Comments by "josh72456" (@josh72456) on "Top 10 Differences Between The LOTR Movies and The Rings of Power" video.

In media form I have to pick the LOTR trilogy due to nostalgia and of course was well crafted. I read the book later which I like now The Hobbit trilogy I think there were choices that felt safe if Guillermo Del Toro didn't leave though he agreed to the Hobbit in 2 parts then it might have been more interesting visually. They did credit him as story writer in An Unexpected Part but once Peter Jackson took directorial role well that was a safe choice again and then was expanded into a trilogy. I read the book beforehand so I kinda thought why, even though the 2 parter idea Del Toro took part of but I know it was for monetary reasons mostly to expand the story. I think first part is ok and the rest more lacklustre. Rings Of Power I find interesting but it's only been 6 episodes I like some storylines but a few I think dialogue and character development are ok. The Silmarillion I didn't finish reading since last chapter I was familiar since that intro was in The Fellowship of the Ring film. The Lord Of The Rings The Ralph Bakshi version let's say it was experimental what they'd done given it was the first adaptation of that story.
4
@dagger1580 Well the first Hobbit film was ok I think and the same with Rings Of Power.
1
@idathomasdotter9806 I mean I think An Unexpected Party is ok and yes the rest were more lacklustre I find. Rings Of Power I mean it's visual at least but yeah ok I think also.
1