Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Ukraine: The Problem with Mine-Clearing Tanks" video.

@ArchOfficial Russia doesn't have a single conscripton round yet. They didn't even do a full mobilisation.
12
@ArchOfficial OSINT = some social media guys. It's a fancy word for nothing.
11
@ArchOfficial Child, where do you get these absurd numbers from?
10
@ArchOfficial You do get that your absurd propaganda doesn't change reality. What you say is like "I could beat Mike Thyson, he's super old and ill and on drugs and I'm much smarter and fitter." Yeah, you can lie to yourself like that. In reality you are still toast.
9
@carlosdgutierrez6570 NATO doctrine only works against countries with no army or a far inferior army after brutal bombing campaigns (with massive civil casualties). It's not like Russia COULDN'T do that. They can. They don't want to, because that's the whole point of it being an SMO and not war: they don't see Ukraine as the enemy, but the coup regime, it's Banderites army and of course NATO (which was created to pillage Russia, nothing else, was never about defense, no one gives a fuck to conquer anything in Europa or the USA, there is nothing to get from that).
8
@wertywerrtyson5529 Minefields on their own are pointless. Minefields as first line of a layered defense is extremely lethal. Not even because of the mines, you CAN get rid of them. But doing that slows you down massively what makes you fish in a barrel for the other layers. What is it's purpose.
5
Focussing on the minefield is anyway the first mistake. The mistake exists as a barrier and to slow you down. You have to ignore it and focus on the actual defense lines behind that. If you can't do that: yeah... you should probably just give up (at least on your try to break through). If your plan is to overcome the minefield and that as just the first line of a layered defense, you already walked into the trap of that layered defense.
3
@carved6749 I mean, tanks lost a lot of meaning, got less to do with crappy systems like Javelin, though. But just as mines they still got their placed in combined armed warfare.
2
@ArchOfficial You mean because nukes or what?
2
Mein reason for a minefield is to slow down the enemy. Clearing the mines is still doing that. And it's not like it's hard to renew the minefield.
1
@ArchOfficial Well, NATO mainly loves to carpet bomb people who got no army in the first place. Of course you don't need mine fields for that.
1
@carved6749 Child, Russia is dominating in this war and that with massively holding back, since their goal is to free Ukraine from the Banderites - not destroy Ukraine. Sadly neither the Nazis nor their NATO masters care about that at all and want to ruin Ukraine as much as possible. Especially NATO. For NATO the Ukrainians are an annoyance, at best usefukl cannonfodder. They even admitted that several times, when they talk about what a great investment Ukraine is, beacuse only Ukrainians die there. Typical talk of a fascist talking about those he sees as subhuman.
1
@ArchOfficial Those numbers are nonsense. And Russia won't have much problem to get rid of their mines. Much more annoying and dangerous for civilians are the mines the Nazis love to bombard the east Ukrainians cities with, which just land everywhere including in tree and on roofs.
1