Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Can the French AMX-10 RC Make a Difference?" video.

  1.  @shannontarrant1826  They idea alone that you can just do that. Sure somewhere, somewhen far away from any frontline, you may manage to find some guys from Donbass in an old tank with no backup and all. So you overall just risk you life for a completely pointless kill and will 99% likely die afterwards anyway without even the chanec to make any difference, just some lives wasted for nothing, because randomly killing lone people far away from the frontlines won't win you a war. At the frontlines, you won't have the chance to sneak up on a tank, since that tank got a layer after layer of backup and protection. Can you be lucky? Sure. Will you still die? For certain. And even that lucky part is borderline absurd with somtething like that a 2km firing range gun that has to stop to shoot.
    2
  2.  @Blabzcrow  What offensive?
    1
  3. Now you only need a machine that takes your insane delusion and makes it reality.
    1
  4. Good luck against an enemy with massive surveiilance of the whole battlfield with satellites and hundreds of drones.
    1
  5.  @AndreiKucharavy  Congrats to come up with some rusty old second hand tanks, bombed into stone age by US fascism and alike before any troops were sent in. Very compareable.
    1
  6. Tha thing is a desaster and only works well in NATO wars = slauthing a thir world country, where you fight some goat herders with AKs and a mortar here and there. To use that against Russia is just suicide. Yeah, you might here and there be able to shoot at something and even kill someone, but, see, randomly killing does not win a war, that's just ruining some life and that's it.
    1
  7.  @olivierpuyou3621  You mean the typical NATO slaughter AFTER carpet bombing the shit out of the country? That's like someone saying he was ale to beat Mike Tyson - well, after a doctor pumped him full of drugs and he already laidd on the floor anyway.
    1
  8.  @MrZlocktar  It's the only thing NATO bots got as reply, since reality is completely against them. What shall they do?
    1
  9. I got an effective firing range of 2km. That's a freaking joke. That's not even half the firing range of a tank, not talking about all the other systems it has to survive with even more. Even infantery is a massive threat for that scrap pile.
    1
  10.  @stormiewutzke4190  Only reason HIMARS is not destroyed within days like other systems is its firing range, so they can hide it 50km behind the frontline, drive out, quickly fire at Donezk city tryin to kill some civilians or a bridged (for which those rockets are not powerful enough - the new 150km range rockets even less...), then quickly drive away to hide again, mostly inside cities behind civilians. Still won't save them, but they survive a lot longer than crap like this with 2000m(!) firing range. Good luck...
    1
  11.  @oleg3269  Peopel also don't get that near to never a tank fights another tank, especialyl not in modern days.
    1