Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Russia Reportedly Withdraws From Izyum, Deploys Troops to Ukraine in Response to Kharkov Offensive" video.

It's note even a 'clever' trap. Overall the fact alone, that these lines weren't defended well shows, that it's unimportant for Russia to hold that area. It was more just a simpe bait and they still fell for it. Overall it's likely that NATO simply gives a fuck about Ukrainian lives (and it seems more like they hope for getting rid of as many as possible, the less people Ukraine got, the easier it will be to suck it dry...) and the coup regime just blindly follows the orders of its master, while the military leaders of the Ukrainian army are silenced and have to follow order or be cut.
7
@pr0methian Tell your CIA propaganda officer to train you guys better, you got exactly one reply, it's dumb AND boring.
4
Reminds me of US fascism in Korean war, when they were pushed back by China and during the peace talks started to bombard Korean civilians even more, since it could bring them in a better position to get more land. Did not work by the way - beside causing the death of many thousand more civilians. Meanwhile a very good way to WORSEN your position in peace talks is to have not much of your army left because you sent it to the slaughter.
3
No, they were not. You are defeated when you hold against it, by that waste the lives of your soldiers, what Ukraine/NATO loves to do with the lives of Ukrainian soldiers (overall it seem that NATO just wants to thin out Ukraine's population...) and lose that fight. If you fall back to lure in the enemy to counter him with much less effort and danger for your own troops, that's simply what you call military strategy and tactics.
2
@maxmensch8910 What massives losses? You alwayys got losses, it's a modern war with weapons system that can fly or shoot up to 100s of km. It's not a video game that takes place on a 1qm km map and where your units all got some health bar and whatever.
2
@CloneDAnon Russia is 100% involved. They abuse Ukrainians as cannonfodder, but everything else is its war. And Ukraine can't win anyway, since even a win of NATO would be a total loss for Ukraine.
2
@lonestar1233 Ukraine's army even with NATO support got nothing in common with the situation back then...
2
Less opinion would work well, this podcast today wasn't a good one, here the reason. 1. I wonder how many terrible bad decisions were made in military and political history because "Oh no, that would be emberassing." 2. War isn't a videogame. It's not that if you just make the right decisions you will be an invincible wall that just marches forward. When Ukraine, which got much more soldiers and full NATO amasses forces in one point, it CAN of course push forwards. It's still a terrible mistake and disgustingly without care for the lives of their soldiers, but of course this will 'work' in regard of pushing in the wanted direction. 3. The idea, that the Russian leadership would think, that some militia is strong enough to push back heavenly armed forces is just ridiculous. They did not think that. No one sane would ever think that. That's the whole point of the withdrawal. If the enemy makes an offenense like that, you don't throw away the lives of your peopel and push against it, you fall back and counter. 4. Stop using words like 'emberassing' and 'disasters' especially in such an absurd way. It's a disaster for the Ukrainian soldiers who are sent to to their death for nothing. For Russia it's not even close to anything of a disaster - it would be one, if they would be so stupid to hold against it and waste lives for that. Moral? Moral of whom? Internet soldiers? Russia clearly does not care at all what some people on the internet think.
2
@tomdasilva2060 Yes... obviously.
1
@maxmensch8910 No one ever said that but the Ukro Nazi/NATO bots. Russia COULD crush Ukraine in a short time - if they simply would not care about ruining Ukraine and amassing dead civilians. But that's a NATO thing, not a Russian one.
1
@maxmensch8910 Of course a Nazi lover like you also loves NATO, after all NATO was created to continue the work of the Nazis under new leadership.
1
@pr0methian It's the same shit, child. They are one big fascistic, parastic network.
1
@krisvanderhoeven8614 Sure, kid, sure. Everything is just as easy as in your sunday morning cartoon, because anything else goes over your head so you just ignore it. Who cares about reality, facts and logic. Things are just as you want to see them - or as otheres want you to see them. My, what a wonderufl world this must be, where even the most stupid fantasy jsut comes true.
1
@littlepiggy6930 Your problem is, that you talk about the knive, while it's all about the cake. Area doesn't matter if it isn't linked to any special importance. What mattters is, how much you lose and how much you destroy. The actual bill here is not paid in 'area' but in 'equipment' and 'soldiers'. And Ukraines cost is already gigantic. Area? Without the equipment and the soldiers, all the area is meaningless.
1
@JimCOsd55 You can call it whatever you like, kid, overal fascism is just one of many words which explain the ages old system of the rich ruling over the poor. Capitalism is a 100% fascistic system for example and we, the whole 'free west' follow it by all bloody means.
1
Succesful would mean, that they took anything of worth to begin with. And even then you would have to count the costs for it, as you said. SInce Ukraine did not even get a prize, only the costs remain. It's absolut insane to call that a success as this point, it's the opposite.
1
@torgnyhansson7409 Sure, Nazi, sure, we know your lies....
1
@torgnyhansson7409 True, following your idea, they would simply not exister, after all the plan of you Nazis is to kill or displace them all. That's the sole reason behind the genocide going on since 2014.
1