Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. One side got a partial mobilisation after starting with around 150k soldiers. The other side after starting with 3-4 times that much had full mobilisation and meanwhile over 10 conscription rounds, starting to drag people from the street, out of their homes and even goes o funerals to catch men, while demanding that Europe shall send those who fled back to fight. Obviously the first one must have the horrendous losses, while the second one far less. And no, being on the defense doesn't automatically lead to fewer losses at all. That depends on the weaponry. If you are in a highly defensible position like a castle, buit the other side got cannons to bombard you, while you have not, you just get bombarded to pieces.
    17
  2. US fascism is known more for that...
    9
  3. Kiev was a simply distraction, that was clear from the start. Russia has won, that's already clear, the only question is, how much of Ukraine you want to ruin and kill to deny that. If you ask NATO and US fasciscm, of coure all of it, no matter if it leads anywhere or not.
    9
  4.  @pi10623  You do get that those 3 day onyl exists in the PR of you Nazis. Russia never talked about taking Kiev at all, neither in 3 days.
    8
  5. US aid burned down Ukraine - as usual. US fascism does that since decades all over the planet.
    7
  6.  @williamzk9083  It was 2 helicopters with a surprise attack. And those ATACMS are expensive as hell. Without the element of surprise, they lost all meaning, that's why you heared nothing alike afterwards, instead dozens of coup regime planes were shot down.
    5
  7. Prigozhin said everything and the opposite of it. He was no leader but a PR guy and in general anything said on the internet especially from the military guy, shouldn't be trusted. War is deception and to openly talk about something where everyone, including the enemy, can read it... yeah, only stupid do that if it's not deception on purpose.
    5
  8. They literally pinpoint destroy stuff 100s and 1000skm away. All the time.
    5
  9. Child, we, the west, are the sheer evil - and that since centuries.
    5
  10. "Helped"? In what way? Nothing of that helped Ukraine, it ruined it. All of it helped US fascism and especially their small war industry, because they could burn down Ukraine and make some money of it. Meanwhile nothing of it helped the US citizens. Everything gets destroyed - together with hundredthousands of Ukrainians. That's no help.
    5
  11.  @rick7424  Kid, Iraqi T-72 got nothing in common with Russian ones but the name. And Iraq was a NATO procy that got backstabbed by its masters out of sudden and bombarded to stonage with 100.000 bombing flights before a single foot of a NATO soldier stepped on the ground. Overall: tanks today got mainly the function as bait. They exist to role in and draw fire, but their offensive capabilities are simply not that great, no matter which tank.
    4
  12.  @williamzk9083  Always funny how western propaganda just takes reality and turns it around 180°. USA is so corrupt, you LEGALIZED the corruption.
    4
  13. Never were made for much else, the sole reason people think that Tanks are something else was NATO fascism slaughter third world countries and when the main weaponry of your victim are old asssault rifles with at best a few 100m range, than a tank is godlike. Against a real army, a tank becomes a joke alone by its extremely limited firing range in comparison to all other units. In that case the main goal is to be send against the enemy and take as many hits as possible, while the other system analyse the attacker for their strikes.
    4
  14. Isn't japan the country with over 2,5 years in DEBT? Over 260% of their whole GDP as debt mountain?
    4
  15. Lend lease was a joke in comparison to the massive production of the Soviet Union. It exists for the US fascists to make money, after it was clear that their Nazis they supported before, during and after the war, would lose anyway.
    3
  16.  @kasparkannel3108  Reality does not care for your delusion. It just crushes you even harder.
    3
  17.  @NitroDragon  If only half the numbers on Oryx would be true, your Nazis would not cry for another 500k cannonfodder and wouldn't have needed a singler cent from NATO - instead of the whole GDP of two years.
    3
  18. Those Bradleys firing at an disabled tank is pretty much th only 'success' you see from them in the whole SMO. Beside that you only see them standing around far away from the front - or destroyed.
    3
  19. Sounds more like optimal for money laundry.
    3
  20. Internet losses are not real losses, child.
    3
  21.  @hugoguerreiro1078  You problem is, that reality gives a giant fuck about the insane fantasy world inside our Nazi mind.
    3
  22. Spoken like a true Nazi, no clue, stupid, but full if fanatical racism.
    3
  23. If you believe Ukraine, which lies since day one while crying for more weapons, NATO involvemenrt and tellings its civilians to pick up weapons to die for them, sure...
