Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. Knife attack is if course about being silent and by that not alarming others. The cape, black as it is on that thermo cam, was likely used for just that until that point or if any drone would show up. They obviously got drone support and were led by that. So all superhero jokes aside, that was more James Bond level, if you want to compare it to fiction.
    143
  2. You can be 100% sure if someone tried to do that "destabilize the Muslim region of Russia", it was the USA, not Ukraine...
    122
  3. That boat is likely 5% of the price of that drone.
    94
  4. Those ship attacks just ensure, that Russia won't leave Ukraine any port. Congrats.
    87
  5. Ever seen NATO wars? You pretty much almost got more dead civilians than combatans.
    78
  6. It's some random trucks, you don't even see any kind of explosions = there was no ammunition on board, nothing. Just a random terror attack by guys who proudly use the emblem of the Waffen SS Galicia. Militarywise absolutely worthless. This is not like a strike of Russia these days where they blew up a truck that clearly had tons of ammunition on board. At best these trucks had some building material for trenches or whatever.
    72
  7. It's a patrol boat. If you look at the fleet, all the real warships are undamage. It overall shows that NATO can try all their terrorist tactics as they like, they are unable to even damage the not even very important Black Sea Fleet in a real way. They go after low value targets for PR, because they can't do anything else.
    64
  8. What an absurd idea, that someone would use trenches and alike directly at the frontline as supply roads.
    55
  9.  @ussindianapolis487  You mean oryx where NAFO triple posts destroyed Ukrainian tanks as Russian ones?
    55
  10. IRIS T is good enough against drones - still too expensive with 200.000$ and more per missile. Range ist also limited, but at least it's not 5.000.000$ per shot as Patriot.
    47
  11. "Sir, sir, the enemy attacked!" "They breached the castlewall?!" "No, Sir!." "They attack the gate?" "No, Sir!" "God damn, tell me, boy!" "They took control over that pit latrine at the border of the forest!" That's how most of this feels...
    44
  12.  @mikaeljansson149  Never heared of 5 million, but with some hunrdredthousands dead, overall casualties including wounded being 1,5 million plus isn't far fetched and goes along well with reality. Russia is dominating in absolut every regard, when it comes to drones, artillery, missiles and of course pretty much the only one able to use aviation. A single FAB is doing more damage than hundreds of drones (majority of those getting destroyed anyway, you just only see the few % of succeeding drones, not the hundredsthousands which are destroyed) and Russia is using hundreds of those week by week. And that's just the FABs.
    43
  13. First thought: wait 50k in three monthes is more than 35k in just one month (per month), but they mean 50k every month for three monthes? Is it so bad meanwhile that they need 50k to replace the losses, not just those 20k as before? And 35k is still massive. We talk about 465k people in a year.
    40
  14. Look at Greece and what EU fascists did with it. Now imagine what they gonna do with Ukraine...
    35
  15. Was there any secondary explosion? Was there actually any military stuff on those trucks? By the way: that blue yellow lion emblem on that video is from the SS Galicia (14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS). Look it up.
    33
  16.  @andrew30m  Until 2014 Ukraine had a government that trade well with Russia and the west. An illegal coup pushed by NATO destroyed that, followed by the illegal coup regime starting a civili war against its own people. You got zero clue what you are talking about.
    32
  17.  @jug5298  History tells us that the Banderas Nazis loved to kill otehr Ukrainians since a 2. WW at least and especially again in the last 9 years.
    32
  18. They tell such BS stories since start, what's new about it?
    31
  19.  @clydelouis5956  Ukraine used cluster munition since 2014 - not against soldiers, though, they fire against cities with them.
    31
  20. By the explosioini that was no ammuntion depot. Russia is by the way taking much care for civilians regarding food, water, medicine. So quite likely that they just blew up some food end medicine.
    31
  21. Imaging wasting 12 expensive cruise missiles to make a little, easy to repair hole in a bridge. 12 Storm Shadow missiles = 36 million dollars.
    28
  22. Iskander got a 800kg warhead. That building would look VERY different...
    26
  23.  @edthebumblingfool  Funny enough as soon as you Nazis saw the chance, that Wagne may switch sides, you instantly forgot about all these losses. Wagner was never big to begin with. And the whole medial focus on them was mainly one thing: distraction.
    26
  24. Not even dominance. Randomly attacking something because it's the only thing you can manage it deadly stupid.
    26
  25. Utterly insane 'bridgehead' in modern times. No space, enemy knows where you are, if not firing now than clearly waitin till you bring more stuff there to blow up.
    26
  26.  @Marlene-ou5ol  Having some guys with knives flying a plane into your Pentagon is embarassing.
    25
  27. That Ukraine is now willing to talk with Russia without Russia just giving up completely, that's on the level of Monty Phyton, when the Black Knights without arms and legs is willing to call it a draw.
    24
  28. Yeah, the northern European countries somehow always got a thing for fascists, nothing new.
    24
  29. Uuuuh, that situation at the river is a typical trap scenario - and the Banderites they let go there are the bait. To keep that awful position, they have to keep sending troops and equipment, what is simply wasted there with ease. Only chance to get out of that trap is to retreat, but even that will likely not be possible without Russia stricking down on them. They could crush them, but then Ukraine may likely stop sending more troops and equipment to destroy. In contrast, letting them stay there forces the regime to keep sending more.
    24
  30.  @lockeboss502  Because those are pretty much free fall, you got very little time, they are small, fast, got very low signature. Anti air was overall never designed to intercept bombs and while the gliding makes it a bit more possible it's still not enough. Drawback is the low range so overall what you would intercept is the actual bomber. If you can't do that, well, you are fucked.
    23
  31. Bad weather is bad for everyone equally. Russia steps back because there is simply no need to push with the higher risk bad weather brings, that's all. If Ukraine is doing this, it just shows why they lose to brutally.
    22
  32.  @fabianschrotter  There are many different red lines, child.
    22
  33.  @zarhun7  Biggest reason HIMARS survives long is Ukraine hiding it very well and sparsely use it for quite random attacks. Overall the impact of it is minimal.
    21
  34.  @erikjacobsen9021  Nazis could have followed Minsk 2 and stop their genocide, but no...
    21
  35.  @chrissmith7669  You mean reality?
    20
  36. "and claims that he will show absolutely everything" Yuck... thanks for that mental picture....
    20
  37. It's mainly about North Korea having so many shells which will never be needed, so you just use something that would be thrown away else. And of course North Korea gets more from having bigger powers protecting it against US fascism.
    19
  38.  @Cottam89  Russia never tried to take Kiev. Only a complete idiot would think that, because the idea that Russia would send a few thousands soldiers to conquer a 3 million city like Kiev is absolute absurd.
    19
  39. Those lone tans send in are bait. They are tanks and made to take hits, that's their main reason to exist. A single tank will never be able to do much, but sending them in forces the enemy to act - and then this is used to reveal the troops of the enemy, to be attacked by artillery, drones, aviation and so on.
    19
  40. Iskander got a firing range of around 500km. Why the frick should Russia have a warehouse with Iskander missiles a few km away from the frontline? Ever seen an Iskander launcher there? So why should missiles be?
    19
  41. That's no bridgehead, that's a cauldron they create for themselves = insane.
    18
  42.  @Jamicaman516  Kid, the poijt of the Iran drones is not that they are super duper high tech, but that they are super duper low tech, cheap and still effective. They mainly show how shit the western systems are.
    18
  43. Shouldn't forget to put a Svastika on their flag and some "Heil Maui!" or alike.
    18
  44. Reason why the Russians went out of the city was the attacking of the dam, not those fire cracker attacks on the bridge.
    18
  45.  @LevanGudadze  What is utterly unimportant, since it's just that, transport aircraft. Only interesting part is, that this likely came from NATO territory, but that's also nothing new, overall this whole war is a a 100% NATO war since a year, without NATO fascism Ukraine wouldn't be able to do shit - and many Ukrainians wouldn't be dead today.
    18
  46. Crimea is the main ship. You can control the whole Black Sea from there.
    18
  47. If you send drones or drones and missiles in waves, it only makes sense when you do this at the same time, so the first wave can saturate the air defense with the second wave getting through thanks to that. Else you just warn the enemy and make it even less lightly that your main wave gets throuth.
    17
  48.  @andrew30m  Moskva didn't even take part in the SMO. If you think your Nazis shot at it with NATO weapons, then you call them even more stupid, because they obviously had this one shot (since you never saw anything like that again) and wasted it to attack an absolute unimportant way over 40 year old ship. And who cares if they manage to damage a small, damaged submarine in the dry dock. Again: an absolute pointless hit with zero miitary impact = a stupid target. But likely the only thing they can hit. Like sneaking into Mike Tysons bedroom to punch him in the face when he sleeps, then brag about how you beat Mike Tyson.
    17
  49.  @ptitemerde1  Russia never gave any time line. This aside: they would have done just that, without NATO pumping in good 200% of the Urkainian GDP into their Banderites and the coup regime absolutely willing to sacrifice Ukraine's population to just keep this going.
    17
  50. sigh That position across the river isn't a problem for the Russians but the Ukrainians. It's a horrible position, especially in case of Ukraine, with the river right in their back and zero room for movement.
    17
  51. Is there actual proof that the ship was destroyed? Because the whole video looks a lot like the last fake they made up when they alked about a warship they sank, but then it showed up with no damage at all.
    17
  52. While every lost life is a tragedy, those aren't heavy losses in general at all.
    17
  53. US had sent thousands of advisors since 2014 - and before.
    17
  54. That's like saying when an enemy doesn't manage to break the castle gate, that you wouldn't have been in the need of the castlewalls in the first place. Those fortified lines ARE the reason they can't break through, since there you got all the artillery and missile systems. The first line is mainly a blocker.
    16
  55.  @centurionoomae1543  Only a small fraction fights at the front and where the Banderas Nazis fight, you got only some scout units
    16
  56. Rofl. Sorry, but Prigoshin wasn't some "military leader on the ground who could tell the truth to the people". He was a PR troll.
    15
  57. If that's true that the air defense was hacked in some way, that makes it indeed likely that the Russians did it - and is pretty horrible for the enemy when they can do that. They just shut off your defense.
    15
  58. Biggest problem is, that he talks too much out of his ass. He should focus on the facts and keep it that way and of course understand that you only see a very small fraction of what is happening on the videos. As desperate as the Banderits are, they love to seel their view successes on the internet, but Russia for example got no reason to show everything they do on the internet, what includes showing it to the enemy, since this is just counterproductive and utterly worthless.
    15
  59.  @MegaAsmodey  No, they did not. Ukrop Nazis tried to blame it on them, like the attack ton the train station or market, but it had always been themselves.
    15
  60. Sneaking in isn't a bridgehead. A bridgehead is a solidly fortified point from which you can start further operation. Sneaking in is just sneaking in.
    15
  61. You people and the words you heared. Momentum. What do you even think that is? You do get, that Ukraine taking Bakhmut back would be wonderful for Russia and they got not much need or reason to prevent this. Bakhmut is destroyed by the Nazis abusing it as cover. If they got back there with even more troops, you can just keep bombing them. Same for those areas on the map north and south. Those aren't fortified positions. You got some light scout troops there at best, the real defense lines are far behind that. What is the idea you poeple have? That where those colored areas on the map touch, that there are two frontlines with thousands of soldiers and tanks who look at each other? There is no "breakthrough", because there is nothing to break through.
    15
  62. Real question would be how you can be so stupid/fanatic to fall for such an obvious trap. If they would have manage to create a real bridgehead and continue from there, you could discuss it, but the way it wen, they just kept throwing bodies into that hole for no other reason thatn to talk about how many bodies they got in that hole. There is litereally nothing they could do from there they couldn't have done from the other side of the river. Pure insanity.
    15
  63. That blue yellow lion emblem on that video is from the SS Galicia (14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS). Also: I don't see any bigger or secondary explosion. What exactly were those trucks?
    14
  64. There is nothing to exploit, there is LESS to exploit now.
    14
  65. Retreating only makes sense when you got a follow up plan. Else you should give up. Russia for example retreated from certain regiosn because those were without of importance and they instead strengthened the frontline by shortening and of course fortifying it. Only sacrifice they made was when trying to hold Kherson city, accepting the massive disadvantage with a river in their back to keep the city from harm. The terror attack on the dam ruined that, but in military tems it massively improved the situation of the Russian army not turning the river into an advantage.
    14
  66. Not suicide, but losses which can be avoided, so they got not need. It's even better for Ukrainian soldiers - if their fascistic regime would simply give up.
    14
  67.  @doresearchstopwhining  Child, that was an office building and if that was hit by western cruise missiles, well, then western cruise missels are garbage, if they can't even destroy such a a small building.
    14
  68.  @banhunlanglyngdohnongbri2734  The Banderites show every little thing they can, including their own destroyed tanks and sell them as Russians. And even when you take all that together you don't come even near those 200.
    13
  69.  @just_dimi3  Those were trucks, kid. And not even with ammunition on board. They drone bombed some trucks. While puting the emblem of the Ukrainian SS unit onto the video.
    13
  70. They would have to send 100s of systems for that and even that would likely not be enough.
    13
  71.  @schepvogelk5971  See: only an idiot would care for "humiliation" in warfare, it's certain way to defeat if you think like that.
    13
  72. It's still in the range of such missiles, but you got more time to intercept them this way, that's all. No need to risk it.
    13
  73. The stories he tell to it are just stupid. That's just the missuse of the word bridgehead. It's like painting some wheels on a paper box and call it a car. Also "securing the area" You can't secure an area that is in the kill zone of drones, air force, missiles and artillery. Only way to secure it would be to destroy all that, but nothing of that is in that area they jump around in.
    12
  74.  @bartolino980  The guy with the weapons got the power. Azov itself openly said they would kill Zelensky when he tries to stop them. So Zelensky became a good pro Nazi president.
    12
  75.  @geoffc1694  You do get that these 11/1 losses are Ukraine/Russia, right? The very basic of warfare is logistic and it's even worse in Kursk for the Banderites than everywhere else.
    12
  76.  @TMHYAH7  Ukraine is becoming a hole in the ground thanks to the support of NATO. Else they would just have given up and wouldn't be ultra bankrupt with hundredthousands of lost lives.
    11
  77.  @SimonH1111  Those are not gains. People must learn to understand, that those lines on the map aren't the frontline. Those are the borders of the most brutal killing zones. The fortified positions and defense lines are far behind that, especially those with the heavy weaponry, drone commanders and so on, which are 2nd line and beyond. So those "gains" are just walking right into the kill zone.
    11
  78. UK/EU = NATO...
    11
  79.  @chrisdee216  Robotyne was 500 people village, a stain on the map and that in front of the actual defense line. They liteally fought for weeks against some scout units.
    11
  80. If they don't want to attack anymore, than their action at Kherson is even more stupid, because that's an awful defense position in every way.
    11
  81.  @louise_rose  US navy losses way bigger ship to random fire in their home harbour. And not forget how some guys with knives flew a giant plane right into the Pentagon.
    11
  82.  @kapokparski4573  Most fled the Nazi regime and Nazis never fightt for their land. The Nazis attack the people in the east and south, the Nazis don't live there, it's not their home at all.
    10
  83. Well, not really. Maybe a thousands but that's still a very fictional number.
    10
  84.  @dennisg1460  If NATO attacked the Moskva, it just shows how incompetent the generals are, because it was the absolute most useless target for that single shot they got. An almost half a century old ship that didn't even take part in the SMO. The USA lost double as big and half as old ships to fire - and that right in their homeport.
    10
  85.  @Bishop46066  Retreats are since thousands of years a very succesful tactic. It's simply stupid to hold an area out of stubborness, when it's much smarter to fall back for further strikes agaist the enemy. Positioning is extremely important. If there is an extremely advantage positions, you don't want to give it up. Some open fields are never a good position.
    10
  86. It's an obvious trap and the soldiers they let get there are the bait. Those soldiers there can do nothing what couldn't be done better from the other side of the river and that without constantly losing massive amounts of troops and equipment just to keep them equipped. Utterly insane.
    10
  87.  @A31415  "You wasted millions of dollars on this crap." "I wasted much more before on other things." - "You do get, that this makes it worse?"
    10
  88.  @avratzz  Poland wouldn't even exist anymore without Russia.
    9
  89.  @edthebumblingfool  Russia buys North Korean ammunition, because North Korea has no need for it. It would have to discard it in some years, so instead they sell it to Russia, who instead of using their newer ammunition will fill their depots with that.
    9
  90.  @TimMountjoy-zy2fd  It's more a country of 20M, with many left the countr and of course no one on Crimea and in south/east Ukraine fighting for the coup regime. And they are WAY beyond the 500.000 you imagine, they already lost much more to death and injuries than that.
