Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "TomDark" channel.

@SkunkApe407 The Emirates are Muslim countries, Jordan is Muslim country, Indonesia is Muslim country, Malaysia is a Muslim country and I can name more. All are stable and all received millions of refuges in total. Even Saudi Arabia and Iran would be counted as a stable Muslim country and yes, refugees do enter them , though a lesser extent for obvious reasons.
11
Not a valid question at all as the stable Muslim countries do take in millions of refugees.
10
@SkunkApe407 LOL. Iran and Saudi Arabia are secular🤣🤣 ? Even the ones that are not a theocracy like Iran is far from secular, Malaysia for example have religious department and sharia court for crying out loud .
4
@icysisdee9547 Jordan is already housing over 700K refugees. Google Jordan's GDP and total population, it doesn't take a genius to figure the answer to your question.
4
I dislike Hasan Piker, but isn't Asmongold the one who is hitting a new low here?
4
@Roach2137 I suggest you goggle the movement of refugees. Yes, they do.
3
@artair70 If you read or study history you would have heard this thing called the Islamic Golden Age, but alas you don't.
3
@d33pblu3 That puzzled me too. I get going to greener pastures like Germany or France, but Belarus and Poland isn't really an upgrade from your standard Middle East right wing dictatorship.
2
@SkunkApe407 Two mistake on your part. Iran never been secular since The Revolution. Its goal have alway been to uphold and spread its version of Islam across the region. Saudi , while actually being more secular than Iran, contrary to you false belief, was steadfast in its own version of theocracy as it tied to their identity as warden of Holy sites . So you already failed in denying these are not Islamic state. Again, even the non theocratic Muslim nations counts as Muslim countries as their entire identity, culture and even governance are closely tied to their Muslim faith. Your second mistake is tying stability with being a US ally. China, Iran and NK for example are very stable countries despite the furthest from being US allies.
2
@jesse8250 You can literally google each country's name and the number of refugees they've taken in. That how I found out Jordan have over 700K refugees and Saudi Arabia around 450K.
2
@SkunkApe407 Did you look in the mirror before posting that? You're the one who poste ridiculous claim such as Iran not being theocracy and how there is no stable Muslim countries. Here is another hint for you, if a country have an official religion and government funded religious departments , that country isn't secular.
2
@SkunkApe407 I suggest you google what secular and secularism means because you seem to not know their definition.I guess someone lack the education and intellect to ven use a dictionary. Both Saudi Arabia and Emirates are Muslim countries and proudly declared themselves as such . What the Emirate isn't is a theocracy. In Iran and many Muslim countries economic system is influenced by religion ,for example Islamic banking don't use usury . You don't seem to understand what being Muslim country mean. I wonder what country as Muslim country in your book, if you even read books.
2
@SkunkApe407 Thank you for finally admitting my points that government system don't need to be 100% "Islamic" for it be Muslim country or even a theocracy . After all the US is classified as a flawed democracy and yet is still recognised as one.
2
@SkunkApe407 Why the heck you namedrop the bumbling idiot Trump out of the blue? Many Muslim country can have deep ties to the West, that does not disqualify them from being Muslim countries. Similarly a theocracy don't have to micromanage everything according to their strictest religious interpretation . Not all theocracy is the Taliban . You should stop claiming intellectual high ground if you can't grasp basic concept such as this.
2
@bzipoli You're confusing immigrants with refugees. Both countries still holds million of refugees within their border. It seem to me people here do confuse refugees with immigrants a lot.
2
@GigachadGggsskj Pre-Islam Arabia was a place where female babies were buried alive . Yeah, Islam was a major upgrade.
2
@artair70 How to tell us you flunked history class without saying you flunked history class .
2
@artair70 Learn to read. Credible historians unanimously agrees that the coming of Islam to region uplifted humans rights there , especially the treatment of women in the region . There never was a glorious pre-Islam days in that region as insinuated by the guy I was replying to.
2
@artair70 Explain to me how Pre-Islam Arabia was better then.
2
@artair70 Yep, you're definitely no historian .
2
@artair70 Again, your lack of historical knowledge e shows when you ignore literal thousands of years of history .You do realise Islam came to the region over 1400 years ago , right?
2
@artair70 Again, compare the region pre Islam to after . Your lack of history acumen is really showing.
2
@artair70 Those rose because of the arrival of Islam. There were reason it was called the Islamic Golden Age and not Iraqi and Egyptian Golden age.
2
@artair70 And the science the Greek took from India and Persia were originals? It seem you are also ignorant of science if you think science isn't built upon foundation laid by their forefathers. That standard also apply to even the science and tech that allow you to write you semi bigotic post behind the anonymity of a throwaway alt account. By your logic the Romans too are unimpressive because it have been thousand of years since anyone from that region have done anything relevant.
2
@artair70 LOL. Europe plunged into centuries of Dark Age after The Roman Empire fell, there was nothing to be built upon. The tech Renaissance were due to rediscovery of science preserved and expanded by the Islamic civilization . Even novice history buffs would school you on this one.
2
Obviously Tom Dark didn't watch the last GoTG movie if he thought Rocket was funny in that one.
1
The first I ever heard of Of Cowardly Crowder was when he ran away from debating Potholer54 . The then do that again and again when he ran away from debating people like Seder who came to debate him .
1
@d33pblu3 I too find it puzzling that those refugees tries to enter Belarus or Poland considering those countries are just as backwards and stable as the one in Middle East . Those trying for the greener pasture of Western Europe, those one are is obvious.
1
@icysisdee9547 No country wants refugees, but everyone with a brain can easily see how country with 11 million people and is already housing 700K war refugees is not excited about receiving more. I mean just look at Jordan's GDP.
1
@jesse8250 Learn to read. I said Poland and Belarus aren't .
1
@popepisspot1675 I can't think of single nice or kind thing I can say about Hasan Piker , The least offensive thing I can say is he's a hypocrite. I leave it at that.
1
@TallicaMan1986 And how is that relevant to what is argued here? No one said they have great human rights .
1
@TallicaMan1986 Being charitable towards your fellow human being in need isn't good thing in your book?
1
@ronmastrio2798 Every country that could should take in refugees if they could , richer and better of countries like in Western Europe and the US should pull their weigh more. You should suggest more international cooperation and coordination rather go the bigot route.
1
@TallicaMan1986 The idea that rich G7 countrie can afford to accepts them or their laws and ideologies are so backwards and regressive that they can't handle refugees is "hilarious" . Especially countries like Canada and US that is built upon migrants with differing culture than the natives. Too many post here reek of bigotry and racism. Define "integrate" . Refugees don't up uproot themselves an risk their live and limb on the line because it convenient for them. Unless that country is heavy on persecuting people , then why does culture and faith matter to refuges ? Canada already got inverted when the Europeans came there hundreds of years ago.
1
@drewdj45 Thanks for being transparently racist,mr bigot.
1