Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "Elon Musk FLAILING as Twitter Takeover Ruins Him | The Bulwark Podcast" video.

  1.  @glennjanot8128  Funny that he doesn't' seem to grasps that concept with Twitter.
    7
  2. And carried that company to success, the EV industry is littered with carcases of failed EV startups.
    2
  3. I agree.
    1
  4.  @mattmarkus4868  Let me tell this as former Elon Musk fanboy who now despises the man. There are plenty of good reason to strongly dislike Elons Musk. Just because he was successful with Tesla and Space X doesn't make him any less of a POS humans being.
    1
  5. Starship is their effort at making rocket cost effective. Starship have the possibility of reducing the cost of access to space from the current a few thousand dollars/ kg with the cheapest option , which is the Falcon 9, to less than a hundred dollars/kg.
    1
  6.  @bosoerjadi2838  I already did, both of them are rife with errors and cherry picked data that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. For example Phillip Mason exaggerated the cost of Falcon 9 launches while severely undercuts the cost of platform like the Space Shuttle, while Common Sense Sceptic doesn't' seem to fully understand that methane is far cleaner fuel than jet fuel and rocket grade kerosene, metahsn can be made to be carbon neutral . Those are just a few among many other . While I do not know much about Commons Sense Sceptic, I have lots of issue with Phillip I like To Burn Holy Books Mason. Philip E. Mason is not a good source . He tend to cherry picked data and even fabricates bad experiments to prove his point.He also keep missing the point such as when he fail to grasp why there was a need to test the infamous EM drive or hydrogen storage or why the Chernobyl miniseries was historically accurate despite not being scientifically accurate. Ironically he is more akin to Anita Sarkeesian , a person he loves to slam, in this regards. He have a hate boner against EV and NASA's scientific projects. Who can forget his terrible analysis of battery technology where he accuses Chemistry Nobel Prize winner John B. Goodenough of being a fraud.
    1