    9
  91.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Simply because Ukraine made a lot of old stuff ready, likely with help of NATO. NATO also sent in many of the soviet stuff the eastern European NATO countries still got.
    9
  92. It's quite normal that in case of an aggression from outside, that people tend to not take risks and stay with the old, that is something that is abused in the west often enough, when they scaremonger. In case of Russia, it's not Putin that creates that threat, but the west, constantly, openly talking about how Russia must be punhished up to destroyed and that after centuries of tries to do just that up to genocidal mass murder. The only time where a threat from the outside will create backlash for the government is when the citizens got reason to blame that government for it but either a) being the reason for that threat (and even then they might stay with them) or b) seen as too weak, what generally leads to them going for a much more brutal government, so they would vote for someone who comes up with just stomping Ukraine into the ground and going much harder on NATO. We can be glad, that Russia stays with a peaceful Putin instead of going for that, like our stupid western citizens tend to do...
    9
  93. That destroyed aicraft picture looks manipulated. By the damage that was no cluster ammunition, but in both cases a direct hit, but both airframes are destroyed in the exact same way, what is extremely unlikely.
    9
  94. Drone simply had no weapon, that's all. Many drone are like that, that's the standard use of them. And of course when you see the drone, you can also see if they are armed or not.
    9
  95.  @raysschoko  What system, kid? Those are some random trucks with not a single gram ammunition on board, obviously, since none of them explodes.
    9
  96.  @hongry-life  She actuallly called Ukraine "Kokaine". Funny enough she first started righit with ukrain... than switched to cocainian grain.
    9
  97. The whole "captured" thing is so stupid. It's like someone manages to physically get to the upper level of a company into the office of the CEO and then media writes "random guy takes over company". Just to GO there isn't the problem.
    9
  98. It's not the point. The point is the brutal losses. Warfare is about destroying the enemy's army. Doesn't matter at all who controls village A or not.
    9
  99. Роботине is a village that had an population of under 500! Why are all media treating it like they would have taken Mariupol or whatever?
    9
  100.  @daffyduck780  No, it's not, nor does the damage look like much at all. And that news report about a "2,8 earthquake" would be aroudn 20t of TNT.
    9
  101. Oh, they did defend it and could have done further, the thing with the attack on the dam made it too high risk. Of course Ukraine simply does not have the skills nor weaponry to do the same.
    9
  102. Why peopel even care about what piece of area belongs to whom? It's unimportant. That town is just a bunch of ruins and not even past the first defenseline. It's a nothing burger.
    9
  103. They haven't even reached the first line, which is a pure obstacle.
    8
  104.  @Bishop46066  Ukraine lost several armies. Without the gigantic debt it was put in by NATO fascism, it would be done for since a year and still is. NATO fascism just keeps throwing wood into the fire.
    8
  105.  @arostwocents  Bloggers are some social media guys = random people on the internet.
    8
  106.  @AlfaOmega-mz7hw  Not a jail, a slaughterhouse.
    8
  107. That's not a S-300 "division". Do you know what the word division means? It's one system at best. Russia got around 2000 S-300 launcher, 800 of them active. Means they got 1200 as replacement standing around.
    8
  108. As the evil queen?
    8
  109.  @edthebumblingfool  Move from Kherson? If you mean that going on the other side of the river: that was because the Nazis bombarded the dam. Too high risk to hold that position in that case and they had to evacuate the civilians anyway because of this. After that there was simply no reason to fight with a river in your back (= massive disadvantage) instead of using it as natural barrier (= advantage).
    8
  110.  @lloads642  Doesn't matter. There are overall several commanders anyway and you let the one lead who is best at what you currently need, what changes over the course of a long operation. Nothing special.
    8
  111.  @AA-hm9cg  Russia isn't known for that at all, it's just what NATO PR says. Meanwhile NATO PR also says, that they provide false data for their own weapons, but of course the are much better in reality.
    8
  112. Heared that two helicopters are beyond repair, rest only damaged and those who are there joke about how this again was made some big thing from social media warriors... ~shrug~
    8
  113. Pretty absurd to start nuclear escelation with a strike against Kalininigrad.
    7
  114. Best tactic of Ukraine would be to travel back in time to 2014 and not suicide.
    7
  115. Progress in sacrificing their people for nothing and wasting billions of dollars they don't have.
    7
  116.  @klangartberlin  Seems you are of of the germans with the Nazi gen...
    7
  117.  @unknownkw  Russia does not want Kiev...
    7
  118.  @edthebumblingfool  Not at all. Russia isn't known for using gas. The USA/NATO is - what by the way includes Saddam's gas. NATO gave it to him.
    7
  119. Don't insult weasels, they are awesome, brave and cute.
    7
  120.  @RobinHarris-nf4yv  There is no evidence at all, child. And you know what is funny? When you praise your missiles so much and are utterly unable even damage the actual warships which blow up billions of your gear day in and out.
    7
  121. The whole talk is so stupid. "They control Роботине!" Yeah... that's not videogame. You don't get points for that or a respawn flag or whatever, no resources, nothing. That they send units like insane there is just that... insane. Wouldn't surprise me if at one point Russia just drops a FOAB onto it... That <500 peopel village is not even behind the first defense line = to pile up your troops there isn't something you should do at all, especially not taking so long. For an attack like that you need to push as hard and fast as possible through all defense lines. When you fool around in front of the first one, that's pretty much the worst you can do.
    7
  122. Ukrop Nazis fire on the city, so why shouldn't you help civilians who don't want to stay there as long as this lasts?
    7
  123.  @funny_money_ad_infinitum  You don't get infos about over 90% of the strikes make. You think those few videos you see are the only ones happening?
    7
  124.  @useyourbrain1539  Thing is, you can't hit someone where they are not. Abusing a weakpoint only makes sense, if you can abuse this for an actual strike, not punching air.
    7
  125. You never only have a one layered plan. Simply jsut falling back with the idea of making a cauldrons sounds fine, but gives you little room to react. Instead they now play a heavy defense tactic - and the cauldron looms over that on top.
    7
  126.  @insomniacresurrected1000  Pointless to try understanding fascists, you would have to be as fanatic and insane as them for that.
    7
  127. Russia showed more than once that they can remote control tanks. Overall wouldn't surprise if they use bait tactics, especially when you got suppossed systems standing in the open withotu any cover, begging to be detected and shot at.
    7
  128. Hell, how shall they create a "VERY POWERFUL STRONGHOLD!" there with infantery? And for what even?
    7
  129. Just absurd to come up with something over 100 years ago with completely different situations, technology, the whole system (that was still monarchy times).
    7
  130. You neither see big destruction nor do the explosions or fires (any forest fire looks like that). If you want so see a big ammunition depot being blown up, there were some during the time after 2014 in Ukraine. That's a "big ammunition depot blowing up" explosion.
    7
  131. Because it's just some random trucks with nothing military worthwhile on board? Do you see a single bigger or secondary explosion? No? Because none of these trucks carry ammunition. So why even attack them?
    7
  132.  @garylines5755  The thing is, that only idiots or crazies compare war with shopping.
    6
  133. Low range and overall vulnerable to Russians electronical counter meassure.
    6
  134. Hell, it's the reason why this channel is most of the time a waste of time. Taking internet BS seriously and being dramatic about it, oh my...
    6
  135. The first mistake is to think that the USSR collapsed. Russia didn't want all these eastern Europeasn countries from the start and only hold them as blockers. The collapsing part is at best the process, which did not work out as clean as it should - and NATO has its part in that, too.
    6
  136. That alone would be around 5 billion dollars, just those 1000 missiles.
    6
  137. For years? So a satellite weapon. Only way to stay in air that long, to get into an orbit. Of course not impossible to achieve.
    6
  138.  @craiggodard6419  They are likely smaller than reality, because Russian MOD only gives known destroyed targets, not when for example stuff gets destroyed by Kalibr missiles and alike without the possibility to tell how much.
    6
  139. The less remains, the lesser you can lose every day.
    6
  140. Sorry, but what got the Azov guys to do with the grain deal? Absolutely nothing.
    6
  141. The Ukrop Nazis got massive problem with hitting thins on Russian territory, becaue they got close to no system to do it. Something here and there doesn't help you, when on the other side you got hit 10-20 times more.
    6
  142. Child, they surrounded that most armed stronghold of the Banderites, what shows that they dominate them.
    6
  143.  @Chon-c  Only a fraction of it is used in Ukraine. Russia didn't even have a single full mobilisation. The Nazi regime got over 10 rounds of conscription meanwhile.
    6
  144.  @drencrum  It's no race. Russia's focus is clearly on limiting own losses and the risk for the lives of its soldiers. Yes, you can always go faster, but this massively increases the risks. If you got an enemy that is that fanatically stupid to just keep coming, there is really no need to hurry and just welcome this and exploit it.
    6
  145.  @wolfgangohmer3518  Well, Ukraine IS ultra bankrupt, why do you think NATO has to pay ALL the bills?
    6
  146. 266 hectar (or 2,66 square km), is below half the size of Arlington with 639 hectar. It started at 200 hectar, but that's the today's size. Arlington is place 8 in the list of biggest cemeteries on the planet and not even the biggest in the USA, that would be that one: Calverton National Cemetery Area: 1,045 Acres Buried: 212,000 (as of 2008) Established: 1978 Location: Calverton, NY, United States Regarding the number of graves: that depends a lot on the size of it. While over 50% bigger than Arlington, Calverto got only half the graves.
    6
  147.  @kapokparski4573  "The Defence Intelligence of Ukraine has confirmed " - would be more believeable if you wrote that your dog confirmed it.
    6
  148. The whole "under control" thing is nonsense talk anyway. Under control means, that this zone is save and you can't be attacked there. If you can be attacked there, you are not under control. By that: pretty much whole Ukraine isn't "under control" of Ukraine, for sure not the frontlines. You can argue, that some attacks here and there are acceptable, but for sure not when the enemy can just obliterate you with bombs and missiles.
    6
  149. That would take 1 second of thought, how dare you to demand that?
    6
  150. All their actual warships are undamaged, what are you talking about?
    6
  151. They are mercenaries. It's their job to sell their fighting power to people who pay for it. So for example they could jsut work in Belarus as bodyguads or whatever or just stay a small mercenary force, just not the size of the original Wagner anymore. Wagner had a LOT of support from Russia, especially when it comes to equipment.
    6
  152.  @Torgrim5958  NATO fascism was 20 years in Afghanistan, fighting goat herders who neither got an army (well, they do now...) nor any endless billion support - and lost. Because that's what a loss looks like, when you start a war with a goal and not only reach nothing of it, but the opposite.
    6
  153. Sure, because this is some videogame, where you just put a landing ship full of soldiers on the sea for the lols. Hell, if that attack was even real, it was a not used ship with no weaponry, they love to attack these, beacuse it is something they can hit. The impact is of course borderline zero. And no, why should there have been any losses of the crew? A damaged ship doesn't kill the crew on board for no reason. Again: stop living in a videogame.
    6
  154.  @arostwocents  Kid, 2/3 of those were civilians.
    6
  155.  @arostwocents  You believe a Nazi soldier who is telling absurd lies which were all contradicted?
    6
  156. You mean that one picture where you see one tank with a Z (which by the way you can simply paint on your own tanks anyway) plus three Wehrmacht Cross tanks? And alike? Even if they would have captured 100 tanks, what would it be in comparison to the thousands they have lost? And no, they did neithe conquer nor destroy 100+ tanks, not even close. Ukraine tells us, that they got more tanks than ever since monthes, while begging NATO to send more and more and ever more.
    6
  157.  @jug5298  Yes. Easily. Starting with that western economy is a joke. Better ask about asian economy, especially China.
    6
  158. When you look at the picture, the light is very different, so this could just be odd reflections you can suddenly see. Look at the building part south of it. Looks utterly different by the light. What kind of explosive should this even be? Why should you place them like that?
    5
  159.  @cgpxae2119  You do get that the shown loot is close to nothing and a small fraction of what Ukraine loses every single day since months.
    5
  160. Russia got zero reason to show their operations. They give some examples here and there, that's it, you won't see the majority of operations. You already got example of how the helicopters works, no reason to repeat that. War is deception, so in general, you show the enemy as little as possible and if, then not something they can use against you.
    5
  161. Whole thing looks fishy. I just smokes a bit, doesn't explode and stands in the open like stupid. Looks very odd, like a fake bait.
    5
  162. The thing is, while this may work with the western slaveholder who are in the end just greedy merchants, it doesn't work at all when you talk to an actual political leader.
    5
  163. The fact that they shoot at some civilian target again just shows, how they just want a picture of something but are unable to use it fo anything worthwhile regarding warfare.
    5
  164. If you really think that NATO isn't directly involved in this...
    5
  165.  @-John-Doe-  Desert Storm was more a mass murderous beat down against someone who was a) incredible worse equipped, b) fatigued from two wars c) without any will to fight and d) no support from anyone else. So it's simply ridiculous easy to slaughter such an enemy, that's all.
    5
  166.  @bobjones-bt9bh  Yeah, guess what: they simply never stopped lying as they do since day 1. Why do peopel think that the "Snake Island" and "Ghost of Kiev" guys would suddenly be honest?
    5
  167. 266 hectar is pretty big but clearly not the biggest. Biggest in the USA is over 1000 hectar (second place in the world), biggest is in Iraq with 2200 hectar - and around 5 million graves.
    5
  168. They don't step back. What you see there is all in front of the defense lines, the Russian units who are there are scout level and constant movement is the very thing they do in general.
    5
  169. It's not about labour. North Korea got a hell lot of ammunition lay around which would at some point have to be replaced anyway. It's just economical to buy that for few bucks before it goes bad.
    5
  170. Russia shows video of destroying things: You clearly see what they destroy most of the times before and after shots. Ukraine shows video of destroying things: you see shit and just have to believe the story that in this tree line was a Russian HQ with a five generals and 20tons of ammunitions plus 5 jets (yeah, exaggerated).
    5
  171. The video of the Ukrainians look quite odd. More like high summber, not really like Oktober and the weather we go, no?
    5
  172.  @orytek1  Crimeans said they don't want to be Ukraine anymore and what they want is the only thing that matters, not what some fascistic and illegal coup regime says.
    5
  173.  @toolshed47  See, you only show that you got no clue of this. Russia never went for area gains but destruction of the NATO-sent weaponry and Nazi soldiers. They had zero need to advance for that, while the plan of the Nazis clearly is to get south (stupid idea enough) and "cut of Crimea". It's less about the little movement, but their horrendous losses, while they couldn't even get through, mostly not even to the first defense line, which is mainly just an obstacle. To have ANY success worthwhile, they would have to get through the first and second defenseline and take the third out of order. That's where a success would start.
    5
  174.  @Rolerus  Ukraine used cluster ammunition. Have neither seen much regarding Russia. The Nazi regime is using it since 9 years.
    5
  175. Actually when you see such a bridge you can leave it there, wait and watch it and strike at a moment that is far mor effective than only destroying the bridge.
    5
  176.  @napoleoncanio4996  Sure - problem is that you have to go against dozens of missile batteries, which are protected by anti air cannons and so on, creating a layered network of anti air, where you can't just fly to point A and destroy all with some missiles.
    5
  177.  @mrpocock  They literally pinpoint destroy targets 1000km away, kid.
    5
  178.  @Reinhard_Erlik  I mean, Israrel attacked Syria over and over the last years, so per se they ARE at war what Israel started.
    5
  179.  @lepetitroquet9410  1. Minsk 2 had nothing to do with Russia at all. 2. Russia didn't send anything to the Donbass, that was some BS propaganda talk to justify the slaughter, that it is actually against Russia and terrorists, not against citizens who didn't want to go alonig with the coup - and fought back against the coup regime that tried to kill them for that.
    5
  180. And all that for a patrol boat, because they are unable to damage the actual warships.
    5
  181. And still talking out of his ass. If he would just stay with the facts, this channel could be good.
    5
  182.  @that1guy_248  You don't need this ships for that.
    5
  183.  @tim_isoara6423  Warfare isn't about territory. Territory you take as you please AFTER the war. During the war, you don't go pointless area gains or defend pointless positions. Giving up territory to for example shorten your frontlines for more effective combat or as part of tactics to lure in the enemy and so on, that's nothing new, that's done since 1000s of years.
    5
  184.  @namewithoutmeaning1096  Warfare isn't about area gains, but to destroy the enemy's army. Territory you can take as you please when you are done with this.
    5
  185.  @charles8642  That's the thing about fiction, you can make up anything you want. Doesn't change reality, though.
    5
  186. Whole map thing is pointless anyway. Just red or yellow is WAY to simple to show the situation in modern warfare.
    5
  187. What I love most is media coming aroudn with "Richterskala 2,8" - what is pretty much nothing. A single FAB 3000 is already giving a 2,2. 3 would be ~30t of TNT.
