Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "US to Send M1 Abrams to Ukraine + US-backed Terror Targets Myanmar's Upcoming Elections" video.

And it's not just the optic of the tank. When you look at leaks from the war, you often see Russian drones marking even soldiers and keeping them tracked. Easy to do that with a massive, heavy tank. And behind that possible Russian T-72 or better tank is a hell lot of artillery, attack drones, attack helicopters, missiles, air forces and of course the infantery can also not be ignored. The Abrams and Leopards won't have such cover or at best a fraction of it. Russia is also far better at keeping up their drones and bringing down Ukrainian drons with anti air or ECM.
15
@Hereford1642 First one was abaout that NATO used Saddam as proxy warrior against Iran, but that sucked, so Saddam turned around and attacked Kuwait instead, wha was a very more worthwhile target for him. Suddenly he was the bad guy, while doing pretty much the same as before where NATO had armed him. Germany and others had sent Saddam the chemicals for his weapons...
6
Quora is even worse than witter. It's like the internet Nazi bar.
3
Those long range missiles are single shot and way longer in the air, so overall easier to intercept than a barrage of the smaller ones Russia is shooting down all the time. Nazis will just use them to shoot at the cities anyway.
1