Comments by "Andrzej Barcelona FRLK" (@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416) on "What is Russia's plan for victory?" video.

  1. Except Ukraine was neutral before, no perspectives to be accepted to NATO , and as a result of the 'very special operation' Sweden and Finland are in NATO, 100 km from St.Petersburg, a border 1000+ km long (and Putin says 'No problem with that')
    5
  2. Not NATO. President Putin said it is ok when Finland and Sweden joined NATO, the border with Finland is only 100+ km from St. Petersburg...
    5
  3. Don't you know Vladimir Vladimirovich himself said that there's no problem with Sweden and Finland in NATO, a hundred km near to St.Petersburg? . Or are these "nato missiles" in the room with you?
    4
  4. Congratulations, great parody of putinist propaganda cliches.
    4
  5. To be included in NATO, Russia would need to meet some conditions, it was already tried. As it comes to what Russia is interested in, I wouldn't exclude too much.
    3
  6. No nukes in Poland and Romania, what are you talking about ? The same with Slovakia, Hu, Bułgaria, Baltic states, Dk, Finland, Sweden...and Norway(sińce 1949)?
    3
  7.  @mortanafidler  I understand you are not able to support your claim. Also, I'd like to point your view is simplified - eh Russia is the biggest country (surface wise) and it's dependent at present on China (P. R.).
    3
  8. @prostokeereell1286  Putin as well: 'Russia isn't going to use force against it's neighbours' about a month before the invasion. Then there was "denazification", when it didn't catch ("wasn't comprehended"), "desatanisation", Then the "new/conquered oblast's will be Russia" , later "the war isn't about the conquest". When Finland and Sweden joined NATO, "it is not a problem for us" (the same Putin or his double). You comprehend.
    3
  9. Really? President Putin said after Finland and Sweden joined NATO it's no problem. No problem with the dozen of countries that join the organisation before.
    3
  10. Good luck with the economy booming, do you mean food prices, reglamentation cards?
    3
  11. @Princip666  "Local trolls" - look who is talking ... Coming from you, it looks auto-irony.
    3
  12. @jimk3  I'm saying take Putin's Russia aggression into the perspective. It is the violation of several of the treaties, some he signed himself. Because of that Sweden and Finland joined NATO after the era of the neutrality.
    2
  13. ​ @evgeniya7853  You lack arguments , resorting to intent of insults .
    2
  14. It's not about NATO, president Putin himself said it's no problem when Finland and Sweden joined the alliance.
    2
  15. Vladimir Vladimirovich himself said it's OK when Sweden and Finland joined NATO , what are you talking about?
    2
  16. Did APN say Russia would lose resources ? I think he means the working force, production ability, personnel and equipment replacing etc
    2
  17. ​ @evgeniya7853  Have you got any actual argument/s?
    2
  18.  @ronniaj  Putin that said Russia isn't going to invade in February 2022, "There are no Russian Army soldiers" in Crimea and Donetsk in 2014 - "Их там нет ", "you can buy their uniforms in any uniform shop"...
    2
  19. What is the actual argument? if it is not too much to ask?
    2
  20. "NATO membership" bogeyman , here we go again
    2
  21. There are no regions of Russian population majority.
    2
  22. Perhaps because Ukraine was neutral before the war and you can see it was no thing to stop Putin / Russia from the aggression
    2
  23.  @AronAroniteOnlineTV  Please explain a little bit more , start with what is a coup, if it is not too much to ask
    2
  24. The fighting in Kiyv area and Kherson oblast' and most that continues in the east ?
    2
  25.  @name-os8kl  God bless you too, may have the Mercy.
    2
  26. Here we go again ... NATO has been bordering since Russia day 1 (and the Soviet Union since it's funding). Now when Sweden and Finland joined NATO, 1000+ km border, 100 km from St. Petersburg, president Putin says "no problem".
    2
  27. Slowly - it looks they are not able, Hostomel and Kherson... What do you mean by carefully? They don't care about rules of law / civilians , they don't care about their own soldiers and citizens ..
    1
  28. @iamaim2847  Oh, an "expert" - may be you can explain why despite the textbooks Russia struggle with insufficient vehicles numbers - tanks, IFVs, even cargo transport trucks? (It has been more than two years, three in February... and T-14 Armata isn't coming) What does 'Nazi' mean, according to you? Ever heard of Godwin's law?
    1
  29. @VeselySmertokog  With all due respect, it looks you ignore my reply just above yours, It's not about what you mentioned, mind eg Poland wanted to join both and was accepted, after several years/ decade, when complied with their conditions.
    1
  30.  @fisher123fisher  It makes sense, as long as Russia doesn't wage wars, of course. I think the balance of economic damage is opposite, you wrote yourself Russia lost the majority of their exports and will not be able to import (modern) technologies from anywhere else.
    1
  31. Russian putinist propaganda, how boring it is now, can't you come with anything else? Godwin's law looking at you.
    1
  32. Mind February 2014 and so on, February 2022 ...worth considering.
    1
  33. It looks you miss APN's point. BTW Non-NATO isn't the same as neutral.
    1
  34. ​ @cmanlovespancakes  Even if it were true , in 4 years Trump will not be the president anymore.
    1
  35. Excuse me, you confuse language use and nationality - easy examples are the USA, Australia, Canada speaking English (among other languages), Québec, Switzerland... Etc etc etc ...
    1
  36. Do you mean withdrawal to Russia in order to take care first about the problems at home?
    1
  37.  @lavague7648  What do Minsk agreements have to do to the bogeyman "NATO missiles at the borders"? BTW, EU wasn't a side in the M agreements , they were broken by Russia + Girkin people as well.
    1
  38. IF the "sister countries" lived that well, why Russia's aggression??
    1
  39. So much writing to put Russian propaganda. If you are interested at 3, APN made a video about it.
    1
  40. ​ @Unknown_Web_User  ​ None of those, afaik. "Nazi bombili Donbas" is scratched record of putinist propaganda , is this all you can come with? eg Which politicians ?
    1
  41. Here we go again, "Nazi putsch" propaganda that aged like milk. Care to elaborate on Wagner Group?
    1
  42. Could you list the countries the US "has politics control" and these where has not? In Germany...no comment
    1
  43. Almost is a big difference - the solution was found without invasion or 'little green men'. Ukraine hasn't been " invited ", in the first place. BTW, I cannot see Mexico or Canada be that stupid, so no worries.
    1
  44. You don't pay attention , APN made a video about that (the "vicious lie" as you put it, emitted by Russia (Putin) TV)
    1
  45. ​ @evgeniya7853  Name one Hungarian unit in Wehrmacht. None.
    1
  46. NATO scratched record. Ukraine isn't (wasn't) NATO member or even an associate.
    1
  47.  @AronAroniteOnlineTV  These guy from YouTube have algorithms to do that work, but I don't think the problem is with a definition of a coup .
    1
  48. APN does watch M. Katz (among others), they had an interview here.
    1
  49. Isn't it Don't Bus ? Would Putin consider chairman Xi take care about the Chinese minority eg in 海参崴, Hǎishēnwǎi?
    1
  50.  @Princip666  "Local trolls" - look who is speaking.
    1
  51. ​ @onebronx  I don't think Russia is able now to think about Odesa anymore - too weak. Mind that most of the pressure is in the east now and it's not very successful.
    1
  52. I'm sure president Putin knows that too many have died and stil continues the mad aggression...
    1
  53. Are the sewers overflowing in Olgino now?
    1