    5
  188.  @Itoyokofan  No one really cares about damage vehicles. You know how much stuff Russia got and how easy they produce more and repair that? This isn't your typical US war against some thousands goat herders or bombing civilians. Ukraine had got a good millione soldies all together (if you count what they had and added to it), with billions of heavy NATO equipment and surveillance in the background. The idea that you could just roflstomp that without taking casualties is absolutely absurd. Do you know how desastrous NATO wars would look like if fighting that, even with their usual carpet bombing of the country with hundredhousands dead civilians?
    5
  189.  @horoshkoaleksandr273  Russia got incredible little losses for fighting an insane enemy with no care for its own soldies and all fed by all the NATO billions. Meanwhile the Nazi losses were horrendous even in their own build up defense.
    4
  190. Partly wonder if he gets paid for telling that shit to add to the bait that whole thing is.
    4
  191. The idea will be, that those fly from NATO countries, with NATO missiles and than the story that "Ukrainian pilots" do the flying and button pushin, so NATO is totally not part of it. Of course all this will be very limited anyway by distance alone, but they will likel play with the idea, that Russia will then destroy those airfields and US fascim can use this to send in for example Poland as next sacrifice. The whole idea of NATO is, that it's cannonfodder for the US Nazis. They would LOVE to start 3.WW with it, if Russia and China didn't made clear, that their main strike would be against the USA, not agains the cannonfodder...
    4
  192. Had your chance with Corbyn, now you get another Blair. All your own fault, so stop crying.
    4
  193.  @LevanGudadze  Israel Nazsi are like the Ukrainian Nazis, everything they hit is declared to be a valuable military target...
    4
  194.  @jeffnorris8848  Sure, on some lonely people at the most outer parts of a the frontline. Impact on the war, close to zero.
    4
  195. GRAD trucks are as cheap as it can get. It's pretty much a truck with some pipes on it. Russia got hundreds of it - and they are outdated and are replaces anyway over the least years.
    4
  196. So much talk about so little...
    4
  197. Of course you get less videos. They have less and less units to destroy.
    4
  198. What's preceise about it? It's heavy bombs causing wide destruction. Just obliterating a whole building isn't "precise".
    4
  199.  @craiggodard6419  He mainly focusses on pro Ukrainian nonsense actually. Just not to an insane level as the PR clowns.
    4
  200. In case they really stopped using FABs now, that would make me extremely nervous as a leading officer on the coup regimes side, because it feels like they lay another trap to lure you into piling up troops and equipment again for the next strike. "Oh noes, we run out of bombs and it's too dangerous to fly missions, seems we can do nothing to stop you now, please don't abuse this and amass troops there. ~wink~"
    4
  201.  @johnparsons1466  Lend lease was a joke in comparison to the amounts the Soviet Union produced. The US fascists by the way had massively supported the Nazis on their rise and partly even during the war.
    4
  202. There are thousands of them. When you put air defense to all of them, you don't have much air defense left for other things.
    4
  203. A batallion are around 1000 soldiers, at least several hundred. An absolute absurd number. Are those clown trucks?
    4
  204. Indeed. It is repairable, because it is a warning, still. They CAN destroy it, that you can't repair it and overall could just destroy it again as soon as you repair it. They were given another chance. The xy-th.
    4
  205.  @ZwaneMakki  Military worth of the attack was borderline zero. Even if they would have manage to take out the bridge the military could just use ships or the landroute without problem. Completely worthless and just a dumb escalation.
    4
  206.  @daffyduck780  We simply can't. We lack the economy to do that. Oour western economics are giant bubbles, swimming on an ocean of debt and with near to no resources to waste on anything.
    4
  207.  @sinenomine4540  Warfare isn't about area, it's about destroying the enemies' army.
    4
  208. Called fanatism. Fanatics are very "brave".
    4
  209.  @fabianschrotter  Bakhmut only fell, because the Nazi regime lost too much to hold it anymore. Russia doesn't give much on Bakhmut itself. The reason it was in the focus was the Nazi regime sending so much troops and equipment into it.
    4
  210.  @cameronspence4977  Russia only sent in a fraction of its firepower, while Ukraine had gotten several times the amount from NATO to keep the fire it's dying in burning.
    4
  211.  @basvoer-qp7qw  Before or after a Nazi coup? And what you want is without meaning anyway, solely the decision of the people there counts, this excludes the Nazi part of Ukraine, which tries to mass murder the part that did not like that.
    4
  212.  @nikoskn1252  I mean, what is the alternative? Watch how the Banderites slaughter the Donbass then march on Crimea?
    4
  213.  @r423fplip  If it's an old ship and they don't care to use it further anyway, they won't produce spare parts and not repair it. Not about they can't but about they don't want to.
    4
  214.  @Finness894  Ukraine got money on their side than Russia's military spending for over three years. You can't win to zero against that. Hell, NATO doesn't even manage to win their slaughters witout losses against third world countries with zero support of anyone. Better ask yourself, why the only thing that NATO manages to hit are not active warships. If they are so good, why don't they sink any of the missile cruisers? You know, the main marine strike force.
    4
  215. NATO is doing this itself.
    4
  216. It's just suicidal insanity. 1. This is no videogame. It's not like the Ukraine got a combat round and can do what they want while Russia just have to watch and accept it. They will be attacked the whole time. 2. Even this aside, you can't just freely choose where to go, because overall every moverment you do will make you vulnerable, especially from the side you don't attack. Overall this whole offensive is just suicide.
    4
  217. All those little glimpses without actual proof in a war that is from one side mainly driven by propaganda videos, are pretty worthless overall. Random peopel on the internet, fed by all kind of fakes and halftruth, spin their stories about what is or what isn't. Just a giant mess and completely past reality.
    4
  218. Hell, stop talking about "capturing the settlement". It's not even a settlement anymore. It's a bunch of ruins and never was anything to capture in the first place.
    4
  219. The more drones you got, the easier they are to detect early and you can't just send them in all at once because their destruction would then also damage/destroy the drones next to it. Those marine drones are slow. Overall they more show that they got no missiles for that, which are just in every way better, because faster, smaller, better to use for swarm attack and so on.
    4
  220. Those aren't offensives, it's called active defense. Means you got some small strike forces which keep the enemey agitated and reveal their positions. Those aren't assasult troops to just storm the lines.
    4
  221.  @lukasnemec9310  Russia still got 1000 ways to got harder before reaching nuclear level, kidl.
    4
  222. @ Official Meeting: Ah, Ukraine propahand did a "Star Trek Into the Darkness" here. We just shall believe, that high ranked military official just meet like that right at the frontline in an easy so shot position.
    4
  223. When you look at such footage it wouldn't be surpsing if those are just bait anyway. Most of the time when you see videos about it, they stand in the open for everyone to see from dozens of miles away. That stinks.
    4
  224. Only idiots will agree with that, because Wagner just had media focus, that's all. Also you guys should choose what story you want to tell, because it switches between invincible Wagner and that they lost tenthousands of mercenaries for Bakhmut, which by the way wasn't conquered by them, you simply had not focus on the Russian army surrounding the city (and still does by the way).
    4
  225. "But no side attacks." What does he think bombing with artillery, missiles and drones is? "SIR! They do not stop their bombardement!" "I see, I see - but are they... ATTACKING us?" "...sir?"
    4
  226. Strikes on Crimea are utterly pointless on top of being high risk. The main forces come from Russian mainland, not the peninsula, so what's the point to make some strikes on Crimea? None. Meanwhile the losses from such attacks are way higher, just by the distance alone. And why exactly shall Ukraine focus on the Black Sea fleet? Even ignoring everything else, that fleet is by far the least threat to them and all missiles it can fire can be fired from ground and air, too. Seems more like NATO wants to focus Russian ships to reduce Russia's ability to strike against its when it comes to other conflicts. Even that won't have much impact, though.
    4
  227. "... that the Russians create a cauldron." Congrats for getting why the whole idea of Ukraine is suicidal. The whole plan to just push toward the sea of Azov is nothing else but selfdestruction, even in the best case.
    3
  228.  @johnparsons1466  It's actually worse. Those experience pilots are experienced in completely differnt machines. So you have to untrain them first, that's harder than just train from the start.
    3
  229.  @havanasyndrome3024  Child, there is zero reason for some absurd naval attack on Odessa as you thnk of it. You play too many videogames.
    3
  230.  @Signal_Glow  1. No one knows what Russia is using, since you only see very few outtakes. 2. Why focus on Tornado and ignore all these other systems whch overall do the same job?
    3
  231.  @pedrohpires6608  Hard to compare a tankround with a missile that costs around 1,5 million dollars per shot. They will likely sell it as "Russian HQ" again, as usual.
    3
  232. What's even the point of pixilating it in the first place? Also: how exactly shall this whole work? The borders of the damage are going outside, so the reason for its creation was coming from the inside in an impossible angle for any missile hit.
    3
  233. Those videos from Ukraine look odd. When you got certeinly real videos from Russians using these systems, they don't stand around like that for obvious reasons. Why are those doing that? It IS stupid.Ukraine got support from NATO fascism, including surveillance, so to stand around like that is nothing you should ever do.
    3
  234. In what way are these trucks armored? None of them is. Just random trucks not even transporting ammunition, as none of them explodes.
    3
  235.  nuttywalls8190  It's one thing to side with something and being an active part of it or the main reason. If you kill people for siding with stupid/disgusting things, you wouldn't have much humans left. Zelensky did enough real war crimes in and against Ukraine.
    3
  236. It's far worse. Kherson city was a giant area to the north the Russia defended against the attackers. Where the Banderites are now IS the bottle neck. If the Russians are not just 'carpet bombing' it, they likely wait that the Banderites put more vehicles there for one big strike.
    3
  237.  @sergentGG  So you mean the usual lies, since there is no shot down A 50.
    3
  238.  @yototrash  They know how, it's simpl easier and better to take your time. Russia could easily crush them, but that would create way bigger losses.
    3
  239. If they even do buy drones, at least they buy them, in contrary to the Ukrop Nazis, who sell country and people to NATO for all their stuff.
    3
  240.  @PlacidDragon  Thousands and thousands of supermarket drones, not military ones.
    3
  241. The whole war is 100% NATO. Ukraine is just cannonfodder.
    3
  242.  @fastforward83  Ukraine lost 2014, when it sold out to our western fascists.
    3
  243.  @BanzLanda86  What you see is the typical "weasling out" of the MSM, nothing else.
    3
  244. Uh, Kalirb missiles can even be shot from LKWs. If anything would make a difference, then it would be when it comes to air launched Kalibr, since air launche mostly got an even further range and it's harder to make out where they will they come from, but ships won't change much in that regard.
    3
  245.  @dirkerbornheim2808  You do get that farting out of your mouth isn't an argument and doesn't change reality, yes?
    3
  246. He mainly takes videos from social meda - what would be okay, if he wouldn't even add to it. Those videos are often enough questionabel themselves, even without extra stories on top.
    3
  247. From what happend over the whole time of the SMO, Russia masters to keep the coup regime in false safety. Those night vision drones are a new example for that. They could have done that much earlier, but this way the build up the believe of the regime, that they can use the night - just to flip the switch at the worst possible moment and do this...
    3
  248.  @rogerhudson9732  Yeah, that's the thing with Nazis. Remember that they still got delusions 1945 with soviet tanks in Berlin...
    3
  249.  MrSaiga308  If the west ever had a strategy to fight the Soviet Uninon, they would have used it, but all of it was more about, that European NATO countries would be sacrificed and massiven nuclear bombing (which also destroyed the NATO countries, no joke... german took part in an exercise which was pretty much about how western germany would also be destroyed by US nukes...). Their actual strategies were to either just attack countries which can't attack back or to use proxies - like Ukraine - where it didn't matter how brually the proxy dies.
    3
  250.  @vincentrusso4332  Friendly fire is a very common reason for losses in modern warfare, kid. Many losses of NATO fascism are friendly fire, even when they fight ill equipped militias.
    3
  251.  @OMT988  They make gains all day, kid. You simply don't get what warfare is about. It's not about taking area. It's about destroying the army of the enemy.
    3
  252. No, they redrew because the Nazi and NATZO started to bombard the dam and later destroyed it. When the attacks on the dam began, the risk was too high and they were right to not take it and evacuated Kherson city. With the civilians in safety anyway, there was no reason to fight from a very disadvantaged position. That 'retreat' was the worst that could happen for the Banderites, who were slaughtered with the Russian at that disadvantage. After the retreat the river became an advantage instead, so it just got way worse for the coup regime.
    3
  253.  @Warren_Peace  They are not even diverting Russian assets from other front, since the whole build up Russia followed with the partial mobilisation was to man the whole front, including additional backup, so it wouldn't matter where NATO's Banderites attack. The diversion idea could have worked before, when they only got limited manpower in, not after the tripled it.
    3
  254.  @perhansen2077  Ghost of Kiev Ukraine tells against about endless shotdown jets, while not able to show a single picture or video and that while they are supposed to went down right at the frontline. Easy to take pictures, no?
    3
  255. Uh, what? That makes no sense. The missiles they attacke the infrastructure with are something completely different than what they attacks the frontline soldiers with. Got nothing to do with each other. And of course the numbers of daily losses get lower for Ukraine. This is not like a videogame, where you do full damage to the boss and the boss stays full power until HP reach zero. The more you destroy, the less is left for destroy and the more the attacking forces are weakened and simply can't do such attacks anymore which lead to the big losses.
    3
  256.  @andrew30m  If the Nazis shot at the Moskva, they are even more stupid than you think. Imagine that you got ONE shot to sink a warship and then waste that on an almost half a century old ship that didn't even take part in the SMO, instead of sinking at least one of the missile cruisers which blow you up day by day.
    3
  257. Tell them to stay away from Megiddo at least...
    3
  258.  @laurentstevens898  Why shouldn't they step back? That area is of no importance, while their defensive movement is lethal for the attackers.
    3
  259. You can be certain, that NATO got their hands in that, as usual.
    3
  260.  @jiminverness  The bridge is absolute unimportant for the military.
    3
  261. Utter waste @ use as air defense. How exactly even? They will have to keep those in Poland or they will just get destroyed. Good luck being fast enough to interecept anything from there.
    3
  262. Western insurance companies already did this and others don't care.
    3
  263. Military worth of this: zero.
    3
  264. All this started as a war of a coup regime against Ukrainians who fought back. It's not such a surprise.
    3
  265.  @cheesypeas4041  BLACKADDER!!!!
    3
  266. Again that talking out of the ass. Stay with the facts, such theories are mosty utter nonsense.
    2
  267. Funny, how they try to mimick the marking, by just putting to red rings over nothing on the video, which then just move around, so are not really marking anything, it's just two red rings.
    2
  268.  @jamesgornall5731  Warmongering thefts are warmongering thefts, so of course they also attack each other.
    2
  269. DU mainly emmits alpha radiation, not gamma.
    2
  270. That village now is even small for a village. But yes, that's indeed the similarity.
    2
  271. NATO trainers are in Ukraine since YEARS.
    2
  272. Apple produces expensive garbage for fools.
    2
  273. That's not testing, they simply attack civilians because those are easier targets. That's all. They do that since years.
    2
  274. Russia did just that (holding a position on the other side) for monthes and very effectively, only stepping back from that when the dam was bombarded, because the risk was too high.
    2
  275.  @fabianschrotter  Calle warfare manveuering. What the Banderits fights there is bait that lures them into killing zones.
    2
  276. Russia got no reason to move.
    2
  277. Overall the next try of western fascism to make Russia fall failed and this is simply just cutting losses, nothing else.
    2
  278. This war shows clear to nothign in that regard. Russia didn't lose a single active war ships in that time. NATO just maneges to hit something here and there, but in two years that's not really much. The marine drones very super ineffective and Russsia overall could just easily destroy the NATO surveillance and then it would be even worse and you could do shit with the cruise missiles.
    2
  279.  @laustudie  What has air defense to to with jets 1000km on the floor? And those F-16 are not only old garbage they would get rid off anyway, because too expensive for their rotting economies, they will at best used to fire cruise missiles and alike from far away, since they wouldn't survive an hour going to the frontline.
    2
  280.  @joseafonso7668  You simply don't hold a scout position, for what? If the enemy attacks there in force, you fall back and let your actual frontline which is FAR behind that scout potion, handle it. People really seem to think, that that colored area on the map are some kind of fortified frontlines, where the armies directly look at each other and if one manages to get into the other colored area, they just broke through this army. In reality, you can just go there, that's no the problem. The problem is, that the further you go, the more barrels are targeted at you.
