Comments by "Brand131" (@Brand131) on "Paul Joseph Watson" channel.

For the journalist and the viewing public the content of whatever she said on stage isn't considered newsworthy. From their perspective she's simply a delusional person that disrupted the senate. As I said before, the editing on itself isn't meant to deceive. It's a practice that is sometimes used in journalism to better tell a story.
1
They probably didn't have a recording of what she said on stage either. They have to show her standing on the stage for to give her later statement context, but a mute video isn't something you want to give airtime too. So they combined the two clips to have a short to the point story that covers the essentials.
1