Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Ukraine's Offensives: Tactical Victories Can Contribute to Strategic Defeat" video.

  1. Destroyed infrastructure hurts civilians the most. In contrary to Ukro and NATO Nazis, Russia never wanted to do that.
    12
  2. People call Kherson the feint, what is very unlikely seeing the amount of attackers and losses. Actually more likely that Kharkiv attack was the feint to drag forces from the south there to prepare the actual idea pushing south, destroying the landbridge and then using artillery to destroy the crimean bridge, what would indeed by a very strong success for Ukraine in contrary to the pointles 'success' in the north. Overall Ukraine/NATO will likely not really know now what to do with this success, after Russia did not fall for the feint and may even tend to split now itself, to defend the 'conquered' territory in the north - plus all the additional havoc Russia will continue cause over the whole front line and its attack against the infrastructure and alike.
    2
  3. "I conquered this area!" "At what cost?" "I conquered this area!!" "What damage did you do to to the enemy?" "I conquered this area!!!" "... that bad, eh?"
    1
  4. Sure, when you got no clue of tactic and strategy and think everything is like a Hollywood movie with plot armor and all, it might look like that.
    1