Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Who's Winning on Ukraine's Battlefields in 2024 w@historylegends" video.

  1. War is not about taking land, but who got an army left. The one with the army left just takes anything he wants. In war itself you only take land if you have to if it serves a purpose for tactical or strategical reasons. That's not special or new knowledge but very, very old. In earlier times it was simply overall more important to move, because you got pretty low fighting range, so to attack something you had to go there, because even cannons got an effective firing range of some hundred meters, bigger ones maybe something over 1000m - what is a joke in comparison to today. Today you can easily bombard things 10, 20, 50 or even 500 KILOMETERS and more away from you.
    22
  2. You don't even know the words you use.
    2
  3. "The west only gives them a little bit every time" - the west sent them several full armies.
    2
  4.  @JDubya123  It interevened to enforce Minsk 2 after the illegal coup regime that couped against the democratic elected government not only started a civili war against all Ukrainians who showed resistance against the coup but also denied to follow the peace solution of Minsk 2, even after the UN ordered them to. Master behind that is of course NATO/the west, for which again it is just another try to pillage the richest country on this planet, like so many times before. That's why you never see western media, military or politicias ever talk about the lives of Ukrainiane people, espcially not eastern Ukrainian or Crimean, it's always about conquering Russia, taking it down - so the west can steal its resources.
    1
  5.  @i8Hardcore  You can't compare warfar then and now. The range of weapon systems changed a lot as does logistics. What people most forget about earlier warfare was the massive importance of convoys who simply dragged all the water and food along, being pretty much another, civilian 'army' just to keep the fighters alive. In times were most of this was transported via simple wagons and horses, distance quickly became a massive problem. Today with trains, ships, planes and of course millions of trucks, this became a much lesser problem. And as said: today you got weapon system which can destroy things 100s of km away, so you don't have to send a massive army there to cause vital damage.
    1
  6. It's not even too much information, since majority is missinformation anyway. Even if you take the actual information, it's only a small glimpse, at best something around 5%, the other 95% simply give you no material. This is a war with on both sides around 2 million soldiers since start, maybe a bit less, maybe a bit more. How many of those have you see on video or fotos? A few thousands? It's the same with those "frontlines" on the map, those colored areas. That's not the front. People treat it like if those are some fortified walls and if you manage to overcome those, you have conquered that area behind. Those borders on the colored maps are simply empty. It's zero problem to run in there. The problem is, to survive, because you are now in firing range of pretty much all system, not only the high range ones. The real frontline, especially of the Russian army, is far behind that and does not move much.
    1
  7.  @evilleader1991  Pretty sure Peter Griffin leads a much healthier life.
    1