Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Ukraine Should CANCEL its "Counteroffensive"" video.

Western instructors: "So you storm this position with heavy air force and drone support, call in strikes as needed, but be careful, those goat herders might have some mortars in addition to their old rifles." Some Ukrainian guy forcible recruited for that: "Uuuh..."
367
@flyingintervation4188 You can use old tanks as assault guns without any problem. Those old tanks aren't there as MBT, they are simply self-propelled cannons.
23
@ThaDonJsuan You do get that the whole "free west" = mass murdering imperialists, are a minority on this planet? And votings in the UN mean nothing. You got NATO fascism solely voting for itself and a lot of countrie who vote with them to not become the victim of NATO fascism. In the end those votes lead nowhere. If you want to know how the world thinks, look at the trading.
3
Going for crimea is insane, no matter how. If they would have control over the Black Sea, you could start to think about it, but as things are, if they push south in what way ever, it's not only that there is a very narrow entrance to Crimea itself, what alone makes it a natural and of course heavily armed fortress - they got Russia all the time in their back. What giant armies shall hold the flanks to the east? Not even starting to talk what the Russian navy will do with you - and the air force. Oh, sure, you could bring your missile artillery there, for example to attack the crimean bridge, what overall would not hinder the army much, it would be way more annoying for the civilians. But if you get that close, you have to scratch the frontline with them and than the chance to survive shrinks from ~80% (thanks to firing at the frontline from max range) to <5%. Crimea itself is around as big as Belgium. That's not just something you just take SImferopol and Sewastopol alone are two major cities both with over 300.000 citizens. And that's just some marker and every single one of those point out how insane the idea is, to reach any of them with 50.000 soldiers (not even starting to talk, that Russia still got a ~500.000 army going in Ukraine alone PLUS the soldiers on Crimea, which are not even part of that).
2
I wouldn't count on "Russians didn't see us". They got no problem with waiting and making you feel save. Many askes, why they didn't strike here and there an everywhere, why there are still airfields and so on. False sense of security. They made the enemy think that those areas are safe, undetected, not on the target map. Then the enemy piled up their stuff there - and boom. War is deception. Not just some fast, easy feint, but to be completely inscrutable. That's why it's always such a laugh, when the bloggers come up with "What is Russia doing!?!?!" Exactly. That's the point. If any social media guy can analyze you, you suck at warfare. And they don't.
2
Well, their insane shitshow only works in fiction, what shall they do?
1
@GamingPotato3214 Kherson? When they obliterated the Nazis there and only went out of the city when those terrorists with NATO fascism support started to bomb the dam, what made the risk for the civilians there simply too high to not evacuate?
1
@thomasmccann3679 Yeah, yeah, we know that UK fascism slaughtered all around the globe - too bad the empire is gone and will never ever return.
1
A pretty stupid idea, to just drive into the enemy controlled area because you can. I mean, sure, you can... it's just suicide. But maybe it's enough for some selfies before dying. So there is a gap. You drive there. And then? You are now in range of 80-90+% of the enemies weapon system. While your support dwindled since you left your area and drove out of range of most systems. Oh, sure, maybe you find some lone soldiere here and ther and might get a 'kill', but wars were never one by just some lucky kills here and there, especially not when the are that costly...
1
@ssglbc1875 Russia does not even have had a full mobilisation, even less conscription rounds.
1
@MrTangolizard The Soviet Union left, because Gorbatchov wanted to send a sign to NATO that the Cold War should end. The Sovite Union knew very well, that US fascism pumped billions into creating interantional terrorism in Afghanistan to ruin the country and "give the Soviet Union their Vietnam" (that alone shows how evil they are, since the USA created Vietnam all by themselves and now recreated it for Afghanistan). This was mainly a disaster for Afghanistasn first and later the whole middle east and when a little spartk came back at the USA via 9/11, they just created another slaughter and another terror group. It's funny how freaking evil the USA is and still so little people want to see it. And this is just fraction of all the mass murderous shit they had done. The soviets by the way got into Afghanistan, because they were sure that the CIA had started another program there do destabelize the country and push it into civil war. Hard to say if that was the case from the start - wouldn't be a surprise - but US fascism clearly made it true afterwards. The Soviets had never been the problem in Afghanistan - which by the way at that time had a secular regime, going for woman rights and so on. US fascism trained and armed people who hated that. And no, not even the Afghan groups, those were too moderate.
1