Comments by "Andrzej Barcelona FRLK" (@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416) on "Mobilization, annexation and nuclear weapons" video.

  1. What promises?
    3
  2. You rather write it to Putin , perhaps some rubles...
    3
  3.  @tuehojbjerg969  I think Adam A is a troll. eg Logistics problems solved by the mobilization (the drivers will make appear more trucks?) "Russia not affected in the economic war" ...
    3
  4. Any proof pls?
    3
  5. "Excuse" of half a year of time passed and the situation developed?
    3
  6. I'm not sure about the KiA dead, unless other like DNR LNR quasi republics militia are added, but anyway the number is growing, hence the intent of mobilisation. On the other hand, the number of wounded is higher, I think. Then , the captured or surrounded PoWs. Then, the economy and long term effects on the society. Altogether, I agree Russia is on its way to a disaster.
    3
  7. RLY? Are you serious or is it an intent of satire?
    2
  8. How come you don't remember what happened earlier than a month ago ?
    2
  9. Poe law applied?
    2
  10.  @keithmorgan3295  Poe's law applied 😂
    2
  11.  @tomk3732  Will you apply the same to the Chinese parts of Russian Federation? BTW, are there any sources for the referendums you mentioned? Were there any about the Soviet Union republics?
    2
  12. Russia wins what ? So far it's on the way to military fail at least, economic disaster and preparing demographics disaster for its people...
    2
  13.  @tomk3732  what's your opinion on Chinese territories in Russian Federation ?
    2
  14.  @tomk3732  You haven't answered the question. Instead you bring Alaska , which was sold by Russia to the US, should Alaska be bought back?
    2
  15.  @tomk3732  What "Spanish possessions" were gained by the US in North America?
    2
  16. Andi Mcc, What about the losses, tens of thousands killed, many more wounded?
    2
  17.  @andimcc6131  I think the vision of comfortable rotating the troops in the front isn't realistic. Apart of that almost half of the planned 'new' soldiers will have to fill the place of those lost, the 'old' ones who stay will have to provide training to the 'new' units, so the that idea cannot work.
    2
  18. I think you're not able to prove it.
    2
  19.  @andyfreeze4072  6000 no way, may be somewhere in between, around 30 thousand? I mean usually there are more of the wounded than those killed. Anyway, I agree with you the picture for Russia and it's soldiers is dark, because of the reasons you mention.
    2
  20.  @tomk3732  Poe's law applies 😂
    1
  21. It didn't end well for the Russians in March.
    1
  22.  @tomk3732  I know there are , the thing is what @Imperial Diecast is pointing: it is not Russians in Russia who should decide ( less one old man in Kremlin) . Also, you haven't answered the question about the question about Chinese territories - or is it it's the people there who decide , not somewhere far from there ?
    1
  23.  @hedgehog3180   @Mikhail Belkin  trying to compare Cuba and Ukraine as parallel, However, the difference is there were Soviet missiles in Cuba and there wasn't a war, while there aren't Nato's missiles in Ukraine and there's a war.
    1
  24. Mind it's half a year later, the situation is much different, it's stil partial mobilisation (whatever its effect may be)
    1
  25. APN is talking facts. You're talking visions that are detached, any attack on Europe means quick end of Russia, Putin is not stupidly suicidal.
    1
  26.  @helgardtmuller3254  What arguments do you mean ?
    1
  27. Who is us/ we ? and where could you hear or see these points?
    1
  28. I don't know where you took the number from, but as it comes to the equipment, it's not enough even for the present number of troops, the losses cannot be replaced.
    1
  29. I think these bloggers are 'proxies' of rival power sides.
    1
  30. I think the desinformation and pacification have limits - when people see it is them who pay (for nothing), they eg flee the country.
    1