    2
  281. Those heavy explosions videos are fake. 1. It would look like that. 2. The video edit is often so bad, that you can see it, for example the center of instant explosion not where the actual drop is. Even if there would be the idea, that this a some giant armor depot, it would exploide like that in a giant instant detonation. Not even a thermobaric warhead of a ToS1 would create such a big explosion and why should ToS 1 ammunition lie around there in the first place?
    2
  282. Uh, the Russians don't need to cross that line to destroy anything that is moving behind it...
    2
  283. Warfare isn't about taking territory. It's about destroying the enemies army. It doesn't matte if they take these towns or not. What you see on the internet is only a very small percent of what actually happened and is painting a very wrong picture. That's how media works. It takes the fragment it wants you to see to manipulate you. If you accept that and don't look at the acual, full picture, you will always end up as a fool.
    2
  284. What do you mean with "Russian side"? Internet talk means nothing, that's random people who just throw aroud their opinions.
    2
  285.  @ryanfalgoretti  The western air defense itself told this, since they get destroyed all the time, including the ultra expensive patriot.
    2
  286.  @Janshevik  Prigoshin is a PR muppet. He's doing pretty much nothing beside playing a questionable PR clown.
    2
  287. Guess what, right wing and even more fascistic politicians lie for obvious reasons. Telling the truth goes completely against their plans.
    2
  288.  @wespeakforthetrees  That's mainly ECM and anti air of course. The reason why you see some succesful drones is the length of the frontline. You can't protect everything 100% all the time.
    2
  289. The thing is - DU is mainly an alpha not a gamma emitter.
    2
  290. Why the Nazis never get, that when you want to encircle someone, you shouldn't encircle yourself in the process. Even if they would manage to push in there and by that cut off those guys at this nose, what do they think will all the soldiers around them do now? Just watch them?
    2
  291. More likely that the coup regime army is more and more shattered by chaos in those areas, what leads to (even more) irrational behaviour of remaning troops.
    2
  292. Gonna start to not just give upvotes but dowvotes instead when he talks too much out of his ass. This just make the videos bad, not much better than those NAFO social media clow channels. You should never mixture facts with opinion.
    2
  293. "The Ukrainians can choose where to attack." You mean if that would be a round based videogame and they can do what they want during their round, while the other side just have to watch it without for example simply crushin them there. The whole "blooming flower" idea is just suicuide. Of course pretty much everything Ukraine can do is suicide anyway, so...
    2
  294. It's a patrol boat. NATO can't even damage any real warship. If they could, they would.
    2
  295. Do people really think that a village gives some kind of magical buff that raises your defense?
    2
  296.  @imyarek  USA pretty much created all islamistic terror groups and used them for their own gains (what backfired often enough, but they don't care). ISIS is one of the bigger examples for that.
    2
  297.  @demos436  He's a random blogger like many others.
    2
  298. And not even a small one.
    2
  299. No, there isn't they simply hide the system (way more than official told) far behind the system and use them here and there for some attack, what overall just makes zero difference because incredible sparse and they can hit almost nothing with it, since the big targets which would be wortwhile are fare out of reach. That hundredthousands of dead soldiers and hundred or billions of US dollers in equipment will manage to destroy something, yeah, of course. But the minimum success needed for such an amount of waste would be to take something like Mariupol. Not this nothing.
    2
  300. Western media is cutting that out every time - what just shows that they are Nazis, too. They know exactly what these peopel are and hide it on purpose.
    2
  301. Because all the now/low value targets got a lot weaker air defense and are a surprise target no sane person would guess to get attacked. That's the only way they can succeed at something. They tried to sink an active warship, never worked.
    2
  302.  @CapitaineNautilus  Russia did not care to get into Bakhmut. The reason they didn't give Wagner more ammunition was exactly that. Wagner went in, but overall, there was no need for it. Even now the Russian army didnd't move into Bakhmut - for what?
    2
  303.  @andersbiro  You read that in a western 'history' book, eh? The story about the stupid subhumans in contrary to us glorious uberhumans, right?
    2
  304.  @edwinhatlee7100  Prigozhin was a PR guy and media troll, who talked shit all day, most of it on purpose. They idea alone that someone just tells all that openly on the internet, what would brutally endanger his own men by the way.
    2
  305. A few weeks repair for uch infrastructure is already terrible. Not compareable with for example a bridge. People need electricity and all, everything does, your whole economy, there is no way around that.
    2
  306. Those river bridgehead are retarded and pointless. What pressure? They put themselves on a plate to get slaughtered, nothing else. It's like placing yourself in front of a castle wall and let yourself get shot by the archers.
    2
  307. I mean, Russia got around 2000 D20 howitzers alone... Let's say they destroy 2 a day for example then they are done with it in ~3 years.
    2
  308. Both marine units where in repair dock = no reduction at all, since those were out of order anyway also not soldiers on board and no weapons. Russia can shoot their missiles from pretty much anything, the Calibr from air, water and ground alike. Zero impact.
    2
  309.  @meadbrow8479  The Nazis fight scout units there. If they only struggle against those, they should just give up.
    2
  310. Starting with that these videos don't look like December in Ukraine.
    2
  311.  @JLC_Subutai  Not at all. It massively holds back and you have to be VERY strong to do that, stronger than just bombing everything to pieces. When you are weak, you can't hold back.
    2
  312. Why is that explosion glowin neon yellow and --pink?
    2
  313. Since Russia, thanks to the ridiculous sanctions, is full export nation, low value money is wonderful for that. It's mainly a prob when you need to buy from other nations.
    2
  314. You don't have to be a military expert to know that.
    2
  315. Dissapearing from radar means shit.
    2
  316.  @seanniemeyer5437  Then EVERYTHING is a letitimate miltary target, if you argue like that. Slaughtering civilian will also have a massive impact on that plus moral and all. That's not how it works, though. This bridged is half a country away from the front. it's not like you can stop the advance and force the enemy to risky tactics or anything alike. Just putting everything on a landing ship and carry it over isn't a prob in the black sea. And overall: the frontline is north of crimea anyway, so the way from Russia to that frontline over the landbridge is shorter. It has zero tactical value and the strategical value isn't big either. And they killed seven people for that and on full purpose, because there is not excuse for that explosion to hit civilians - and even less to abuse an innocent man with no clue about it.
    2
  317. A no flyzone 100s of km away from where the bombers are flying. Sure, why not.
    2
  318. Everytime they burn some oil (what overall makes ZERO difference, in Russia you got hundredthousands of these oil and gas storages), the electricity of the regime is cut down further in return... wonder when they will learn, probably not even at 0.
    2
  319. Russia does not WANT Kiev. Never did.
    2
  320. Leyen's CDU is a far right party. So far right that it was them which took in most of the Nazis after 2.WW and made sure they can keep all their jobs - or get new ones, for example in NATO. For such a Nazi party, the deman to follow general human rights (which are radical left by definition) are of course 'far right' and a threat to their terror.
    2
  321. Such moves will also be risky and cause more losses for your own troops than needed. Russia has no need to rush anything. Nor does territory matter as long as it's not threatening areas where civilians still live.
    2
  322.  @derekdekker9685  So you mean fake opposition is still allowed. You know, the term opposition means, that the politic is actually different and not the same shit just in blue.
    2
  323. They likely got the idea, that Russia got the same problem as them = limited amount of soldiers and resources, so they want to force Russia into a defense there and take away troops from the east. Of course this doesn't work, because the main reason for Russia to do a partial mobilisation was just that: to build up a defense over the whole frontline without any need to move troops around and with massive backup for each part. That you don't see much of those is part of the deception that is the very core of all tactic and strategy. Both are pointless, if you don't manage to hide them from the enemy.
    2
  324.  @huveja9799  No, it's not difficult to know what's going on in Russia. Of course when you only listen to our Nazi PR... well, yeah, of course they will give you zero info about that.
    2
  325. IMO a cheap PR trick with the try to make it sound legit for Russia by using the real number of losses on their side.
    2
  326.  @Ze_Moose  Guess what: Africans differ as much as any other humans, so of course you also got crazy peopel in Africa who become mercenaries for Nazis. And yes, even the german Nazis did such things. It's not like mercenaries got any special position or rights - they are cannonfodder. The idea of the mercenary is, that he will survive it and make good money.
    2
  327. That's stupid. To build that tunnel would take a long time. On top of that: Russia neither needs the bridge nor a tunnel for their SMO at all. At best this is about the idea, that NATO will continue to use terror tactics and a tunnel would be save from small drones. Of course something like that truck bomb would be far more devastating in a tunnel (since on a bridge the majority of the explosion just goes poof in the air - what it can't in a tunnel).
    2
  328. It's a funny idea, that Russia needs the navy. They got artillery, missile artillery, tanks, infantery with all kind of weaponry, drones, ECM, helicopters, bombers and other ground attack jets and of course on top of that also the fleet. It's all of that combined.
    2
  329. IMO that leak is a cheap PR trick. They use the real Russian numbers to make it sound legit, but then come up with very low losses on Ukrainian side, plus the idea that a big an heavily armed army is waiting to attack. The idea is likely to trick Russia into thinking that big reserves are still hidden somewhere, plus sowing chaons in the ranks, by giving the idea that all of the military reports are just lies. It's of course extremely unlikely that this will work, since Russia does not need such leaks at all.
    2
  330.  @fabianschrotter  No, they are not. This simplified offense vs defense is ONLY about if you got equal manpower and weaponry on both sides and then the offense storms the defensive position, in that case the defensive position is of course much better to hold, better fortified and since moving is bad, because it takes away from your defensive AND offensive possibilities, it is much more risky and dangerous. But when the offense just bombards the shit out of you wirh artillery and alike, that's a COMPLETELY differnt scenario. Look at all the wars of US fascism over the decades. They were ALWAYS the aggressor and invader on offense. They never had three times more losses, because they got way more firepower - and mainly slaughtered third world countries barely able to fire back in any way. The nazi regime isn't that badly equipped, but the difference is still massive. And Russia clearly doesn't care to conquer area.
    2
  331. Don't ge the point regarding that mine beside using it as a trap. But whatever. Overall a very, very small battle in this war.
    2
  332. Still have seen zero proof for any of those A 50.
    2
  333. Commando tactic, quite useful in city fights. You of course need high skill for that and the technological advantage over the enemy. Can't do much if Ukraine would have at least surveillanyce control over their areas. Just saw a ToS-1 attacks close to Kherson. Soldier said, the target is around 5km away. At that pretty short distance (a drone is normally able to see 6-8 times that far and they weren't hiden, they stood right on the street a bit behind a hill, that's it, but that wouldn't be enough for drone coverag or alike) they weer able to make a test strike, wait for the impact and the information of their drones, then adjust and fire a salve to destroy the target and weren't exactly in a hurry to escape. some minutes later there were some strikes in the aree where they had been, but overall it was obvious that they know: a) That Ukraine got no surveillance over the area even so close to them. b) How long it takes for them to counter after they fired. This tells a lot of how advance their own surveillance is - which overall had their target all the time in check and could instantly tell them how to adjust the strike for a direct hit.
    2
  334.  @KSmithwick1989  Your argument is shallow racism?
    2
  335.  @danielpetrucci8952  Control of area doesn't matter anyway. War is about destroying the enemies army. Area you take as you please after that. During the war, maneuvering, especially in modern times, is the A and O. You don't hold onto pointless area.
    2
  336.  @DoctorChained  Russia easily hold Kherson city with the giant disadvantage of a 100m wide river in their back. They stopped it, when the Nazis started to attack the dam, so the city had to be evacuated anyway, what made it pointless to hold such an awful position. Now that river is the disadvantage of the Nazis.
    2
  337.  @Jaysharings  What decoys? Those are just trucks.
    2
  338. sigh Securing an area means, that you have to make sure that the enemy can't attack it. What they can't. Just to be there isn't securing anything.
    2
  339.  @merfymac  They do - absurd numbers, though. If you believe Ukraine's numbers, they would have a bigger army than at start PLUS all the NATO equipment. And yeah, because that's how it looks like and when you cry for even more every week, when you got such a gigantic army. You also go to the x-th conscription round, when you got no losses and even start to conscript women. Because everything is running so well.
    2
  340.  @Cornellzz12  You win a war by detroying the enemy's army. If it helps you to do this by going out of an area for better positioning, that's simply NORMAL in warfare.
    2
  341.  @boydw1  Joke is, that the first defenselinse only exists to slow down the enemy. If you really want to breach the defense, you have to get through ALL of them. Only that would be a breach - and still far off from a victory. The Nazis could reach the coast of Azov sea and it wouldn't matter, since that would just be a horrible cauldron for them. That they only got devastating losses before even reaching the first defense line, the mere obstacle, is just insane.
    2
  342.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  Issue is, that Russia in contrary to NATO and its Nazis does not want to burn Ukraine to the ground what it could easily do.
    2
  343.  @ClubofInfo-Circulation  You mean when Russia did not defend an area that go zero importance for them? And even that the Nazis paid with heavy losses.
    2
  344.  @lepetitroquet9410  You do get that your insanity does not change reality, right?
    2
  345.  @thomassmith4999  If that would be full of explosies, you wouldn't have such a single explosion, but many, many smaller ones. If it is a transportship, the fuel alone would cause such an explosion.
    2
  346. @@foreveryoung2778 Indeed, they changed the game from a quite harmless defeat to a destructive death rape of Ukraine by NATO.
    2
  347. The Nazis overall just tell stories all the time. It's intereting to see that even close to the frontlines, when ever you see an Urkainian videos, the supposed Russian soldier their act as if there is no enemy at all. Stuff stands around in the open from miles away to see and so on. When you see footage from the Russian side, they never act like that.
    2
  348. Sure, why not think about believing the Nazis who lie since years about absolut everything. XD
    2
  349.  @gurglejug627  If this got no consequences it shows how this condition was a lie. Just as they bring up Ukraine as the culprit of the Nordstream attack, but no consequences = it's another lie.
    2
  350. @@AB-hi9qd It's shit for Crimean civilians. For the military it plays no role. And even regading the civilians, the railroad alone is the main transporter. And no, they didn't show anything. They show, that even with all the preperation and luck possible, the only are able to damage it. Russia could EASILY destroy the same kind of target on the other side. And of course Russia will see this as the exact opposite. That you have to crush the Nazis even more.
    2
  351. Looking at their 'plan' at the end: they really think this is a videogame, still? "Just don't trigger aggro, let's prepare first. As long as you don't aggro them, we can do anything we want and they won't notice."
    2
  352. Russia got whole stealth tank armies of that kind since 2014 at least.
    2
  353. The crucial part is: a) It was an out or order ship anyway. b) It wasn't an important ship, when have you ever seen such ships used in the whole SMO?
    2
  354. If you try to do a surprise attack with drones, don't make a testing round, that's just stupid because after that it's for sure no surprise anymore. And to know where the anti air is at that point doesn't help: 1. They will move. 2. If you don't have anything to get rid of the anti air, knowing where it is doesn't help you anyway. Much more likely that they know it anyway, since NATO gives them all the infos (if not doing these drones attacks themselves...).
    2
  355. If NATO joins actively, that would just make it easier for Russia, because now NATO fascists hide behind their Ukrainian cannonfodder, but if they openly declary war, that would make all the NATO countries fair targets. That's why NATO is doing their usual Nazi shit - ruining other countries for their greed.
    2
  356.  @spinnakerthegreat2612  The air power is meaningslses without the fleet, that's the point. Why do you think US fascism got such a big fleet with aircraft(!) carriers as the very core?
    2
  357. Russia loves to follow back attacking units to their base and just destroy the base. Nothing new.
    2
  358. Airfields are mainly a flat area.
    2
  359. The compareable part is, that in both cases the coup regime pumps endless amount of money and people against a wall, withotu any care, tactic, strategy, nothing. Wagner wasn't never the main part of anything beside media attention. Overall it seems pretty clear, that Russia didn't like the aggression Wagner put on display on media and on the battlefield, partly seemingl mimicking the insanity of Ukraine regarding their recruits (what feels a bit like that this was about money: they get paid for their mercenaries, when those mercenaries die, Wagner keeps the wage they would have to pay... - wouldn't surprise me). Russia still does not seem to care to hold Bakhmut nor did they care much to conquer it. For what? It's ruins anyway and was a perfect trap for the Nazis, who kept coming and coming and coming. Likely the reason they let Wagner do their shitshow on the field and on media, because they kept the idea going, that Bakhmut was something extremely important and the Russian army got horrible losses in their desperate try to take it. What was completely wrong, but war is deception... The whole focus on Wagner is a good example for that. What is Wagner? At best some good fighters (what will count only for a fraction of them and for sure not for those ex prisoners), but not many and their equipment can't hold a candle to what the Russian army got.
    2
  360. Clusterbombs aren't that good. It's more like throwing a bunch of grenades.
    2
  361. Russia got THOUSANDS of anti air systems. That's the difference. Even if you destroy some of them, that's not even a dent.