    3
  24. Russian tanks got up to 8km firing range depending on ammunition they use. TOW got <4k.
    3
  25. When NATO joins directly, Russia can just shoot down all their drones, surveillance aircraft and satellite as fair game. So it would overall make the situation worse for NATO which is escalating from afar and hiding behind the "we are not at war with you" lie. When they give up that lie, they just become 100% legitimate targets.
    3
  26. Russia got no shortage in anything, kid. You do get that just eating your own lies makes you only lose even harder?
    3
  27. You know what the most certain way for a devastating defeat is? To think that the enemy is an idiot.
    3
  28. Everyone made deals with the Nazis before 2.WW, including the USA who supported them massively. Stalins deal was solely on buying time, because he knew very well, that the whole western fascism had the idea, that the Nazis would crush against the soviet union alone. It overall WAS the main target of them, but of course they first quick and easily conquered the rest of Europe before that.
    3
  29.  @mmclaurin8035  If people would even think about it for a second, how and endless row of ships you would need to transport all that... You just take any number thrown at you, that was always the problems of idiots.
    2
  30.  @javiermoretti1825  See: your head being full of stupid shit is no argument.
    2
  31.  @verdebusterAP  You mean those united24media propaganda channel nonsense? Even Ukrainian soldier hate that crap, because it's just that, absurd crap, that makes them look like idiots, since they brutally lose while the propaganda says they shouldn't.
    2
  32. I mean, it's all about money laundry for the big guy.
    2
  33. US fasicsm even lies about its wars, about its system, its elections, its economy, its ridiculous school and health care system - hell, its hard to find anything they don't tell utter bullshit about.
    2
  34. Look like you got ZERO clue of second world war and Soviet Union.
    2
  35.  @mikitadou  Russia SAVED Poland. Else germany would have marched through and easily finished their genocide. Same for all other eastern european states. None of them would exist today. Wonder if Russians ask themselves if they just should have watched, seeing how so many they saved from excinction went 100% Nazi mod today (not that it was sooooo much different in WW2 - there were many eastern europeans who just went along with fascism - including a part of Ukraine, the part that is praised as heroes today by the current regime.
    2
  36. Real fun about you Nazi bots is, that scientiest already analyzed media for bot activity. Russia got very little, NATO got tons of it. Was an australian university that analyzed that, so clearly not pro Russian.
    2
  37. See, child, you clearly got zero clue about 2.WW, the warfare there and everything else. Why not just keep your mouth shut to leave the doubt if you are an idiot or not?
    2
  38.  @djambox1439  When you don't reach your goal, you lost.
    2
  39.  @Karadjanov  World peace? You mean under the brutal rule of US fascism? Nice peace. Around the peace their proxy Hitler promised, they had supported so much for just that.
    2
  40. Corrupt assholes want that absurdly expensive F-35, because it's not their money, they know they will never use them anyway for anythign else beside bombing people who can't fire back in the first place and of course because they will also get there %s from that corruption.
    2
  41. Well, EU/NATO openly voted PRO Nazism in the United Nations - as did Japan, soooo...
    2
  42. Guess what: neither Russia nor China build a big airfleet, since they are not like US fascism who want to carpet bomb third world countries. 200 F-22 vs THOUSANDS of anti air missile systems. And both Russia and China have endless anti stealth radars and other methods - plus of course would simply sink the carriers and destroy the air fields and then what with your ultra expensive sparkle jet that needs more repair that it has fly time?
    2
  43.  @mappingshaman5280  US fascism did not try to stop them spreading communism (soviet union wasn't communistic itself by the way, neither where the countries the US nazis invaded). US fascism invaded those countries for their path to world domination. Didn't work out at all, but that was the idea.
    2
  44. German government live deep inside the US ass since 2.WW. Nazis were glad to have their idol USA (which had helped the Nazis a long time before and during the war quite a lot - and was overall the ones they copied their racist ideolog from) save them and keep them in power for continuation of 2.WW = Cold War, with the same goal: world domination for the Führer (now USA) and of course killing Russia/Soviets and China.
    2
  45.  @Goprof150  Since Russia never wanted to, that's easy to say.
    2
  46. If anyone is known for lying about war it's US fascism since pretty much forever.
    1
  47. On western Europe I guess, hm? Since no chance to get those to Russia.
    1
  48. You just give the main reason why NATO fascism loses so horribly bad in Ukraine.
    1
  49.  @SamtheIrishexan  More like US fascism is known for its constant lies about absolute everything.
    1
  50. I mean, without Russia, Poland wouldn't even exist anymore.
    1
  51. It's bait. The tank is send in to draw fire, while surveillanec is monitoring the positions. Then those positions will be destroyed directly or be analyze and monitored further for even harder strikes.
