Comments by "Andrzej Barcelona FRLK" (@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416) on "Grain deal stand-off shows Russia's maritime weakness" video.

  1. You derailed off the track already at the beginning. APN mentiones it at 6:06
    9
  2. Could you provide the data to back up your statement ? Hasn't the grain price go down ?
    7
  3. Thanks for your analysis or should I say synthesis 🤝 😀
    5
  4.  @Princip666  Could you provide evidence pls?
    5
  5. @Anders Puck Nielsen  Sir, have you added 'maritime' (weakness) in the headline of the video? or it is my memory playing tricks?
    5
  6.  @slaphappyduplenty2436  Thanks, but I don't have kopeyky / rubles account 😭 DKK Danish kroner neither 😂 I hope the comments are good for YT algo_rithm
    4
  7. APN didn't say that naval blockade wouldn't look bad. He didn't say that Turkiye forced Russia into deal, he said they called Russia's bluff. Russia joined back the deal because it would be embarrassing not to be in and not to be able to countre it at the same time (=be helpless and be seen as such) if I understand well
    4
  8. Yes (his videos are fake)
    4
  9.  @seancidy6008  Does Macgregor talk about * how trained * these reserves are? about the lack of NCOs and officers for new units? How more manpower can influence the problems of logistics? And of equipment? Communications? Command? Airforce?
    4
  10. Discipline - I cannot see how cannon fodder can favour Russian army, I can see how disastrous will be the effects of the losses in long term in the society of Russia Federation - like after Afgan war or worse. Sad.
    4
  11.  @seancidy6008  What do you mean by "easily trained"? ( btw more than drafted in Sept/October, from Moscow, Siberia or St. Petersburg, escaped the draft and left Russia to abroad). There's a question: Who would train the next pool of the reservist?(mind the reform of Serdyukov). Who will be their NCOs and commanders? Above all of that, the previous problems remain: (lack of) the equipment, logistics, etc, etc ... Thousands nor millions of manpower don't solve them, may make them worse. BTW at the beginning of the invasion Russian professional troops did have advantage and it wasn't enough.
    4
  12.  @seancidy6008  I think you overestimate the training Russian conscripts received, eg expired food rations, reserve tanks kept without valuable parts (engines!), missing millions of (winter) uniforms - do they indicate anything ? So far Russian big offensives were only partially successful only at the beginning of the invasion ...
    4
  13.  @anderspuck  Thank you very much for your reply. It is more exact this way, indeed (although I liked the general impression the previous one was projecting 😂) And thank you for all your work, I learn a lot from your videos. Tak! *871@22..34
    4
  14. There's also a question of the short and middle term effects of the missing thousands on the crippled economy and society (this in present, unlike that I mentioned before) There are eg reports where out of 26 doctors in a hospital, 11 were drafted...
    3
  15.  @seancidy6008  I think it's not probable (depuis d 24 Feb toutes proportions gardées ) Like US, China isn't happy about that.
    3
  16. Well, I think if you needed the grain you would consider changing your relation
    3
  17. It's a result of Russia's decisions and actions. 🇺🇦🤝🇵🇱
    2
  18.  @hyhhy  OK, Each to his/her own.
    2
  19.  @seancidy6008  Good point , Never say never but invasion was meant to gain something, but in the case of nuclear weapon here... I can't see gains, rather many downsides instead.
    2
  20.  @seancidy6008  Kiyv, KHarkiv, Donbas, KHerson ... I see you are believer of lenin-stalin dogma "quantity changes into quality", but mobilisation 8 months after starting the war will not bring new pilots, tank commanders, VDV airborns etc etc etc
    1