    2
  362.  @Hbmd3E  1. Those planaes likely start from outside Ukraine and use them as cover. 2. Airfields are hard to destroy, because they are in general just that: a field. Even if you damage them, that can be easily repaired.
    2
  363. You do get that Russia could just burn Ukraine to the ground, right?
    2
  364. Child, if you think you talk about Ukraine, what they show you is that one hit, not the 1000 misses.
    2
  365.  @hongry-life  It's not how article 5 works anyway. In both cases.
    1
  366. Of course that's a NATO strike. Hell, the facts that they use NATO weapons alone is making that 100% clear. Look at middle east, where the western fascists cry all the time, that every fart is Iran's fault. Imagine what they would cry about if a anti ship cruise missile from Russia or China would destroy any of their ships there. They would INSTANTLY make clear that this is a declaration of war from these countries against them.
    1
  367.  @lilbahadurchetri4361  The right wing extremists regime of Irael is brutally bombing Gaza with giant bombs that level whole blocks, while WHOLE Israel itself is only ~2/3 as big a Crimea with Gaza around as small as a single, bigger city. And this still does shit against Hamas.
    1
  368.  @cgpxae2119  1. They don't want Ukraine. 2. Ukraine is dead since months and only kept alive by NATO transfusions, what bleeds out NATO. The second this stops - and it will, since NATO can't keep that up indefinitely, Ukraines crumbles to dust.
    1
  369. Everytime I see a video where a supossed important Russian vehicle justs stands freely in the open withotu any kind of defense or try to make it hard to see, I wonder where the people went with their "hahaha, that were just fake ones". Who would place actual ones right in the open easy to see from many miles away, hm?
    1
  370. They do that all the time, problem is, now with western tanks, you can't sell the Ukrainians losses as Russian ones anymore. Well, they still try, the lie just becames obvious.
    1
  371.  @zharkoo  Do we speak of the same Pentagon that was hit by some guys with knives?
    1
  372.  @gerumarc  I mean, it's overall mainly about the missiles anyway. No matter if new or old, those will be shut down if they go close to the frontline. So it's all about to fire long range missiles at.. something.
    1
  373.  @louise_rose  As usual, they literally send them the old crap instead of paying the scrap money for it. And after the war they will demand that the Ukrainian people shall pay for it and gift away their resources.
    1
  374.  @limedickandrew6016  Since Russia is doing a very good job at hiding its tactic and strategy (what is something you MUST do, people who say Russia should communicate it or that it should be so obvious that everys social media guy can analyze it, don't seem to understand what the point of a tactic/strategy is - and that's for sure not to be easily understandable by your enemy), there CAN only be speculation. Of course what we see on the side of NATO/Banderites is often in general just insanely stupid, no matter what, but NATO is simply used to slaughter third world countries, which can't defend themselves. So the whole NATO training seems to be running on the idea, that the Nazis can just easil storm Russian defens lines as NATO bombs some goat herders.
    1
  375.  @hermitoldguy6312  War is about power and wealth. And no other country is as wealthy as Russia. Distanced played a massive role during the centuries, sure. Else 'we' would have attacked Russia and the rest of the world even more.
    1
  376.  @hackgolfer6752  US fascism got their own terrorist fly a plan right into the pengaton. Means the US army doesn't exist at all, right? By your logic.
    1
  377. Drones get destroyed by the thousands. You simply get shown those <1% which are succesful and there is no 100% protection. It's impossible.
    1
  378. If that ship was true, it would be the first actual warship and not even a big one. The whole thin feels like bait, because why would you put a single warship there?
    1
  379.  @havanasyndrome3024  Without NATO money Ukraine would simply cease to exist at this point, unable to even pay wages. Then Russia can just take whatever it wants.
    1
  380.  @thedurrrbikers1058  A bear can smell a human anyway, why should a period make any difference?
    1
  381. What surprise? It's one of the most heavily armed fortresses of the Ukrainian Nazis. And they get surrounded, what is the worst position you can be in.
    1
  382. It's MILLIONS of drones. 0,1% hitting something is still 1000 hits per million. And guess what: drones don't win you a war. You needs millions of drones with these losses to compensate what a fraction of airforce or artillery is doing. You do not see way over 95% of what is happening.
    1
  383.  @SurvivalRussia  It's not. Russia does not care about some vehicles. It repairs them, re-uses the material and so on. Those pushes exist to force the enemy to act. You think that they just send in these guys and that's it? Oh, you got no videos from what is happening? Because war is deception. Only an idiots make marketing out of it. All those propaganda videos are one of the reasons Ukraine is losing yo badly.
    1
  384. How should a pause work in Ukraine's favour? The whole point of such kind of offensive is to be quick. The longer you are on the bad and vulnerable position of an offense, the worse it is, especially such a desastrous position as the Banderites got at that river. If you want to go slow, you have to do it like the Russians = a strong forward defense, were you mainly push with your whole front with main focus on keeping the defense high.
    1
  385. Called manveuvre warfare and is devastating for idiots who don't get how it works - as you can see very well in Ukraine.
    1
  386. Just stop electing all those right wing extremist parties...
    1
  387. Sorry, but what should western fascism do if Russia says no? Sanction them? Arm up their puppet regime in Ukraine? Let their right wing media write how evil Russia is?
    1
  388.  @ryanfalgoretti  The "multi ethnic" IS Russia. Meanwhile the problem of Ukraine is, that half the country does not want to be Russian.
    1
  389. In that case he should be againt the coup regime and NATO, which are both the worst enemy of Ukraine.
    1
  390. The Nazis don't have many cannonfodder left and our western empire is falling apart, rotting from the inside anyway. War is a MASSIVE waste of resources, resources we don't really have. The idea of this war is to compensate for that by pillaging Ukraine and Russia afterwards, but without this happening, it simply adds to the failing of the western empire.
    1
  391. No, because in contrast to the NATO fascists, Russia is neither retarded nor evil nor crazy. It's simply not worth it.
    1
  392. War NEVER made sense.
    1
  393.  @tranbaohoangvu9464  NATO was NEVER about defense. NO ONE on this planet gives a single fuck to conquer Europe or the USA. NO ONE. NATO was ALWAYS an alliance of aggression against the rest of the world, especially against Russia and China, those two are the main obstacle in the way to US world domination. Of course thise never worked out. The idea of the USA after 2.WW, which was awesome for US fascism, was to repeat it, so to use all the stupid NATO cannonfodder to make Europe and Asia burn again. The problem was, that neither China nor Russia are retarded, so both made clear that it NATO does anything like that, they will kill the USA first. That's why it ever went there, but they still really, really, really want to do it. So they try to push it as far as possible, hoping to reach this situation with them staying in their usual safety at home. USA can't take a hit. Take 9/11. It went nuts about something that was NOTHING in comparison to all the mass murder and burn down of nations it commited worldwide. USA couldn't handle to be attacked at all.
    1
  394.  @Kefuddle  No, they don't. If they would have, you would have such news day in an out and about actually worthwhile targets.
    1
  395. They aren't, kid. Not even close.
    1
  396. Not really Ukrainian success. Without NATO fascism and all the money, Ukraine would be done for since a year - and have an actual future. Wagering a war that does nothing but to ruin your country in every way possible - there is no way to win. Their 'success' is simply randomly killing some people here and there, what brings them nothing.
    1
  397.  @lepetitroquet9410  Nonsense, you just repeat the BS of western propaganda told to justify all this, but it got nothing to do with the facts.
    1
  398. Ukraine slaughter civilians on purpose since over eight years meanwhile and the whole reason for the whole war is the Ukro Nazis trying to get rid of over 8 million 'Russian' Ukrainians and that gladly by mass murder.
    1
  399. War is deception, that's the most crucial part of all tactic and strategy. And one of many big reasons for the horrendous losses of Ukraine, who sacrifice all this for absolute pointless PR victories.
    1
  400. Such heavy grass grow sound more like swamp than anythign else. Good luck to get over ther with a 75t tank. Also the amount of cover will be wonderful.
    1
  401. @@potatogunman5428 The delusion that the Nazis thin out Russia, when even their military leaders say that Russia got way more artillery and all, so with what exactly do they want to thin out anything?
    1
  402. Uh, Musk's satellite aren't spy satellites. They are very small and don't have the equipment for that.
    1
  403.  @edthebumblingfool  The Ukrainians who fight for their freedom are those in the east and south, the ones Russia helps against NATO.
    1
  404.  @silvertime7188  Russia won the war several times already. Why do you think NATO fascism needs to pump in several new armies into Ukraine and Ukraine needs to make more and more civilians into cannonfodder?
    1
  405. They are not doing that anyway, if Russia woul do that, you would have totally different numbers. The reason they attack the electricity now and alike is of course putting overall more pressure on everyone, including civilians. That's why they waited so long in hope for Ukraine giving up. But as typical for nazi regimes, they live in their own world and never stop and NATO is even worse. For NATO it's simply a nice bonus if any many Ukrainians as possible die.
    1
  406. Never understood that nonsense. What worth got a change in president or chancelor even have, if they are all the same shit. USA got such a forced switch, but they got pretty much just one party to begin with and the president doesn't matter at all. And even that wouldn't be a problem, if that one party would care for the people - what the US party doesn't. They are plutocrats. And if USA would be under brutal attack as Russia, oh my, their country would be in an even worse state than it already is.
    1
  407. They seem to have the idea tha the Russian army is doign what they did = now hiding inside Bakhmut? And that they could now get revenge by encircling it? What is of course stupid, because Russia will not put their army into Bakhmut, why should they? If you encircle those few people in Bakhmut you got the actual Russian army right in your back. That's not how encircling works at all...
    1
  408.  @amalia_ag  Peopel don't understand what stalemeate means. When you lose thousands of units and tenthousands of soldiers, you don't have a stalemate. Russia does not NEED to move.
    1
  409.  @amalia_ag  Russia does not kcare for Kiev, never did. It care for the (pro) Russian regions, those the Nazi regime in Kiev attacked since 2014.
    1
  410. Smoke doesn't mean much. Nearly everything produces smoke after struck by a missile or alike, including the missile itself.
    1
  411. What is he talking about? The Ukrop Nazi abused the deal for the drone attacks. That broke the deal, several times. Also the Nazi regime does not need ships fo weapon delivers, would be WAY too risky to smuggle things in like that and not needed at all, since got NATO right at the border.
    1
  412. Russia does not care to advance. Warfare isn't about taking territory. As long as the Nazis keep coming, the got little reason to push.
    1
  413. Russia destroyed half the army of Ukraine in the first weeks. Why do you think NATO Nazis had to pump thousands of vehicles into it? What Russia lost these days in vehicles is not even close to 1% of what they got.
    1
  414. "Under Russian control" != Everywhere in that red area are Russian soldiers. That's not how modern warfare works, especially not at the frontline.
    1
  415.  @du5707  Wow, another transporship without any worth in this conflict, done by NATO facism again, since your Banderas Nazis have nothing to do such strikes, starting with the weapons. And there were no explosives on board, if you look at the explosion, that's the size you get from the fuel to move such a ship. Explosives would cause a much bigger and in such a case many more explosions, not just a single one.
    1
  416.  @ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub  The nazis pushed back nothing, the ships can fire anything they want from whole black sea and Russia does not even need ships in the first place, since all those missiles can also be fired from air and ground. = there was zero impact on anything with their "successes".
    1
  417.  @ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub  US fascism lost a double as big and half as old ship to fire - and it was right in its homeport. So if you think Russia is crap for losing an almost half a century old ship that was borderline out of commission to fire, then guess what, the Nazi you get all your weapons from are much worse.
    1
  418. Something NATO would do, because evil, not Russia.
    1
  419. Iris T got very short range. Quite behind the frontline so pointless against bombers. Are they using these to shoot down drones? Those missiles are very expensive.
    1
  420.  @НастоящийИсторик  Hitler in some way believed in Ukraine and his "1000jähriges Reich". Zelensky doesn't believe in Ukraine at all.
    1
  421.  @TGBurgerGaming  Nazis are insane, any halfway sane advice would help them, but they will not listen anyway.
    1
  422. Yeah, NATO fascism doing their usual shit.
    1
  423. What an absurd idea with that water crossing. How shall they secure supplies there? How should they survive there? The Russians can bombe the area as they please. And that some RPGs didn't manage to sink a ship that size, of course not. But thousand other things do, easily.
    1
  424.  @Ebergerud  Volkssturm indeed went horrible. It just brutally increased casualties AND crime. Overall: Ukraine will have a very big number of friendly fire kills already. Even the USA got problems with that, now imagine this combined with the chaos in Ukraine -- and the fact how much they love to sell their own dead as Russian ones. "Oh, we just killed our own guys? Load it up and say another glorious strike against the orcs!"
    1
  425.  @allankvist6741  Whole reason Russia had to intervene was the Nazis not stopping to murder East Ukrainians. So obviously only one side can end it and that's the Nazis.
    1
  426.  @МарияСухих-и7ч  NATO's plan is to ruin Ukraine so it can pillage it easily and of course the would love to ruin Russia too for the same reason, that simply doesn't work out for obvious reasons.
    1
  427.  @Magnetroman  You mean when NATO starts a war against Russia. Russia never gave a fuck to conquer Europe or the USA. For what? Nothign worth to conquer. Was always the west who pillaged the rest of the world - or tried to.
    1
  428.  @ericpts6811  You do get, that your propaganda doesn't change reality, right? The idea, that the Russians are all stupid and scared is exactly the reason why you got such gigantic losses. If your plan is the theory, that your enemy is easy to defeat, you got the opposite of a plan.
    1
  429.  @UTubeRepossessions  Ukraine's coup regime does not even have the money to pay their soldiers, even less some secret high tech weapon they could pull out of their ass.
    1
  430. Even the stuff they lost before was already NATO stuff for monthes, all the sold soviet equipment former soviet states still had.
    1
  431. That's nothing special regarding that drone. It's simply possible, because that's some likely empty) hole in the ground, so you can fly in there. Best you get with that is an infantery kill.
    1
  432.  @dinnerwithfranklin  Never was. US fascism wants to keep its proxy muppet there. Of course it started with that western fascism just wanted to deport the Jews elsewhere. They literally just finished it and then abused this for further imperialism.
    1
  433. As usual the Nazis can't shoot down all the aircraft and sink the ships which are constantly blowing up billions of dollars in weaponry, but of course when it comes to everything else, they can easily destroy anything they want. It makes no sense. And don't say "Russia said", when you talk about random social media posts. Social media posts are not "Russia", but some dumbos on the internet.
    1
  434. Uuuuh, Israel would fall apart without US protection, the only reason they can play the big Nazis country is that US fascism constantly threatens everyone to le them get away with that. That starts with Israel being SMALLER than Crimea.
    1
  435. Just look at the original Nazis. Such peopel live in their own fantasy world and with a devil like the USA/NATO in the background, holding the strings and wants to see Ukraine burn, there isn't much chance. People would have to stand up against it - including the soldiers.
    1
  436. Was always stupid to trust anything on social media. It's only a small fraction and for sure not coming from the Russian army. If anything, if you just throw information at the enemy by posting on social media, you better be using this for deception.
    1
  437.  @Bishop46066  Finland's army is a joke, as is Swedens. They got borderline no personal and their corrupt leaders just sell out to the USA for personal gains.
    1
  438.  @LagoDosSantos  Obviouslky working, else NATO fascism wouldn have to pump billion after billion after billion into it and Führer Zelensky forcing even more people to join his Banderites army.
    1
  439. @@schakrei Seems you got zero clue of warfare.
    1
  440. NATO sent a hell lot of planes to Ukraine and the coup regime also put old planes back into service.
    1
  441.  @QWE1321w  Just Nazis and those who are forced to fight with them.
    1
  442. Those "ammo depot destroyed" videos only know extremes. Either they show you an absurd explosions that makes little sense or they show nothing. Looking at where those ammo depot strike shall be, it's unlikely that there is more than some grenades or whatever, you don't build up a big ammunition depot right at the frontline.
    1
  443. You only move in warfare when you have to, movement is bad, because when you move you are way more at risk. Russia isn't moving on purpose and only goes in when the enemy is crushed. Bakhmut for example wasn't conquered by Russia. It simply fell into their hands as a side effect, when the coup regime couldn't spend more money and lives onto it. Russia still isn't in Bakhmut. They still stand to the east of it, because Bakhmut itself is pointless area.
    1
  444. He's a rightwing extremists, no surprise.
    1
  445. They got extreme little cost for fighting an insane enemy that utterly wastes his country and people, all fueled by hundres of billions of NATO dollars - and that while holding back to not ruin the country even further from their side.
    1
  446.  @ChristianHendersonX1  Yeah, that's typical for Nazis. Hitler also won the war 1945. Nothing new.