    1
  52.  @moist_ointment  NATO fascism sent Ukraine already more than 150% of the GDP it got when it was still a democracy.
    1
  53.  @verdebusterAP  Those over 90% destroyd Bradleys rusting in the wild show the clear reality, no matter how hard you deny it.
    1
  54. You have to be full Nazi Endsieg delusion level to think like that.
    1
  55.  @Joesolo13  The tank had no working weapon when the (stupid) Bradly crews engaged. Stupid because the sole reason for that tank was to draw fire to reveal positions, so to counter something like that you send in a single strike unit to disable it and then move out as fast as you can. Such attacks simply mean that drone and alike will monitor you and if you are not destroyed instantly, it's even worse, because then they will likely follow you back to your base...
    1
  56.  @Omega0850  You Nazis are so brainwashed, just like the german ones.
    1
  57.  @mappingshaman5280  It's funny how the Nazis brag about, that they weren't the main target and only went in for the looting at the end. Next we should discuss if it wouldn't have been better to enslave the rest of the Jews at that time or to keep Afroamericans without rights and all that. Same discussion.
    1
  58. It won't since anyone able to destroy carrier fleets will use missiles for that with much higher range than those 200 miles and not detectable at all before some dozen miles away at best.
    1
  59.  @davedoe6445  You people live in videogames...
    1
  60. Good luck flying a bomber over 1000s of km of enemy land to attack something. Even during Cold War time, the main target of nukes was germany. That took even some of the loyal monkes in german governmenrt by surprise, that the plan of US fasicsm was pretty much to nuke germany.
    1
  61. There is not evidence for a single one of them. Internet posts, that's it and even those just make up a story, don't show proof, what shouldn't be hard.
    1
  62. I mean, US fascism integrated the german Nazis pretty much instantly in NATO to continue 2.WW under a new Führer - them - and name, but the same goal: destroy and rob Russia (and China).
    1
  63.  @thebubbclub  You do geht that reality does not care about your delusion and will just crush you?
    1
  64.  @alexandrutheodorbileca4266  Majority of those were civilians. But funny how you Nazis talk about this. Imagine you would say: "Hey, do you think it would have been easy to just get rid of the rest of the jews?" or what about "Would be easy to kill those 10% afroamericans, no?" That's the level you Nazis brag on.
    1
  65. Russia is winning in every way beside they really hate to do this and every person killed and every building destroyed hurts their hearts. But military wise? They stomp Ukraine and their supportin NATO masters. And when it comes to economy, wow, we, the west just shot outselves in the head with one of those javelins... Petro Dollar is gone. SWIFT will ceases to exist and depending on the stuborness of our criminals leaders, this may lead us into a giant economical collapse. Russia? They just come out stronger than before and the majority of the world plays our sick game even less than ever before.
    1
  66. Well, the Banderas regime soldiers fight for a murderous regime that treats them like cattle, all for trying to deport or murder the Ukrainians in the east and south for daring to not accept that regime. Russia is intervening against that and of course against NATO which abused all that for their own plan to get its bloody claws on Ukraine's and even more Russia's resources.
    1
  67. Bradleys get slaughted by pretty much everything, even worse than tanks.
    1
  68. Well, true, the US nazis indeed solely dropped these nukes and killed hundredthousands of innocent to send a message to the world: that they are crazy ultra fascists.
    1
  69. Avdiivka just imploded in a single day...
    1
  70. Hell, you got no clue how an army works, wtf...
    1
  71.  @targaryen6159  They are planes, kid, there isn't much you could build different.
    1
  72.  @Ezekiel903  They for far more pilots than aircrafts.
    1
  73. It's funny, how you Nazi lover don't get that linking facts and reason to Russia does not help your case at all.
    1
  74. Over goat herders, sure, that's easy.
    1
  75.  @zelkuta  Desert Storm was a slaughter, not a war. NATO fascism backstabbed their proxy Iraq and started with brutal carpet bombing of everything. The moral on Iraqi side to fight back was pretty much zero and what was left on the ground for tanks and co were meager, ill equipped rests. Iraqi tanks were also crap in general and are not comperable with Russian T-72 at all.
