Comments by "MrCarGuy" (@MrCarGuy) on "" video.

  1. 8:34 Uh, what? You are driving on a perfectly smooth warehouse floor.
    25
  2. It is classified as an autocycle because it wouldn't come close to passing any NHTSA or IIHS crash tests (maybe small overlap if the outboard wheels are counted in the width, but that's it). If they rugpull again don't be surprised.
    7
  3. It's not safe compared to any other modern vehicle. If you're hit by something like a Model S, or especially the new Hummer EV, you're dead.
    3
  4. Vaporware that will kill you in any real collision with something like a Tesla
    2
  5. ​ @chkndnts  The entire operation is dubious. Just as Elio Motors. Just as the original Aptera company that refused to refund refundable deposits
    2
  6. ​ @themogus When this thing has even the most minor collision the entire car is totaled. Inherent to the design. And that's assuming you would even survive hits from any car that isn't classified as an "autocycle" to avoid safety testing (because they wouldn't pass).
    2
  7. ​ @themogus It's called good PR. I know. Crazy concept! Tesla also provided repair manuals. Even Apple appeased the right to repair crowd because it's the socially popular trend.
    2
  8. ​ @DrTeeHenry It's very different from any other modern vehicle, and not in a good way. It would not pass safety regulations for four wheeled vehicles.
    2
  9. If you think this is safe against almost anything else on the road you fail to understand physics
    2
  10. ​ @greenbergp Imagine believing this. The reason why they designed it with a single rear wheel was primarily to avoid the cost of complying with those pesky safety standards. Two rear wheels would be negligible for range and spaced any distance apart. Regulation also varies based on state. Their internal safety testing wouldn't be biased at all compared to NHTSA or IIHS testing. Right? Of course, they could just have those agencies do the testing "unofficially" anyway because it's so safe, right? Nothing to fear. Right?
    1
  11. ​ @GoClimbARockEh It's going to be hilarious if the IIHS or NHTSA decides to test one against a normal car to show people how unsafe this design is. Shills will squirm
    1
  12. ​ @GoClimbARockEh As soon as those agencies receive info from the horrific accidents against other cars on the road I'm sure they will. Assuming they ever make it to production
    1
  13. ​ @GoClimbARockEh Internal safety testing isn't biased at all!
    1
  14. ​ @madmotorcyclist The impact will be distributed to your body, where it will kill you from blunt force trauma
    1
  15. ​ @ubaldinovega5775 Just an example. Do I need to list all the vehicles on the road with a similar mass?
    1
  16. Best you'll get is dubious internally-approved crash test footage and not anything trustworthy like from the NHTSA or IIHS
    1
  17. ​ @GoClimbARockEh They refunded nothing to the vast majority of reservation holders. It was a rugpull operation. You are a shill. If these are ever sold the horrific videos from accidents will turn that around quickly. Internal safety tests hold no credibility.
    1
  18. ​ @GoClimbARockEh The mass plays a huge role but it's more than that: Rate of deceleration, movement, etc. Do some research. NHTSA or IIHS have resources. Your body is mush if you're hit by something like a Hummer EV vs in a Model 3
    1
  19. ​ @GoClimbARockEh I answered the question perfectly. The mass plays a huge part but it's multifactorial. There are no sufficient crumple zones around the vehicle to control the rate of deceleration. The body can't handle it. Keep coping and shilling!
    1