Comments by "Robert Turner" (@turnerfamilyinozi) on "Mick Mulvaney: "Democrats Will NEVER See Trump's Tax Returns"" video.

Please explain your comment.
3
@DirtyRedMuzik Let's assume you are right and I have a lack of reality. Please explain your comment.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Beautiful. Now show some evidence.
1
@commonsii6075 Correct, so what is wrong with checking out the facts? If we can discover the truth then everybody will be satisfied. Don't you agree?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Not interested in the Steele dossier, it is not relevant. The Mueller report is relevant and I want to see it regardless of what it has say. Do you?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik For something that is not important you seem to be making a big fuss over it. Mueller has said nothing of the kind either way. All we have is Barr's interpretation and he is acting like Trump's personal attourney and not the USA's leading fighter for justice and the rule of law. Which is, of course why Trump hired him. Everybody agrees with border security, but it should be done within US law, and not by Trump ignoring the rule of law. (Hang on is there a theme here). But at least we can agree that Trump is destroying destroying the environment by getting rid of regulations that prevent companies from polluting and ignoring climate change.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik In backwards order, as a I have said (hopefully while debating you) that I will accept the report when I have seen it. (PS We have never heard from Mueller on anything). More importantly, yes we have been destroying the environment for decades if not longer. Obama did much, mainly through executive orders to stop companies polluting the air, land and water. Trump has rescinded many, if not all, to allow companies to make extra profits at the expense of the environment, human health and consequently lives.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Do with agree Trump rescinding environmental restrictions or not?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik The BBC reported on on 6th Dec 2018 that Trump had rolled back more 100 environmental regulations.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik You have had a day to digest Trump's environmental record. What is your reaction? Are you are partisan who does't care about what Trump does or do you have ethics and morals?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik No i didn't see the link. I can only suggest you google "Trump's environmental roll backs" to see a multitude of different sources. If you care for the environment you will be alarmed, If you care more for Trump, then you will make excuses or go into denial.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Where is it? I read the whole article again and are not sure what you are talking about. If you have evidence that the article is wrong please provide your source.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Now that we have settled the fact that Trump is disastrous for the environment which you care about lets discuss climate change. You appear to be an environmentalist who refutes human made climate change. (Is that an oxymoron?). If so what is the cause of our present climate change?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Where are you posting those reports? If you belief in human made climate change why are opposed to the Paris Climate Accord.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Thanks for your patience. But this the first time I've seen the website. Lets assume the BBC were lying through their teeth (unlikely) but the Sabin site says 78 environmental regulations were overturned. Do you think that this is acceptable?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Several thoughts. 1) The oil and coal industries have made vastly more than 3 trillion dollars while causing climate change so they should be able to fund the transition. 2) If done correctly it will not cost any jobs as there will a transition from fossil fuel jobs to renewable jobs. 3) What will happen it the US doesn't implement climate change policies. 4) China and India are implementing climate change policies. 5) Do you support Trump's environmental policies?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Just google Trump's environmental rollbacks and have a look.What is more important to you the environment or Trump?
1
@DirtyRedMuzik 1) They have profited from it, while knowing the truth since the 70's and put out propaganda and paying politicians to lie for them. But there are other ways. Stop subsidising them and start subsidising renewable energy. Nett cost will be zero. 2} No maybe you can't, so you start with those that are willing. The rest can remain with their industries until they both go into retirement. 3) No the world won't end. Some organisms will adapt and thrive, while the majority will become extinct, though I don't think humans will. But the costs of dealing with climate change will be greater every year. They could well be wars over food and water. 4) Yes, but at least India is trying. Generally when people talk about Beijing in a political sense they mean China. 5} What happens if we don't try.
1
@DirtyRedMuzik Then you should do more research into environmental rollbacks and climate change and what you can do to help protect your family. My wife and I will be dead along with our cats and dogs before the worst happens. But I fear for my daughter and her generation. I think we are are on the same side, the difference being, I am certain about climate change while you appear to be not too sure. PS I agree with you about certain relatives.
1