    1
  76. Sure, in theorie, when flying straight towad a single "not anti stealth" radar.
    1
  77.  @MrRoyalbeers  That's the Nazi numbers when it comes to Russian losses. Problem is the fact that NATO keeps pumping thousands of units and bilions of dollars into that burning shithole and the Nazi regime can't stop to force the reaming people they got right from the street, what is the exact opposite of the story they tell. Meanwhile Russia doesn't even have a full mobilisation of reservists, even less starting to shovel civilians in as the Nazi regime does since over a year.
    1
  78. Lol, what's the point, kid? Russia is the main target of western fascism, because it got the most resources on this planet by far. Before, during and after 2.WW it was always about stealing Russia's mountains of resources. Japan overall mainly did their own thing by tring to conquer and pillage China the same way germany went for Russia. In both cases it was Russia/SU and China who by the destroyed most of the aggressor by far.
    1
  79.  @larsskjelbred7822  US lend lease was a joke and just for making profit for the US oligarchs, nothing else. You people just east any shit they throw at you. USA traded well with the Nazis before this and without that germany's Blitzkrige wouldn't have been possible. USA only switched sides when it was clear that the germans would lose and went more in to save them an keep the majority in power as part of NATO - which overall was just created to continuw 2.WW with a new Führer: the USA.
    1
  80. Your typical Nazi stupidity?
    1
  81.  @kukimuki9471  It's funny, how these NATO bots linke facts and logic to Russia, as if Putin is some kind of god of truth.
    1
  82. US fascism is the leading war monger of our times. The whole system is build upon genocide anyway, that's how it was created and of course the slavery and today it's all about stealing resources, what will get even worse, since they burn through gigantic amounts of oil and gas - and got almost nothing left.
    1
  83.  @mythoughts5615  It's always funny how Nazis live in their own dreamworld.
    1
  84. You have to bring them to the target, you know, this is not your video game, where you got your small map and just click a button.
    1
  85. Child, there are actual military analysts out there who now Russia and all very well. The only thing they are surprised about is, that Russia holds back so much, but this is easy to explain, since they want to destroy and kill as little as possible. You got ZERO clue, what Russia COULD do. Easily. They STOMPED Ukraine and that from day one, they simply doing it very, very softly and carreful and that's something you only can do when you are that powerful.
    1
  86. Stealthy against goat herders I guess.
    1
  87.  @Flamechr  Sure and NATO lost a million soldiers covered as mercenaries. You do get that making up numbers isn't really changing reality?
    1
  88. Even under perfect training condition and with newly produced Javelins, they got a successrate of around 20%. With US fascism mainly sending their old crap to their proxy, being used not in training but real fight and mainly by barely trained civilians who are forced into uniform, you can reduce that by another big margin. Such an extra layer, while not strong enough to stop it, will still further add to it, forcing the ammunition to detonate to early, disperse the energy and make it harde to hit points where it could penetrate.
    1
  89. Artillery, missily system, air force, drones - and of course tanks and infantry just adds to that. There is an obvious reason that the Nazi coup regime is begging for another whole new army, after having started with 1-2 and got another one from NATO already, but it's all burned.
    1
  90.  @brianreddeman951  You can hide much better as a human. Only plus is mobility, maybe, but when you are detected you better stay far away from these vehicles if you want at least a chance to survive. Best idea would be to just sell it to the Russian's, give up and maybe not even end as PoW, while massively incrasing your quality of life in comparison to the burned down rest of Ukraine.
    1
  91. Scenario: we would all be dead or if it doesn't go nuclear, the whole western economy would just implode.
    1
  92. Reality isn't working like your video game.
    1
  93. Easily. You don't seem to get how vulnerable our shit logistics is, especially when we run out of cheap resources. Russia is the by far richest country on this planet - what do you think all the aggression of NATO fasscism is about? It's always the same reason: robbing other countries.
    1
  94. That's what Russia is doing, stopping the war of the NATO led Banderas Nazis against Ukraine.
    1
  95. Most certain way to lose horribly is to plan with the idea in you head, that the enemy is an idiot. Congrats.
    1
  96.  @sagnaik  HIMARS is doing little. The biggest effect is PR, since every attack by the coup regime beside grenade drops is linked to that word HIMARS. Russia got way better missile artillery - and MUCH, MUCH more, but you don't have that one word linked to all of it.
    1
  97. Too bad that reality is a "Putin Bot".
    1
  98.  @kurousagi8155  Iraqi tanks are something completely different. It's easy to look that up. If you don't do that, you are simply stupid and lazy.
    1
  99. That's 500km minimum just from coast to coast. You do get, that if they carry weapons, they got quite limited range, right?
