Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "Mark Rober" channel.

  1. He's referring to the past.There have been around 100 billion human that have been living on Earth.Out of those 93 billion dead people, around 51 billion of them were killed by Malaria
    24
  2. There have been around 100 billion human that have been living on Earth.Out of those 93 billion dead people, around 51 billion of them were killed by Malaria.
    3
  3. No, overpopulation(the type you're thinking ) is a myth.
    3
  4. Overpopulation as the way you describe is a myth. Malthus have been debunked multiple times already.His thesis was getting weaker even when he was devising it let alone based on what we know now .
    2
  5. No it won't. Overpopulation as the way most people understand it is a myth.Malthus was wrong.
    2
  6. +theoneandonlyghandi Umm.. The Earth is currently not overpopulated nor will it be for at least several centuries.
    2
  7. There is just so many thing wrong with what you said .Reminds me on an imbecilic PETA mantra that all pets would rather be euthanized than suffers the indignity of the slavery of being a pet. Firstly, there is no such thing as an animal that prefer death or extinction over the continuation of the species. Considering that every single species on Earth fought tooth and nail for life , I guarantee you that they would tell you otherwise if they had sapience. Secondly ,domesticated livestock generally live better lives than their wild counterpart. As for the third part, I'm assuming you're talking about cattle ranching (which caused the clear cutting of wide swathes of the Amazon) as poultry farming isn't really that destructive to nature.Still your number is greatly exaggerated .
    2
  8. The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.
    2
  9. There have been around 100 billion human that have been living on Earth.Out of those 93 billion dead people, around 51 billion of them were killed by Malaria
    1
  10. They're implying that those 51 billion lives can be saves if these devices anachronistically exist at those times.Yes, that is extremely naive thought.
    1
  11. The implication if this technology exist back then ,those lives would be saved.Of course is is rather naively simplistic and quite ridiculous.
    1
  12. Not for a long time.Popular use have redefined it as a thousand million.
    1
  13. Fortunately we wont be suffering an overpopulation problem anytime soon.
    1
  14. Wow, you really swallow tooth line and sinker into the whole overpopulation myth .Malthus have been debunked a long time.His thesis wasn't even applicable for the time he was writing it.
    1
  15. 7 billion still living.Add all our dead an the number comes closer to 100 billion.
    1
  16. Yes, humanity have been around for quite some time.
    1
  17. 7 billion that are still alive.93 billion of those human are dead.They estimated that 51 billion of those were killed by Malaria.
    1
  18. The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.They estimated 51 billion of those died to malaria. Next time watch the video before laughing at it.
    1
  19. In reality, it is practically impossible to save those 51 billion as their death were stretched around a period of hundreds of thousand of years (may be even millions) and they still needed the ability to cure the disease when they detect it.
    1
  20. No, 51 billion.The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.
    1
  21. The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.They estimated 51 billion of those died to malaria.
    1
  22. Phew, Malthus would be so relieved to hear that.
    1
  23. +Xx_Fwezy_xX He's trolling.
    1
  24. Yes.
    1
  25. Your scenario will not happen within my lifetime, so I'll probably won't be there to provide guidance.It wouldn't even happen within your grandchildren's lifetime .
    1
  26. 7 billion still living.Add all our dead and the number comes closer to 100 billion.They estimated that 51 billion of those died to malaria.
    1
  27. I don't think you fully understand how population growth works.
    1
  28. You do know that we won't be having any food production problem within our children's lifetime ,right?.Our current (circa 2017) food production is more than enough for 10 billion people. Or are you ignorant on those facts as well?
    1
  29. The elephant in the room is we do not have a food shortage problem nor will we have one within a generation or two.
    1
  30. How is he a criminal ?
    1
  31. Don't have children.You'll be doing us a favour.
    1
  32. The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.
    1
  33. How the heck is a microscope and a centrifuge be deemed illegal?
    1
  34. Probably the same reason Schwarzenegger couldn't be president. HINT:It's the same reason why Trump said Obama couldn't be president.
