Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Daniel Davis / Deep Dive" channel.

@phoenixbird7579 I guess they talk about Satan or some other evil being?
17
Sorry, but they will do the usual, stop talking about it, tell some more lies and the masses will eat it - as always.
7
And people don't get that that current situation is the best that NATO can have (while losing), hiding behing their cannonfodder and meatshield coup regime. If NATO would go in itself, Russia would not care anymore to obliterate all NATO targets in reach (which is pretty much anything on the whole globe, but especially anything in Europe). NATO fails against peopel who can't even fight backa against their aggression. Even a country like Iran would be a completly different case, since Iran CAN destroy anything that attacks it and sink carrier fleets and alike. And Russia is several times more powerful, even without nukes.
7
Was also just standard military strategy to shorten the frontline. You don't hold onto area that isn't of direct importance to you, when it would be a burden for your soldiers and logistics.
6
Warfare was never about gaining ground. War often is, but warfare is about destroying the enemis army. You take whatever you want after you did this.
4
Tucker's example is bad, starting with that there are enough old men who get a young woman, especially the american way = with money. In general, what we forget regarding the Soviet Union is, that it was Russia who disolved it, because it didn't need those annoying blocker nations anymore. This was all a bit chaotic and did not work out well and it was utterly naive of the Russians to think, that NATO would be reasonable and disolve, too, but it's not like the Soviet Union was defeated.
3
Could simply stop sending money and weapons. Or even directly order it, since Zelensky is just an US puppet.
2
Why even invite a guest who has absolutely no clue of anything?
2
Will never happen, NATO got NOTHING to gain from this. Not even old NATO countries are allowed to get nukes, even less some extremist proxy which the USA wouldn't trust at all. On top of that, why should Ukraine even have to listen to NATO anymore when they got nukes? And obviously it's very likely that the fascisic coup regime won't surive forever, but the nukes would stay. And that's all coming before the obvious fact that Russia would intervene before this happens.
1
I mean, both guys, Hodges and the other general, tell the exact same ridiculous, reality denying nonsense, so this is clearly a script given to them.
1
You see the coup regime troops constantly abusing civil buildings and cars, even of red cross as cover an that since start. In western PR videos!
1
Can't avoid what already happened. Ukraine lost 2014, when it let a coup happend, that made it a puppet of NATO fascism, pushed it into civil war, ripped it apart by that and now escalated it to a point where it is not clear if it will survive as the broken state Ukraine at all. Not even by any of the military damage and losses of lives, but all the corruption and crushing debt.
1
Pretty much ANYTHING is dual-use. It's more a propaganda word used in both directions. When NATO is sending stuff meant to arm up, they say it's dual use to make it look like civilian goods. And when China is simply trading with Russia (and they obviously got a LOT of trade going on as neighbors alone and with China being the biggest economy in the world and Russia being the country with the most resources), NATO calls all of this dual use to make it sounds like China is arming up Russia. And that's just one example, but it's always the same. Overall, one thing typical for NATO propaganda is to blame its targets with what itself is actually doing.
1
What the Kiev regime presented looked more like another case of an anti air missile hitting the city - happens a lot when you hide your air defense inside these cities of course with the consequence that any interception will still lead to a crash in the city and any failure in your air defense system can quickly lead to it detonating in your city and killing people. One of the first videos of the SMO was just that, an anti air missile hitting a civil building - also sold as a Russian attack. Not even starting with clear false flag attacks like the attack on that train station - or later Bucha, when they tried to sell the victims of their 'cleansing' as a Russian warcrime, while it was their own warcrime. Or the S-300 missiles which went so far right off (if its wasn't done on purpose), that it hit Poland and killed two civilians there. Their anti air missiles failing and killing people happend so often, that they made up the fantasy story of Russia using anti air missiles for attacking ground targets. The video the regime showed did clearly not show the impact of an Iskander missile at all. There is enough real footage showing how a building looks like after an Iskander hit. They of course made up that nonsense about a cluster warhead, but that also makes no sense, you would use such cluster ammunition against buildings because it wouldn't be very effective at all, the building would just absorb the majority of the fragments - as you could see with the fragments of the anti air missile, which did destroy some glass here and there, but were not able to even get through the building walls and alike. A normal warhead meanwhile would extremely likely kill anyone within that building by destroying most parts of it, turning what is destroyed into deadly fragmenta and the standing part of the building channeling the pressure of the detonation.
1
@Marcel-tz9db None of these gifted Russia anything, at the very best Russia MAY have bought something from them = they paid for that. Meanwhile NATO pumped way over 100% of the Ukrainian GDP into their coup regime puppet, which is treating the Ukrainian population as cannonfodder without ANY regard for the furture of the country and the lives of its population. Western Ukraine is dead - and that not by Russian bombs and missiles but by endless debt. Meanwhile Russia got borderline not dept at all and that with NATO fascists stealing hundreds of billions of its money.
1
@ Rutte: the irony this coming from NATO, the mass murderes who kill more civilians than combatants in all their wars, without any care at all.
1
If even happening, it's simply a trade helping both sides. Russia keeps its stocks (and the idea that Russia would empty those over Ukraine is absurd, Russia of course knows, that western fascism is the real player behind this and Ukraine just some cannonfodder for it), while North Korea can sell weapons they won't use anyway (and get something of value in return plus political back up against US aggression, who can't of course mess with North Korea if Russia an/or China are involved). Else it would just be scrapped.
1
It's not irrational. It's fascism. Western fascism does not care for those Slavs nor all those other "subhumans". That's the reality behind all our propaganda. And don't be naive: they also see the majority of the western plebs as 'subhuman'.
1
They will not have to explain anything. The majority of people are blind and stupid, always have been. Nothing of this is new. It happens all the time - since centuries. And people learn nothing from it. Ever.
1
@MultipleMiggs88 Well, most of western stupids keep voting the warmongers into power, soooo....
1
The "all look alike" thing got some basis by a population that all got dark hair, not red, not blond and then when you for example got soldiers with all the same hair cut and uniforms or just in general very look-alike clothes, this quickly makes people much harder to distinguish. But that's an extreme and of course more something you got with a big mass of people you don't know.
1
@John_Pace Oh, the fault the US makes is electing these fascists to power over and over again (same for other western countries). The fascists DO get a lot of what they want. You see: no matter if that fails, they get richer, because they don't pay the bill: you do.
1
He's a fascist, what shall he do? Stop lying?
1
Stupid people think this is a video game and it's about some zerg rush to the anime base to win the map. What Russia is doing is strategically excellent. They hold a strong defense which can obliterate anything in front of it and at best sends in scout units. Yes, you get videos from drones attacks and alike, but that's 1% of what is actually happening. If you take all together, this is a war with around 2 million soldiers all together. How much have we seen of that? Not even 1%. The majority is not shown, but the numbers don't lie. If the Banderas regime woulnd't have horrible loses, there would be no reason for NATO to send in billion after billion in replacement and for the Banderas regime to have its thugs hunt down civilians on the street to force into uniform or to demand that NATO sends back the refugees.
1
Well, those were already sold - even more since Ukraine failed to make Russia collaps as planed. Overall the best tip for any Ukrainians now is to go in the Russian territory, since that part is protected from exploitation. The west will suck Ukraine dry.
1