Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Kherson Offensive at Standstill, US Weapons Stocks Depleted, EU Throws Money at Gas Crisis-Inflation" video.

People for some reason love that "momentum" word. No, you don't need to have or use momentum. if you plan is to surprise your enemy and use that to your advantage, you should of course use this to the fullest, but even then you still have to look out to not push too far and run right into a trap. Russia's strategy the last monthes is completely different, though and is all about wearing down the enemy without putting the lives of their own soldiers at unncessesary risk. You don't need momentum at all for that.
8
That wave plan would be absolute stupid (plus in deep disdain of human life...). Normally as defender you want to force the attackers into something like that, that they are not able to attack all at once and every part of your front. To do that on purpose as attacker is... absurd. And - everything aside how disgusting it is to just sacrifice the lives of your soldiers like that - to send in your worst soldiers last is the icinig on that cake of insanity.
4
@mayo911 Standard tactical behaviour to do that. Retreat from a hard to defend position, let the enemy come and counter attack it, simply summarized. People don't get, that the border areas of the Russian hold territory are not where the majority of its righting forces are. Just look a the range of used weapon systems and you may imagine how it really works. The line on the map is nor wall nor any other kind of defense line you have to or even can break through. It's the line behind which you get in range of way more weapon systems. To cross that line and 'capture' the area behind it isn't hard at all. It's just extremely dangerous.
4
It's pointless to just make some holes into a bridge. If you want to destroy a bridge you must damage/destroy the carrying structure at best to the point in which its own weight makes it crumble. Holes in any other part don't matter much at all.
2