tech the system is, the more you need a complex support for that system and if you don't have set, well, you have to work around somehow, what even if possible makes it awful. No one says Ukrainians are idiots, it's not like NATO armies are run by super smart people. But it's a complete unusual system for them and that mainly on its own, not as part of the whole military system which would actually be needed to make it work well. Also: many veteran soldiers in Ukraine left, gave up or died, so you got a hell lot of rookies and for those it's just completely overwhelming. And even if you got training, that just training. US military guys explained quite well, how you get into an experience team as a trained rookie and then learn further - not BE the guy who then shall train others with no clue at all. It's insane enough to just give people rifles and some trainin and send them in, but overall a rifle is a quite simply thing.
2
@Nathan666 Of course what works in the US army as a halfway well oiled system is somethign completely different when you got the current situation in Ukraine. For example the system they send in aren't bad, HIMARS, HARM and whatever, but if you cut them out of the whole machine they are working in with all the support they need, the surveillance, protection and all, it's a completely different thing. And even inside that: they are not wonder weapons. They of course obliterate 3. world countries, but you don't need a wonder to do that against those who can barely fire back to begin with.
2
Taiwan scenario is even worse. A small island all on its own direct in front of China. Yeah... good luck defending that...
2
Actually because of that there is no Ukraine left. It's brutally ruining Ukraine. It's not Russia that is destroying west and middle Ukraine (and south and east they already build up again where this is possible), but all that NATO 'support', coup regime Ukraine will never be able to pay back, while our 'free west' is not known for gifts at all (in regard of Ukraine, it was actually Russia, that had given many gifts and good contracts).
2
@tomk3732 In contrary to NATO (and it's coup regime puppet), Russia does not WANT to burn down Ukraine. Burning it down would be far easier.
1
@AntisXP You mean beside the ability to end humanity?
1
They of course HOPED for some sanity left in Ukraine. But they were clearly prepared for the worst, especialyl because they know that the coup regime is a 100% NATO puppet and while a Ukrainian politician MIGHT care for Ukrainian people, NATO only sees them as cannonfodder. The less Ukrainian are left eh better for NATO, especially when it would be in the east (that's why we got that mass murder there going on since eight years, NATO wants to see that region clean of people, because there is quite some to steal from).
1
Russia was forced to get in when the fascistic coup regime, trained and armey by NATO, started their last, final try to finish the cleansing of East Ukraine AND take back Crimea by force. So overall: Russia HAD to act. It tried to solve this peacefully via Minsk 2, but EU/NATO/coup regime meanwhile said it themselves: Minsk 2 was always a fake and they never cared for it, it was all to buy time and build up the army. It's absolute disgusting, like all fascism, but, well, you still just hope that it would go otherwise. Now it has to bes stomped by brutal force, again. And NATO and coup regime make sure, that it is absolute devasting for Ukraine, because both give a single fuck about the Ukrainians, all of them. Russia is clearly prepared for this worst case scenario. You aren't able to uphold MONTHES of such artillery bombardement without that.
1
The smart guys in Ukraine army which are against the whole fascistic coup and the mass murder against its own people mainly already left the fighting forces in Ukraine or switched sides (people forget, that coup regime Ukraine is mainly fighting other ex Ukrainian soldiars, who simply switched sides to defend the peopel in east Ukraine). What was left and filled up with were a) fully Nazis and other Extremists b) people without moral who just follow orders, no matter what and c) poor idiots who believe the nonsense of evil Russia trying to kill them all. - and of course mercenaries (who fight for money, that's it) and the shady NATO guys orchestrating all that... It's clear, that none of these people would just welcome Russia. The idea (what would have been best for UKRAINE(!)) was that Ukraine would give up after their idea of the ethnical cleansing obviously utterly failed the moment that Russia went in. They they are so fanatic, retarded or whatever to burn down their whole country for nothing... well... really nothing more to say about that. That NATO gives a fuck - of course. NATO or better the NATO emperor USA never cared a single second about what price other countries would have to pay. But Ukraine, the coup regime, is following along willingly. Sad for the people in Ukraine. Would be better to just give up on the whole country and start something new at this point. To repair the damage done by NATO and coup regime is meanwhile just impossible.
1
Yeah, sorry, I will never side with Nazis who try to slaughter thousands of people and deplace millions for whatever reason. Can't stand with Ukraine. They oculd have stopped that ALL THE TIME. SINCE YEARS! And even with NATO fascism pushing them there, NATO does not have the power to do that if the coup regime didn't want to. NATO has to hold up that fake that they are the good guys who only defend. They could not openly threaten Ukraine to do what they want.
1