    1
  447.  @simonsmatthew  Cruise missile would do shit against a bridge, though. You need a MUCH bigger warhead to destroy a bridged of that size. They already attacked a bridge with them some monthes ago, much smaller and weaker one and made a mall hole in it. A giant bridge like that to Crimea is much heavier and for really destroying it, you would have to take out the pillars.
    1
  448.  @Fighter4Street  Russia never wanted Kiev. The numbers alone make that clear. You don't take a 3 million peopel city with a few thousand soldiers.
    1
  449.  @Vladput  Orxy is a bullshit site that is swarmd by the Ukrainian propaganda outlets and NAFO. Their "proof" is a joke, since you can easily fake such low res quality pictures. If even half of Oryx numbers woul dbe true, the Banderites would have won a year ago with zero help from NATO.
    1
  450.  @iBleedStarsAndBars  NATO is doing these attacks and never managed to even damage any active warship of the Russian navy.
    1
  451. This is a NATO war against Russia. EU and UK troops are NATO troops. This plan is simply saying that NATO should set foot on the ground in Ukraine and is actually going further than just Ukraine joining NATO, but being occupied by NATO troops and by that NATO weaponry, which the western fascits will surely exploit for another attack on Russia - what Russia knows and by that won't accept that. Peacekeeper must come from a halfway neutral party not from the main aggressor.
    1
  452.  @godmode5738  In contrary, the losses got even less. Russia was a bit surprised (why ever) how evil NATO and how suicidal retarded its Nazi puppet regime is, willing to burn down whol Ukraine, but they adapted to that. Most losses were in the days of surprise when all these suicide attacks started.
    1
  453.  @moemoo11  Yeah, and few weeks later suddenly all the Nazi PR told us that Wagner got full strenght and lost no one and how they gonna conquer Russia now. Your problem is, that your own propaganda rips itself apart. You just make stuff up as you please and you can never show anthing to support it.
    1
  454.  @lightweave  Sure, Nazi lover, sure.
    1
  455.  @hongry-life  Nothing unusual. Remember Syria for example. Whenever it fits all the ISIS guys are civilians. Also ignored that most dead civlians today come from the air defense rockets (since these idiots still fire them inside cities) or they shoot down missile over the city - what of course does not make it vanish, but fall down onto the city... One video shows that well, when you got first a big dust cloud from the impact - then the warhead explodes. So it was shot down just to land right inside the city. Ukrop Nazis give a fuck about defending the city, only themselves.
    1
  456.  @Nothing_to_write0  It's funny how internet idiots are so easily detecable by using just one specific word.
    1
  457.  @Suntzufool-td2zo  Of course, that western policy since centuries.
    1
  458.  @jeckjeck3119  Random internet Nazi: "ORCS!!!!!!BLAHLHBALHBALHBA!!!!! *farts out of his mouth*"
    1
  459.  @billnikola2463  Only reason the USSR kept the states it had saved from the Nazis was NATO fascism, since it had to keep that nuclear armed Nazis as far away as possible - as exact these Nazis are proving again right now.
    1
  460.  @sinenomine4540  They use missiles all the time, they simply run out of wortwhile targets. It's just normal when the enmies capabilities crumble more and more, that you will do less attacks against the fewer remains.
    1
  461.  @MegaKurgen  He's a Nazi, BS is their main thing.
    1
  462. Can? Sure. Will? Clearly not. NATO fascism is a genocidal maniac, you ever see them being judged for that?
    1
  463. @Limson Davis No, western fascism started this war with an illegal coup that brought Nazis to power which instantly started to ethnically cleanse their country - what is overall no surprise, because NATO fascism is doing that shit since decades, the west pretty much since centuries.
    1
  464. XD You really think that those who fled that fascistic regime while come back in masses?
    1
  465. More like it was some random trucks for some consctruction or whatever, maybe military maybe civil. In the end you see no soldiers running around, you see no bigger or secondary explosion = there was not a single drop of ammunition on those trucks = absolutely not an attack, at best it was building material for trenches or whatever. That Emblem on the left, the yellow lion on blue ground is from the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS. 100% Nazi emblem and there the worst kind.
    1
  466. You do get that those icons on the map are only a small fraction of what is actually happening, right?
    1
  467. Is there any actual proof for that? The first time such videos was shown it was fake and now they show the same thing. Overall: in contrary to the wars of US fascism on the other side of the planet, attacking ships does nothing. Even the missiles those ships can fire can also be used by air and ground units with no problem. The best that could happen is, that Russia has enough at some point and declares war. And then the Nazis and their Nazi bots will see the difference.
    1
  468.  @45641560456405640563  The biggest success of the expensive UK weapons are hitting ships without any impact on the conflict. If they would be super effectiv, the would strike actual meaningful targets.
    1
  469.  @seanniemeyer5437  Ukraine died 2014 by western pushed coup that utterly ruined the county. NATO fascism is raping the corpse of Ukraine right now - on purpose, because western Nazis don't care for it at all, the more Ukrainians dead the better, makes it easier and cheaper to pillage it. You got ZERO clue of what is happening now and all the centuries of western genocide around the globe.
    1
  470.  @AnInterestedObserver  Your real trouble is your far right system which by definition robs the masses and gives it to the oligarchs. THIS is destroying your country, not some other poor people. You are complete idiots if you don't get that.
    1
  471.  @antyspi4466  Syria is just another victim of NATO fascism as so many other countries.
    1
  472. Just show what you collected form social media accounts, your opinions make it worse and worse to follow this channel, because it's mainly ridiculous.
    1
  473.  @KSmithwick1989  Seems more like the decods hit something, when you see the little damage.
    1
  474.  @elsonck2523  That's nonsense, only an idiot would wait what the enemis does to prepare for it. And an even bigger idiot would think that the enemy got no clue and that some surprise attack will just wok as planed. But the Nazi regime doesn't learn. The whole way they fight is with the idea in head, that they will just force more men into death and that NATO will keep sending weapons and money.
    1
  475. It's 100% clear that NATO is involved. Ukraine simply does not have the tools for that on its own, it wouldn't be able to fight at all without NATO.
    1
  476.  @leopardontheboat8252  Soviets never fought like that, child.
    1
  477.  @kapokparski4573  No, majority of people there already fled to Russia since the Nazis keep bombarding the cities. Some stay - getting bombarded by the Nazis, what for sure doesn't inrease the illusion that the Nazis would liberated them from anthing but their lives.
    1
  478. 25km isn't far at all.
    1
  479.  @lorigoetz4078  Just do like Ukraine and sell it to terrorists?
    1
  480.  @edthebumblingfool  Germany's right wing chaos governmen just got told by the judges, that they can't just print an extra 60 billion Euro. It's not ultra bankrupt like the USA, but it's still a lot and constantly growing. Overall: germany does not really have anything left to share.
    1
  481.  @GIJOE839  Kid, not even Stalin wanted these annoying nations. The Russian's ware forced by NATO to keep them, to jeep the NATO Nazis away from its borders. And NATO itself showed how right they were.
    1
  482. Why should the park demining equipment there? Makes little sense.
    1
  483. You do get that our right wing extremist 'leaders' push this farce version of a discussion about minority rights to manipulat you in the same way they do since thousands of years?
    1
  484.  @stefanr.823  NATO is 100% involved since 2014 and before. Absolute everything they do not onl make them part of this war, it makes them the prime warmonger of it.
    1
  485. PR = lies mean nothing. Lies just make reality crush you even harder. You can fool idiots with lies, but not reality.
    1
  486.  @GrantTerror  Bevor the USSR defeated the Nazis in 2.WW and saved all the eastern European states from their mass murder - then forced to keep them when NATO was created to continue Hitler's work, the USSR was much smaller - and mainly Russia and one half of Ukraine when it especially comes to population.
    1
  487. Always love those "Russian Command Centers" in some random exactly at the frontline on the map. But I guess you just have to believe.
    1
  488.  @TeddyR_Official  Sure and your head is more like an emtpy bowl than a skull with a brain in it, eh?
    1
  489. When you plant a bomb it can of course also destroy it like that. That's a civil air plan, not some armored military one.
    1
  490.  @witoldjagielski713  No, it took the Nazis a year of brutal losses to stop wasting money and lives on it - and now they still just continue. As usual, Nazis are fanatically believing in their Endsieg.
    1
  491.  @Slimedog1963  Don't forget that US fascisms current plan got Iran as the last goal. Not unlikely that they used the whole Hamas attacks and even pushed and staged parts of it, to do the same as they did in Ukraine: provoke a war they can abuse.
    1
  492.  @seanniemeyer5437  You really think they wouldn't and didn't try, hm? They are Nazis. They attack everything they can all the time, mainly civilians, since it's pretty much the only target they are halfway competent at killing.
    1
  493.  @seanniemeyer5437  You miss the point and that on purpose. The military got no problem, since they got several other ways and Crimea itself got a a big military HQ there anyway, so it's not like when you cut off Crimea from Russia via the bridged, that you could storm Crimea, no chance for that, especially because Russia is still right next to it and today missile range - as shown again - has no problem to hit targets even at the western border of Ukraine and can of course also defend Crimea PLUS all the miltiary that is stationed there anyway. When it comes to the frontline, those are easier to reach witout Crimea anyway. The impact is close to zero. When it comes to hitting Kiev and Co, that's about military infrastructure and the support of it. The influence on the military capacities is massive while how many civilians died (and by the video proof that was mainly by intercepted rockets or even failing air defense, since the explosions are way too small or obviously from a crushing = intercepted missile) during these attacks? The truck bomb killed seven civilians. Which was just one explosion and since it is a truck you could pinpoint detonate it where you want, so the dead civilians were on purpose, not even talking about the driver they just tricked into it.
    1
  494. Following western propaganda, Russia is a bear with millions of heads. All those headquarters everywhere.
    1
  495.  @vanjamenadzer  Against goat herders, sure.
    1
  496. NATO would never actually defend any of its countries. You peopel don't get what NATO is for: to die for US fascism. The most USA would do would would be sending weapons, but never get involved to actually help or save someone. You will be used and be ruined by that. Your main ally as NATO member is China/Russia, because both made clear that when USA tried to sacrifice the other countries for its goals, it will destroy the USA first, what is pretty much the only thing that holds US fascism back, who would instantly repeat 2.WW if they could = burning down Europe and Asia while enjoying the show from home.
    1
  497. Because there are many hundredthousands of innocent civilians and Russia isn't as fucked up genocidal evil as NATO.
    1
  498.  @asmo8198  It doesn't really matter, since social media in general is only showing you something betwee one and at best five percent of this war which is dominated by drone videos and the try to enforce a completely wrong narrative. So as long as you follow that social media nonsense, you will always be missinformed.
    1
  499. The only reason why drones seem to be dominant is, that every drone is always making a video from its strikes and of course you got millions of drones, so even just 1% of them is 10.000 videos. This makes them look dominant, especially becaue it is the main thing that the Banderites got in vast numbers and where it is hard to see them getting destroyed like the tanks and artillery sytems. The Banderites and NATO put way more effort into social media PR - that's where the drones shine.
    1
  500. Whole talk about "Ukraine" is so stupid. This is a NATO war. Take NATO money and weapons out of this and Ukraine borderline ceases to exist at this point, unable to even pay wages and for sure not able to arm any of their soldiers. Even the soviet stuff they got left is from NATO countries and all the drones are bought with NATO money.
    1
  501. Why should he?
    1
  502. Musk is just a rich oligarch. Who controls a big media platform with twitter. That's all.
    1
  503.  @andrew30m  Banderas/NATO PR is the actuak joke, since it makes ZERO sense. Following the propaganda, when Russia went in and fought 100% ready Ukrainem, the brutally lost everything, almost got nothing left, while Ukraine stole more Russian equipment than they lost themselves, plus the thousands of vehcles they got from NATO. So Ukraine, according to their own propaganda, got now a strength from 200%+ while Russia got so maybe 10% left. Yeah, very realistic.
    1
  504.  @EddieBlueHalen  Same for Obama, Clinton and Biden and pretty much most US presidents before. Only one who didn't start a war was Trump.
    1
  505.  @seanniemeyer5437  No one was deported forcefully, you brainwashed Nazi lover. Okay, wrong, the Nazi regime forced millions to to flee, you could count that as forced deportation.
    1
  506. Uh, Wilders is a right winger. Right wingers lie. Always. That's their main thing. Because the truth is their worst enemy.
    1
  507. People could easily stop voting for her corrupt Neonazi party - they just keep doing that.
    1
  508.  @wuppas  Money is distraction in capitalism. Capitalism is about owning the country, the means of production, the land and by that the people. Money is nothing. It exists to distract the stupid from being robbed. That's why they always talk about money - not about the machines and resources and goods.
    1
  509.  @vanjamenadzer  Funny enough that't exactly the main method of our western propanda: projection. To call others what we are.
    1
  510. Moskva wasn't eh main ship. It didn't even took part in the SMO. It's simply the oldest ship. So old that it was borderline out of comission and the replacement already in build. It's a sentimental loss, nothing else.
    1
  511.  @TiddlesTheBearBaiter  If you would send in all 700000 soldiers at once. That's not how it works, though.
    1
  512. If it's real, than the mistake is to stand around like that, especially with system which are MADE for quick movement, fire, escape. Why stand around in the open like a suicidal idiot? Most Russian units don't work like that at all, but use them the proper way.
    1
  513.  @ImperativeGames  You can't fight a country that sends hundredsthousansd to their death and with endless billion in NATO support without having losses. People don't get how small Russian losses are fighting something like that and this wiht holding back to keep the civilian casualties at a minimum. Look at Gaza right now what Russia COULD do and worse. They could just burn Kiev to the ground and be done with it.
    1
  514.  @baykal6  Exactly, but peopel don't get it. They don't get that they only see a small fraction and if you just go by that you get a completely wrong picture.
    1
  515.  @MarkBarrack  Pretty much all beside those from NATO fascism for obvious reasons and those who are scared of NATO fascism, but Russia knows that.
    1
  516. Same for Nordstream. It's so absurd. They admit they knew about it, but Ukraine just did not listen. Yeah, sure... Because Ukraine would attack the energy infrastructure of NATO countries if NATO emperor USA told them "No!". Imagine that attack would have been Iran, they would 100% push Article 5 for that.
    1
  517.  @stormtrooper9404  Anyone can do such stupid s**cide attacks like that. Normal people are just not that stupid. Anyone could easily fall into the USA or any NATO country - hell, they can't even keep unarmed civilians out of it.
    1
  518. If anything, than this minutes long part at the start shows, how unimportant that area is. As if a single tank would survice doin this at any main frontline.
    1
  519. Question is who tells us that those "stains" on that potato level video aren't killed Ukrainian soldiers...
    1
  520. Wonder if those 'Russian air defense systems' you see there are just decoys. Most of them are standing there wide open easy to see without any try to hide them. That's... unusual.
    1
  521.  @andrew30m  You do get that coup regime Ukraine and NATO are the dictator, right?
    1
  522.  @andrew30m  No one on this planet gives a fuck to conquer Europe or the USA. If anyone thinks about that it's NATO itself, no one else.
    1
  523. Nah, the Nazis don't see Ukraine as their country. When this is over they will leave Ukraine with all the millions they made.
    1
  524. Without NATO fascism there would be no war in the first place. And without NATO fascism and its billions Ukraine would be done for since a year and with far less dead...
    1
  525. Obviously there is, else NATO wouldn't waste their billion dollar programs on attacking low value ships and go after the real ones.
    1
  526. Those guys don't matter anyway. If Russia called Erdogan, it will be likely more about "Let these guys go, we got some missiles reserved for them..."
    1
  527. The Nazis never cared for civilians...
    1
  528. Helis aren't that expensive. Mil Mi-28 costs around 15M, production will be even cheaper, so around the price of two patriot missiles or second hand leopard tanks.
    1
  529.  @skylangford6083  What in the end should make it very clear, that he's trolling. Else, if lying or not, he would be canceld alrady for communicating with the enemy, what you of course does when you use social media like he is. War is deception. Especially as enemy I wouldn't believe a single word out of his mouth.
    1
  530.  @Volkan-uh2by  Russia is the richest country on this plane by WIDE margin.
    1
  531.  @Volkan-uh2by  Sure, you can see pretty much anythign on the internet. And when you are braindead stupid you may even believe it's real.
    1
  532.  @a.t6066  The west never helped anyone, not even itself. It's all about their fascists and to increase the profit for them. Ukraine is dead, the only parts saved will be those Russia is taking and already rebuilding right now.
    1
  533. US fascism wants to provoke a war of NATO against Russia in which Russia is seen as the bad guy world wide, so it will quickly give up and not use nukes. That's the whole idea regarding all these provocation and further escalation. Russia knows that of course. Arming Iran to strike US ships for example would only give the USA what they want.