    1
  100.  @Joesolo13  They drop bombs all the time over the whole front line = they are very close to it. Plus of course firing long range missiles everywhere they want. You think F-22 would survive just flying straight over Ukraine? Dream on. It wouldn't.
    1
  101.  @uranusismightybig5111  Because it's Nazi propaganda what the word "orc" alone shows?
    1
  102. Russia saved you, you wouldn't even exist today without their gigantic sacrifice to defeat the germans who would have slaughtered you all. And when it comes to the time afterwards: say thanks to NATO, which was created by US fascism to continue 2.WW. Russia wanted peace, instead NATO brought war and by that Russia couldn't just retreat one-sided for serveral decades. When it eventually could, your corrupt politicians sold you out to western fascism for nothing. Congrats. If Russia would have wanted Poland, it would never hat let you go. It never cared. The peaceful disolving of the USSR is 100% proof for that and that NATO didn't do the same but instead marched eastward is proof for its fascistic aggression. Without the nukes, the USA would have already sent you as cannonfodder eastwards, just was it had done with the german Nazis, the USA had supported even during the war, including during the attack on Poland that was stopped by the USSR. the USA only went in for the looting, when their Nazis had learly lost. Not to finisht of the Nazis, but to save them and keep the majority of them in power, integrated into NATO and of course to take over Europe, which even today is the USA's little b****.
    1
  103.  @XerrolAvengerII  Israel is ultra corrupt and for what do they even need those in the first place? To carpet bomb civilians? No need for stealth.
    1
  104. You do get, that your delusion does not change reality, right?
    1
  105.  @SlavicCelery  No, they had not. You fall for internet mythc. Majority of the ill equipped Iraqi army was destroyed by endless air raids. And the main reason some ground kills are piling up was crews reporting the same tank several times, because the shot at it, too.
    1
  106.  @thebubbclub  I mean, have fun dying with that delusion. Those things got ripped apart by pretty much everything. And reality does not care if you think otherwise.
    1
  107.  @thebanished6725  It's pointless to talk with these brainwashed idiots. Propaganda ruined the little brain mass they had left.
    1
  108. Moskva was a good half a century old and borderline out of commission grandma of a ship. If NATO was really so stupid to waste that one surprise strike they got on that ship... Overall fascinating, how they enver go for all the high threat targets, the missile cruise which destroyed billion after billion in NATO equipment. Who cares about an old polish transport ship?
    1
  109. Well, true, US fascism indeed was the big winner of the war they loved so much, since no one actually attacked them. They had fun in safety oversea and only went in for the looting at the end, when the Nazis were already done for. The Nazis they had supported on their rise by the way, a long time during the war and of course afterwards, where they kept the majority of them in power.
    1
  110.  @Lucas-ew5lk  Pointless to talk to these Nazis, they are delusional as ever, as uneducated as fanatic.
    1
  111. It's not Azov alone, there is also C14, Right Sector and other, also a hell lot of foreign mercenaries it seems, something western military analysts came out with. USA/NATO tried to make Ukraine some kind of giant bomb to bring down Russia - and they DID try to do that, it just did not work at all. Who would have guessed. Where did it EVER work, even against much smaller and far weaker countries? NATO fascism is good a bringing misery and burning down countries, but that's it. Ukraine pays a heavy price again, especially the western part, which will have to get along with the massive debt all this creates (people should probably just cancel the country as it is and form a new one and let the west sit on the abyss of debt it created...). Ukrainian news said, in the moment they got 50 billions minus - per month! A country that got a GDP of 150 billions (per year). Ukraine was utterly ruined since 2014 and we, the west, wanted that.
    1
  112.  @sotirzvanidjubre4109  Of course. They want to burn down Ukraine in the try to smoke Russia a bit. It does not work, at all. Russia gave all thsie eight years time to the point where it was clear, that the coup regime with their NATO master would just roll over the east (the prepared for that just - there are info which show how the bombarding massively increased already, pretty much right after Putin denied the order of the Russian parliament to recognise the separatists, what he then did, after this clear attack with the goal to finish the ethnical cleansing going on since 2014). And of course Russia also prepared for it these eight years. That's why NOTHING worked. Not the SWIFT nonsense, not the sanctions, not throwing billions of dollars in arms at it. They try to repeat Afghanistan. But even Afghanitan didn't work like that. Not at all.
    1
  113. It's old crap and tanks lost most of their meaning anyway. Russia is a high tech nation. The main reason they buff stuff from other countries is, that when you sell things, you want to get something of worth in return. It's pointless to pile up money, especially because Russia got close to no debt.
    1