    1
  35. Explaining to you why Manu could never be a US president .
    1
  36. The solution seem to education.
    1
  37. Actually there are around 100 billion people on Earth.It's just that 92.5 billion of those are already dead.
    1
  38. +Slime GamingYT The implication if this technology exist back then ,those lives would be saved.Of course is is rather naively simplistic and quite ridiculous.
    1
  39. The total number of human that have ever walked the Earth is around 100 billion.They estimated 51 billion of those died to malaria.
    1
  40. +James Bond We gave it the name" Malaria" in 1880, the parasite itself have existed for ten of thousand of years.
    1
  41. 7 billion still living.Add all our dead and the number comes closer to 100 billion.
    1
  42. There're around 100 billion people on Earth.It's just that 93 billion of those are already dead.I'm not joking ,that the estimated total number of human that ever walked on this planet.
    1
  43. I don't think you understand how population growth works.
    1
  44. Ironically, going vegan might condemn most of those animals to near extinction.They only reason they exist in such numbers is because we bred them for food.
    1
  45. +something something You're not wrong.There is also another aspect of "halal" not usually highlighted: there must not be any form of torture in the caring of the animals or the way they are slaughtered.
    1
  46. +FrostyWolfZ Wait..You're one of the loons that equate animal husbandry with The Holocaust?Wow...Just wow... The mass extinction of species (as well as the other environmental problem you cited)that we're facing right now have little to do with the fact that we ate animals.It s main cause is climate change .Turning to veganism to solve that problem is akin to applying tourniquet to a head trauma victim. +something something I doubt such change would happen within your lifetime, regardless of FrostyWolfZ's misguided scaremongering.
    1
  47. +FrostyWolfZ Firstly, animal husbandry IS A PART OF AGRICULTURE. Another thing , animal husbandry=/= animal cruelty.That's a false analogy. Secondly ,equating The Holocaust to eating different types of animals that is a false equivalence at best (unless you're trying to say the Nazis were cannibals).The Holocaust was a systematic attempt at eradicating (aka causing extinction) to people of differing ethnic origins and background.Animal husbandry is a system to ensure that we can rear different types of animals in the most productive way (which includes increasing their numbers).One is designed to eradicate, the other ensuring the survival and continuation of those species( cattle eg).See the dichotomy? Thirdly,that paper you cited(the 51% percent one) have been widely criticised by climate scientist as flawed as it used highly inaccurate and speculative methodology (double accounting,miscalculating greenhouse gas cycles etc).Most climate scientist agreed that agriculture as a whole( which includes animal husbandry) accounts for around 10% of global greenhouse gas emission.I already addressed the Amazon issue. Fourthly, turning to "Green Power" is the best way to stem climate change (as agreed by virtually all climate change scientist/expert).Our mass industrialisation is the main contributor to the greenhouse emission and replacing them with sustainable and cleaner energy is the way to go. BTW, people have died from vegan diet as well.There is a good reason why Italy banned parent from forcing vegan diet on their children.
    1
  48. +FrostyWolfZ We can disagree on opinions but it would be delusional to disagree on facts.While you are are right that the medical links you provided does seem legit (I haven't properly looked into the validity of all the data in them,yet) what I've said about vegan diet is still holds true. Good day.
    1
  49. +FrostyWolfZ Only if you continue to refuse to looked them up.Have you checked why most climate scientist rejects The Word Watch paper in their greenhouse emission model ? It is up to you if you still want cherry pick and disregard data that doesn't conform to your view.Just remember that it isn't intellectually honest and healthy in the long run.
    1
  50. +FrostyWolfZ It's not a matter of believing , its about knowing the current data and facts.I strongly suggest you check that out yourself. Again, World Watch institute figures is outdated and have been picked and dismantled even since it was released in 2009. Of course , 18% (at most, some estimate put it as low as 12-14%) from animal husbandry is indeed a high number.When combined with the emission from other agricultural fields (non animal based) the number rose to as high as 30% (again it's lower based on some other estimates).This is still higher than transportation interns of emission.
    1