    1
  534.  @edwinhatlee7100  Uh, US fascism ruined Iran and is constantly trying to repeat this. Not Iran's fault, well beside them having so many resources US fascism wanst to rob...
    1
  535.  @Ozbird-72  Russia is simply destroyin the Banderite army. Was the same in Bakhmut. Russia does not care about Bakhmut during the war. But most Nazis went there.
    1
  536.  @dmaster717  No, they never did, NATO fascism did and that with the goal to burn it down and use this against Russia. It's not even the first time they did this, they do this since decades, if not centuries, but in the last decades alone already dozens of times.
    1
  537. @supernovaaust Yeah, well, the Nazis won't leave Ukraine, nor would NATO be happy with that. They arm and train the Nazis as proxy to burn down Ukraine, not to leave it.
    1
  538. They don't need to? That's the whole point? Ukraine MUST move around the rest of their troops. Russia doesn't.
    1
  539.  @davegeorge8412  You don't control the other side of the river by being there. The whole point of the river is, that it is a constant obstacle. It's not like a wall, where you must storm it and then you open the gate and the wall is no problem anymore. Everything on the other side of the river becomes a problem. It's funny, becuse when the Russians controlled Kherson city all the NAFO clowns knew this. Suddenly they don't anymore and the position of the Banderites is much worse than the Russia's had been.
    1
  540.  @jeremy9256824  The west would never fight an actual army to begin with. They barely manage to not lose (but also not win) against rice farmers and goat herders - and that with brutal genocide against the whole nation with way more dead civilians than combatants.
    1
  541. One of the reason why you send men in and not women is, that you tell the men that they fight and die for the women (and children). When you start to send in women, too, you need a very good reason for it, like 2.WW, when the Nazi army was indeed just all about the genocide of everyone anyway. Else this can be quickly devastating for the moral, because even those stupid enough to fall for all the other lies will quickly ask themselves, for what exactly they are fighting and dying for now.
    1
  542. Someone told me, that the western leaders eat poop every day, to fill their skull up with it again, after losing so much from talking. Just as believeable as your story.
    1
  543. Wagner's problem and fault if this happens. There is no need for them to stay there.
    1
  544.  @ljubomirculibrk4097  There is no patriot. that's more PR garbage since that ultra expensive system would be toast if you put it close to the frontline.
    1
  545.  @ApocDevTeam  USA could not defend their Pentagon against some guys with knives. So their militar must be the worst in human history, right?
    1
  546.  @MyTakeOnLife001  There is simply not 100% defense of everything. While this is annoying, the attack meanss nothing. Russia is destroying such oil tanks day in and out and Ukraine is still not running out of fuel. Oh, great, sometime an attack comes through. No repeat this thousands of times and you may have a start.
    1
  547. Those missiles can be shot down, too. And they got lower range than for example S-400. What do you want to attack? You do get, that this is massively layered and you don't have the time to dig through these layers. When you want to attack the ships for example, you have to fly deep into tha anti air area and get in range of dozens of anti air units - which, as said, can also destroy your missiles.
    1
  548.  @koneofsilence5896  NATO and their Nazis puppets would never do that, though.
    1
  549.  @elsonck2523  What do you think other bombs do, NATO PR bots? Look at NATO wars and how all of them got got an endless row of dead civilians, WAY more than combatants. By the way many of them with way worse things that thermbobaric bombs, but Napalm and chemical weapons, cluster bombs and so on.
    1
  550.  @TiddlesTheBearBaiter  NATO IS what you described and you tell Russia to back away and let millions of Russian Ukrainians be slaughtered by fascism - again.
    1
  551.  @rayanthony5647  If it only stopped there. US fascism dropped many tenthousands tons of Napalm on countries even CITIES(!). Tenthousands of tons in cluster ammunition. Kiloton of chemical agents. And overall never cared at all about civilian casualties. Even with the NATO Nazi puppets using human shields tactics, Russia is holding back so massively, that you don't even have a tiny fraction of the casualties you would have with NATO being in Russia's place. They would have carpet bombed everything in Ukraine from day one before even going in.
    1
  552.  @kofteci408  Why do you think countries join NATO, an alliance created to conquer Russia and rob its resources? The reason they didn't attack Russia war fear from retaliation. Why do you think they made Ukraine their proxy?
    1
  553. Yeah, it's 100% NATO strikes, the whole war wouldn't exist without NATO. But it's pointless to go against it, even more because in the end NATO fascism is falling apart anyway and is ruining itself much more than it hurts Russia. Escalation would only play in the hands of the fascists.
    1
  554.  @TheMightyCat748  You got ZERO clue what a little shit show NATO is. And money means nothing. If you put it to world war level, you will have completely different actions from Russia AND China. They will for example shut down the internet, what is easy for them. That alone will already have such an uber destructive impact on western economy, that war is the last thing they can think about. Inner chaos will rip NATO countries apart, because the civilians there got nothing from all the warfare of their fascistic leaders.
    1
  555. @@Testtest-rx2yp When NATO fascism comes to try another genocide against Russia, why should Russia care to leave us Nazis alive anymore?
    1
  556.  @fabianschrotter  You do get how much of an idiot you have to be believe weirdos like Girkin and Prigozhin.
    1
  557.  @fabianschrotter  I mean, good for Russia, when you Nazis are so stupid to believe that. Suicidal bad for you.
    1
  558.  @robertdownes793  Don't even think that Russia was the one pushing for Wagner storming in. There was litereally no need for that.
    1
  559.  @cameronspence4977  The thing about your Nazis is, your can't even stay with your propanda. First you say Wagner was comlpetely destroyed by your Nazis ubersoldiers. Then a week ago, Wagne suddenly revived completely and you cheered for them, they should take Moscow. Now they are all dead again. See, the biggest joke about the western Nazi PR is: it constantly contradicts itself.
    1
  560.  @JustaNaughtyBoy666  I mean, good for Russia that you guys are so stupid to believe that shit, I guess.
    1
  561.  @ExpatZ266  What would be stupid. But it's very clear that he lies a lot, what even makes sense. You don't post such stuff on social media. If what he says would be real, his own mercenaries would have quite the reason to kill him for that, since it risks their lives. Prigozhin also loves to copy/paste the western PR: he tells all kind of stories which constantly contradict each other. He felt like a troll, but maybe he's indeed just an idiot who sold out to the CIA for some money, but never cared to give them much back in return.
    1
  562.  @charles8642  "Massive", what nonsense. What are the Nazis suffering then? Catastrophic losses? For your info: you don't see over 95% of what Russia is doing on the internet, since the don't care for such pointless and actually dangerous fame. You don't show your military operation on the internet - to the enemy. The few videos you see are not even the most crucial parts, mainly side line activities, so it doesn't have much impact. War is deception. Russia's deception is strategical, that the enemy doesn't know what they are up to. The coup regime's deception is propaganda: to make up stories about a glorious victory.
    1
  563. It was no battleship. By the small size of the explosion there wasn't much on board beside fuel, for sure not (much) other explosives, this wouldn't look like that.
    1
  564. Funny how peopel still think that Vuhledar was of any meaning. The Nazis managed to sacrifice thousands of soldiers to hold an unimportant sideline without importance - and sell this as big victory. Meanwhile billions in equipment and hundredthousands of soldiers were lost, ruining Ukraine forever, but yeah, some Russian tanks were desroyed, wow.
    1
  565. "BILD" reporter. BILD is a german 'news'paper that is known for lying. One cabarettist once described it in a fitting way: "It's so disgusting that you insult fish with it, when you wrap it up in it."
    1
  566. Sorry, but what about using your brain for a seconid? How exactly do you think could the coup regime side show you the video input from failing drones, hm? Those are THEIR drones failing. They might have done it on purpose to make it look like Russian drones, but how should they get this footage?
    1
  567. Nah, should have been when US fasicsm had installed that mass murderous dictator after 2.WW, but now it's too late for such things. Just see it as two seperat countries and focusson on helpin North Korea against the still ongoing aggression.
    1
  568. Is there ANY proof of a "concentration" in any of these areas? I mainly see, that they keep pushing their people and stuff from a cliff.
    1
  569. Banderites likely hit themselves again with failing anti air missiles. That's why they love to spread this nonsense about the Russians wasting anti air missile on ground targets.
    1
  570.  @Papagulag  No, they didn't. Why should they? That would be utterls stupid. The Nazis hit their own stuff with failing anti air missiles and made up that lie for that reason.
    1
  571. Looks like a civil ship at best it's some small coast guard boat. What's the point? Pretty much that it's the only thing they can hit, something random.
    1
  572. Zelensky is the sockpuppet of the west and Ukraine its cannonfodder.
    1
  573.  @quixote1965  Yeah, and? It's a cruise missile, that's a big war head and this overall doesn't look like any kind of ammunition explosion.
    1
  574.  @Tyrant_8053  Why should ships be hard to build? And Russia lose zero of its active, modern warships.
    1
  575.  @numalesoybea1348  Break through in what way? They haven't even reach the first defense line and this is MADE for break throughs, just an obstacle, nothing else. Not even able to reach it is insane.
    1
  576.  @tombayless9759  Rain? you mean what will make the ground mud and make their vehicles stuck even more?
    1
  577.  @ademriecken4736  The problem of your Nazi PR is, that it makes no sense. You are bad even at lying.
    1
  578.  @edthebumblingfool  Yeah, yeah, you Nazis and your wish for no one stopping your genocides...
    1
  579.  @DoctorChained  Child, first, look at the map and how much territory Russia took and made a fortress out of it. Second: warfare isn't about a territory, it's about destroying the enemies army. Russia got no need to push: It liberated and secured vital parts of the Donbass and the landbriegd to Crimea, fortified it and is now just destroying the army of the Nazis. What overall they already did 2-3 times meanwhile. Ukraine was defeated a year ago. What we know got is the Nazis and their NATO master raping the dead corpse by sacrificing a whole generation of men for nothing and pumping billion of dollars into that burning shithole - what also burns down any future West Ukraine may have had, which is pretty much solely destroyed by NATO and their Nazis. It's not like Russia is burning them to the ground (what it easily could), the most damage is done by the gigantic debt the warmongering created.
    1
  580. Hell, really, stop your nonsne babbling. Especially that "test targeting". That's no test. And it would be stupid to do such a test, even more with such heavy losses of your own missiles you nearly got none and your aircrafts. On top of that, if you do such a test strike you just warn the enemy, while the surprise factor is the only thing they got.
    1
  581.  @anxietydisorders5917  Wrong in what sense? If it's about ruining a country, sure, shock and awe works very well. If it's about ruining the lives of as many civilians as possible, shock and awe is clearly the right way to go. If you don't want to to that, though...
    1
  582. That this channel does not understand, that Russia is telling you shit about all its operations, because that would be ridiculous stupid. What you present here is maybe 1% of what happens and mostly from other sources, half of them hard to take seriously. The idea alone, that a fanatic bunch of crazies like the Banderites wouldn't have massive problems with friendly fire (even USA got this problem) - but then of course still sell this as their success. If you take social media, Russia would have been defeated already and Ukraine would be the best army in the world. In reality, Russia hadn't even a full mobilisation and the semi mobilisation they got is still rarel seen on the field. Meanwhile Ukraine is sending wave after wave of "Volkssturm" in, cannonfodder and it's army only exists at this point because NATO fascism keeps pumping in the billions.
    1
  583.  @doleofdolonia8859  Feels more like uno reverse the cheap PR trick of Ukraine, knowing that the ones who fall for Nazi PR the most are the Nazis themselves.
    1
  584. It's some random, civil trucks, you don't see a single explosion during that attacks, so clearly no ammunition on board. You can't defend against terror of that kind and protect everything. Better look at the emblem of that video: that's 100% the SS Galicia insignia, one of the most evil SS units of 2.WW.
    1
  585. Attack with 10 people. 5 die pretty much instantly. "They try to slow us down!" No, they literally kill you.
    1
  586.  @onomatopejaB  Then fall on cities and explode there, not that the Nazis would care.
    1
  587. They already did all this, they already declared war many monthes ago, doesn't matter what they say, but what they did.
    1
  588.  @Tonyx.yt.  Sound more like real values in contrast to fake and worthless money.
    1
  589. I mean, this is either trolling/strategy or Prigozhin is an absolute idiot to talk about this on social media like that. I overall don't think, that mercenaries would accept an absolute idiot in power.
    1
  590.  @lithuanianwarrior1081  Kid, you got no clue, you can't expose anything but your own stupidity.
    1
  591.  @staypuft899  Well, regarding Ukraine it was over then. NATO just keeps pumping money into Ukraine and Ukraine is burning down its own country and future - well, that of the western Nazi part, the east and south is save from that shit. Also Russia can switch the lights off in Ukraine whenever they want. That's pretty obvious.
    1
  592.  @Jocular-mt3jb  Depends on the speed of the missile.
    1
  593. Russia does not care about PR, while it is the main thing that NATO/Banderites got. They focus on somethin that has in the end zero military impact: selling videos to clowns on the internet. The video you see on the internet are maybe 1-5% of the war.
    1
  594. There is nothing to capture. That is an incredible small, empty village, that is turned to ruins.
    1
  595.  @facts9538  Warfare is not about taking area. It's about destroying the enemy army. You simply got no clue how this works. What Russia does is like laying siege to a castle. You don't have to move for that.
    1
  596. @@potatogunman5428 52 if not even 10% of what the Nazis lose every day just by killed, not even counting the wounded.
    1
  597.  @michalzajic8602  The F16 story makes even less sense than the Patriot one. If there really was a destroyed Su 34, it likely just had technical issues. Such things happen all the time in the military. This said: the Nazis are dumb enough to waste an ultra expensive Patriot system for such a PR number.
    1
  598. It's why in the end you can't take any of these channels seriously. While the Banderites might be stupid enough to just spew out all their tactic and strategy over the internet to the enemy, Russia clearly isn't. In contrary, whenever detailed information comes over the internet to you, you should very much doubt it, not because Russia is making up bullshit like the Nazis, but when you are not completely retarde, you simply don't give any info regarding your real tactic and strategy to the enemy, because it would make both utterly pointless.
    1
  599.  @commissaryarrick9670  Winning a war is about reaching a set goal. The goal of US fascism was to conquer vietnam and make it a proxy against China, just as they tried in Korea and many others. They didn't reach that. That's why they lost. Goal of the Ukrain war is to push Russia into chaos and regime change. Also does not work at all. So they at least try to ruin Ukraine as much as possible, so they can pillage it.
    1
  600.  @Oheng75  Funny how you Nazis think, that solving a mutiny without violence is a sign of weakness.
    1
  601.  @whitehorse4318  The sole reason for the existence of NATO is to conquer Russia (and China) and it's vast resources.
    1
  602.  @Reinhard_Erlik  No, we don't. Germany never ceased to be a Nazi state, we simply adapted to the circumstances and now the Führer is of course US fascism and our country just one of many disgusting little soldiers for it. The USA kept most Nazis in germany in power and career - while the enemies of the Nazis were fought and oppressed. After 2.WW not the 'new' 'ex Nazi' parties were forbidden, because those were good little muppets of US fascism, but those partie forbid the communist party, mainly for demanding consequent human rights (no surprise there, since communism is just that, following the general human rights, you do that, you got communism). Of course fascists hate that. The idea that everyone got human rights is the most disgusting thing they can think of. Like telling a slave owner, that he got no right to own slaves.
    1
  603. Not Europe, the western Neo Nazis at the top of these countries.
    1
  604. Why should it prove that? That's not how it works. Biggest problem is, when he makes up stuff he got no clue about at all. Should just stay with the facts.
    1
  605.  @Crosley-1520  See: if you want to tell people, that you are retarded, just tell that or limit it to "Putler's orcs", that's enough for everyone to know and you don't have to waste time to write the rest of that braindead garbage.
    1
  606. That's a NATO strike. It's done with NATO weapons, with NATO surveillance and likely even NATO pilots. NOTHING of that could even be done by Ukraine, the don't even have the weapons and other technology for that.
    1
  607.  @well9179  US fascism got a strike right in the pentagon by some guys with knives.
    1
  608. 61 F16 sounds like "give them enough to reach something before all are shot down", since the haven't the capacity to run all of them anyway.
    1
  609. In most of those "Ukraine destroyed a Russian ammunition depot" videos, you either only see the explosion of the missile or bomb or some absurd instant Hollywood fireball. Only a fraction of these videos look like actually hitting something like an ammunition depot. It's anyway quite stupid to call any box with grenades and rifle ammunition an "ammo depot".
