Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "The Internet Entrepreneur Who Tried To Make An Anti-Gravity Device" video.

It is practically impossible for Starship to not deliver. They already have the getting into orbit and recovering the heavy booster almost perfected . The only thing they need to work on is reliability, reusability and safety.
5
@jespado Their customers don't really care whether or not Starship will successfully land or be reusable . The Heavy Booster is already a proven product that can deliver payload to orbit at cheaper price than current offerings . Even with that alone their financial future is already secured, before even counting the Starlink money.
2
@Sadiregu1619 That is like saying Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are failures because they launched zero cargo into orbit in 2009 .
2
@ You referring how Musk refused to pay rent and how he employed tax loophole to avoid paying his share , huh.
1
@Sadiregu1619 Give me any good reason why you think Starship and Heavy Booster would not repeat the success of Space X's Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy series.
1
@Sadiregu1619 No one , not even Tesla and Space fans, ever took Elon's promises at face value when he make any of his predictions . In facts the term Elon Time was coined by those fans to describe his missed deadlines. The promises do came through, he just always overestimate or exaggerate the rate of progress and when those goals will be met. This was true both the history of the Falcon rockets and still hold for Starship .
1
@ The Starship project isn't funded by taxpayers money , though. Saying Space X is government funded is as stupid as saying Politico was government funded.
1