Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Did Ukraine Change your Mind about Russian Tanks? @TheChieftainsHatch" video.

@redalertsteve_ Pointless to tell them that dead is dead, no matter where the turret goes.
11
@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized Well, even in that time range was always the number one superior trait.
10
@xaina222 BEFORE the endless billions from NATO fascism, yes. But without NATO you wouldn't even have had that coup.
2
Pointless to tell them. They are brainwashed idiots.
1
@paulbedichek5177 Their anti tank weapons are far better, yes.
1
@jonathanbaird8109 Kid, you are brainwashed and throwin a grenade into an empty tank is nothing special. The majority of destroyed tanks to you see are Ukrainian tanks, their own and sent from NATO. And yes, Russian weapon systems got zero problem to destroy them, why should they? It's as easy as destroy the Leopards and alike.
1
@COLT6940 You mean when shooting at goat herders who can only fire back with AK rifles, then go back into their green zone and have lunch in their own McDonalds, eh? Yeah, helps when you are just some Nazi army who slaughters people who can't fight back. The specialty of the USA - while still unable to actually win.
1
@rayquaza1245 Yeah, that's like bragging that you can beat up a five year old, mainly making your a psychopath Saddem was a western puppet, when his masters who had given him all these chemical weapons to attack Iran with, suddenly went against him, carpet bombing his country. None of the soldiers had even the will to fight this, when the US fascists just ran weeks of bombing campaigns to destroy the whole country. Russia could by the way do that, too, easily, they are just not mass murderous fascists like the USA.
1
@Mrstrangert392 Even on paper it wasn't bigger than Ukraine's forces, it had been at war with Iran and had a moral from pretty much zero, many fleeing the conflict or giving up with ZERO support from the outside. Ukraine would have been done for even faster and with much less destruction than the brutal mass murder the NATO fasscists commited against their former puppet, but NATO - as usual - kept Ukraine burning. Ukraine would have given up and wouldn't be a dead corpse, further and further raped by NATO.
1
@olafkunert3714 They obviously couldn't even beat Iran and that with all the support they got from NATO, including chemical weapons (yes, those were given to Iraq by the west).
1
@xsu-is7vq Also because the Iraqi army had close to zero will to fight back and no support at all from anyone. Take NATO fascism away and what is left of Ukraine? - Actually more than today, because then they would have given up, too and not be burned to the ground by NATO.
1
@allangibson8494 Russia NEVER gave ANY time of time table, kid. That nonsense comes from you Nazis, no one else.
1
@aymonfoxc1442 You clearly go no clue of both wars, that's the main problem.
1
@maxo.9928 There is no difference, when a giant Nazi army suddenly attacks you from behind with brutal carpet bombing.
1
@timonsolus Russia didn't want any of that violence, that was the point. That's why they wanted Minsk 2, but of course the idea that NATO fascism would ever go for peace is absurd. Odd that Russia still didn't learn that, but they likely think that we are normal people and not evil demons as proven since hundreds of years of world wide mass murder.
1
@xsu-is7vq So 80's tech is pin point destroying targets 1000km away?
1
@PaulVerhoeven2 By what meassure? When Russia started its intervention, it came in with how many soldiers? 150k? 200k? That's FAR less than what NATO fascism rolled in with an that with carpet bombing of the whole country from the very start, something Russia clearly is not going for, since it didn't want to destroy Ukraine - sad enough, nothing the NATO Nazis care for, who want to see Ukraine just as dead as Iraq.
1
@luna-hw9li It was a push over army and Ukraine itself would likely even have been smart enough to give up. Than NATO fascists came in and forced them to continue, ruining Ukraine forever. Oh, and regarding Ukraine: don't forget that by all teh carpet bombing, US fascism simply creaetd ISIS and kept burning down the whole middle east with it, having no plan beyond their mass murder, as usual.
1
@luna-hw9li There was zero support from NATO. NATO clearly wants to see Ukraine as dead as possible, that's what all the weapons are for. When you get in a streetfight and someone throws a knife into the ring, they don't want to see you win, they want to see blood and death. NATO would love to see Russia failing, but if this doesn't work, at least the death of Ukraine by their 'gifts' is the minimum they want to have. Of course without the eastern and southerin regions, pillaging Ukraine isn't that much of a good deal.
1
@SgtBeltfed Russia started with MUCH less soldiers than Ukraine had and still dominated it in every way to the point Ukraine would have given up. Then NATO came in, leading to the insanity to sacrifice the whole country, leading to rising Russian losses, sure, you can't have zero losses against hundredthousand fanatics fed with hundred billions in dollars by NATO, but way worse: detonating Ukrainian losses. Something NATO could never carry, if it where their own, but who cares about half a million dead Ukrainians, right? Clearly not the NATO Nazis.
1