Comments by "" (@williamlong2682) on "savagegeese"
channel.
-
768
-
234
-
68
-
49
-
16
-
9
-
9
-
The futuristic film analogy of the final thoughts is a great one. Hadn’t looked at it that way but it makes a lot of sense. This S Class, to me, represents what happens when an automaker gets too caught up in consumer trends and market pressure without any critical thought as to whether it actually makes for a better, easier-to-use, enjoyable-to-drive product. With so many other luxury automakers making the tech-everything dive, I wish Mercedes would put their foot down, take a stand, and approach their interiors with a “tech in moderation” mindset. It may not be giving their target market exactly what they say they want, but it would absolutely make for less distracting, more user-intuitive vehicles, especially in the long term (though yes, I know hardly anyone keeps these long term). Not holding my breath, though.
8
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
A constructive criticism if I may as a fan of the channel. In your passing mention of the Wagoneer, I would have appreciated a reference to a specific, concrete, verifiable and widely-documented powertrain issue with the Hurricane Inline 6 if you’re going to make a reliability critique. Otherwise, I would have liked that comparison to focus on other merits of the vehicles themselves, whether that’s other aspects of driving dynamics (ride, handling, cabin noise, fuel economy, etc.) or interior attributes (space, materials, design, features, etc.) or what have you. To simply take a passing swipe at Stellantis and their reliability reputation in the way you did I found to be unprofessional. Otherwise, I enjoyed the review overall and appreciated your specifics in your comparisons to the Expedition and GM full-size offerings.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1