Comments by "Andrzej Barcelona FRLK" (@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416) on "Naval war is back after grain deal collapse" video.

  1. Now it's not about (blitz) progress in terrain, but mostly about attrition (soldiers, artillery, ...). APN talked about Ukraine's offensive in the other video of his.
    4
  2. Ships aren't going *for now*, ok, what's going to happen when they start to go ? especially Turkish or Chinese ones?
    3
  3.  @claus-not-santa  I think that Ukrainians proved they aren't wooden pawns and can arrange un/ loading (after reinforcing air defence) in their ports.
    3
  4. I read the first ship sailed / arrived in Ukrainian port . AMS1 , IL
    3
  5. Three ships at the moment: Israeli, Greek, Turkish-Georgian flags
    3
  6. True colours, right. But I'd say Russia has no friends: they dominate some countries, Iran just is in similar position, and China ...may be already making Russia a vassal, behind nice words.
    3
  7. In fact some part of Ukrainian grain is being exported via Poland and Romania, however, transport by land is not efficient enough because of the quantity/volume (imagine by air!), there's also the difference in gauge - the rail cars undercarriage has to be adjusted when crossing UA border.
    3
  8. Everything's going according to the plan? 😆
    3
  9. What is a "lie" here pls?
    3
  10. Poland and Romania do help on transfer, but railway is not that efficient as maritime transport , so it is a bottleneck ...helps a little but doesn't solve the problem.
    3
  11. There are 2 separate things : importing by Poles the grain to sell it in internal market / use it within Poland and transporting Ukrainian exports to other countries through Poland (transfer) It is the first that is blocked now, not the latter. However, transport by land isn't efficient compared to maritime, so it is a fraction of all the volume. The same goes for Romania, I think they're rushing with building infrastructure to use waterway.
    3
  12. Land transport is far less effective/efficient, unfortunately. However some part of Ukrainian grain was exported this way.
    3
  13. I think it is being done, but getting the grain there by land makes it slow (bottlenecks on the borders, the gauge...) The same goes for Poland and it's ports (even further distance😓)
    3
  14.  @claus-not-santa  Red and white, incidentally 😅
    2
  15. It's 6 ships today and 10 more are coming. they're managed by Turkiye.
    2
  16. ​ @claus-not-santa  To Izmail (I thought I'd answered yesterday, but the post isn't published)
    2
  17. What nuclear bombs? ? You're mistaken.
    2
  18. S. Hersh published one person's story without verification, but with some errors, so I wouldn't rely on that. e.g. what would be the reason to smuggle anything via ship inspected by Russian officials, when having land and air connections with Europe?
    2
  19. ​​ @davidsphere I'm not questioning the achievements of S. Hersh of Vietnam war era, but his errors in present work
    2
  20. ​ @davidsphere What is the "lie" pls?
    2
  21. What?
    2
  22.  @SianaGearz  Poland wants more monet? Where do you know that grom, please ? There is political play as it comes to importing grain into Poland, but I haven't heard about ... negotiating price for transfer. Poland gave Ukraine a lot of equipment and fuel , so it is surprising for me.
    2
  23. ​ @claus-not-santa  It looks China don't want to import all the grain they need from Russia. Wise.
    2
  24. Transports of weapons (what kind?) and Russia did nothing? It doesn't add up together .
    2
  25. That is ?
    2
  26. Has Putin accomplished anyone of the goals he talked about ? Kiyv? It was last year and finished as it finished. Odesa? Tell me - how? 😅
    2
  27. What happened in 1945 ?
    2
  28. It looks from holidays 😅 even more appropriated!
    1
  29.  @davidsphere  Presuming is presuming. What information is to be omitted, pls?
    1
  30.  @davidsphere  I'm asking about information, not "suggesting"
    1
  31.  @davidsphere Information you may find of interest The “anonymous US official” supposed to be briefing Hersh used a Russian expression (мальчик в трусиках) that English speakers don’t use. 😂
    1
  32. The transfer of grain isn't blocked, some countries blocked (temporary) the import to their markets. 3. It us not happening, but it may change. 1 re: torpedoes - it is possible for Russia to shoot of course , as is receive eg a neptun missile, that's APN's point, I think.
    1
  33. Is that you, Steven Seagal ? 😅
    1
  34. ​Was fertilizer sanctioned at all? @claus-not-santa Where did you get the 3% from, pls?
    1
  35. It doesn't add up together . Transports of weapons (what kind?) and Russia said and did nothing? BTW Poland etc stopped the grain import for now because of their farmers, not "pesticides ". Transfer continues. I think you're confused about Minsk (2) agreement/s ?
    1
  36. Not that "quickly" as the other time- may take more than 6 (9?) months.
    1
  37. ​ @gambaridup  Are you saying Russia didn't know what to do with 20 mln t? 20+% of its production ??
    1
  38. Yo tengo un requerimiento que me paguen un millón de francos suizos, ¿lo cumplireis ? Países africanos compraron lo que habían querido , algunos , por ejemplo Líbano no han querido. China compró más. Lo de armas en los barcos - Vladimir Vladimirovich no ha dicho nada de esto , ¿de dónde lo sacaís?
    1
  39. What else could APN do for you? Dance kozachok during the video? Sing Kalinka instead of his observations?
    1
  40. ​​​ @michaelk5507 What isn't true in the video ? BTW, do you think that label changes the content?
    1
  41.  @michaelk5507  Label changed perception is usually overcome when you grow up, of course manipulation techniques exist. How APN is spinning, according to you? To be neutral is another thing than to be objective. Who is neutral? The pope isn't, DalaiLama probably either ...
    1