    1
  610. That guy is either trolling on purpose or he's a suicidal idiot if he really talks like that openly on social media = informing the enemy. If you want to get infos about the Russian military in Ukraine, you don't hear much at all, what is the norm. You can't just tell everything on social media, what ruins every tactic and strategy you have. The immense focus on Wagner is funny - and by all logic exploited for deception. If Prigozhim would really be the idiot, he would have been silenced a long time ago, because that would be unacceptable and dangerous. That social media guys fall for that: just makes it better. Let the Russian bloggers and co cry havoc, this just refines the deception.
    1
  611. ROFL, nice joke. XD Ukrainian is more democratic than Russia. XD BWUAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAA! Next you say that the USA is more democratic, too, because after all they switch the president every few years. XD
    1
  612.  @jcym9058  That US fascism killed a puppet that didn't do its job, obviously.
    1
  613. Of course the PR crew is relaxed, they just make some videos for the internet monkeys. If those are real soldiers, hell, Ukraine got even worse problems than imagined, because they are completely infantil and a threat to everyone around them.
    1
  614.  @ant208  ? Putin is clearly on the side of a two state resolution. What exactly means that you aren't taking sides.
    1
  615. Still waiting for actual proof for that missile boat. You only get those fake videos the Ukrop Nazis love to use, never any real evidence.
    1
  616. Whole thing is 100% NATO with Banderites just being cannonfodder.
    1
  617.  @Titoscudd  Because our western Nazis would just use it for further pushing escalation and Russia can handle it without shooting down the toys of our fascistic cowards.
    1
  618. If those naval drones from NATO would be any good, they would go for the high threat targets, the missile cruiser and alike. Also, like the boat last time, I would like to see actual evidence, because those Ukrainian videos are not. They have used that several times for fakes.
    1
  619. No one has answeres to random terror attacks. Since you don't see a single bigger or secondary explosion, none of these trucks had any ammunition on board. It's just a random swarm attack on random trucks by a Nazi battallion - and they themselves make that clear, since that Lion on blue ground with the crowns is the Emble of the Waffen SS Galicia.
    1
  620. Ukraine has one central hot water system? o_O
    1
  621.  @rainieresguerra-uw7on  Yeah. With ships. You can sink ships.
    1
  622. Don't really see the rollercoaser here. It's straight downward for Ukraine with an insane lack of care for its troops.
    1
  623.  @lepetitroquet9410  Problem is, that your "gains" are without meaning, while the insane losses of soldiers and equipment aren't.
    1
  624.  @Vladput  Starts with the same two stupid ideas: 1. That area got any importans on its own in general. 2. That the lines on the map are of any meaning and represent something like the walls of a castle you could overcome and that are in a much better position, while in reality where those lines on the map are, there is mostly nothing, so to just go there isn't hard. You are just in firing range = not good.
    1
  625. New to western proapganda? 'Our' propaganda always says two opposite things at once. Take for example "Russia lost 90% of its armys" and "If Ukraine doesn't win, Russia will threaten Europe." So they say tha Russia's army is absolute garbage and pretty much destroyed, but also a giant threat to NATO. That comes from the same person in the same talks.
    1
  626. Wonder why every box of granades is named an "ammuntion depot". Well, okay, then we got 100.000s of "ammunition depots" in Ukraine.
    1
  627. Looks more like they terrorize civilians there. Peopel still live here and there in that area and the Nazis just see them as easy targets.
    1
  628.  @Bishop46066  Why not accept the fact, Nazi, that these ruins are nothing but a death trap?
    1
  629.  @deeptime5581  Even if ou would manage to destroy the bridge, this wouldn't isolate it.
    1
  630. Those typical terror attacks only show, that they got nothing military wise. And the military value of it is borderline zero. You would need hundreds of those to get any real impact. Look at the coup regime itself. Russia did much more damage to their energy network and the still keep their Nazi army running.
    1
  631.  @edthebumblingfool  When the Nazi regime is done for it will stop or NATO fascism stops to arm it. The Nazi regime won't stop their genocide if Russia leaves.
    1
  632.  @vladukas6623  He's a Nazi, those don't care for facts.
    1
  633.  @jiminverness  Yeah, too bad that even all international observers made clear, that neither the russian army nor russian weapons played any role in East Ukraine until Feb 2022, Nazi lover.
    1
  634. Lol, sorry, but sine when it was ever hard to hit something that just stands there openly without any cover? Overall this likely was just an unlucky hit, because what's the point to waste so man expensive missiles to attacks something that's out of order anyway? Absolute stupid target. Also: those firecracke rockets are simply not strong enough to destroy a bridge. A bridge is MUCH more sturdy than any vehicle.
    1
  635. Because the whole talk about "capturing" anda like is stupid to begin with. Those frontline movements of Russia are mostly bait and deception.
    1
  636. Got nothing to do with democracy of course. Democracy is, when the politics serve the people. Doesn't matter how. China for example got a way bigger focus on democracy than the west does. You got one ruling party - and the elections are about people voting for those who carry the problems and wishes to that party who then has to find the best way for everyone. Election in the west aer a bunch of party who deliver a show, then betray you and everything they promised anyway and work for the oligarchs instead.
    1
  637.  @arostwocents  Russian bloggers are still just social media clowns, child. It's not like they are actually on the ground there or part of the Russian military or whatever. They just take what other peopel on social media say and repeat it, what includes the shist coming from the NAFO armies.
    1
  638.  @LloydTaray-bt7ho  I mean, when you got a bomber that is carrying bombs and then sent any kind of plane against it with air to air missiles, if you only take these two the bomber would obviously have bad chances, since he got no weapons against the other plane.
    1
  639.  @gadingnicolas1394  Especially as if the coup regime with Zelensky's big PR company wouldn't film such a crushing trap 100%. With bombers high in the air to drop the bombs, it would be easy to film from far away.
    1
  640. You see the faction of a clip from a single drone. There was already footage from Russian drone following units back to their hideout to destroy it. So just seeing that Bradley 'escape' for example doesn't mean anything.
    1
  641.  @easygroove  The actual ship part seems completely undamage. What you got on top isn't hard to repair. It's the same like their attacks on bridges. They make holes in it, but never damage the actual important part. They just suck at it. And this was pretty much a civilian ship anyway.
    1
  642.  @easygroove  Problem is, that it's no gun, but more some backpack. Oh no, they damaged a backpack. Have you ever seen Russia using landing ships during the SMO for anything?
    1
  643.  @davecuddahy7872  No, kid. Russia got no need to hurry. This it not a videogame with bonus points for quickness. Rushing things means bigger sacrifices. Nazis ran out of money and gear already, only kept alive by NATO fascism, but this isn't endless. They also got close to no men left, so even with NATO Nazis throwing more money at it, this won't go forever. With the Nazi army gone, Russia can take whatever it want and will not let the remaning terrorist give the chance to continue like that. Could have followed Minsk 2 and it would never had had that problem.
    1
  644. The regime must be destroyed for sure, question is if they take control over Ukraine itself, what they very likely really don't want at all. Russia let the USSR go for a reason.
    1
  645. Wouldn't surprise me to find him one day with an overdose (maybe enforced upon him by one of his Nazi lovers...).
    1
  646.  @brolohalflemming7042  Putin doesn't care which puppet is talking. It's about the negotiation. Western puppets are all the same anyway.
    1
  647. US fascism would give a fuck about any of its cannonfodder. It would at best see Poland's soldiers as more cannonfodder, as Ukraine is running out.
    1
  648.  @Grondorn  Soviet Union warned Europe what Hitler would do and wanted to unite agaisnt him, but all the western fascists said no, since the whole idea was that germany would go against the Soviet Union, both would ruin each other and the rest of Europe (and especially the USA) could then just pillage both. Didn't work out, when Hitler just used the army they let him build up to take whole Europe before attacking the Soviet Union. SU especially warned Poland and Finland. Both said no and wanted to attack the SU with germany again instead. Simply didn't work out as they hoped for, especially not for Poland (which had to be saved by the SU, which went in when Poland was defeated and by that stopped the germans to just walk through and finish their genocide).
    1
  649.  @arostwocents  EU is an economical Union and not of the people but of the oligarchs. Only german left wing party said 25 years ago that EU as as well as the Euro will lead to all these problems we got now, because it's a right wing dictatorship of wealth and those who control it, not an union of nations and people. And of course they were right, but majority of people are stupid and will never learn.
    1
  650. The only thing special about the HIMAR scrap is, that they got such a low amount of them, that they keep them far away from the frontline instead of wasting them like everything else. They got close to no impact thanks to that, too. For every strike that Nazis make, Russia makes 10 and more. That's why the Nazi regime sacrifices more and more of its population with forced conscription and NATO has to keep pumping billion after billion into this flaming shitshole.
    1
  651.  @jesseterrell2109  NATO wants no peace, only all the resources of Russia.
    1
  652. Ukraine is big, it's not as easy as looking on a map. Humans are small and of course as insane as the Nazis are, they still try to spread out, hide, sneak in. And you can't just carpet bomb whole Ukraine, even less as Russia, which overall does not want to ruin Ukraine, in contrary to NATO.
    1
  653.  @ryanfalgoretti  Oh, US fascism mainly goes to wars in which they are invulnerable, because they slaughter people who got nothing to fire back.
    1
  654.  @nursebruno  It's indeed just insane to believe, that they could build up a bridgehead there. You would have to be utterly dominante in your weapon systems to do this against an enemy with no or close to no chance to attack you there. Else this is a freaking death trap and if the enemy lets you get in there, that just underlines it.
    1
  655.  @rainieresguerra-uw7on  What exactly do you want to train, child? Dodging explosions?
    1
  656. @kevinallies1014 I mean, what shall they do? Tell the truth? Then how shall they find cannonfodder and how shall our western fascists explain why the give those Nazis so much money?
    1
  657.  @patricebertrand1146  War is deception, kid. 'Traps' are standard.
    1
  658.  @chrisperrien7055  Russia could, they had done that, but it's overall quite a disadvantage you only take when you need it. Since the Nazis keep coming, there is no need to not let them do that. It's MUCH easier and so much less risky.
    1
  659.  @rainieresguerra-uw7on  That's even more stupid. If you want to break such defense, you have to push through ALL of them and clear that area. The absolute worst thing you can do is to fool around in front of those lines, where they just obliterate you.
    1
  660. Russia doesn't need to move, the Nazis jump willingly into the kill zone. And Prigozhin did shit in terms of military, he's a media guy, nothing else.
    1
  661.  @A31415  "US is doing just fine, assuming nuclear war doesn’t start." - Sure, for a fascistic empire rotting away from the inside, it's doing fine. You do get, that your corrupt politicians have to raise the debt limit every years to not go bankrupt?
    1
  662. Kind of odd, how many of those Ukrainian succes videos show the Russians just doing nothing but some stupid walkin around or standing right int he open, waiting to be shot at. I mean if they would attack and by that have to hurry through the open, fine. But when they don't attack and then just walk around right at the frontline, clearly in range of sight... what kind of behaviour is that? Same for anti air units who just stand there in the open, without any kind of care, easy to see from 50km away. Extremely odd, because when you are shown combat footage from Russian side, they don't work like that at all.
    1
  663.  @lasseaardestrup7387  Wagner are merecenaries. Their ideology is to sell their fighting power for money. You got Nazis everywhere, in all western police and army forces for example. Not compareable with what we got in Ukraine and what NATO is doing here, where the Nazis play the core role and are everywhere. It's one thing when one of he policer officers runs around with an SS tattoo and another when the whole police force proudly waves a svastika flag and is honored for that by the politicians. And the idea alone, that Russian would side with Nazis is ridiculous. Russia always had been the biggest target and victims of Nazism. Peopel talk about Jews, but the Nazis killed double as many soviet civilians alone than Jews.
    1
  664.  @volkerr.  Kindchen, wo nimmst Du den Schwachsinn her? Völlig absurde Zahlen.
    1
  665.  @FineBlackSea  UNO is dominated by NATO fascism, that's why.
    1
  666.  Blitz  I mean, there is no reason for them to hold Bakhmut. The Nazis want to go back in there? Let them. Bakhmut is an empty ruin, thanks to the Nazis abusing it as cover.
    1
  667. TOS is actually one of the weapons that got absolutely no prob with trenches, you can't hide in trenches from a thermobaric weapon. The subpressure still kills you. That's pretty much the point of the weapon.
    1
  668. You do get that trees and alike burn?
    1
  669. Uh, that happened 2014.
    1
  670.  @oconnem1  The opposite was the case. The Nazis came up with absurd numbers of one missiles destroying a whole air field and everything on it, what never even made sense by the physics alone. And all proof there was where some low res satellites images with stains, which were sold as burn marks.
    1
  671.  @antiopanak  You do get that you Nazis didn't manage to even damage a single actual active warship? You damage transportships or at best that small submarine which was out of order anyway, so, wow: just put a submarine out of water and the Nazis can maybe hit it.
    1
  672.  @ilias856  They count fisherboats as ships, too.
    1
  673.  @MegaVero23  They don't even need to leave Ukraine. The reasons that led to the Ukraine SMO. 1. An illegal coup. 2. The coup regime started a war against those against it. 3. The coup regime didn't follow UN orders to stop it. 4. The coup regime was stopped by Russia with force. but instead of ceasing its violence and follow the UN order as it should have in the first place, it started a total war (total in the sense of sacrificing its own population and country for it). All this of course with NATO as the master of all this in the background. If it didn't do: 1: there would still be whole Ukraine. 2. there would still be whole Ukraine 3. They would only have lost Crimea. 4. They would only have lost Crimea - maybe Donbass.
    1
  674.  @Meoldson  Ukraine was democratic till 2014. The coup was fascistic and absolished democracy.
    1
  675.  @edthebumblingfool  What is simply not true at all, kid. You see a fraction of what is happening and most of what you get shoen is done by the Banderits for PR purposel. And you then just multiply that to get the full picture, what is of course just stupid and wrong.
    1
  676.  @Kneejair  It's funny how easily the stupid propaganda method of fascism works, to just repeat a stupid lie, the idiots will eat it.
    1
  677. Sure, Nazi, sure.
    1
  678.  @volkerr.  Let me guess: Reichsbürger?
    1
  679.  @volkerr.  Majority of the world give a giant fuck about our western fascism they all knew all too well.
    1
  680.  @Bubissima  You would have to pay Russia a few trillion dollars to take Berlin, they wouldn't even take it as a gift.
    1
  681. Because that would kill many innocents and Russia isn't like the fascistic west.
    1
  682. That river crossing is 100% a trap, Russia using the insanity of the coup regime for PR victories. There is nothing they can do there they couldn't do better and with much less losses from the other side of the river.
    1
  683.  @gunterodim1535  For what? Russia only wants to defend itself against our greedy claws. It doesn't need a huge army for anything else. And against NATO this would end in nuclear war anyway.
    1
  684.  @patricebertrand1146  The sole reason the Soviet Union 'collapsed' was them not needing those buffer countries anymore thanks to all the modern missiles systems. Of course it was naive to think, that NATO would stop trying. Even Stalin didn't want to have the east european states. There was simply no other choice with US fascism continuin 2.WW under new name and them as the new Führer.
    1
  685.  @patricebertrand1146  Russia would never have given up the buffer states if it would still have needed them. That's why it's the main reason behind it.
    1
  686.  @georgewashington90  US empire is rotting away from the inside by its own corruption. It never helped anyone by itself to begin with and all it does to the EU is to drag it down with it.
    1
  687.  @stevebuckley7788  Not really, the propaganad is extremely bad in quality, Goebbels deliverd much higher quality propaganda (sadly...). But people are even dumber than in 2.WW times, it seems. Of course overall for a fascists it does not really matter how stupid the stories are, they believe them because they are fanatics...
    1
  688. So they wasted hundreds of millions by sacrificing a patriot system to shoot down some old Russian bomber, eh? Interesting. I mean, you would guess when you make up such stories that you would at least try to look like the winner.
    1
  689. NATO exists as cannonfodder for US fascism, nothign else. It's never about defending each other. And NATO will never go to war with Russia or China, because both made clear, that they would go for the Emperor's head first, what makes the whole idea to use all the idiot countrie who joined NATO as cannonfodder pointless. Why do you think NATO fascism usese other countries as proxies the whole time?
    1
  690. Bakhmut is ruins. The real "joke" is, how much the Nazis have lost over it.
    1
  691.  @olimmultipado6438  It's basis logic, problem is the majority of people lack even that.
    1
  692.  @moondiegordr  That'a the reason Banderas Ukraine burned through three full armies meanwhile.
    1
  693.  @hiram-2211  Even got a name for that: Capitalism.
    1
  694.  @Br1cht  There is no catastrophic failure, kid. You got zero clue what you are talking about.
    1
  695. They just want their subsidies for gas back.
    1
  696. @Kris P. Bacon If you think that the west has ever or will ever give anything away from free, your are naive beyond hope.
    1