Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "The Ukrainians Destroyed The Russian Ship With A Cruise Missile Strike. Military Summary 2023.12.26" video.

@r423fplip If it's an old ship and they don't care to use it further anyway, they won't produce spare parts and not repair it. Not about they can't but about they don't want to.
4
This war shows clear to nothign in that regard. Russia didn't lose a single active war ships in that time. NATO just maneges to hit something here and there, but in two years that's not really much. The marine drones very super ineffective and Russsia overall could just easily destroy the NATO surveillance and then it would be even worse and you could do shit with the cruise missiles.
2
@ryanfalgoretti The western air defense itself told this, since they get destroyed all the time, including the ultra expensive patriot.
2
Because all the now/low value targets got a lot weaker air defense and are a surprise target no sane person would guess to get attacked. That's the only way they can succeed at something. They tried to sink an active warship, never worked.
2
@thomassmith4999 If that would be full of explosies, you wouldn't have such a single explosion, but many, many smaller ones. If it is a transportship, the fuel alone would cause such an explosion.
2
@spinnakerthegreat2612 The air power is meaningslses without the fleet, that's the point. Why do you think US fascism got such a big fleet with aircraft(!) carriers as the very core?
2
@Hbmd3E 1. Those planaes likely start from outside Ukraine and use them as cover. 2. Airfields are hard to destroy, because they are in general just that: a field. Even if you damage them, that can be easily repaired.
2
Of course that's a NATO strike. Hell, the facts that they use NATO weapons alone is making that 100% clear. Look at middle east, where the western fascists cry all the time, that every fart is Iran's fault. Imagine what they would cry about if a anti ship cruise missile from Russia or China would destroy any of their ships there. They would INSTANTLY make clear that this is a declaration of war from these countries against them.
1
@ryanfalgoretti The "multi ethnic" IS Russia. Meanwhile the problem of Ukraine is, that half the country does not want to be Russian.
1
@Kefuddle No, they don't. If they would have, you would have such news day in an out and about actually worthwhile targets.
1
@du5707 Wow, another transporship without any worth in this conflict, done by NATO facism again, since your Banderas Nazis have nothing to do such strikes, starting with the weapons. And there were no explosives on board, if you look at the explosion, that's the size you get from the fuel to move such a ship. Explosives would cause a much bigger and in such a case many more explosions, not just a single one.
1
@ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub The nazis pushed back nothing, the ships can fire anything they want from whole black sea and Russia does not even need ships in the first place, since all those missiles can also be fired from air and ground. = there was zero impact on anything with their "successes".
1
@ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub US fascism lost a double as big and half as old ship to fire - and it was right in its homeport. So if you think Russia is crap for losing an almost half a century old ship that was borderline out of commission to fire, then guess what, the Nazi you get all your weapons from are much worse.
1
@simonsmatthew Cruise missile would do shit against a bridge, though. You need a MUCH bigger warhead to destroy a bridged of that size. They already attacked a bridge with them some monthes ago, much smaller and weaker one and made a mall hole in it. A giant bridge like that to Crimea is much heavier and for really destroying it, you would have to take out the pillars.
1
@45641560456405640563 The biggest success of the expensive UK weapons are hitting ships without any impact on the conflict. If they would be super effectiv, the would strike actual meaningful targets.
1
It was no battleship. By the small size of the explosion there wasn't much on board beside fuel, for sure not (much) other explosives, this wouldn't look like that.
1
Hell, really, stop your nonsne babbling. Especially that "test targeting". That's no test. And it would be stupid to do such a test, even more with such heavy losses of your own missiles you nearly got none and your aircrafts. On top of that, if you do such a test strike you just warn the enemy, while the surprise factor is the only thing they got.
1
That's a NATO strike. It's done with NATO weapons, with NATO surveillance and likely even NATO pilots. NOTHING of that could even be done by Ukraine, the don't even have the weapons and other technology for that.
1
@well9179 US fascism got a strike right in the pentagon by some guys with knives.
1
@ryanfalgoretti Oh, US fascism mainly goes to wars in which they are invulnerable, because they slaughter people who got nothing to fire back.
1
@antiopanak You do get that you Nazis didn't manage to even damage a single actual active warship? You damage transportships or at best that small submarine which was out of order anyway, so, wow: just put a submarine out of water and the Nazis can maybe hit it.
1
@ilias856 They count fisherboats as ships, too.
1