Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "The 'Blyatmobile' - The Russian Turtle Tank" video.

  1. While this one looks worse, it's a smarter solution, because the Maus was FAAAAR too heavy.
    8
  2. A hit that make ammunition in the tank explode will kill the crew anyway. Guess what: humans are squishier than tank shells.
    6
  3.  @LeroxYT  The tanks at the front are mainly there to draw attention, force the enemy into reaction and at best survive. It doesn't really matter much if they can shoot or not, in comparison to the fire power all the artillery, bomber and co got, a tank is a weak hitter anyway.
    4
  4. You can see a tank anyway, especially when doing such missions, so profile doesn't matter at all, especially not when the tank itself isn't bigger. Damaging those added plates around it is doing nothing. And when you hit the tank, the plating will absorb energy and force the warhead to explode sooner, messing up a lot with the process that should destroy the tank.
    4
  5. It will obviously force mainy anti tank weapons to explode prematurely and will always take energy from the attack. Attacks against tanks are no certain success and everything in between will lower that even more.
    3
  6. "cope" is a word mainly idiots on the internet use to sound smart, while yelling loudly that they are not.
    3
  7. Extra armor is always good if there are no drawbacks. In regard of tanks this is mostly weight, but this extra armor isn't heavy. ATGSMs are by the way no wonder weapons which automatically destroy a tank if you fire at them and even if they it doesn't mean that it has to destroy the tank. And every little bit can change that.
    2
  8. That's the main points of those tanks anyway. They role in to force the enemy into action, the drones and so on spot the enemy and bomber, artillery, missile and drones do the attack.
    1
  9. Tanks are outdated anyway, They serve the role of "bullet catcher" still for such provoking assaults, but beyond this they got little meaning.
    1
  10.  @michaelccozens  Russia got hell lot of tanks. The numbers the notorious liars of the coup regime deliver are made up and far beyond reason and truth.
    1
  11. Tanks lost their importance a long time ago. Their firing range is simplay way too short. Range is everything in warfare, today more than ever. What is left for the tank are such suicide missions to force the enemy into action - so all the other forces can strike against them.
    1
  12. Anything that absorbs energy and covers up the target what makes it harder to hit weak point helps. And AT weapons are failing a lot to kill tanks. Extra protection just adds to it. You fall for propaganda, that only show you the success, not the 95% failure.
    1