Comments by "Robert Turner" (@turnerfamilyinozi) on "Leaders 'went out of their way to scare us' at climate change summit" video.

  1. 6
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8.  @jakeg3296  Their standard line is that the climate has always changed, so yes it is a coincidence My brother who is an avowed climate denier, believes that it is because the scientists are in it for the money. (You can see a similar thread here where they claim the activists are in it for the money). They are all in on a conspiracy. When I point at that if a few of them come and show how the figures are fudged they will be instant millionaires he tends to go silent. You next two questions are tied together. The fossil fuel industries, who know that climate change is real, are taking a leaf out of the tobacco lobby's playbook. Dispute the science for as long as you can, while making as much money as they can in the interim. Conservatives who tend to be more pro corporation than liberals are the obvious target for bribing by way of political donations. You can check this by going to 'Open Secrets' which tracks political donations. To complete the trifecta you get Rupert Murdoch who is very conservative to push the fake global warming claim. Murdoch owns Fox News in the US and Sky News in Australia plus many newspapers including the Australian. You can see the effect of this propaganda by the comments posted. When Fox talks about global warming you will see exactly the same type of comments. Therefore people who only or mainly use Murdoch media only get the anti climate change view. You have probably seen my comments asking them to explain exactly what is causing the present change. I get very few responses because it could lead them to change their world view and that is very daunting. The few replies are very easily refuted and then I never hear from then again. To prove my points I tend to use organizations like NASA, Scientific American, Berkley Earth etc. I never use IPCC because they believe it is in on the conspiracy. Anyway that is my view and I don't think I'm too far from the truth. But thanks on two counts. One, I will save this post and use a modified version when conversing with deniers. Two, its nice to be able to converse with someone with common sense.
    2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1