Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Worlds largest Hyperloop Company GOES BANKRUPT!" video.

  1.  @trypich8121  Volume isn't even the main prob, but all the security parts. But of course it also gets more expensive by volume since it's no a videogame, so a big hole got more probs regardings it stability and so on than a small one and you have to show more effort to handle that.
    4
  2.  @potodds_trading  What is like selling someone a Porsche for 5k, but then just give them the match box version.
    2
  3. I hope this is not about that you would need a flat earth for it, because that's not the problem.
    2
  4. There isn't much of a point anyway to do that. It would make it 100 times more expensive for very little effect. From the problem a train at highi speed has to work wiht, air is one of the lesser ones. Overall you would only have to get rid of the air if you put the train in a tube, because there the air can't go anywhere. So the vacuum tube would solve a problem that wouldn't even exist without the tube.
    1
  5.  @matthewcoveney4380  In a vacuum you simply would have no fire, because it needs air to burn. Sad enough the lung does, too. How to get a crashed train out of it if you somehow manage to have a crash an not already everything shredded to pieces by the speed alone, well, yeah. You could of course just let air inside, but even the question would remain if it got the same problem as the Vegas 'loop' = simply no space. Overall the whole tube thing, vacuum or not, makes no sense and just makes the price detonated. And without the tube you wouldn't even need a vacuum, since when it comes to train in the open, air is the least problem. It only becomes one in a tube, where the air can't go anywhere. So even in theory and before all the other obvious problems, it's just stupid. It's something you would use on another planet or the moon, where you simply have no air and you would then run the train in a tube without care to pressurize it, but COULD if something happens and you need to save the passengers. That's a scenario where you could think about it, that you simply have a vacuum as natural environment.
    1
  6. Worst part is that they ate the idea of it being 10 times cheaper. You could in theory discuss many things about it. But the idea that it could be cheaper as a trainsystem is utterly absurd.
    1